Martijn Weisbeek writes:
> The current release-version BTW is not a good advertisement.
Well, luckily I don't have to worry about market share...
> There's been an error while compiling somehow (which required some
> patches) and those patches have not been implemented in the
> download.
Ac
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:28:04AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Additionaly I seriously doubt that it would be possible to make
> > The Gimp look more potato shop like by simply giving it another
> > 'skin'.
> besides of that: it is not and has never been our goal to make gimp
> look or f
Hi,
Hans Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Additionaly I seriously doubt that it would be possible to make
> The Gimp look more potato shop like by simply giving it another
> 'skin'.
besides of that: it is not and has never been our goal to make gimp
look or feel like potato shop. Actually a
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Hans Breuer wrote:
> What do you suggest? Stopping the distribution of gtk/win32 apps ??
Maybe add an explicit message in the installer that the Win32 version is
highly experimental compared to the Linux version.
> And as a reply to your next mail: If I would want my mom use
At 21:25 06.06.01 +0200, Martijn Weisbeek wrote:
>At 10:24 06.06.01 +0200, David Monniaux wrote:
>> [... removed lot's of stuff I don't want to comment (anymore) ...]
>>
>> Let's add that the UI in the Win32 version is *BUGGY* (my mom runs it and
>> there are some ugly glitches - and I'm not talk
At 23:08 05.06.01 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>Chris Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
> [..., removed becuase I totally agree to the points Sven made]
>
>> My second suggestion is more technical, finding a way (and forgive me if
>> there already is) to allow Gimp to have skins or something like
At 10:24 06.06.01 +0200, David Monniaux wrote:
>On 5 Jun 2001, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
>> He's speaking of the Win32 version here which of course looks and feels
>> different than the usual win32 application. This feeling will change as
>
>Let's add that the UI in the Win32 version is *BUGGY* (my
> A few weeks ago I installed Gimp Win32 for my mom, she's a newspaper
> person who can use some good image editing software. I told her that its
> every bit as good as photoshop. But when I started it up for the first
> time she exclaimed "It looks terrible, its can't be as good as
> Photoshop!".
On 5 Jun 2001, at 23:08, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > To many people, it won't matter whether it's free, or whether it
> > supports the same features of a commercial product from Adobe that
> > is far more polished.
>
> Well, those people should stay with their commercial products then.
> This is fre
On 5 Jun 2001, at 15:43, Chris Brown wrote:
[how to improve the GIMP Look&Feel]
> My second suggestion is more technical, finding a way (and forgive me
> if there already is) to allow Gimp to have skins or something like
> that so that if someone wants it to *look* like Photoshop, they can. I
>
On 5 Jun 2001, Sven Neumann wrote:
> He's speaking of the Win32 version here which of course looks and feels
> different than the usual win32 application. This feeling will change as
Let's add that the UI in the Win32 version is *BUGGY* (my mom runs it and
there are some ugly glitches - and I'
Hi,
Chris Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't post much, just like to watch the Gimp development. I absolutely
> love the program but since I've seen a few things about UI stuff lately I
> thought I might pose a few questions. As someone posted earlier it is
> impossible to make everyone
I don't post much, just like to watch the Gimp development. I absolutely
love the program but since I've seen a few things about UI stuff lately I
thought I might pose a few questions. As someone posted earlier it is
impossible to make everyone happy, but I think that it would be good at
least to
13 matches
Mail list logo
