Mario wrote:
Here we clearly see Dr. Barad trying to deny the free speech of
others. Instead of ignoring posts he objects to Dr. U.G. Barad wants to
censor posts he does not approve of. If he is allowed to do this, where
does it stop? Such autocratic attitudes cannot be allowed to prevail
This is in reply to Message: 10, Dated: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 From: Mario Goveia
under Subject title as in above.
Mario wrote: Here we clearly see Dr. Barad trying to deny the free speech of
others. Instead of ignoring posts he objects to Dr. U.G. Barad wants to
censor posts he does not approve of.
--- On Wed, 10/29/08, Gilbert Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To me (a conservative), the Republicans would be better off making the case of
where in the federal budget to cut; rather than whom not / to tax. I would
rather see Americans taxed; instead of borrowing the money from the
This is in response to Message: 11, dated Wed, 29 Oct 2008, from: Mervyn
Lobo under Subject titled as above.
My response: Mervyn's reply is too apt
Best regards,
Dr. U. G. Barad
Marvyn's message:
Bosco,
Goanet? should be a mine relating to all things Goan. We have 10,000
readers?but only
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mervyn Lobo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have no problems pointing out personal attacks. I have no problems getting
ten people to write to the Goanet Administration pointing out?each personal
attacks.
The real value of moderation is when readers are
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:23:57 +0530
From: Dr. U. G. Barad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I request Goanet Owner as well as Moderators of Goanet to STOP the thread on
USA election...The thread under discussion is not at all relevant to GOA.
May I request, Goanet Owner as well as Moderators of Goanet to be
Mario Goveia wrote:
As you well know, I am not the ombudsman for Goanet. If you and the
other moderators see an obvious falsehood, don't you think you should
flag those posts and return them for re-consideration?
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:31:51 -0400
From: Bosco - Goanet Volunteer [EMAIL
Bosco - Goanet Volunteer wrote:
RESPONSE: Experts (not me) will tell you, that the impersonal nature of
communicating
by email sometimes lead us to understand something not what the author
intended to say.
If you are claiming to be a recipient of a personal attack in the above
example,
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mervyn Lobo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A few days ago, I posted a simple explanation showing why/how there are two
classes of US citizens. The post was simple to read and hard to prove wrong by
argument or evidence.
Mario Goviea did not try to prove my
I commend Mario for defending the USA and George Bush - single handedly.
However, my wish is to make him famous - like another Dinesh D'Souza.
Perhaps Mario with his extensive knowledge and time on his hands, could write a
book responding to / rebutting a book written by an American.
Title:
Gabe Menezes wrote:
RESPONSE: I apologise for my indiscretion, I should not have been
drawn in by the spurious posts of Mario Goveia.
RESPONSE: Apologies are not necessary. You have important contributions to
make here vis-a-vis current financial uncertainties instead of getting
caught-up
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:01:24 -0400
From: Bosco - Goanet Volunteer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is a fair amount of outright falsehoods expressed here from time to time.
I dont see you single-handedly correcting all of them in the interests of
fairness and the truth. Does that mean at those times
Mario Goveia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is to clarify that every one of the 15 messages mentioned above were
anti-Bush and without foundation, context or perspective. Some were
outright falsehoods. Thus I was forced into single-handedly correcting
all of them in the interests of fairness and
Bosco - Goanet Volunteer wrote:
Mervyn Lobo wrote:
A discussion where Obama (slightly crooked), was born should not have made
it to Goanet in the first place. Once the topic is introduced, everyone
has the right to participate in the discussion.
RESPONSE: You have alot of rights including
Mario Goveia wrote:
As you well know, I am not the ombudsman for Goanet. If you and the other
moderators see an obvious falsehood, don't you think you should flag those
posts and return them for re-consideration?
RESPONSE: NO!
I have made the point repeatedly that Goanetters need not be
Mervyn Lobo wrote:
For the first time in many moons, I clicked on the above link to take
a look at the rules and regulations. On the very first page, there is
a, DO NOT ENGAGE IN PERSONAL ATTACKS rule.
If the moderators strictly enforced this rule, 90% of the junk posts
here would be
-Original Message-
From: Gabe Menezes
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 5:02 PM
To: Goa's premiere mailing list, estb. 1994!
When the USA sneezes, the rest of us catch a cold; when our
institutions (other than US) through sheer greed get involved in
buying monkeys, we all suffer.
So you
2008/10/27 Bosco - Goanet Volunteer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
RESPONSE: There is no disagreement over the colloquial expression When the
USA sneezes, the rest of us catch a cold aka whatever happens in the US
affects Goa vis-a-vis the financial implications consequent to the gyrations
on Wall St.
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:21:03 -0400
From: Bosco - Goanet Volunteer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However could you please explain how does Bush's legacy affect Goa as far as
the content of the exchanges were concerned?? The particpants in that thread
were:
Edward - 3 msgs
Francis - 1 msgs
Gabe - 5 msgs
2008/10/27 Mario Goveia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is to clarify that every one of the 15 messages mentioned above were
anti-Bush and without foundation, context or perspective. Some were
outright falsehoods. Thus I was forced into single-handedly correcting all
of them in the interests of
When the USA sneezes, the rest of us catch a cold; when our
institutions (other than US) through sheer greed get involved in
buying monkeys, we all suffer.
So you can be sure that when the USA is in convulsions, the rest of
the World will also be rocking.
So easy to say keep topics Goa centric.
21 matches
Mail list logo
