Hi,
Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually I tried to explain to carol that the in some 2.0 version the
> brush used for stroking is not always the same that is selected in the
> brush dialog. Looking at stroke4.png does not convince me that carol
> really used the brush the thought w
Carol Spears ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 09:26:12PM +0200, Simon Budig wrote:
> > Actually I tried to explain to carol that the in some 2.0 version the
> > brush used for stroking is not always the same that is selected in the
> > brush dialog. Looking at stroke4.png does n
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 09:26:12PM +0200, Simon Budig wrote:
> Carol Spears ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > well, due to the many concerns about how i made these images, there is
> > now a whole series of pngs/xcfs in this same directory, ending with:
> > http://carol.gimp.org/files/stroke4.png wher
Hi,
"Adam D. Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The top two look like they were stroked with a square
> brush, which when applied to a circle is a pretty precise
> recipe for what transpired...
The top two are the result of stroking the selection outline using
libart. The strange outcome is bec
Carol Spears ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> well, due to the many concerns about how i made these images, there is
> now a whole series of pngs/xcfs in this same directory, ending with:
> http://carol.gimp.org/files/stroke4.png where the same selection is used
> in all three gimp versions.
>
> the s
Adam D. Moss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Sven Neumann wrote:
> > My guess is that you used a
> >different brush when creating the stroke with gimp-2.0.
>
> The top two look like they were stroked with a square
> brush, which when applied to a circle is a pretty precise
> recipe for what transpire
Sven Neumann wrote:
> My guess is that you used a
different brush when creating the stroke with gimp-2.0.
The top two look like they were stroked with a square
brush, which when applied to a circle is a pretty precise
recipe for what transpired...
--Adam
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 08:35:32PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > I cannot reproduce your brush-stroking result for gimp-2.0 then. Is
> > > that a recent version of gimp-2.0 that you've been using? Does it
> > > contain the fix for bug #14783
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I cannot reproduce your brush-stroking result for gimp-2.0 then. Is
> > that a recent version of gimp-2.0 that you've been using? Does it
> > contain the fix for bug #147836?
> >
> i am using gimp-2.0 from debian.
>
> is there a reason that it wo
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 06:21:42PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > the upper circles were stroked with the default setting of the current
> > stroke dialog. the lower circles were stroked with the fuzzy 7 pixel
> > brush. the stroking with gim
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the upper circles were stroked with the default setting of the current
> stroke dialog. the lower circles were stroked with the fuzzy 7 pixel
> brush. the stroking with gimp-1.2 did not have a default stroke option
> like one finds in gimp2 so it i
Hi,
Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What would help the stroking would be an automatic conversion of the
> outline to a path and then stroking this. We cannot do this right now
> since the selection to path functionality is implemented as a plugin and
> the core must not depend on a plu
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 05:48:13PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > i have been playing with many generations of TheGIMP this morning. i
> > compared the gimp's ability to make nice strokes and i found the results
> > to be interesting and revealing:
> >
Carol Spears ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> i have been playing with many generations of TheGIMP this morning. i
> compared the gimp's ability to make nice strokes and i found the results
> to be interesting and revealing:
> http://carol.gimp.org/files/stroke.png
Interesting. I always assumed that
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i have been playing with many generations of TheGIMP this morning. i
> compared the gimp's ability to make nice strokes and i found the results
> to be interesting and revealing:
> http://carol.gimp.org/files/stroke.png
Well, the image alone doesn'
15 matches
Mail list logo
