Hello list,
Is it possible to rescale multiple images (ie: hundreds) without having
to open each one individually in the Gimp? I guess this would be a sort
of batch processing.
Background: I have a perl script which I run to shrink images before
uploading to the web. This typically
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 10:03 -0300, Jon Lapham wrote:
Hello list,
Is it possible to rescale multiple images (ie: hundreds) without having
to open each one individually in the Gimp? I guess this would be a sort
of batch processing.
Hi,
you can use convert from ImageMagick.
cd
nuno alexandre wrote:
you can use convert from ImageMagick.
[snip shell script]
As I mentioned, I have a perl script (incidently using the ImageMagick
module) which does exactly what your shell script does.
I was just curious if/how the Gimp could do it, as I use the Gimp for
all my image
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 10:28 -0300, Jon Lapham wrote:
nuno alexandre wrote:
you can use convert from ImageMagick.
[snip shell script]
As I mentioned, I have a perl script (incidently using the ImageMagick
module) which does exactly what your shell script does.
I was just curious if/how
Oh and BTW,
Can you _please_ reply only to the list and not to me personally,
unless requested ?
Thank you.
nuno
--
Non-free programs are dangerous to you and to your community.
Don't let them get a place in your life. - RMS
Jon Lapham wrote:
Is it possible to rescale multiple images (ie: hundreds) without having
to open each one individually in the Gimp? I guess this would be a sort
of batch processing.
David's Batch Processor (DBP) is a Gimp plugin to do exactly this.
Look at
nuno alexandre wrote:
Oh and BTW,
Can you _please_ reply only to the list and not to me personally,
unless requested ?
Unfortunately (IMO) this list is set up so that a Reply
goes NOT to the list but to the original sender of the message.
I don't know why this list is set up in this way -
nuno alexandre wrote:
I quote:
[...]
src: http://adrian.gimp.org/batch/batch-7.html
I quote http://adrian.gimp.org/batch/batch.html, the contents page
for that document:
NOTE: This doc is ancient. It it wrong. You really want to look at
Basic_Batch instead.
That's
I can say that you are better suited with ImageMagick and, like you
said, your custom perl scripts.
I quote:
Batch mode is slow. Its not really a practical replacement for tools
like ImageMagick or NetPBM when it comes to large scale image
conversions or similar. At least not without
David Hodson wrote:
Jon Lapham wrote:
Is it possible to rescale multiple images (ie: hundreds) without
having to open each one individually in the Gimp? I guess this would
be a sort of batch processing.
David's Batch Processor (DBP) is a Gimp plugin to do exactly this.
Look at
Please do not reply to this message.
Please let this discussion end as quickly as possible.
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Andreas Waechter wrote:
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:45:50 +0200
From: Andreas Waechter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple
Hi,
Francois du Toit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wanted to suggest something similar. To not make gimp more
configurable just because there's no space in the user interface
seems silly to me. Make the feature configurable so the user can use
gimp the way he/she wants to. If it clutters up
On Friday 24 June 2005 10:45 am, Andreas Waechter wrote:
nuno alexandre wrote:
Oh and BTW,
Can you _please_ reply only to the list and not to me personally,
unless requested ?
Unfortunately (IMO) this list is set up so that a Reply
goes NOT to the list but to the original sender of the
Andreas,
Not sure what is going on in your Thunderbird, maybe a setting or
something, but reply should send it right back to the mail list.
No, Thunderbird should not reply to the list with the
current settings of the list.
There is no Reply-To header, thus a Reply has to go to
the
14 matches
Mail list logo
