Re: [Gimp-user] Windows compilation of RawPhoto 0.7

2004-10-13 Thread Matthew H. Plough
No, I didn't see that he updated his page.  I will try to get a Windows 
compilation out within the next couple of days.

Matt
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
Hello, Matthew!
Did you see the renewed http://ptj.rozeta.com.pl/Soft/RawPhoto with 
the new ! 
http://ptj.rozeta.com.pl/Soft/rawphoto/rawphoto-200410130109.tgz ? :)

P.S. Windows version is still missed ;).
P.P.S. Now I'm compiling (and fixing dcraw for usage with your 
rawphoto compilation) by myself :). The compilation from Bendjamin 
Lebsanft doesn't fix bad pixels on my PC and direct compilation by 
myself doesn't work without one hack.)

Matthew H. Plough wrote:
Hi everyone --
I have compiled PaweÅ T. Jochym's RawPhoto 0.7 ( 
http://ptj.rozeta.com.pl/Soft/RawPhoto ) for Windows, and need people 
to test it. The plugin works perfectly on my computer, but I don't 
know if this will be the case elsewhere. The plugin acts as a GIMP 
2.0 front end for dcraw (Windows binary at 
http://www.insflug.org/raw/ ), which processes RAW digital camera 
images.

Would anyone be willing to test this plugin on Windows and give me 
feedback as to how well it works? My compilation is located at 
http://www.princeton.edu/~mplough/tmp/rawphoto-windows-0.7.zip . I 
also have a sample image (of a Coast Guard cutter shot from a cruise 
in Alaska) at http://www.princeton.edu/~mplough/tmp/CRW_0092.CRW .

Thank you,
Matthew Plough



___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Windows compilation of RawPhoto 0.7

2004-10-12 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
Hello, Matthew!
Did you see the renewed http://ptj.rozeta.com.pl/Soft/RawPhoto with the 
new ! http://ptj.rozeta.com.pl/Soft/rawphoto/rawphoto-200410130109.tgz ? :)

P.S. Windows version is still missed ;).
P.P.S. Now I'm compiling (and fixing dcraw for usage with your rawphoto 
compilation) by myself :). The compilation from Bendjamin Lebsanft 
doesn't fix bad pixels on my PC and direct compilation by myself doesn't 
work without one hack.)

Matthew H. Plough wrote:
Hi everyone --
I have compiled PaweÅ T. Jochym's RawPhoto 0.7 ( 
http://ptj.rozeta.com.pl/Soft/RawPhoto ) for Windows, and need people to 
test it. The plugin works perfectly on my computer, but I don't know if 
this will be the case elsewhere. The plugin acts as a GIMP 2.0 front end 
for dcraw (Windows binary at http://www.insflug.org/raw/ ), which 
processes RAW digital camera images.

Would anyone be willing to test this plugin on Windows and give me 
feedback as to how well it works? My compilation is located at 
http://www.princeton.edu/~mplough/tmp/rawphoto-windows-0.7.zip . I also 
have a sample image (of a Coast Guard cutter shot from a cruise in 
Alaska) at http://www.princeton.edu/~mplough/tmp/CRW_0092.CRW .

Thank you,
Matthew Plough

--
With respect
Alexander Rabtchevich
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Windows compilation of RawPhoto 0.7

2004-09-08 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
Matthew, I've tried standalone dcraw in -d mode. The results are really 
strange: the bad pixel isn't affected with changes in the .badpixels 
file! There is definitely a bad pixel somewhere at 1052,998, starting 
from 0,0. But with or without the .badpixels file, the result is the 
same. I've tried to mark one of the neighbour points as the bad pixel, 
but the things didn't change.

P.S. I'm using the latest dcraw compilation from 
http://home.arcor.de/benjamin_lebsanft/
DCRaw win32 5.90/1.201.


This seems like an issue with your version of dcraw, but I will try to 
check it out.  Does dcraw use the .badpixels file if you run it standalone?


--
With respect
Alexander Rabtchevich
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Windows compilation of RawPhoto 0.7

2004-09-08 Thread Matthew H. Plough
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
Matthew, it seems rawphoto doesn't use .badpixels file if it exists. 
I've put it into the same directory where dcraw is and it didn't help.

This seems like an issue with your version of dcraw, but I will try to 
check it out.  Does dcraw use the .badpixels file if you run it standalone?

Matt
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Windows compilation of RawPhoto 0.7

2004-09-08 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
Matthew, it seems rawphoto doesn't use .badpixels file if it exists. 
I've put it into the same directory where dcraw is and it didn't help.

--
With respect
Alexander Rabtchevich
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Windows compilation of RawPhoto 0.7

2004-09-08 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
Hello, Matthew
I know nothing about using *.tif as a RAW file.
Matthew H. Plough wrote:
So that's why it had to check those!  Do you know if other cameras have 
RAW images with a .tif extension?  If so, I will place both those 
extensions back on the list.

--
With respect
Alexander Rabtchevich
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Windows compilation of RawPhoto 0.7

2004-09-02 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
Eric Pierce wrote:
Basically, it works for me on Win2000 Pro at work w/the static version of your plugin.  I need to try the dynamic one again.  I didn't have dcraw installed at the time I tried the dynamically linked binary (didn't know I needed dcraw installed - maybe add that to your install instructions and where to copy the dcraw binary in Windows?)
Copy dcraw into you GIMP-2.0\bin directory.
2.  It seems your plugin is trying to open any file that Gimp tries to open regardless of extension.
Many cameras have "unofficial" RAW, e.g. Minolta G500, G400, Casio ... 
The RAW images have *.jpg extension. So the plugin should check the 
image if it is RAW one.

--
With respect
Alexander Rabtchevich
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Windows compilation of RawPhoto 0.7

2004-09-02 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
Matthew H. Plough wrote:

I will see about contacting them.  I also have a pretty good idea why 
the plugin gives photos a magenta/red color cast, and am working on 
fixing the issue.  It seems to be related to an arbitrary selection of 
color mapping; most cameras use sRGB, so any other scheme will create 
errors.  I have a lot of information on the topic, but I haven't 
finished going through it, so this might take a while.

Matt
Maybe I was wrong - there is still light magenta cast in my G500 photos. 
I should even say no magenta cast, but luck of blue of the clouds 
(R=G>B). Maybe it is correct, but is suspect it isn't.

--
With respect
Alexander Rabtchevich
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Windows compilation of RawPhoto 0.7

2004-09-02 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
Matthew H. Plough wrote:
Do you have an email address for him?  I tried the one that he posted 
his the RawPhoto home page, but haven't gotten a reply.  I guess that 
email might be inactive now.
No, I only have the address from his page. I used the address to contact 
him before. But the last mail got no responce :(.


Also there were people who were interested in such a plugin in yahoo 
gimp-win conference.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gimpwin-users/

I will see about contacting them.  I also have a pretty good idea why 
the plugin gives photos a magenta/red color cast, and am working on 
fixing the issue.  It seems to be related to an arbitrary selection of 
color mapping; most cameras use sRGB, so any other scheme will create 
errors.  I have a lot of information on the topic, but I haven't 
finished going through it, so this might take a while.

Matt
Did you use the checkbox "camera white balance" and click "reload 
preview"? It changes the result significuntly (removes the magenta cast 
at my photos from Minolta G500).

The plugin has a problem from my pov - is it doesn't show camera 
settings (WB). It uses it if appropriate checkbox and button are used, 
but don't show as the initial values in the lower sliders: WB and green 
component. I suspect it uses them as origins and the actual color 
temperature is applied as the initial value (not shown) shifted by 
slider position minus 4.75. The same is for the green component. This 
solves the problem by isn't convenient (at least for comparison with 
other RAW converters).

--
With respect
Alexander Rabtchevich
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Windows compilation of RawPhoto 0.7

2004-09-02 Thread Eric Pierce
Hi,

First off, thanks for writing this plug-in.  There's some cool RAW options in the 
plugin that I was never knew about when converting RAW images.

Basically, it works for me on Win2000 Pro at work w/the static version of your plugin. 
 I need to try the dynamic one again.  I didn't have dcraw installed at the time I 
tried the dynamically linked binary (didn't know I needed dcraw installed - maybe add 
that to your install instructions and where to copy the dcraw binary in Windows?)

Two things:
1.  Should the top 5 check boxes be radio buttons so only one can be selected?  I 
selected all for shits 'n giggles and saw several conflicting flags being passed to 
dcraw.

2.  It seems your plugin is trying to open any file that Gimp tries to open regardless 
of extension.
Here's a screen:
http://epierce.freeshell.org/multimedia/dcraw.png

On the whole, I'm pleased to be using your plugin/dcraw.  Now I can removed the 
hundreds of megabytes of software that accompanied our camera (Canon G5).

Thanks and I'll report back again,
Eric P.

On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 06:00:36PM -0400, Matthew H. Plough wrote:
> Hi everyone --
> 
> I have compiled Paweł T. Jochym's RawPhoto 0.7 ( 
> http://ptj.rozeta.com.pl/Soft/RawPhoto ) for Windows, and need people to 
> test it. The plugin works perfectly on my computer, but I don't know if 
> this will be the case elsewhere. The plugin acts as a GIMP 2.0 front end 
> for dcraw (Windows binary at http://www.insflug.org/raw/ ), which 
> processes RAW digital camera images.
> 
> Would anyone be willing to test this plugin on Windows and give me 
> feedback as to how well it works? My compilation is located at 
> http://www.princeton.edu/~mplough/tmp/rawphoto-windows-0.7.zip . I also 
> have a sample image (of a Coast Guard cutter shot from a cruise in 
> Alaska) at http://www.princeton.edu/~mplough/tmp/CRW_0092.CRW .
> 
> Thank you,
> Matthew Plough
> ___
> Gimp-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
> 
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Windows compilation of RawPhoto 0.7

2004-09-02 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
Hello, Matthew
The plugin still works fine :). Do you want to send its code and binary 
to the original plugin author? He was interesed in it.
Also there were people who were interested in such a plugin in yahoo 
gimp-win conference.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gimpwin-users/

Matthew H. Plough wrote:
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
Excellent! I am glad to hear that it works.  I have now made the Windows 
source available at 
http://www.princeton.edu/~mplough/tmp/rawphoto-20040830-src-cygwin.tgz 
.  No changes to rawphoto.c were necessary to build the plugin, but I 
had to nearly rewrite the makefile.  The Windows version of gimptool-2.0 
seems to have crashing issues when it isn't configured exactly right, so 
the makefile explicitly includes the necessary libraries as opposed to 
asking gimptool-2.0 what libraries and C-flags should be used.  Also 
included is kill.awk, which removes WinMain from the preprocessed 
version of rawphoto.c; the makefile runs this automatically.  The 
WinMain call messed everything up, and removing it doesn't seem to cause 
any problems.

I have started cleaning up the code to make it easier to understand, 
maintain, and extend, but at this point it is functionally no different 
from RawPhoto 0.7.

Matt

--
With respect
Alexander Rabtchevich
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user