On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:05:51AM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
[...]
> 4) if I do these changes, is there anyone who does not agree?
Just change whatever you think should be fixed/improved. :)
Ulf
--
Im Grunde geschieht alles im Leben so freiwillig wie unsere Geburt.
-- Karlheinz
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 01:52:39AM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 03:09:15PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> > 3) In case of a replacement, I found it useful to let the old section be
> > accessible by web. Now there is a bug in the site, see by yourself:
> >
> > http://docs.gim
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 03:09:15PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> 3) In case of a replacement, I found it useful to let the old section be
> accessible by web. Now there is a bug in the site, see by yourself:
>
> http://docs.gimp.org
>
> - there is no direct links to the on line HTML 2.6 section, t
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 06:24:00PM +0200, Ulf-D. Ehlert wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:36:09AM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> > PS: May I ask you a favour Ulf? Can you tell me why the command syntax is
> > that?
> > Why you have to specify appendix.po(t) three times?
>
> [...]
>
> > it seems
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:36:09AM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
[...]
> Why should it be different? It launch a different command?
It should be the same, but to compare both methods you should run
orig ---(method1)---> result1
orig ---(method2)---> result2
instead of
ori
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Ulf-D. Ehlert wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:52:16PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> [...]
> > Doing exactly this I just noted that the already translated strings in
> > one .po file do not magically ;-) move from one file to another...
> > (from introduc
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:52:16PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
[...]
> Doing exactly this I just noted that the already translated strings in
> one .po file do not magically ;-) move from one file to another...
> (from introduction to appendix...)
>
> I need a way to avoid to create uneeded work to
Doing exactly this I just noted that the already translated strings in
one .po file do not magically ;-) move from one file to another...
(from introduction to appendix...) I need a way to avoid to create
uneeded work to other translators...how can I move all those strings
for _all_ the langu
Oh my! You are right! I just need to move the whats-new in the appendix
history and change its name in history-26.xml ...
and add an include for history-26.xml at the end of history.xml.
___
gimp-docs-list mailing list
gimp-docs-list@gnome.org
http://
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:37:02PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 05:42:44PM +0200, Kolbjørn Stuestøl wrote:
> > >2) I was in doubt if it was better adding a new "What's new with GIMP 2.8"
> > >leaving the old section renamed into "What was new with GIMP 2.6" but
> > >
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 05:42:44PM +0200, Kolbjørn Stuestøl wrote:
> >2) I was in doubt if it was better adding a new "What's new with GIMP 2.8"
> >leaving the old section renamed into "What was new with GIMP 2.6" but
> >maybe is an overkill...
> >
> >Please _say_ what you _all_ think about
Den 01.05.2012 15:09, skreiv Marco Ciampa:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 08:30:02AM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 07:49:41AM +0200, Julien Hardelin wrote:
Le 29/04/2012 20:43, Marco Ciampa a écrit :
Reading the manual from the start, just after the intro, you see
What's New in
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 08:30:02AM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 07:49:41AM +0200, Julien Hardelin wrote:
> > Le 29/04/2012 20:43, Marco Ciampa a écrit :
> > >Reading the manual from the start, just after the intro, you see
> > >
> > >What's New in GIMP 2.6?
> > >
> > >Why do
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 07:49:41AM +0200, Julien Hardelin wrote:
> Le 29/04/2012 20:43, Marco Ciampa a écrit :
> >Reading the manual from the start, just after the intro, you see
> >
> >What's New in GIMP 2.6?
> >
> >Why do not clone it creating a new section
> >
> >What's New in GIMP 2.8?
> >
> >I
Le 29/04/2012 20:43, Marco Ciampa a écrit :
Reading the manual from the start, just after the intro, you see
What's New in GIMP 2.6?
Why do not clone it creating a new section
What's New in GIMP 2.8?
I think that this could be a good starting point:
http://www.gimpusers.com/tutorials/gimp-2-
Reading the manual from the start, just after the intro, you see
What's New in GIMP 2.6?
Why do not clone it creating a new section
What's New in GIMP 2.8?
I think that this could be a good starting point:
http://www.gimpusers.com/tutorials/gimp-2-8-features-preview-april-2010
--
Marco C
16 matches
Mail list logo
