i have modified the sources...
2012/5/5 GSR - FR
> Hi,
> strata_ran...@hotmail.com (2012-05-04 at 2119.16 -0700):
> > > OTOH, I no longer have to worry about
> > > accidentally flattening my 10-layer composition when saving a PNG and
> > > then forgetting to resave as XCF.
> > > Chris
> > You sh
This is a feature I learned about on IRC from Alexia Death. I have to
thank her a TON for actually spending the time to really dig into
what I was saying to show me the the new tagging feature actually did
almost exactly what I was complaining about(I had said tagging was "OK"
but I prefer the w
> Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 17:26:23 -0400
> From: ptilopt...@gmail.com
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] LOVE thread - single window mode
>
> * Richard Gitschlag [05-05-12 15:52]:
> >
> > Now if GIMP would just remember that I want to run it maximized
> >
>
> This may
On 05/05/2012 01:23 PM, Paul Read wrote:
> LOVE it
>
> Congrats to the Devs for adding this feature - also the single
> reason I jumped to R28 as soon as it was announced
Lucky me, it can be turned off.
Maybe I will eventually decide that I like it. Can't reasonably say
otherwise, it will mos
Hi,
strata_ran...@hotmail.com (2012-05-04 at 2119.16 -0700):
> > OTOH, I no longer have to worry about
> > accidentally flattening my 10-layer composition when saving a PNG and
> > then forgetting to resave as XCF.
> > Chris
> You should be saving your .xcf file first, THEN save the PNG copy of
> i
* Richard Gitschlag [05-05-12 15:52]:
>
> Now if GIMP would just remember that I want to run it maximized
>
This may be a function of your windowmanager, which you failed to mention.
KDE has the ability to designate specific windows to maintain size and
position in addition to which deskto
Yse, single-window mode is definitely a new feature to love. I mentioned it
elsewhere but in every previous version of GIMP I've used to date, every time I
open an image file for any reason the first thing I have to contend with is the
fact that it overlaps the toolbox windows.
I tried everyt
At the risk of committing a mailing list etiquette fopah...
I'm reposting as I got no response and I am hoping one of the developers
can actually shed light on this:
On 5/3/2012 8:15 AM, Jay Smith wrote:
Jonathan, I hope that you realized that when editing a JPG, repeatedly
saving/exporting t
LOVE it
Congrats to the Devs for adding this feature - also the single reason I
jumped to R28 as soon as it was announced
(a few tweaks to make it reliable on Windows 7 (works ok on WinXP) would be
nice but not essential)
--
Paul
http://www.readiescards.co.uk
__
>the save and export stuff is going to stay as specified here:
Hurrah :-)
Paul
On 5 May 2012 18:17, Michael Natterer wrote:
> You can stop this crap, the save and export stuff is going to
> stay as specified here:
>
> http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Save_%2B_export_specification
>
> Period. Thi
> Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 14:19:49 +0800
> From: ngoonee.t...@gmail.com
> To: for...@gimpusers.com
> CC: t...@gimpusers.com; gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
>
> ... (single-window on a tiling WM, whee!!)
Speaking of which, the new sin
Hello everyone, I don't know if it's permitted to do here, but I want
inform you about my new GIMP plugin.
BIMP isa graphical batch tool made for applying a set of GIMP
manipulations on a group of images. It's different from the "old but
great" DBP plugin in various (and interesting) aspects...
You can stop this crap, the save and export stuff is going to
stay as specified here:
http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Save_%2B_export_specification
Period. This is the final word in this discussion.
Besides, do you guys really think that "HATE" is a good
subject for achieving anything?
--Mitch
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> However I stlll find it highly disturbing that so many people felt
> that the project wasn't doing dccent PR work, and yet noone else
> volunteered. If I'm run down by a truck tomorrow, what is the
> community going to do about the lac
>
> Is it really that complicated to change the menus
> and dialog boxes or the existence of them based
> around user preferences?
> [...]
> Dan
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Jay Smith wrote:
> c) The developers UTTERLY FAILED to manage public relations on this. It was
> completely obvious to me (from monitoring the discussions on the developer
> list) that this subject was going to touch of an enormous storm of anger
> among some user
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Richard Gitschlag
wrote:
> You should be saving your .xcf file first, THEN save the PNG copy of it.
> Priorities :)
Indeed. I also try to "Save As" every hour or so and bump up the
version of the XCF. Disk space is cheap ;)
But mistakes can happen, particularly
On 12-05-04 08:47 AM, Johan Vromans wrote:
Anyone managed to build Gimp 2.8 on Fedora 16, 15, 14, ...?
As long as you have the required dependencies (or build them for your
machine), you should have no trouble building GIMP under any version of Fedora.
If you have a specific problem with try
On 05/05/2012 10:30 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> We are not separating people into better of worse users, or the
> deserving and non-deserving, or entitled and not entitled. This would
> not be a constructive approach.
>
> What we _are_ doing is _focusing_ on a group of users who are
> under
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Jay Smith wrote:
> c) The developers UTTERLY FAILED to manage public relations on this. It was
> completely obvious to me (from monitoring the discussions on the developer
> list) that this subject was going to touch of an enormous storm of anger
> among some users
I didn't mean for Gimp proper to offer different versions
or make it part of the program in preferences etc.
I meant where are the files that determine what the dialog
boxes and menus say, and where exporting and/or saving
are accomplished to? It can't be that hard, you're just talking
about meta f
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Daniel Smith wrote:
> Is it really that complicated to change the menus
> and dialog boxes or the existence of them based
> around user preferences?
> Is there a link anywhere to how it's written?
> I can guarantee you that when I worked in a big
> graphics house the
On 05/05/2012 10:30 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Ken Warner wrote:
but many posts calling for civility have come from people who want to divide
the user base into two groups where one group is somehow more entitled to
use GIMP than the other because of the th
Personally I like these new changes. Alexander is quite correct about
that it is notfor not wanting "light users" but adding suport which was
not there for those in real need for something more. This something more
is that when you work with layers, lots of ioperations, you get all this
in the
Is it really that complicated to change the menus
and dialog boxes or the existence of them based
around user preferences?
Is there a link anywhere to how it's written?
I can guarantee you that when I worked in a big
graphics house they'd find a way to alter them.
Dan
__
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Ken Warner wrote:
> but many posts calling for civility have come from people who want to divide
> the user base into two groups where one group is somehow more entitled to
> use GIMP than the other because of the things they do with GIMP.
You know, it's quite fru
On 2012-05-04 at 17:29 I said:
> with 2.7.4, the text-entry window is much smaller, with no
> apparent adjustment control, and any text entered does not
appear in
> the white panel.
> (But I did discover that one could cut-paste from one to the
> other, though the dynamic box seems more diff
On 2012-05-04 at 20:14 someone said:
> mageMagick wil do it:
> http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/text/#text_operators
Command-line functions are no good for this job.
You need to be looking at the image, so that you can:
(1) See what the annotation should be
(2) See that the text is positione
On 05/05/2012 11:14 AM, Olivier wrote:
Just to add one more link to this long thread, do you remember when
the Toolbox menus disappeared? How many people whined or screamed
because this change ruined their way to use GIMP? How many people
spoke about MY workflow, MY habits, MY opinion about this
In general, I agree with you Archie. This discussion should be more civil but
many posts calling for civility have come from people who want to divide the
user base into two groups where one group is somehow more entitled to use GIMP
than the other because of the things they do with GIMP.
I f
Just to add one more link to this long thread, do you remember when
the Toolbox menus disappeared? How many people whined or screamed
because this change ruined their way to use GIMP? How many people
spoke about MY workflow, MY habits, MY opinion about this stupid
change, and threatened to stick to
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 1:17 AM, John Coppens wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2012 09:52:32 +0400
> Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
>
>> We don't know exactly what you do ing GIMP during those unsafe workflows.
>
> About 90% of the time I load PNGs or jpegs (100s of them), edit them,
> and save them back in th
The classic case of YMMV.
Some do love the new GIMP, while others prefer the old layout. Changes can be
pretty difficult for others but ... I would camp with Oon-Ee Ng when he wrote,
"and it took all of 2 sessions to get used to the change.
Face it. There are the GIMP users, and there are those
33 matches
Mail list logo
