--- michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tell the gimp developers that. I don't know. Honestly.
Perhaps I'll submit a patch? ;-)
Walking ants means it's not a layer... it's a floating selection...
[see my later message]. Solution: Make the floating layer non
floating - by putting it on
--- sam ende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
awfully complicated, why don't do you skip the create new pic bit and
chose 'paste as new' ?
Oh, ok. Didn't know about that. Thanks!
yes. after doing 'paste' you need to go to the layers menu and right click
on the floating layer and select 'new layer'
Von: Peter Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I should be able to move any layer freely about and manipulating it
separately from the rest of the layers (and the pic/canvas).
You can do this, at least I don't get what your problems with this are.
This is how layers work in CAD-software (to which I
--- sam ende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
heh :), even easier is image/duplicate :)
You learn something new each day (which is a good thing(tm))... :-)
yes, me too :)
Goodie! ;-)
i'm really not sure why or what you mean. turning it into a layer doesn't
anchor it, you can perform most functions
--- Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can do this, at least I don't get what your problems with this are.
Ok, then I stand corrected. I just thought that it didn't.
Especially, I don't get why doing something on a layer - even temprarily
hovering and anchoring a selection - should
On 8/8/05, Peter Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can do this, at least I don't get what your problems with this are.
Ok, then I stand corrected. I just thought that it didn't.
Especially, I don't get why doing something on a layer -
On Monday 08 August 2005 15:33, michael chang wrote:
I believe GIMP can do everything you want, except transform everything
as a group. *sigh* If you can transform everything as a group, I
have no clue how to do it.
under filters there is the option of filter all layers which allows quite
Hi,
michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe GIMP can do everything you want, except transform everything
as a group. *sigh* If you can transform everything as a group, I
have no clue how to do it.
Simply link the layers in the Layers dialog, then transform a member
of the group,
Hi!
I'm trying to rotate an image (which is in a layer) by 90 degrees which is
taller than it's width. So when I rotate it, gimp will automatically crop
the image no matter what I do. I have the Clip result unchecked.
Gimp 2.2.8. How do I remedy this (I'm stumped)?
Best regards
Peter Karlsson
Hi,
Peter Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to rotate an image (which is in a layer) by 90 degrees which is
taller than it's width. So when I rotate it, gimp will automatically crop
the image no matter what I do. I have the Clip result unchecked.
Gimp 2.2.8. How do I remedy this
--- sam ende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
either rotate the whole image (image/transform) or try increasing the
canvas size (image/canvas size) in height to the width of the image/layer
before rotating.
Ok, that works. Thank you!
But why would gimp crop the image? I tried resizing the canvas to
From: michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Aug 7, 2005 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Rotating an image
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/7/05, Peter Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But why would gimp crop the image?
It won't. But some people would like to keep an entire layer's data,
but only
--- sam ende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i don't think it is cropping. i just tried that, but then maybe you have
to do image/center layer afterwards ?, try that.
Ok, perhaps I need to elaborate... First open an picture (which
should be rectangular in shape). Then copy the picture (or a part
of
On 8/7/05, Peter Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, perhaps I need to elaborate... First open an picture (which
should be rectangular in shape). Then copy the picture (or a part
of it). Create a new pic (under File/New). Paste (a regular paste
into the new pic). Click on the rotate icon and
--- michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It won't. But some people would like to keep an entire layer's data,
but only have some of it visible. I've done things like that before.
*shrugs*
Seems reasonable I guess. But wouldn't it be easier to use if all of
the layer were visible and hide some
On 8/7/05, Peter Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It won't. But some people would like to keep an entire layer's data,
but only have some of it visible. I've done things like that before.
*shrugs*
Seems reasonable I guess. But wouldn't it be
I am building some animation frames and have a need to rotate an image
for degrees other than 90, 180, 270. All I can find to do is to use the
transform tools-rotate. However, this only works on the top layer. I
really hate having to apply the same procedure to each layer in turn.
Is there a
17 matches
Mail list logo
