jim feldman wrote:
>
> I have a curious question.
>
> Have you tried to play with the tile cache sizes? I had a problem
> some time ago but I didn't get a chance to go further due to priority
> changes. I was having problems with large images as well. I got as
> far as changing tile cache
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 08:03:07PM -0600, jim feldman wrote:
> I'm working with scanned medium format film images that are TIFF's of 100MB
> each. The GIMP environment is gimp 2.2.6 (built from ports about a week ago)
> on FreeBSD 5.3 Release. The display is a Linux (RH9) box. The tiff's are
> c
jim feldman wrote:
Quoting Asif Lodhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Though I have never worked with such large images, don't you think it
> would be a good idea to save each TIFF as XCF, do whatever you want to
> do on XCF and then save the modified XCF as TIFF again? May be odd
> beh
On Sunday 24 April 2005 21:06, jim feldman wrote:
> Quoting Asif Lodhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > Though I have never worked with such large images, don't you
> > think
>
> it
>
> > would be a good idea to save each TIFF as XCF, do whatever you
> > want
>
> to
>
> > do on XCF and then
Quoting Asif Lodhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Though I have never worked with such large images, don't you think it
> would be a good idea to save each TIFF as XCF, do whatever you want to
> do on XCF and then save the modified XCF as TIFF again? May be odd
> behavior will go away that w
ay be increasing the tile cache will work with the XCF!
Best regards
Asif
On 4/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 20:03:07 -0600
> From: jim feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> Subject: [Gimp-user] Odd
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 11:43:00AM -0600, jim feldman wrote:
>
what i learned about pdf from the openicc mail list.
long ago when i was first able to read and make pdf on my little linux
computer, my pdf looked terrible on my computer and the pdf i was able
to make did not look good displayed on
On Sunday 24 April 2005 15:42, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 11:43:00AM -0600, jim feldman wrote:
> > my options are tiff, jpg and pdf.? Of possible interest is that
> > if I read in (using TC set to 400mb) one of the big tiff's, write
> > it back out as a xcf (GIMP native), set th
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 11:43:00AM -0600, jim feldman wrote:
>
>
> my options are tiff, jpg and pdf.? Of possible interest is that if
> I read in (using TC set to 400mb) one of the big tiff's, write it
> back out as a xcf (GIMP native), set the TC up to 600, read back the
> xcf, and it still cra
my options are tiff, jpg and pdf. Of possible interest is that if I read in
(using TC set to 400mb) one of the big tiff's, write it back out as a xcf (GIMP
native), set the TC up to 600, read back the xcf, and it still crashes with the
same errors.why doesn't GIMP like TIFF?Quoting Carol Spears
<[
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 08:03:07PM -0600, jim feldman wrote:
> I'm working with scanned medium format film images that are TIFF's of 100MB
> each. The GIMP environment is gimp 2.2.6 (built from ports about a week ago)
> on FreeBSD 5.3 Release. The display is a Linux (RH9) box. The tiff's are
> c
I'm working with scanned medium format film images that are TIFF's of 100MB
each. The GIMP environment is gimp 2.2.6 (built from ports about a week ago)
on FreeBSD 5.3 Release. The display is a Linux (RH9) box. The tiff's are
created by vuescan on linux.
The FreeBSD box was running with "only"
12 matches
Mail list logo
