1.1.21 crashing trying to save a .jpg

2000-05-02 Thread Jon Winters
I spoke too soon when I reported that 1.1.21 is workin' ok. Tonight I opened an image, did a re-size, then went to "save as" a .jpg. When I move the "Quality" slider Gimp crashes. :-\ Is it my system or the Gimp? Thanks -- Jon Winters http://www.obscurasite.com/jon/ "Everybody Loves Th

Re: pnm plugin

2000-05-02 Thread Nick Lamb
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:27:09AM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > ppm saving works. But I am unable to create pgm or pbm files with the gimp > (pbm is known for some time, but gimp definitely writes a ppm file for > greyscale images). Nope, my routine Export tests for Gimp show PPM and PGMs being c

Re: pnm plugin

2000-05-02 Thread Kevin Turner
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 02:27:09AM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > ppm saving works. But I am unable to create pgm or pbm files with the gimp > (pbm is known for some time, but gimp definitely writes a ppm file for > greyscale images). that's not what "file" thinks about the attached files: pudding.

Re: Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-02 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 08:15:44PM +0200, Raphael Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried to use the Perl-Fu scripts in 1.1.21 and I saw that all of > them abort with the following error displayed on the console: > > ** ERROR (recursed) **: could not find handler for message: 65536 > abor

Re: pnm plugin

2000-05-02 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 02:55:46PM -0700, Kevin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > B) I just tried it. It works fine. Even if you do want to consider it ppm saving works. But I am unable to create pgm or pbm files with the gimp (pbm is known for some time, but gimp definitely writes a ppm fil

Re: pnm plugin

2000-05-02 Thread Kevin Turner
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 01:47:29PM +0200, DrMartin.Weber wrote: > The pnm plugin can read the pnm, ppm, pbm and pgm format, but it cannot save to > ppm, pbm and pgm. Short version: -- A) It's not a bug. B) I just tried it. It works fine. Even if you do want to consider it a bug, i

Re: Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-02 Thread Mattias EngdegÄrd
>While we are on it, could someone please check that all Perl scripts >register menu names with trailing dots if, and only if, they open a >dialog. Not a Perl script, but the About... menu entry shouldn't have the ellipsis, according to most GUI standards, since in this case opening a dialog is a

Re: Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, > But I also noticed that something else has changed in the Perl-Fu > scripts: in the previous versions that I tried (under Solaris), these > scripts were always registered at the bottom of the menus, instead of > being mixed with the C plug-ins. Now it seems to be the contrary: the > Perl-F

Re: successful install

2000-05-02 Thread Jon Winters
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Jon Winters wrote: > > Just a quick note... I was able to install 1.1.21 without any problems. > Seems to be working nicely. I guess I should have mentioned... System: fresh redhat 6.2 Updates: glib, gtk+ and associated devels from helixcode I also updated a few perl modu

successful install

2000-05-02 Thread Jon Winters
Just a quick note... I was able to install 1.1.21 without any problems. Seems to be working nicely. Thanks! -- Jon Winters http://www.obscurasite.com/ "Everybody loves the GIMP!" http://www.gimp.org/

Perl-Fu plug-ins in 1.1.21

2000-05-02 Thread Raphael Quinet
I tried to use the Perl-Fu scripts in 1.1.21 and I saw that all of them abort with the following error displayed on the console: ** ERROR (recursed) **: could not find handler for message: 65536 aborting... And this message is displayed in a pop-up box: [/path/to/script]: the gimp is usin

Re: Gimp 1.1.21 build fails under Solaris because of Linuxisms

2000-05-02 Thread Michael Natterer
Raphael Quinet wrote: > > Oops! I forgot the second part of my patch. The problem with SA_NOMASK is > also present in app/main.c: Raphael, no need to oops... :) I'm about to commit this. It seems I made Gimp unworkable for all systems except Linux... argh, 1 day before a release. will be fi

Re: Gimp 1.1.21 build fails under Solaris because of Linuxisms

2000-05-02 Thread Raphael Quinet
Oops! I forgot the second part of my patch. The problem with SA_NOMASK is also present in app/main.c: --- app/main.c~ Mon May 1 19:43:09 2000 +++ app/main.c Tue May 2 17:49:05 2000 @@ -334,15 +334,15 @@ /* Handle some signals */ - gimp_signal_private (SIGHUP, on_signal, SA_RESETHAND

Re: Gimp now requires Glib 1.2.7?

2000-05-02 Thread Raphael Quinet
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Pierre Rochefort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got the sources out of CVS and tried to compile. I have Glib 1.2.6 > installed and it used to work fine (up until this morning). Has the > requirement changed in regards to Glib? Yes. The current version of the Gimp requires g

Gimp 1.1.21 build fails under Solaris because of Linuxisms

2000-05-02 Thread Raphael Quinet
I just downloaded 1.1.21 and I tried to compile it under Solaris. The build breaks early while compiling libgimp, with the following error: gimp.c: In function `gimp_main': gimp.c:202: `SA_NOMASK' undeclared (first use in this function) gimp.c:202: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only on

Gimp now requires Glib 1.2.7?

2000-05-02 Thread Pierre Rochefort
Hello all! I got the sources out of CVS and tried to compile. I have Glib 1.2.6 installed and it used to work fine (up until this morning). Has the requirement changed in regards to Glib? Thanks. Pierre = It said "Needs Windows 95 or

location of glibconfig.h, why?

2000-05-02 Thread pixel fairy
why does glibconfig.h go in $prefix/lib/glib/include while glib.h goes in $prefix/include? gimp dont seem to know where it is. i ran into this after deleting the gtk slackware packages and reinstalling. glib-config --cflags works fine, but ./configure on the gimp tree does not. (it fails while bu