Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-03 Thread Patrick Horgan
On 03/02/2011 03:43 AM, Carol Spears wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:02:30AM -0800, Carol Spears wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:30:30AM +0200, Jeremy Nell wrote: What ways or tips will help speed up GIMP and maximise performance? Obviously, loads of RAM is a start, I guess. And a decent

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-03 Thread Patrick Horgan
On 03/02/2011 09:07 AM, Stefan Maerz wrote: My computer doesn't have a problem with it unless I'm going very fast and have the spacing at its lowest. I don't know, but I don't use brushes that fast. And if I did, it would be hard to control the brush (quickly responding or not). That's just

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-02 Thread Tobias Jakobs
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 08:30, Jeremy Nell jeremyn...@gmail.com wrote: Obviously, loads of RAM is a start, I guess. Yes, loads of RAM is a good start.  And a decent graphics card (for rendering), yes? No, graphics card aren't that important. Every normal modern card should do. What other tips

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-02 Thread Carol Spears
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:02:30AM -0800, Carol Spears wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:30:30AM +0200, Jeremy Nell wrote: What ways or tips will help speed up GIMP and maximise performance? Obviously, loads of RAM is a start, I guess. And a decent graphics card (for rendering), yes?

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-02 Thread Szabolcs Hideg
If the generated brush outline is too complex, turning it off for that brush only, or somehow simplify more complex brush outlines would be a better solution than disabling it altogether in the program settings. I have created deliberately a brush, which outline slows down Gimp when drawing. Is it

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-02 Thread M@thew Green
I didn't even know you could turn off brush outlines. I took it as a mini-challenge to see if I could work it out. BTW, to create some context for my experience I have been using GIMP since 2003, and designing / architecting web sites since 1994. Here's what I found :) - I first went to the

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-02 Thread Carol Spears
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:51:08PM +0200, M@thew Green wrote: I didn't even know you could turn off brush outlines. I took it as a mini-challenge to see if I could work it out. BTW, to create some context for my experience I have been using GIMP since 2003, and designing / architecting web

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-02 Thread Carol Spears
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:01:33PM +0100, Szabolcs Hideg wrote: If the generated brush outline is too complex, turning it off for that brush only, or somehow simplify more complex brush outlines would be a better solution than disabling it altogether in the program settings. I have created

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-02 Thread M@thew Green
Let's not argue semantics here - you know what I mean :) There should be a degree of the obvious when interacting with an interface. In other words, it should, as far as possible, be obvious as what to click on, in order to facilitate some action. This is far from the case here. Granted, there

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-02 Thread Jeremy Nell
I've tested working with outlines both on and off, and there really isn't much of a difference (other than not knowing my brush size), and I'm using an i7 quad core. GIMP is great and I'm getting used to it (after moving from Windows to Ubuntu and

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-02 Thread Carol Spears
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:23:51PM +0200, Jeremy Nell wrote: Simple comparison: An A4 page, 300DPI, open in both applications.nbsp; Grab a paint brush and and increase its size considerably.nbsp; Paint across the canvas and watch how much GIMP lags; the rendering of the

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-02 Thread Jeremy Nell
I run Photoshop on Windows (my old PC) and GIMP on Ubuntu (my new PC). Photoshop is slower, in general, but its real-time rendering (on an old P4 with minimal RAM) is still faster than GIMP's real-time rendering on an i7 quad core when doing identical painting

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-02 Thread Carol Spears
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:19:01PM +0200, M@thew Green wrote: Let's not argue semantics here - you know what I mean :) There should be a degree of the obvious when interacting with an interface. In other words, it should, as far as possible, be obvious as what to click on, in order to

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-02 Thread Stefan Maerz
This speed problem is, for me, the single most frustrating aspect about GIMP.  (I can live with its inferior text tools, but real-time rendering should be beefed up.) As usual, easier said than done. Simple comparison: An A4 page, 300DPI, open in both applications. Grab a paint brush and and

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding up GIMP

2011-03-02 Thread Jeremy Nell
Not very fast at all. Use a brush with a soft edge (hardness set quite low) and colour in parts of an A4 canvas. Standard colouring in motion (using a stylus), which GIMP handles poorly. On 02/03/2011 19:07, Stefan Maerz wrote: This

Re: [Gimp-user] Speeding Up Gimp on WinXP Computer

2004-01-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Friday 23 January 2004 14:29, Marc Dver wrote: Can someone recommend ways of speeding up Gimp on a WinXP Pro machine? I'm using GTK+ 2.0 and the stable version of Gimp (the development version won't install on my machine because it has a AMD