On 12/04/12 00:28, Jeffery Small wrote:
> shaunak writes:
>
>> I notice that there are two "cursors" that appear while using the new
>> sliders. One is an "up" arrow that allows me to quickly change from 0 -
>> 100 (Like the old slider) and another is the "double side arrow" cursor
>> that makes
On 11/12/12 16:05, Briyanna wrote:
>> On 11/12/12 15:43, Briyanna wrote:
>> I'm still running 2.6 but I think it's the same
>> I think you're dragging by the normal window manager header,
>> not the gimp dialog header, which is the bar just below it where
>> the tool options menu button is along wi
On 11/12/12 15:43, Briyanna wrote:
> I accidentally pulled my Tool Options tab from my Toolbox. No matter how I
> drag
> it back to where it says "You can drop dockable dialogs here" it does not
> return
> to where it came from. It will drag itself to random places all over my
> display, but it
I'm trying to build 2.8 on freebsd.
As a starting point, I'm trying to build only babl-0.1.10
I've downloaded the tarball and unpacked it.
then:
cd /usr/local
mkdir -p gimp-2.8/lib/pkgconfig
mkdir gimp-2.8/bin
export PATH=/usr/local/gimp-2.8/bin:$PATH
export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/gim
Can someone tell me where the output of (display ...) in a script goes
when running in batch mode?
Thanks,
Gary
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
On 09/21/12 16:48, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Gary Aitken wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to automate a process, and don't want to have to manually start
>> ufraw.
>> I could start ufraw and use its "gimp" button to transfer
On 09/20/12 22:54, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 22:37 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to tell gimp to bring up ufraw differently,
>
> You can run ufraw outside of gimp, not as a plugin.
I'm trying to automate a process, and don't wa
Hi all,
I've got a script for processing a bunch of files which starts by
bringing up ufraw. I would like to have ufraw save the list of
modifications made before returning to gimp. (.ufraw file)
However, when gimp starts ufraw, it passes some option to ufraw which
causes ufraw to not display th
On 09/19/12 04:19, paynekj wrote:
> According to the procedure browser,
> the third parameter to pass to the plug-in-unsharp-mask should be the
> drawable id,
> but you are passing the image id.
> It's only working in your first stage because, by luck,
> the image id and the drawable id have the s
On 09/19/12 09:11, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> On 12-09-18 09:37 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:
>> Can someone point me to a list of constants usable in script-fu?
>> Things like RUN-INTERACTIVE, etc.
>
> I don't have a complete list but you can find some of the lesser known
>
Using gimp 2.6
I originally defined my script-fu procedure as
(define (my-proc fileExpr)
...
)
and registered it using:
(script-fu-register
"my-proc"
...
"" ; image type the script works
on
SF-STRING "FileNameExpression"""
)
But
Is there any way to turn off the jpeg thumbnail
when writing out a file using
file-jpeg-save?
Otherwise, a small web image can be large when generated by copying from an
existing image which has a thumbnail.
In my case, the source image is coming in via ufraw.
It's not clear to me whether the
When processing a series of files in script-fu,
I'm trying to do the following:
for each file name:
Create an image by reading it in.
(set! orgImg (car (file-ufraw-load ...
Create another image by duplicating the input image and manipulating it.
(set! newImg (car (gimp-image-duplicate
Can someone point me to a list of constants usable in script-fu?
Things like RUN-INTERACTIVE, etc.
The docs / tutorial lists some of them, but not all.
Thanks,
Gary
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/
I assumed from the scheme manual that procedure-overloading
(in the form of different numbers of arguments) was permitted,
since, for example, there are two versions of string->number.
However, I can't seem to get it to work.
Anything special one needs to do to overload?
If you take the following
--
> Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:47:38 -0400
> > From: ke...@ve3syb.ca
> > To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> > Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] script-fu: illegal function?
> >
> > On 1
When I try the following in the script-fu console:
((define (find-dot txt txtLen offset) (print "foo")) (find-dot "abcd.ef" 7 1))
"foo"
Error: illegal function
The find-dot macro obviously exists and is being executed.
So what is the illegal function it is complaining about?
Thanks
subject says it all...
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
On 09/09/12 19:37, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> On 12-09-09 06:09 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:
>> This has to be something dumb, but I can't get a script-fu function to show
>> up.
>> freebsd, gimp 2.6
>
> The script-fu-register and script-fu-menu-registers blocks do not go
This has to be something dumb, but I can't get a script-fu function to show up.
freebsd, gimp 2.6
~user/.gimp-2.6/scripts/test.scm:
(define (script-fu-garya-test fileList)
(script-fu-register
"script-fu-garya-test" ; function name
"My Menu Label" ; menu label
Hi all,
An issue I commonly come up against is getting appropriate definition in an
image saved for the web.
In particular, I often have images where most of the image could easily be
saved at a high compression ratio, but selected portions, particular things
like peoples' faces, need better d
On 05/31/12 04:24, eduperez wrote:
> So, I'm always using some type of brush tool in GIMP;
> I exclusively use round brushes,
> that I change in size and hardness quite frequently.
I would second that comment
> In 2.8 I cannot change the size from the brush editor
> (well, I can, but the change
I don't see a 2.8 in the FreeBSD ports tree. Can anyone tell me / point
me to where to find out what the status is?
Thanks,
Gary
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
At the risk of committing a mailing list etiquette fopah...
I'm reposting as I got no response and I am hoping one of the developers
can actually shed light on this:
On 5/3/2012 8:15 AM, Jay Smith wrote:
Jonathan, I hope that you realized that when editing a JPG, repeatedly
saving/exporting t
On 5/3/2012 8:15 AM, Jay Smith wrote:
Jonathan, I hope that you realized that when editing a JPG, repeatedly
saving/exporting to JPG (your step 4) reduces the quality (actually
compresses / deletes data). Maybe this has been working for what you are
doing, but I beleive it is contrary to what mo
exiting,
or is that just information and it should continue executing?
Thanks for any ideas,
Gary
On 4/28/2012 1:07 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:25:17 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
When I run the install (using normal install, although custom fails as
well), it appears
closely the 2.8 rc1 install should mirror 2.7.5
Thanks for any insights...
Gary
On 4/26/2012 10:17 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: Gary Aitken
Has anyone gotten the windoze installer version of 2.8.0-rc1 to work
properly? I've been running 2.7.5 for a while but when I tried
insta
Are you running XP or something more recent?
On 4/26/2012 8:48 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
Win32 installer worked perfectly for me, the only problems I've had so
far seem to be related to reloading Script-Fu scripts from inside GIMP.
(Note to self: Double-check the "To:" address before hittin
Has anyone gotten the windoze installer version of 2.8.0-rc1 to work
properly? I've been running 2.7.5 for a while but when I tried
installing the 2.8 rc1 I'm having problems. The gimp comes up ok, but
when I attempt to load a .jpg file it hangs; as I recall it's spinning
its wheels in ufraw-
Try
http://docs.gimp.org/2.7/en/index.html
On 2/5/2012 11:40 AM, gerard82 wrote:
I compiled Gimp-2.7.x from git sources.
There are things in brush Tool Options not very clear to me.
Is there any Help/Manual available for this version?
If so where can I find it?
Thanks in advance.
Gerard.
_
On 2/2/2012 12:37 AM, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
The Display profile in UFRaw is not embedded, the output profile (middle
of the three) is. No matter what output profile you select, the preview
in UFRaw shouldn't change, if I understand things correctly.
A. I knew the display profile s
On 2/1/2012 12:08 AM, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
When I apply an Output Profile in UFRaw and send to GIMP, GIMP asks me
whether to keep the embedded profile or convert to sRGB, so I do know
that it's noticing a profile there. You can set GIMP to ask on the
bottom drop-down of that menu.
I d
if they are not considered bugs. Sticking to
sRGB doesn't solve these issues. I'm more than willing to accept that I
need an education, so any and all clarifications or welcome.
Gary
On 1/30/2012 6:07 PM, Frank Gore wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:
I hav
I have a question regarding the use of ICC profiles in UFRaw + GIMP.
If I load an image into UFRaw and specify an ICC profile for my camera,
then output a .tiff image, that image is color-corrected. At least that
is my assumption...
Now, if I load the .tiff image into GIMP, and again specify
Hi Brent,
For painting, try this:
Once you have the area selected, by whatever means:
Create a new layer containing only the selected areas,
with a transparent background in other areas:
Edit/Copy (ctrl-C on windows)
This will copy everything in the selection (green areas, roads, etc)
C
Seth, you're way ahead of me with your thoughts and methods on this, but
I might offer an easier, but less precise, alternative.
As you point out, Brent probably wants to include those areas the road
obscures. Since the roads are pretty narrow, one could get fairly
accurate results by simply
Hi Brent,
This is pretty simple in terms of getting the selected area with this
particular image:
Load the image into gimp.
Choose the color selection tool.
Set Threshold to 30
Click on the darker green area.
At least for your sample map, that got everything. Note that the color
on your samp
Hi Seth,
Thanks for the perspective. I was thinking if my world ever settled
down (won't happen for a few months at best) I might try to gnaw on that
a bit. Thanks again,
Gary
On 1/21/2012 4:05 PM, Seth Burgess wrote:
Hi Gary,
edge_dog isn't the most elegant of plug-ins, and behaves more
n Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Gary Aitken wrote:
Hello all,
gimp 2.7.5 on winXP, unfortunately. New hardware problems on my freebsd
system. grr. Anyway...
Why won't the gimp allow me to use a difference of gaussians on a layer
mask? This seems like a perfectly fine thing to do for edge
Hello all,
gimp 2.7.5 on winXP, unfortunately. New hardware problems on my freebsd
system. grr. Anyway...
Why won't the gimp allow me to use a difference of gaussians on a layer
mask? This seems like a perfectly fine thing to do for edge detection,
and indeed, other edge-detect algorithm
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
