On Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 03:14:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > It doesnt work. You can click to add points, and move them around. It
> > is very nice start for a new gui for Bezier tool but it is not
> > _working_ since you cannot really do anything useful with it yet.
>
> What's missin
On 7 Feb, Simon Budig wrote:
> Agreed. Its a pity that I dont have the time to complete the tool at
> the moment and - as pointed out earlier - I dont dare to touch the
> Path-Dialog in the current feature-freeze state. The
> converting-to-selection should be pretty easy.
Hm, I'll have a look
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 09:43:17AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 6 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote:
>
> > This has been mentioned at least three times on this list: one of them
> > works, the other doesn't.
>
> Both don't work correctly, as I stated before. Do you read my mails?
> The Bezier S
On 7 Feb, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
> It has the problem of being very sensitive to pointer accuracy :(
> Other than that it works very well, but the bezier tool is perhaps one
> of the most complex tools in a image manipulation program. It is also
> one of the most powerful ones, thus taking some
On 7 Feb, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
> I'm expecting a lot from this tool though, I really wish Simon and the
> dudes have time to finish it.
Maybe some people will find time to lend him a helping hand... :)
... for 1.3.
--
Servus,
Daniel
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Daniel Egger wrote:
> > It works, it may not have all the features that Simon desired but it's
> > nice nevertheless...
>
> Do you have any idea how much work is needed to integrate it with the
> Paths dialog? A number of new bugs would certainly be int
On 6 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> This has been mentioned at least three times on this list: one of them
> works, the other doesn't.
Both don't work correctly, as I stated before. Do you read my mails?
The Bezier Select Tool behaves very strange: Points appear automatically
here and there and
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 05:26:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You are right, it's time to cleanup. Unfortunately I don't know which
> code is in a better state to stay and which one has to go.
This has been mentioned at least three times on this list: one of them
works, the other doesn't
On 5 Feb, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
>> It works, it may not have all the features that Simon desired but
>> it's nice nevertheless...
> It doesnt work. You can click to add points, and move them around. It
> is very nice start for a new gui for Bezier tool but it is not
> _working_ since you c
On 5 Feb, Nick Lamb wrote:
> Please do not step forward and say "I'll do it", the time for that was
> in November or at the latest December, and there was conspicuous
> silence during my last Triage thread from those named to defend their
> code.
You are right, it's time to cleanup. Unfortunat
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 01:28:43PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > There's no
> > need to discuss which path tool should make it into 1.2, since there
> > is only one that is working.
>
> It works, it may not have all the features that Simon desired but it's
> nice nevertheless...
It does
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 01:46:14PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Do you have any idea how much work is needed to integrate it with the
> Paths dialog? A number of new bugs would certainly be introduced by doing
> so. That's why I say: It's too late!
Agreed. Broken stuff with no-one working on it
On 5 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Do you have any idea how much work is needed to integrate it with the
> Paths dialog?
No, not yet, but I'll have a closer look on this.
> A number of new bugs would certainly be introduced by
> doing so. That's why I say: It's too late!
Every line of code in
Hi,
> It works, it may not have all the features that Simon desired but it's
> nice nevertheless...
Do you have any idea how much work is needed to integrate it with the
Paths dialog? A number of new bugs would certainly be introduced by doing
so. That's why I say: It's too late!
> I'd like
On 5 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote:
> OK, I'll repeat it once again: The new tool was an approach to design
> better path tool taken by Simon Budig.
Well, I talked with Simon about it.
> The goal was to exchange the
> user interface of the BezierSelect tool when it becomes useable. Simon
> didn't f
On 5 Feb, FUJITA Yuji wrote:
>> Which one should we keep? Or better: should we
>> merge it into one Tool which works nicely AND has a support dialog?
> I hope them to be merged into one tool with support dialog.
> Anyway, the dialog window title should be something like
> "Layers, Channels
Hi,
Daniel, please, do you follow the discussions on this list?
> At the moment we have got 2 Pathtools in GIMP. One which is called
> Bezierselect in the Toolbox but has a Path dialog
> (in the Layers/Channels dialog???) and another one called Path tool.
>
> The latter works a lot nicer IM
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pathtool?
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2000 12:03:44 +0100 (CET)
> Which one should we keep? Or better: should we
> merge it into one Tool which works nicely AND has a support dialog?
I hope them to be merged into one tool with support dialog.
Anyway, the dialog
Hi developers,
At the moment we have got 2 Pathtools in GIMP. One which is called
Bezierselect in the Toolbox but has a Path dialog
(in the Layers/Channels dialog???) and another one called Path tool.
The latter works a lot nicer IMHO but I haven't managed yet to
transform a path into a sel
19 matches
Mail list logo
