On 9/1/05, Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW, did you sometimes notice lines you can't click at all?
> > An example is the red line on the most left side of the graph
> > by SHA 66129f88c4cc719591f687e5c8c764fe9d3e437a.
> For what it's worth, everything near that SHA1 works here as expected.
On Thu, September 1, 2005 4:10 pm, Alex Riesen said:
> That's a fine feature :)
>
> BTW, did you sometimes notice lines you can't click at all?
> An example is the red line on the most left side of the graph
> by SHA 66129f88c4cc719591f687e5c8c764fe9d3e437a.
> It goes from blue up-arrow through g
On 8/30/05, Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Try now... :)
>
> It also makes the current graph line thicker now, so it's easier to
> pick out where the line you clicked on goes.
>
That's a fine feature :)
BTW, did you sometimes notice lines you can't click at all?
An example is th
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It also makes the current graph line thicker now, so it's easier to
> pick out where the line you clicked on goes.
Very nice, and quite helpful for colour challenged ones.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
th
Junio C Hamano writes:
> The new output looks a lot less cluttering and I like it very
> much, but it is confusing to me on one count. I clicked one
> arrowhead pointing downward, expecting that the pane would jump
> scroll to show the counterpart arrowhead, and was dissapointed
> that it did not
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, you're the second person to ask for that, so I'll see what I can
> do about it. I can think of 3 possible behaviors when you click on
> the arrowhead:
>
> 1. scroll to bring the other arrowhead on-screen and briefly make it
>larger or something
Hi, Sean wrote:
> The line flowing from this commit extends ~200 more commits downward
> before it is finally terminated with an arrowhead. It would be nice if
> this line could be made shorter, such that the arrowhead was drawn much
> closer to commit in question.
Good point. The arrowheads te
Hi, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> http://ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitk/gitk.hs
>
Unfortunately, this fails on my git-plus-assorted-crap archive:
can't read "mainlinearrow(c1a9ddb1e9f30029384bd687d90af5796a280283)": no such
element in array
can't read "mainlinearrow(c1a9ddb1e9f30029384bd687d90af5796a280283)
Junio C Hamano writes:
> The new output looks a lot less cluttering and I like it very
> much, but it is confusing to me on one count. I clicked one
> arrowhead pointing downward, expecting that the pane would jump
> scroll to show the counterpart arrowhead, and was dissapointed
OK, you're the s
On Wed, August 17, 2005 2:58 am, Junio C Hamano said:
> Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> My reasoning is that it is the local short-range connections which are
>> interesting and informative. The long-range connections aren't really
>> visually informative; if you want to know about
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My reasoning is that it is the local short-range connections which are
> interesting and informative. The long-range connections aren't really
> visually informative; if you want to know about the long-range
> connections, the parent and child lists in
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> I would like to get some feedback about what people think of the
> visual effect of this new approach, and in particular whether having
> the lines jump into hyperspace loses information that people find
> useful.
Me likee. Maybe some knob to tune
12 matches
Mail list logo
