On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 10:28:04PM -0500, Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you provide the subject line of any one of the messages when you
> reported the problems with script-fu which you say have not been fixed
> and/or a date when one of the messages was posted to the list?
Th
> > If re-reporting the bug is so painful that you can't do it
>
>It is so painful because I re-reported it at least three times (so many
>mails are in my saent-folder, but I know I sent more that got lost during
>a crash).
>
> > They are not SO critical that I have been unable to use script-fu
>
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000 20:53:30 +0100, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>As a matter of fact, I couldn't. Why do you think I could?
Anybody can do anything, with enough effort. :)
Kelly
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 11:30:05AM -0500, Kelly Lynn Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >PLUGIN_MAINTAINERS is just a file... fatc is that bugs _do_ _not_ _get_
> >_fixed_, so script-fu is basically unmaintained.
>
> You could, of course, fix them yourself. :)
As a matter of fact, I couldn't.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 11:43:19AM -0500, Glyph Lefkowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> That is VERY vague. What are these 'critical bugs'?
the most critical one is:
"start a script-fu plug-in noninteractively, and things start burning".
start burning means: either script-fu segfaults, gim
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> So what? Sven obviously has not enough time to care for everything in
> the Gimp. Critical bugs in Script-Fu have not been fixed for over a
> year, despite a considerable number of good bug-reports.
That is VERY vague. What are these 'critical bugs'?
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000 13:54:33 +0100, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>PLUGIN_MAINTAINERS is just a file... fatc is that bugs _do_ _not_ _get_
>_fixed_, so script-fu is basically unmaintained.
You could, of course, fix them yourself. :)
Kelly
> I must admit that I have no idea how to edit bugreports or do anything
> else about them. I did *try*, but the pages are not very helpful in
> explaining how to use them.
Each and every one working actively on the gimp should make herself
familiar with the bug-tracker, should be subscribed to
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 09:08:29PM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> don't take this too personally, it is not and was never meant to be!
I didn't take this personally. My problem is that script-fu _is_ not
properly maintained. I appreciate your work, but I fear that you are no
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 03:29:53PM +0100, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 01:52:40AM +0100, Sven Neumann
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I won't unless someone tells us what he thinks is broken.
> >
> > Well, telling "us" about it didn't help in the past, so
Marc,
don't take this too personally, it is not and was never meant to be!
> > I won't unless someone tells us what he thinks is broken.
>
> Well, telling "us" about it didn't help in the past, so why should it now?
> "us" should mean "the script-fu maintainer", and not me nor you.
Well, sinc
Marc Lehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 01:52:40AM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > I won't unless someone tells us what he thinks is broken.
>
> Well, telling "us" about it didn't help in the past, so why should it now?
> "us" should mean "the script
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 01:52:40AM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I won't unless someone tells us what he thinks is broken.
Well, telling "us" about it didn't help in the past, so why should it now?
"us" should mean "the script-fu maintainer", and not me nor you.
> Of course i
Marc Lehmann wrote:
> I don't believe in script-fu getting fixed before 1.2, though.
I won't unless someone tells us what he thinks is broken. Of course
it will get fixed then since it would be stupid to release 1.2 if
there are any known Script-Fu bugs in there.
Salut, Sven
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 01:41:55AM +0100, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been using the Perl plug-in logulator for logos for quite a while, and
> I ran into several
Good ;) However, it seems that scripts converted from script-fu to perl
have a large tendency to crash the gimp (yes, in eve
Hi all!
I've been using the Perl plug-in logulator for logos for quite a while, and
I ran into several
(probably) little troubles, but I am clueless on whether other people are
having them, so I would like to call for someone to share their experiences
and tests of this powerful and nice tool. I a
16 matches
Mail list logo
