Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 15:34 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I estimate that I am about 15% finished on this task and that it will > take me another two weeks to complete. Would this be sufficient for > your scheduling needs? That would be sufficient but I am afraid that you misunderstoo

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread saulgoode
Sven Neumann stated: I am afraid that you misunderstood the task that I am asking you to do. For what it's worth, I did examine the plug-ins but they have two "blurb" strings available (one for the status line and one for the plugin's Help dialog) whereas Script-fus seem to only have the o

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:34:52 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review > > initially set the generated image to "clean". It seems unnecessary to >

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 05:09 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > For what it's worth, I did examine the plug-ins but they have two > "blurb" strings available (one for the status line and one for the > plugin's Help dialog) whereas Script-fus seem to only have the one. I > had mistakenly a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 16:02 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: > > initially set the generated image to "clean". It seems unnecessary to > > prompt for "save" when closing an unmodified logo; the logo can easily > > be regenerated with the same values by re-running the script. > > I've considered thi

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for libgimpmetadata API

2006-06-27 Thread Kevin Cozens
Raphaƫl Quinet wrote: /* decode the given XMP packet (read from a file) and merge it into the metadata parasite. */ gboolean gimp_metadata_decode_xmp (gint32image_ID, const gchar *xmp_packet); /* generate an XMP packet from the metadata parasite */ const gch

[Gimp-developer] Mask to selection

2006-06-27 Thread sampin
Hallo, does there exist a "mask to selection" function that can be called from within a plug-in? Have I missed it in gimp api? Thank you Ollie ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailma

Re: [Gimp-developer] Mask to selection

2006-06-27 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 10:41 pm, sampin wrote: > Hallo, > > does there exist a "mask to selection" function that can be called > from within a plug-in? > Have I missed it in gimp api? > Hi sampin, Use "gimp-selection-load". 'masks' count as 'channels' for gimp-internals purposes. > Thank you >

[Gimp-developer] Gimp python

2006-06-27 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
In bug #346001, Sven wrote: >Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (GIMP developer, points: 23) > 2006-06-27 13:47 UTC [reply] > If you ask me, Python-Fu must not install any plug-ins at all > as long as the user interface doesn't hold up to our standards. This > includes complete internationa

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Kevin Cozens
Sven Neumann wrote: On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 15:34 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The registration blurb for 3dTruchet script: _"This script generates a repeating pattern of Truchet tiles (which are randomly oriented quadrants of a circle). The arcs of the tiles are given a 3-D effect using a gr

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 01:17 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote: > Is there a particular need for these blurbs to be short one liners other than > making things easier for the translaters? Yes, they need to fit into the statusbar and should follow the same style that plug-ins use for the blurb. > On

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp python

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 01:20 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: > (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346001) > > I consider this both sad and grave. IMHO, the build of python-fu by > default, and support for it under Redmond OS is one of the greatest > things in this developm

Re: [Gimp-developer] menu cluttage

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 01:43 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: > I e mentioned once or two that when the script-fu and python-fu > scripts where brought togetehr to teh same menu space as the C > filters there would be confusion about which menu entry is associated > with a script in