Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so should we speak of gnu-bsd-mpl-qpl-artistic/linux ?
or, as gpl softwares number is greater than gnu/fsf ones, should
we speak of gpl/linux ?
A distribution is much more than an operation system. If you just
look at the core components that make
Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We should change it - to Unix.
registered trademark :-(
--
Still untested beyond 'it compiles' (davej)
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello, i'm the gimp maintainer in mandrake linux distribution.
here're the patches i currently apply on gimp-1.2.3:
explaination note for a default that make perl programmers behave
strangely with gimp. by default, gimp perl modules doesn't export
functions, which makes perl programmers became
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
explaination note for a default that make perl programmers behave
strangely with gimp. by default, gimp perl modules doesn't export
functions, which makes perl programmers became fool ...
I don't understand this patch nor the explanation you give.
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
well, my position in this thread is a bit biased since me and other
GIMP developers have spent lots of their free time hunting down bugs
that turned out to be caused by buggy GTK+ themes Mandrake used to
ship.
which ones ? i've only got bug reports
Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
This has been fixed in Mandrake 8.0 one year ago, but we still got a
duplicate bug report related to it this year. And it took a while
for us to figure out that these apparently
Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, that's exactly the reason for the insane size. You probably use
gcc 3.2?? I noticed the same some days ago.
this is not related to the gcc version but to the default cflags.
as for now, most packages come with -g or -g -O2 as default cflags due
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes:
is it worth building the gimp-perl module from cvs yet?
Depends on what you are needing it for.
The evrsion in CVS seems to be fully working, except that none of
the examples that use their own Gtk+ interface have been converted
to gtk2
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another reason may be that it is difficult to build the development
version because it depends on released versions of some libraries that
are not included yet in the major GNU/Linux distributions (e.g., GTK+
version 2.2.2).
both debian unstable, mandrake
Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another reason may be that it is difficult to build the
development version because it depends on released versions of
some libraries that are not included yet in the major GNU/Linux
distributions (e.g., GTK+ version 2.2.2).
both debian
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and anyway, maybe adding a few ifdef round gimp code using
specific 2.2.x features if it can safely be disabled may help
users of older releases or other distros.
We did that for a while. It not only became difficult to maintain
but at some point
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While GIMP is approaching the 2.0 release, the libgimp* APIs are
stabilizing and it's about time to update plug-ins so they will work
with GIMP-2.0
as gimp packager in mandrake linux distribution, there's one thing
that has always annoy me with the way
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We do follow the standard library version numbering. The problem is
that either you did not understand it or didn't look close enough.
Let's have a look at configure.in:
standard libray versioning scheme is to set soname to
libname.major (library being
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[1] i provide gimp1.3 in contribs because so much people complain
to me about font issues with gimp-1.2.x
you could include the gimp-freetype plug-in
(http://freetype.gimp.org) get the one with a 2 in it for gimp-1.2.
this plug-in takes care of
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gimp2-freetype is already packaged in mandrake contribs since Sun
Aug 10 2003 :-)
i didn't know that it was for gimp-1.2.x branch.
Well, what exactly did you package?
i package gimp, gimp-data and gimp1_3.
a contributor packaged
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Thierry Vignaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i package gimp, gimp-data and gimp1_3.
a contributor packaged gimp-freetype-0.4.tar.bz2 as gimp2-freetype
which indeed is for gimp2.
gimp-freetype-0.4 has never been officially released. I
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
we do not remove packages just because they're build from cvs.
being build from cvs rather than an official release does not
imply less stability (there're packages for which this is false
...).
I didn't say this. What I said is that the package
17 matches
Mail list logo
