Hello,
to reduce build noise, let us skip PR builds
cheers,
Ilya Shipicin
From cb4bc027da998dbc01a9825c891708305d616471 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ilya Shipitsin
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:27:39 +0500
Subject: [PATCH] CI: run travis-ci builds on push only, skip pull requests
---
.travis.yml
Fundraising During The Coronavirus Pandemic
For starters, let’s agree that panicking and crawling into a hole because of
the coronavirus is not a reasonable option. Business goes on, whatever the
economic conditions. You can’t not raise funds. You can’t treat loyal and
responsive donors like st
Current master's build passed the problematic point in my TravisCI project:
https://travis-ci.org/github/martin-g/haproxy/jobs/663953359
Note: I use TravisCI .org while HAProxy's official project is at .com:
https://travis-ci.com/github/haproxy/haproxy
I also think this is a problem on TravisCI's e
I will disable PR builds.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020, 6:27 PM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 06:21:15PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > let us calm down a bit :)
>
> Agreed, especially since the build on PRs already happens and already
> adds noise.
>
> > yes, I still believe it is beca
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 3:29 PM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 06:21:15PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > let us calm down a bit :)
>
> Agreed, especially since the build on PRs already happens and already
> adds noise.
>
> > yes, I still believe it is because of buffering. I
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 06:21:15PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> let us calm down a bit :)
Agreed, especially since the build on PRs already happens and already
adds noise.
> yes, I still believe it is because of buffering. I might have missed
> something.
> unless I will repair it, I'll drop arm6
let us calm down a bit :)
yes, I still believe it is because of buffering. I might have missed
something.
unless I will repair it, I'll drop arm64 support on travis (and we will
switch to self hosted github action runner)
William,
Am 18.03.20 um 13:37 schrieb William Lallemand:
>> Yes, in fact Travis does this by default. You can check the list of pull
>> requests and see the checkmarks or crosses in the list:
>> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed
>>
>> GitHub Actions would need to be ex
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 01:32:30PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> William,
>
> Am 18.03.20 um 13:30 schrieb William Lallemand:
> > Actually I think it's possible to run the CI on the pull requests :-)
> >
>
> Yes, in fact Travis does this by default. You can check the list of pull
> requests and
William,
Am 18.03.20 um 13:30 schrieb William Lallemand:
> Actually I think it's possible to run the CI on the pull requests :-)
>
Yes, in fact Travis does this by default. You can check the list of pull
requests and see the checkmarks or crosses in the list:
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/p
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 01:23:44PM +0100, William Lallemand wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 01:17:09PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > It's really annoying to have to constantly commits into the project
> > just to experiment with random fixes there. The problem could very
> > well be in the build
Willy,
Am 18.03.20 um 13:17 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> That was my first impression as well, but when seeing Ilya's fix I
> thought I had incorrectly analysed the situation and that we were
> just missing some part of the buffered output.
Ilya's fixes are correct, but apply at a later point in time
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 01:17:09PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> It's really annoying to have to constantly commits into the project
> just to experiment with random fixes there. The problem could very
> well be in the build-ssl script but it's hard to tell. I was thinking
> about disabling this en
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 01:07:45PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Ilya,
>
> Am 18.03.20 um 10:27 schrieb ???:
> > ??, 18 ???. 2020 ?. ? 13:41, Willy Tarreau :
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 08:59:46PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> it is not trivial bash redirection
Ilya,
Am 18.03.20 um 10:27 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 13:41, Willy Tarreau :
>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 08:59:46PM +0500, ??? wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> it is not trivial bash redirection misuse fix.
>>
>> Ah cool, thank you Ilya! I was also having a look at it not
>>
ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 13:41, Willy Tarreau :
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 08:59:46PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > it is not trivial bash redirection misuse fix.
>
> Ah cool, thank you Ilya! I was also having a look at it not
> understanding what was wrong there! Now pushed.
>
https:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 08:59:46PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it is not trivial bash redirection misuse fix.
Ah cool, thank you Ilya! I was also having a look at it not
understanding what was wrong there! Now pushed.
Willy
Le 18/03/2020 à 04:21, Kevin Zhu a écrit :
Hi Christopher
Can you please test the config files I attached in this mail, HAProxy version
2.1.3
And you can add some debug code like SPOE_PRINTF in function
spoe_init_per_thread to print engin_ids of every agent in every proxy.
Then you can see the
18 matches
Mail list logo
