Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

to make a profit anyway argument. Let's see whether the judge buys that. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: Just in: 04/26/2011 194 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin from Emmett J. McMahon, dated 4/25/2011, re: Counsel for the defendant Best Buy Co., writes

Re: 9th Cir. License Primer

prediction track records) until the case closes is not actually cause for worry. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: 9th Cir. License Primer

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] The respective chances for success of copyright enforcement in court are what causes the FSF to get copyright assignments ... Dear dak, you know quite well that Stallman has no balls to sue for copyright infringement

Re: Question - Best forums to start an free project

for what purpose. And in general: if you have not even gotten to the point proof of concept code, it will be very hard to interest anybody in joining your project rather than starting his own. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc

Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

before starting to party... -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud

RJack u...@example.net writes: On 2/3/2011 10:59 AM, David Kastrup wrote: RJacku...@example.net writes: On 2/2/2011 9:47 AM, RJack wrote: Uh... buh bye SFC and Erik Andersen: ---Filed 02/01/11--- ANSWER OF PHOEBE MICRO, INC. Uh, that's the reply of the defendant, not a court

Re: sort file without sort first line or first two lines ?

David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: moonhkt moon...@gmail.com writes: On Jan 21, 10:00 pm, Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu wrote: In article fda30a91-58d9-4a6c-9b1d-b229c8a66...@t35g2000yqj.googlegroups.com,  moonhkt moon...@gmail.com wrote: How to sort file without sort first line

Re: sort file without sort first line or first two lines ?

. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: license v license v /license/

ever. Capitalism Always Wins ! A loaded gun also always wins. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: license v license v /license/

built in that manner: Linux, but a BSD userland above it. Shows that Linux works without GNU just fine. But not my idea of the best I can get. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Jacobsen v Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373 overruled by the US Ninth CircuitCourtof Appeals

of the law are interpreted _relevantly_ by the courts, not Alexander and you. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: The GPL and groupthink

to believe that _anybody_ knows what communism is. Definitely a moving target that can be located almost anywhere nowadays, except where it was supposed to be. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org

Re: The GPL and groupthink

John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com writes: David Kastrup writes: If you compare the writings of the founding fathers of communism with the actions of existing communist parties and governments, you'll find it hard to believe that _anybody_ knows what communism is. That applies to any political

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

like you. That probably counts as friendly. Anyway, one sales theory of BSD fans is that it is more business-friendly, so why the lack of donation and support? -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

Legends. A few people told RMS when he started. Now it is a whole hissing and yelling bunch. That they bother is the best proof that they are wrong. And they know it. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

RJack u...@example.net writes: David Kastrup wrote: RJack u...@example.net writes: VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote: OK I'm so fucking tired of this. I use OpenBSD. I use GCC. Use GNU/Linux. BSD is free. GPL is free. Don't worry. The GPL license and the Free Software religion will soon

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

RJack u...@example.net writes: David Kastrup wrote: RJack u...@example.net writes: David Kastrup wrote: RJack u...@example.net writes: VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote: OK I'm so fucking tired of this. I use OpenBSD. I use GCC. Use GNU/Linux. BSD is free. GPL is free. Don't worry

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

damages for contract violation of a contract without punitive terms?) I mean, you are pretty much cherry-picking again, aren't you? -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] You won't find any. And that's the point. Since it is YOU GNUtians who are crying copyright violation, copyright violation... which is a tort and on a large scale it is even a crime, IT'S UP TO YOU TO PROVE THE CLAIM

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] If she considers a breach ... She did NOT rule that there was a breach, you retard. She ruled quite the opposite: With respect to the General Public License (GPL), MYSQL has not demonstrated a substantial likelihood

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

considers a breach likely healed because the terms _have_ been heeded after substantial delay, does that mean that she thinks one needs not heed the terms? I have no doubt that you'll form a sentence containing idiot or moron as a reply, but please do try to remember what the topic was. -- David

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

the time of the crime, and the time of sufficient factual evidence establishing the intent constituting an ingredient of the crime. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

better pick those with grammar reflecting what you consider their meaning. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] Whatever. When quoting isolated sentences, you better pick those with grammar reflecting what you consider their meaning. LOL. Dak are you really sure that your German is more correct than the German of http

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] particular sentence, _and_ your attribution to the BGH as source is accurate (for which I don't see any evidence but consider possible), BGH Beschluss vom 06.10.1961 (2 StR 289/61) NJW 1961, 2266; BGHSt 16, 271 http

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: Dak, the ruling I cited is part of http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staatsexamen for prosecutors and counsels (both may become judges). Good thing they won't become Grammarians. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc

Re: SFLC is SOL

this stuff works. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Versa trashes the GPL as well

with the Superior Court or whatever other histrionics we are used to seeing from our resident cranks. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Versa asserts joint ownership/indispensable party defense

(if the defendants don't get a clue in time for the verdict) as absurd, the product of drunk judges and in conflict with the Supreme Court or whoever else. It's not like we have not seen this spectacle before. And time and again. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc

Re: Versa trashes the GPL as well

see how much of the defendants beliefs survives in court. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Versa trashes the GPL as well

RJack u...@example.net writes: David Kastrup wrote: We'll see how much of the defendants beliefs survives in court. You betch'a. No more voluntary dismissals. That's all that real folks have ever asked for -- a court ruling concerning the GPL on the merits. You won't see that this time

Re: SFLC is SOL

purporting not to get them is stubbornness, I might be guilty of that. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Versa trashes the GPL as well

RJack u...@example.net writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: On information and belief, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the doctrine of estoppel. Yeah, that one is hilarious as well. Dear court, how could we assume that we had

Re: SFLC is SOL

amicus_curious a...@sti.net writes: Any merits of the case aside, it would seem to me that Moglen, et al has bitten off a rather large chaw. Fortunately, it is not the job of the court to put any merits of the case aside. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu

Re: Versa trashes the GPL as well

. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

, but they call their religion pragmatism. This might leave a mere rump, scarcely larger than the groups which maintain the BSD kernels. I doubt it. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

RJack u...@example.net writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de writes: In gnu.misc.discuss RJack u...@example.net wrote: Reason? So do birds. flowers and trees. So what is your point? You are correct (for once). I don't get it. Statements usually have to make sense. What's

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de writes: In gnu.misc.discuss David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de writes: Quite simply, that it is the GPL itself which is the main reason for the popularity of Linux amongst the people who write it. Well, that's half of the story. Linux

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

. You may, perhaps, continue to extol the virtues of the GPL under the patchwork of laws of Europe but it's dead in the USA. Stay away from your keyboard during your wet dreams. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: Hyman Rosen wrote: On 3/9/2010 11:50 AM, RJack wrote: ... but that's not relevant. Neither is your analogy. You're wrong about that (naturally). The original conversation was On 3/2/2010 10:43 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: David Kastrup

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

the license can be established, we are talking about copyright infringement. But that situation is not so dissimilar with contracts when one of the parties can be shown to have had no intent of honoring its obligations. So yes, there are some similarities. There are also some differences. -- David

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

a law utterly unrelated to the discussion (repossession). He probably fed the wrong keywords to his quote regurgitating engine. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] Uh moron Hyman. Let comrade dak translate the following for you: Zwangsvollstreckung (§§ 704 - 945 ZPO) No need to bother. It is utterly irrelevant to anything discussed so far. Not that this should surprise

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] Uh moron Hyman. Let comrade dak translate the following for you: Zwangsvollstreckung (§§ 704 - 945 ZPO) No need to bother. It is utterly

Re: SFLC is SOL

?t=3 is still in breach. It would be rather unusual for a settlement not to entail reasonable deadlines for enacting the settlement. There is no doubt you'll act hysterical in the mean time, but that is not really something that the involved parties can take into account when settling. -- David

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

. Courts have no direct input device for facts. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: SFLC is SOL

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: RJack wrote: RJack wrote: PACER: SFLC just voluntarily dismissed GCI Technologies Corp. Uh, where is the SFLC's fucking press release triumphing yet another GPL

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

be passed to others. That includes copyright, but not authorship. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Shoplifting, concealment, liability presumption

. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: SFLC is SOL

decides to do in consequence is a different matter. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: SFLC is SOL

. It is his choice. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: SFLC is SOL

non-parties does no longer apply, and you _are_, as a party, bound by the license terms. The difference between a contract and a license is that with a license, you have the choice to be considered a party, or a non-party. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc

Re: SFLC is SOL

RJack u...@example.net writes: David Kastrup wrote: RJack u...@example.net writes: That's a really brilliant tautology. If I never use the GPL then the Supreme Court ruling doesn't apply! Clever. Really clever. You are getting this backwards. The Supreme Court talks about non-parties

Re: SFLC is SOL

for the results of the case. If the plaintiff lack standing, there will be no reason for the defendants to make the respective sources available under the GPL. Nor will there be any reason for them to merely pretend doing so, as some of our more desperate trolls claim to consider likely. -- David Kastrup

Re: SFLC is SOL

. But if a copy of a work is acquired with permission of the author, short of any contractual restriction that the recipient explicitly signifies agreement with, the author has no say in the default provisions of copyright. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss

Re: GPL misappropriation

their works get relicensed under copyleft licenses is supposed to be a _moral_ storm of indignation, not a legal one. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: GPL misappropriation

RJack u...@example.net writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] BSDL licensed material does not restrict sublicensing to identical terms. Absent an explicit grant of sublicensing rights, no right to sublicense is generally

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

. Darwin may be, but all the graphical folderol running on it is rather descended (or written new) from older MacOS code not based on BSD. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu

Re: GPL misappropriation

help your confusion. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: GPL misappropriation

out in the license in question. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: GPL misappropriation

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] You are confused. If I am the owner of a horse, I can authorize someone else to sell it, even though ownership gives _me_ the exclusive right. The whole point of authorization is to enable someone to act in one's

Re: GPL misappropriation

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] http://www.lehrer-online.de/dyn/bin/366209-369076-1-uebertragung_von_nutzungsrechten.pdf Inhabern ausschließlicher Nutzungsrechte vorbehalten Die Einräumung von Unternutzungsrechten ist allerdings dem Inhaber

Re: GPL misappropriation

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] Under the German copyright act ONLY EXCLUSIVE LICENSEES CAN SUBLICENSE. Wrong. You still don't get it. Exclusive licensees _automatically_ receive the right to sublicense. Not automatically, dummkopf dak. http

Re: GPL misappropriation

Zustimmung des Urhebers einräumen. additional usage rights. And the Urheber (author) has in the case in question granted his Zustimmung, given certain conditions. You are really masterful at digging up quotes contradicting your claims. -- David Kastrup

Re: GPL misappropriation

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: 2) Copyright law seems even in the US holds that nonexclusive licenses are clearly indivisible and do not automatically grant sublicense rights (a sublicense being a new license issued by a licensee). The GPL is used

Re: GPL misappropriation

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: RJack wrote: [...] Substitute the words tranfer of contractual interest for sub-license so that you will no longer sound utterly confused DAK. Are you having a problem

Re: GPL misappropriation

clause is GPL incompatible. That was one motivator for them to drop this clause eventually. So sure: you can't take any BSDL style licensed stuff and integrate it into work you distribute under the GPL. It depends on the license variant in question. Some are compatible. Some not. -- David

Re: GPL misappropriation

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] Dak boy is having a problem understanding § 35 Abs. 1 Satz 1 UrhG: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/__35.html (§ 35 Einräumung weiterer Nutzungsrechte) (1) Der Inhaber eines ausschließlichen

Re: GPL misappropriation

-- the federal courts will refuse to enforce it. I don't need to. That you pretend not to understand BSD licensing does not mean that the courts don't. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: GPL misappropriation

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] BSDL licensed material does not restrict sublicensing to identical terms. It doesn't permit sublicensing at all you retard dak. http://books.google.de/books?id=OCGsutgMdPICpg=SA4-PA42lpg=SA4-PA42dq=sublicensing+explicit

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

a drop-in replacement of existing non-free libraries. That makes mere aggregation a really good defense. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: SFLC is SOL

even the original author of BusyBox v.0.60.3. Why then would defendant settle and publish? -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com writes: On 3/25/2010 10:05 AM, David Kastrup wrote: Licenses covering a work as a whole are hard to press when the material they cover is functionally a drop-in replacement of existing non-free libraries. That makes mere aggregation a really good defense

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

special case to explicitly load a shared executable (and call its entry points) for which not particular headers were used in the preparation of the binary. I do not even know the library/system call for that. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Mining the Blogosphere

profanity is another man's prayer Hyman. You have strange gods. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Mining the Blogosphere

learning the use of the subjunctive mode when you are spilling one of your wet fantasies. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com writes: On 3/25/2010 11:30 AM, David Kastrup wrote: It would appear that you are not familiar with the realities of dynamic linking on UNIX-like operating systems. Dynamically linked libraries (we are not talking about Windows DLLs here) are carefully versioned

Re: GPL misappropriation

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] (Intellectual Property Licensing: Forms and Analysis) Absent an explicit grant of sublicensing rights, no right to sublicense is generally presumed.5 ... 5 Raufast SA v. Kniers Pizzazz, Ltd., 208 USPQ (BNA) 699

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

changes is not the rights to the copyrightable work (those remain with the author), but whether it legally constitutes an integral part of a larger whole or not. When it can be usefully combined with different other parts, this is definitely not the case. -- David Kastrup

Re: GPL misappropriation

attributions remain intact. Of course, when doing so, you can only (successfully) claim copyright violation for those parts which were written/modified by you. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

Nicolas Neuss lastn...@kit.edu writes: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: It does not get you anything additional, but it gets you something _less_: a proprietary product that uses your own code to draw your user base away from you. This is quite understandable - I would not really like

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

to make the best from what one actually got. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com writes: On 3/25/2010 2:21 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Hyman Rosenhyro...@mail.com writes: On 3/25/2010 1:49 PM, Hyman Rosen wrote: it cannot possibly be correct under copyright law for the rights to a work to change by the creation of a separate work after

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] The whole point of the GPL as a license rather than a contract is Dak, please stop ignoring the facts: It's established by several courts in Germany that the GPL is an AGB contract. http://www.jbb.de/fileadmin

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] The whole point of the GPL as a license rather than a contract is Dak, please stop ignoring the facts: It's established by several courts

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] The whole point of the GPL as a license rather than a contract is Dak

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] You did not understand a word of what you were replying to, again. The whole point was that in the case of a _license_, as opposed to a contract, any such stipulation of a _penalty_ is _invalid_, and _only_ sustained

Re: Recommendation for a CL data structures library

is a terrible thing to waste. So why are you wasting away in that manner? -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit

through all money until they have to declare bankruptcy. Wait, they already did. And they _still_ manage to keep burning through their creditors' money. They really turn this into an art form. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc

Re: SCO moronic loss in Novell suit

is also free to chuck it in the bin and act like he never received it in the first place. That's one of its main points. It is also one of the main distractions anti-GPL cranks tend to shout about in misleading ways. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc

Re: Samsung's answer to SFLC gang

having the matter of compliance move to a court in the first place. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: [LOL] Hey Alan, Pee Jay's mind is going to explode soon

he realizes that is a different question. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: [LOL] Hey Alan, Pee Jay's mind is going to explode soon

of communication is to communicate. Here's the communication: STOP BEING UTTER IDIOT HYMAN! I don't see him attempting to compete with you in that area. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: [LOL] Hey Alan, Pee Jay's mind is going to explode soon

Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: Hyman Rosen wrote: On 4/8/2010 12:53 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: Uh idiot Hyman... For indentation, go to http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100403103524185

Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

version under the same protection and licensing. Copyright protection does not go away by changing a few lines, regardless of _who_ changed the lines. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: [LOL] Hey Alan, Pee Jay's mind is going to explode soon

software, not least of all in this group. -- David Kastrup ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

their bluff called by several defendants. Yes, the same fairy tale as before. They'll crawl back into their hole and by some utterly unrelated und incomprehensible act, GPLed sources will be made available by defendants. Like it happened every time so far. -- David Kastrup

Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement

than this License grants you permission to propagate or modify any covered work. These actions infringe copyright if you do not accept this License. Therefore, by modifying or propagating a covered work, you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so. -- David Kastrup

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >