[Gimp-developer] Wanted: pixel warrior drones

2002-03-04 Thread vio
Hi all, After browsing the gimp-1.3 TODO list, I would like to add my little suggestion of things I would wish from Gimp: how about also developing a clear path towards Gimp as a "web graphics server". Analogy: as we now have "static" web pages and "dynamic" web pages (php, zope, etc), simil

[Gimp-developer] Wanted: pixel warrior drones

2002-03-04 Thread vio
Hi all, After browsing the gimp-1.3 TODO list, I would like to add my little suggestion of things I would wish from Gimp: how about also developing a clear path towardsGimp as a "web graphics server". Analogy: as we now have "static" web pages and "dynamic" web pages (php, zope, etc), similari

Re: [Gimp-developer] Access to tools via PDB?

2002-03-04 Thread Michael J. Hammel
Thus spoke Robert Medina > Will new Gimp versions include PDB access to the > various editing tools? Or is access currently > available? The reason I ask is that I'm writting a > plug-in to help me automate manual postprocessing of > freshly scanned images (manual processing is > required). > To s

Re: [Gimp-developer] Wanted: pixel warrior drones

2002-03-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, vio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After browsing the gimp-1.3 TODO list, I would like to add my little suggestion > of things I would wish from Gimp: how about also developing a clear path > towardsGimp as a "web graphics server". > Analogy: as we now have "static" web pages and > "dynami

Re: [Gimp-developer] Wanted: pixel warrior drones

2002-03-04 Thread Branko Collin
On 4 Mar 2002, at 4:10, vio wrote: > After browsing the gimp-1.3 TODO list, I would like to add my little > suggestion of things I would wish from Gimp: how about also developing > a clear path towardsGimp as a "web graphics server". [long explanation snipped] Take a look at

Re: [Gimp-developer] Wanted: pixel warrior drones

2002-03-04 Thread Stephen J Baker
On 4 Mar 2002, at 4:10, vio wrote: > After browsing the gimp-1.3 TODO list, I would like to add my little > suggestion of things I would wish from Gimp: how about also developing > a clear path towardsGimp as a "web graphics server". Wouldn't it make more sense to push Gimp's scripted rendering

Re: [Gimp-developer] Wanted: pixel warrior drones

2002-03-04 Thread vio
* Stephen J Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020304 10:27]: > On 4 Mar 2002, at 4:10, vio wrote: > > > After browsing the gimp-1.3 TODO list, I would like to add my little > > suggestion of things I would wish from Gimp: how about also developing > > a clear path towardsGimp as a "web graphics server".

Re: [Gimp-developer] Wanted: pixel warrior drones

2002-03-04 Thread Carol Spears
On 2002-03-04 at 1138.18 -0500, vio typed this mail: > > I managed to put my hand on a "Net-Fu" package. > Yes, that is what I was talking about. I wonder if this code > is still maintained by anyone, because what I got had a 1997 timestamp. > I hope the authors won't mind, but if I can manage to

Re: [Gimp-developer] Wanted: pixel warrior drones

2002-03-04 Thread Stephen J Baker
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, vio wrote: > * Stephen J Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020304 10:27]: > > On 4 Mar 2002, at 4:10, vio wrote: > > > > > After browsing the gimp-1.3 TODO list, I would like to add my little > > > suggestion of things I would wish from Gimp: how about also developing > > > a clear p

[Gimp-developer] Compiling 1.2.3 with X 4.0.2

2002-03-04 Thread John L. Clark
To whom it may concern: If this email should be sent instead to the gimp-user list, please let me know and I can send it there. I attempted to compile the Gimp, version 1.2.3, (on a linux 2.4.14 machine) under X 4.0.2, and got the following error: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../int

Re: [Gimp-developer] Wanted: pixel warrior drones

2002-03-04 Thread Carol Spears
On 2002-03-04 at 1138.18 -0500, vio typed this mail: > > A good analogy would be with > Dell's 'direct' distribution model: a Dell computer is assembled only "after" > a customer has placed the order for it. Same here: Gimp assembles the pixels > for the image only "after" the server has received

Re: [Gimp-developer] Compiling 1.2.3 with X 4.0.2

2002-03-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, "John L. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I attempted to compile the Gimp, version 1.2.3, (on a linux 2.4.14 > machine) under X 4.0.2, and got the following error: > > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. > -I../intl -I/opt/gnome/include/gtk-1.2 > -I/opt/gnome/include/glib-1.2

Re: [Gimp-developer] Wanted: pixel warrior drones

2002-03-04 Thread Tom Rathborne
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 04:10:39AM -0500, vio wrote: > After browsing the gimp-1.3 TODO list, I would like to add my little > suggestion of things I would wish from Gimp: how about also > developing a clear path towards Gimp as a "web graphics server". This already exists if you are willing to j

Re: [Gimp-developer] Compiling 1.2.3 with X 4.0.2

2002-03-04 Thread John L. Clark
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:41:09PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: > I guess the whole problem is that you don't have X11 headers > installed. This is not unusual for most distributions but it > should be easy to install the X11 header files by means of your > distribution. Look for a package called x

Re: [Gimp-developer] Wanted: pixel warrior drones

2002-03-04 Thread pcg
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 01:11:02PM -0500, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do you mean something like this: > http://www.goof.com/pcg/marc/gimp.html > > but i think the on demand images on this page were not rendered with there are no on-demand images on that page in the dynamic-html se

Re: [Gimp-developer] Wanted: pixel warrior drones

2002-03-04 Thread pcg
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 01:55:37PM -0500, Tom Rathborne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but you may have to wait for Gimp-2.0 to lose the dependence on X and > Gtk+. Hopefully Gimp-1.3 will make more functions available via the > PDB, but it's already pretty complete. the big problem is indeed fonts