Hello, currently I'm using Guice 4.1 on AppEngine with Kotlin, when trying
to upgrade to Guice 4.2 I always get the following error:
Caused by:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: com.google.common.base.Preconditions.
checkArgument(ZLjava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Object;)V
at
FTR, I'm re-initiating the jsr-330 spec revision, that included discussion
of javax.inject.Lazy. If we can get broad consensus on that point, we can
start down a road to a shared Lazy.
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 at 10:39 Tavian Barnes notificati...@github.com wrote:
I started looking into the generic
that doesn't address performance constraints. It's been sitting for
a bit, owing to prioritization, but I think that we should get it in shape
and into Guice soon. (cc:ing colin about that)
Christian.
On Tue Oct 21 2014 at 2:18:15 PM Michael Burton m...@niskala.org wrote:
We are aware of Dagger
of question out.
c.
On Wed Oct 22 2014 at 12:20:33 PM Stéphane NICOLAS steff.nico...@gmail.com
wrote:
I will let Mike answer your question Christian, as it is more oriented to
his previous post.
My personal point of view is that a lot of people already use RG, and for
this reason itself, its
type or the qualified
return type. That conceptual mapping might make it easier.
-christian.
On Fri Oct 17 2014 at 9:32:15 AM Tim Peierls t...@peierls.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Kevin Burton burtona...@gmail.com
wrote:
I humbly propose that these concepts are rather confusing
Worth pointing out that in a cloud-universe where instances are killed and
restarted, improving startup time is actually money on the table, since
work performed by guice at startup costs CPU time which most cloud vendors
charge for. Perhaps a trickle, but still a good thing to fix where Guice
(or
Crap. We'll have to fix this, or everyone's fork's master build status
will spam this account.
On 15 July 2014 06:13, Travis CI notificati...@travis-ci.org wrote:
*BanzaiMan / guice
is a Travis dev who was trying to reproduce
the bad maven stuff.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:33 AM, 'Christian Gruber' via google-guice-dev
google-guice-dev@googlegroups.com wrote:
Crap. We'll have to fix this, or everyone's fork's master build status
will spam this account.
On 15 July 2014 06:13
I think people commenting is one thing. As long as they're not creating
new issues, that's the key. We can direct traffic to the github issues and
I think people commenting on code.google.com will just trail off.
On 9 July 2014 07:03, Sam Berlin sber...@gmail.com wrote:
Already hidden... but
Nah. Makes sense to me. Maybe throw the passwords for gnotifybot and this
new thing into valentine or something.
On 8 July 2014 06:08, Sam Berlin sber...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm going to create a github account for google-guice-dev@ and have it
follow the guice github page, so it gets emails
\, but \@
doesn't seem to work.
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 2:21 PM, 'Christian Gruber' via google-guice
google-guice@googlegroups.com wrote:
Back-ticks.
`this is a code bit`
C
On Jul 5, 2014 5:19 AM, Sam Berlin sber...@gmail.com wrote:
So in reviewing, there's a few things I want to fix up
it's not interpreted as an
@mention? I tried a bunch of things, but only putting in code blocks
worked... and that ruins the flow a bit, unless the entire comment is a
code block (which induces horizontal scrolling).
sam
On Jul 4, 2014 11:45 PM, 'Christian Gruber' via google-guice
google
Awesome. Thanks Sam. I think this will be a great situation once we've
made the transition. Looking to migrate Guava at some point this quarter,
in all likelihood.
On 4 July 2014 07:28, Sam Berlin sber...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI -- I've made some progress on this for issue migration. Starting
I'm happy enough with the github issues list - I've played enough with
tags that I have found a nice balance on some other projects.
c.
On 28 May 2014, at 5:54, Sam Berlin wrote:
Unless folks strongly prefer the codesite issue tracker, I'd rather
just
move everything over to github (if
-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google
there would be good.
(That said, it's a cool project, though blog.clahub.com 404s, yet is
referred to in the main page)
c.
On 28 May 2014, at 15:36, Thomas Broyer wrote:
https://www.clahub.com/
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru
it.
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 3:41:28 PM UTC-7, Christian Gruber wrote:
Wait, Thomas... didn't we have this conversation about a year ago? :D
I
seem to recall you mentioning this.
But I actually think hosting a CLA isn't what I'm looking for so much
as
being able to tie in your own
@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received
@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received
(ServiceInterface.class).to(ServiceImpl.class);
I forgot the @Inject annotation at the ServiceImpl().
During the debugsession I got a nice Stacktrace with all information I
needed. Without remote debugging I got no information about the cause.
Regards,
Christian Kütbach
--
You received this message
certainly a viable option,
though here also I would spout a warning on startup.
Christian.
On 23 May 2014, at 12:20, Luke Sandberg wrote:
While preparing a recent
changehttps://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=409e0f578b620c38f6c8626dee78783219d2956e
to
how @Provides methods
breaking changes if I
recall in Guice 4, so it might be timely (though folks on this list
should pipe up as to whether that's going to rain doom upon them. :)
Christian
On 23 May 2014, at 18:06, Luke Sandberg wrote:
On Friday, May 23, 2014 4:20:30 PM UTC-7, Christian Gruber wrote:
+1. I would
We have the same Problem (running inside IBM Notes).
Are there any solutions found, yet?
Regards,
Christian Kütbach
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
not a lot in the way of a 4.0 release - just
available engineering time to fix up the last things we want to see in
4. We cut the betas precisely so that people can use it if they wish
(we do, in production).
Christian.
On 19 May 2014, at 10:30, Cedric Reichenbach wrote:
I just decided
@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message
options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice group
an email to google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core
, do these need to live in spring configuration xml files?
Christian.
On 6 Apr 2014, at 10:40, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
All I am trying is to convert
property name=foo value=10/
from Springs XML configuration. If you have a better idea, I'll be
glad.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java
that implementation class, pick out its constructor
with @Inject, and then analyze its dependencies. I think the provider
wrapper is unnecessary.
Christian.
On 5 Apr 2014, at 10:36, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi,
one of my modules contains the following code: The Provuder works by
calling
them different from any bound value of equal or wider scope?
c.
On 5 Apr 2014, at 11:47, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Saturday, April 5, 2014 8:33:58 PM UTC+2, Christian Gruber wrote:
Guice will examine that implementation class, pick out its
constructor
with @Inject, and then analyze its
into a constructor?
OptionalBinder lets you do that. Christian just pushed out some of
our
recent internal changes, including the introduction of
OptionalBinder to
the multibindings extension.
Some example usage:
1) Setting a default binding that a user can override:
Library
that users can
change?
2) Inject something into a library or framework that isn't required,
but would be better if a user could set it?
3) Inject an optional value into a constructor?
OptionalBinder lets you do that. Christian just pushed out some of
our
recent internal changes, including
to google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries
context. So it becomes an Admiral-Akbar-style trap, legally
speaking, and companies are at-risk if they then use the code. Which is
why the OSI rejected it as an open-source license.
shrug
Thanks for being open to alternatives, though. Mighty awesome of you.
Christian.
--
You received
://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On 31 Mar 2014, at 11:20, Tavian Barnes wrote:
On Monday, 31 March 2014 13:03:57 UTC-4, Christian Gruber wrote:
This actually looks a lot like a ListMultimapBinder to me. :)
I don't see why, what type would the key have and where would they
come
from?
Whatever comparable you wanted
the
.gitignore files.
Apologies for any inconvenience. It is normally our policy not to
re-write the git history, and the re-write has been reverted.
c.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
of those features
that poor planning will clobber nastily. But it's also an expert
feature in a way, so wise users will space out their priority key-space
so there is room to insert.
c
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com
the
.gitignore files.
Apologies for any inconvenience. It is normally our policy not to
re-write the git history, and the re-write has been reverted.
c.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
Cool! Last time I did CVS - git/mercurial, I did CVS - SVN, then SVN
- DVCS. -c.
On 29 Mar 2014, at 8:37, Sam Berlin wrote:
FYI, I've mirrored a version @ https://github.com/sameb/cglib, and
sent an
email to chrisn about what he wants to do with the sourceforge pages.
Christian Gruber
...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email
at 6:38 AM, Christian Gruber cgru...@google.comwrote:
I'm going to point out that Google doesn't ignore this thread -
Google as a corporation does not offer any guarantees or warrantees or
service-level-agreements with respect to Guice, which is clear in the
Apache license attached to every file
. Other Google projects (and also
companies like Square, etc.) are moving more and more of this sort of
list discussion over to stack overflow. Please do not consider it a
brush off, but a sincere recommendation of a more fruitful course of
action.
regards,
Christian.
On 8 Mar 2014, at 22:37
receiving emails from it, send
an email to google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Christian
and figure out what we really
do need/want in before rolling another version. I think it is severely
unlikely we will have any API-risky changes forthcoming.
Christian.
On 18 Feb 2014, at 3:30, Tim Boudreau wrote:
I've got a soon-to-ship non-trivial application running on Guice 4
beta.
While
-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google
the hollidays are over and everybody is back to work: any
update on this?
does somebody at google want to maintain the persist extension?
On 12/19/2013 06:31 PM, Christian Gruber wrote:
So that's not entirely true anymore. We have a few folks using it
internally. I had originally been cool
may well not be what anyone wants.
If you need order - dependency order is best. Can you not factor out a
commonality to ensure that what needs to be created first is actually
created first as a function of the dependency graph?
Christian.
On 23 Jan 2014, at 9:48, Alper Akture wrote:
In my
from it, send
an email to google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Christian Gruber :: Google
, but in your configuration code - your Modules. It's where
you say, Hey, Guice, if someone needs this thing here in my return
type, execute this method to create it.
Christian.
On 15 Jan 2014, at 14:58, guice_learner wrote:
Whats the differnce between @Provider and @inject difference
Can some
to
no real benefit even if that benefit is merely executable
documentation of intent and code-clarity.
Just my 10,000 satoshis,
Christian.
On 27 Dec 2013, at 14:34, Sam Berlin wrote:
I don't know if there's any way to do exactly what you'd like.
requireAtInjectOnConstructors works the way it does
to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com
I'm in favor of guice-core as an externalized-deps version.
Christian.
On 13 Dec 2013, at 7:59, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 11 Dec 2013, at 15:03, Sam Berlin sber...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting. That would certainly solve our lambdas in java8
problem right now -- folks can upgrade to ASM5
external deps.
On Dec 13, 2013 11:24 AM, Christian Gruber cgru...@google.com
wrote:
I'm in favor of guice-core as an externalized-deps version.
Christian.
On 13 Dec 2013, at 7:59, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 11 Dec 2013, at 15:03, Sam Berlin sber...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting. That would
.
guice-nodep).
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice group
, or
AspectWerkz or other frameworks at this site:
http://java-source.net/open-source/aspect-oriented-frameworks
Christian.
On 9 Dec 2013, at 11:53, Lorenzo Bugiani wrote:
The problem is not Guice...
The problem is use Guice without force my coworkers to use it, I
don't
know if I'm clear...
I
Java6.
c.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
to google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core
it to Maven is
probably
best.
sam
On Dec 7, 2013 6:57 PM, Christian Gruber cgru...@google.com wrote:
Isn't chrisn involved with glib? Can we rope him in to discuss how
to get
this pushed to sonatype?
c.
On 7 Dec 2013, at 11:04, Sam Berlin wrote:
Ok, I:
* Committed the fixes in cglib pushed
.
Because it is a trade-off between advantages, and those comparisons and
valuations are subjective.
Christian.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you
be burdensome. Then again, to me that situation
is also a code smell…
c.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google
a similar intent -
that is, this is an object managed by an external framework, so mucking
about with the reference is going to give you a bad time.
Christian.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
shouldn't
need. That's a judgment about design choices you simply can't make in
place for other teams and projects.
cheers,
Christian.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received
://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you
an email to google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core
find that a little cumbersome, so I whipped up this. Either way.
cheers,
Christian.
On 15 Nov 2013, at 21:17, Maatary Okouya wrote:
Many thanks for your answer, appreciated.
Although i might have forgot to mention that i'm new to guice and what
you
wrote does not make much sense in my body
should have little or no
knowledge of Guice or Guice's internals.
I hope that clarifies the difference a little bit.
cheers,
Christian.
On 11 Nov 2013, at 7:03, Alan Darkworld wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've been working with Java for several years now and I'm always open
for
new ideas
an interface like Supplier and it will generate
a factory method (with no parameters) on the generated factory for that
Supplier's only method. I suspect this might meet your needs.
Christian.
On 21 Oct 2013, at 5:32, Romain Gilles wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to know how can I had the same type
Greg meant http://github.com/google/auto
It's available in source, but not released to maven.
Christian.
On 21 Oct 2013, at 9:25, Gregory Kick wrote:
To clarify about @AutoFactory:
1) It is available now. It hasn't been released due to a buggy
interaction with Dagger, but you can find
Unless I'm completely missing something, Guice not only CAN compile
against 15.0, but it IS compiling against 15.0, thanks to your
(Stuart's) contribution. So the next pre-release should include this.
Christian.
On 16 Oct 2013, at 3:21, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Guice 4.0-beta embeds a subset
surface these. I'm frankly surprised this hasn't gone flakey in
our internal testing environment - a lot of other projects that had
tests based on method order failed pretty quickly after we switched to
JDK7. :/
Thanks for catching this.
Christian.
On 30 Sep 2013, at 7:29, Sam Berlin wrote
Ah crap. No, it was not supposed to do that. I had conflicting change
in both directions and MOE didn't handle it the way I expected, AND I
didn't notice. Thanks for catching it. I'll fix it. :(
c.
On 20 Sep 2013, at 12:20, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Hi Christian,
Was this change meant
:
Hi Christian,
Was this change meant to alter the maven project version back to
3.1.0-SNAPSHOT? (also seems to have reverted some recent pom.xml
changes in master)
I can't find these pom.xml changes in the patches I attached to
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=760 so
should minimize the need for such hedges as
injecting ProviderT. But if you need to, that's the place to do it.
Christian.
On 3 Sep 2013, at 17:22, electrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I just realized that it may be wrong to always get two different
instances
of a dependency when calling two times its
On 23 Aug 2013, at 23:00, Mikhail Mazursky wrote:
Switched to 4.0-beta and no problems so far (a rather big app with
many
modules and almost all Guice extensions used).
Awesome!
Are you planning to expose Guava as direct dependency?
I hope to.
christian.
Christian Gruber :: Google
getting close. I think we can push 4.0 final before
the end of the quarter.
Anyone else who's testing, please pipe up on the things you feel need
to be in.
Christian.
On 23 Aug 2013, at 12:52, electrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to let you know that this 4.0-beta version seems to be working
well
-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google
AM UTC-4, Christian Gruber
wrote:
As a side note, if you don't have a required inheritance hierarchy in
your context, you can make an AbstractInitableWidget which has a
default, overridable init() and implements IInitableAfterCreation,
just
to cut down on boilerplate. It would be good
2013, at 19:47, Christian Gruber wrote:
Hey all,
I just pushed more internal change out to the main open source git
repo. Please build and test it if you're wanting to be on the
bleeding edge - some changes include
More info when encountering duplicates in a multibinder set.
Minor little fixes
(sorry)
We have some more things to come, particularly around error handling and
error trace information, but we had to roll it back temporarily until we
figure out some subtleties. But we proceed forward towards a 4.0.
cheers,
Christian.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core
to performance concerns).
Thanks for the pointer to the JAVAC stuff in maven. I don't know that
we want to do that, but the error-prone folks may well want to.
c.
On 5 Aug 2013, at 1:33, Tim Boudreau wrote:
On Friday, August 2, 2013 6:46:19 PM UTC-4, Christian Gruber wrote:
Awesome. The upside
it can just be yet another
compiler option, so it is trivial to use.
All in all, it's a good time for java tooling and analysis. :)
Christian.
On 2 Aug 2013, at 12:52, Sam Berlin wrote:
The more that can be done by default at compile time with Guice, the
better!
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:45 PM
On 31 Jul 2013, at 19:12, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 1 Aug 2013, at 02:55, Christian Gruber wrote:
Note - I did something that I am unsure of, and we can fix it if need
before 4.0-final. I bumped the internal API version, but I'm not
sure which pieces of API are relevant to the OSGI
.
cheers,
Christian.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
for that bump. So this is an FYI, but also a call to review
that decision.
c.
On 31 Jul 2013, at 18:24, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 1 Aug 2013, at 02:19, Sam Berlin wrote:
Great news!
Agreed, thanks Christian! Will give it a test this weekend.
On Jul 31, 2013 8:17 PM, Christian Gruber cgru
in an eclipse environment. (Note, if you use M2E maven eclipse
integration, you can use Maven-RunAs to execute the maven build from
within eclipse, and error-prone will run if it's been integrated into
maven.)
regards,
Christian.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries
computer... On phone now. )
I'll take a look through, though, and see what other things are in
there.
sam
On Jul 23, 2013 8:14 PM, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 24 Jul 2013, at 01:08, Christian Gruber wrote:
I'll target a release of 4.0-BETA (alpha?) for this weekend
-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google
://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
still
prefer just the requireAtInject, but it's easy to relax the
restriction in
the future once that is released.
--Eric
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Stuart McCulloch
mccu...@gmail.comwrote:
On 23 Jul 2013, at 22:48, Christian Gruber wrote:
Wait… didn't we add
in making beyond your SPI fix, Sam? I can't
see anything crucial to fix with a breaking change, but now would be the
time.
Christian.
On 23 Jul 2013, at 15:48, Eric Tschetter wrote:
Don't rush a release just for me and this one feature :). If you
really
want to use this as an excuse to make one
, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Christian Gruber
cgru...@google.comwrote:
Heh, Eric. Let's get it out there for you. :)
I'll defer to Sam on the numbering. I think he has a better picture
of
the full scope of change in head, having written the vast bulk of it.
:D
That said, while we're doing a 4.0
Jul 2013, at 17:13, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
On 24 Jul 2013, at 01:08, Christian Gruber wrote:
I'll target a release of 4.0-BETA (alpha?) for this weekend.
Will this be what's in master at the moment? Because if so then I'd
prefer just push it out as 3.1 right now before any breaking API
in J2EE (ejb stuffs). CDI is a
semi-weighted replacement for much EJB noise, but is still much more of
a modular component framework etc. As you said, guice seem[s] to be
widely used, so no, I don't think so.
cheers,
Christian.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries
?
Not really, no.
- Is there still activity on guice and on its maintenance by owners?
Yes, see the recent commits.
- If not, why? because guice seem to be widely used?
n/a
- has CDI burried guice?
No.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Aaargh. I misremembered which thing I read that was wrong. lol.
thanks.
Christian.
On 25 Jun 2013, at 9:43, Sam Berlin wrote:
I think you mean the javadoc *is** *correct? Because the jsr
javadoc
says, Injectable methods: ... may return a result ... . The only
thing
that seems
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency
Injection
email: cgru...@google.com mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice
). You get a new multi binder if a multi binder
doesn't already exist for that key. I any other case, you contribute
bindings to the already-existing multi binder.
Christian.
On 13 Jun 2013, at 12:10, electrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to admit I'm not 100% about what is the *scope
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
