Does it keep the entire menu inside the screen if the "layers" dialog
is at the right edge of the screen ?
--
Laxminarayan Kamath Ammembal
(+91) 9945036093
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 08:01 +, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
> Does it keep the entire menu inside the screen if the "layers" dialog
> is at the right edge of the screen ?
Of course. If it wouldn't, that would be a bug in GTK+.
Sven
___
Gimp-de
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 21:47 -0800, Bill Skaggs wrote:
> One of the minor annoyances of using Gimp is that the Layer Mode
> menu (and paint mode menu, etc) is unpleasantly long -- for me, it
> nearly extends from the top to the bottom of the screen. It
> would actually be very easy to change t
Unfortunately now that I have had time to think a bit harder, I
understand that there is a fundamental difference in how my initial
effort to implement a warp tool works compared to how the IWarp filter
does.
Basically, when using the IWarp filter, and manipulating the preview
in its dialog, IWarp
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >snip<
> Hopefully this is a question with an obvious answer, and there is some
> tool that already works like this...
>
> Or is it really so that a warp tool, and the "filter brush" kinds of
> tools that Ankh asks for
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Bill Skaggs wrote:
> One of the minor annoyances of using Gimp is that the Layer Mode
> menu (and paint mode menu, etc) is unpleasantly long -- for me, it
> nearly extends from the top to the bottom of the screen.
It very much depends on particular GTK+ theme in
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately now that I have had time to think a bit harder, I
> understand that there is a fundamental difference in how my
> initial effort to implement a warp tool works compared to how
> the IWarp filter does.
Do y
> Do you really need to do it exactly the way the filter does it?
> From your description, I don't really understand why your
> current approach is less valid, or even why it will produce a
> significantly different result.
It does produce a significantly different result. In my current code,
Bill wrote:
> It seems to me
> that the separators are not that important, because the categories
> are pretty artificial in the first place, and were really imposed
> mostly
> to give the very long list some structure, as far as I can see.
> But this
> is something that you should consider.
agree with Peter,
(part of my job is to improve user interaction && UI usability)
separators are good, even better are spacers (like in Firetox and
Thunderbird [fluid spacers]) also a line OR a background surrounding a
group of buttons are good for focusing to a 'grouped set of functions'
...ins
Bill Skaggs wrote:
> One of the minor annoyances of using Gimp is that the Layer Mode
> menu (and paint mode menu, etc) is unpleasantly long -- for me, it
> nearly extends from the top to the bottom of the screen. It
> would actually be very easy to change the code so that these menus
> are laid o
Well, it's clear that the idea is not generating a great deal
of enthusiasm. Before dropping it, though, I'd like to take one
more shot at clarifying the problem -- I'm attaching a screenshot
showing a typical incarnation of the Paint Mode menu, using
the Default Gimp theme and Ubuntu's default Hu
Why not add it as a preference.. By default, keep it one column. If
people find it annying, they can choose to have two columns in
"preferences" dialog.
--
Laxminarayan Kamath Ammembal
(+91) 9945036093
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@list
"Bill Skaggs wrote
>I would be interested in getting opinions on some of the open
>questions about how such a tool should work.
That tool was at top of my wish list and i had long discussion about a couple
of year ago
I' happy to see that maybe now is doable, but some of the objections i had
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 13:13 -0800, Bill Skaggs wrote:
> Well, it's clear that the idea is not generating a great deal
> of enthusiasm.
[... screenshot...]
> I don't think I have to persuade anybody that this is less than
> ideal from a usability point of view. The question is, can we do
> anythi
Liam R E Quin writes:
> Seems to me that probably most people will use at most a couple of the
> layer modes in normal use, so maybe putting the top 7 on the menu and
> having a "more modes" submenu is a possibility.
Eek, please no! Often the best way to use layer modes is to go down
the list one
16 matches
Mail list logo
