On Dec 17, 2007 10:32 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
As you already noted, this plug-in does not have much use for the casual
user.
Quite in opposite. Edge detection is one of the steps to make sky not
look pale on photos ;-)
Alexandre
___
Gimp-developer
4) Removed the wrap-style radio buttons from the
interface [...]
This was a little bit controversial. Let me add
that as far as I can
see, it was a mistake to create these options in the
first place. The
idea behind the Wrap option was to let a user make
tileable patterns,
but it will
From: Csar Rolln [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please, don't remove the Wrap and Smear options,
because it are useful (tileable patterns is a example).
Removing the functionality of GIMP isn't usability.
As I tried to explain, Wrap is not useful with edge detection.
It is very useful with blurring,
Sven wrote:
You have a point here. But you also need to look at the costs of
renaming a menu item. The documentation needs to change and
users need to learn the new name. With the amount of plug-ins that
we have it is rather difficult to keep track of changes so IMO we should
try to avoid
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 20:21 +, William Skaggs wrote:
As I tried to explain, Wrap is not useful with edge detection.
It is very useful with blurring, because it makes opposite
edges look similar. With edge detection, all it does is to
cause an edge to be drawn at the border of the
William Skaggs wrote:
So I have a pretty coherent vision of which filters are useful
for which tasks, and what sort of interface a user needs in
order to make use of them. I feel that, given a free hand,
I would be able very rapidly to turn GIMP's filter collection
into something that the
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 20:51 +, William Skaggs wrote:
You have a point here. But you also need to look at the costs of
renaming a menu item. The documentation needs to change and
users need to learn the new name. With the amount of plug-ins that
we have it is rather difficult to
Michael Schumacher wrote:
And you do feel that the way to do this is to just commit things, and
everyone else has to keep up with the changes without knowing what
others are to be expected, and if something isn't right, we'll just have
to revert it?
No! The way I did it was broken. But
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 00:23 +, William Skaggs wrote:
No! The way I did it was broken. But the whole process is broken. It
is impossible to fix the interface if every tiny change can be vetoed
by any random person. The question is, how to find a process that
actually allows change
William Skaggs wrote:
2) Added an invert control, so that you can see the edges as dark
lines on a light background. Without this, the preview is almost
useless. I did some voodoo to make invert the default for
interactive use, but not to change the result when edge is called
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 00:12 +, William Skaggs wrote:
1) Changed the menu entry from Edge to Sharp Edges. Having
an entry called Edge in the Edge-detect category is silly, and
the thing that distinguishes this plugin is that it detects edges
between neighboring pixels, that is,
11 matches
Mail list logo
