Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
> This has been fixed in Mandrake 8.0 one year ago, but we still got a
> duplicate bug report related to it this year. And it took a while
> for us to figure out that these apparently
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 03:17:55 +0200, "Thierry Vignaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > well, my position in this thread is a bit biased since me and other
> > GIMP developers have spent lots of their free time hunting down bugs
> > that turned out to be ca
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> well, my position in this thread is a bit biased since me and other
> GIMP developers have spent lots of their free time hunting down bugs
> that turned out to be caused by buggy GTK+ themes Mandrake used to
> ship.
which ones ? i've only got bug report
Hi,
Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> well, bugzilla.gnome.org has dead links and lacks a patch upload tool
> (unless i miss it but i don't see this possibility in submission
> form).
this is a bit akward. You need to submit the bug-report first. You can
then go to the page that has
Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i'm open to enhancements ...
i've received some now, and i have to admit that coming back to the
previous bug report in links is the best way to forget to change the
title of the second one :-(
--
"ca fait pas "homme" d'aller voir le medecin" (gc)
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Of course well-done bug-reports make our life easier and the ones
> you've submitted don't fall into this category.
i love you too :-)
i'm open to enhancements ... i must admit i send bug reports very
seldom but gots several ones on each day the Big R
Hi,
Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i can buy that even if my experience is that 90% of bugs tracked by
> such system belong to:
> - non bugs
> - help request
> - assigned to random modules
> - doesn't provides any useful information beside "XYZ sucks",
> sometimes with the usefu
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi
demad dit!
> > one of my coworker tried one day to write perl stuff for gimp but
> > got mad since he wasted two hours before understanding the doc was
> > wrong since some stuff didn't got imported into namespace, which
> > is what use is intended
Hi,
Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > explaination note for a default that make perl programmers behave
> > > strangely with gimp. by default, gimp perl modules doesn't export
> > > functions, which makes perl programmers became fool ...
> >
> > I don't understand this patch nor
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > explaination note for a default that make perl programmers behave
> > strangely with gimp. by default, gimp perl modules doesn't export
> > functions, which makes perl programmers became fool ...
>
> I don't understand this patch nor the explanation yo
Hi,
Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hello, i'm the gimp maintainer in mandrake linux distribution.
>
> here're the patches i currently apply on gimp-1.2.3:
>
> explaination note for a default that make perl programmers behave
> strangely with gimp. by default, gimp perl modules d
11 matches
Mail list logo
