Hello,
You can avail Flat 50% Off on all Airlines & Hotels.
There are no hidden costs etc.
We're able to offer you such a high discount because we buy airline miles and travel vouchers from market at very low rates.
Limited Promotion. Call Toll Free (855) 425-6766
Thanks,
Patrick
Tr
use keepalive : option httpclose. But
that's a lower performance (for the end-user) thing : IE gets very
slow without keepalive.
--
Patrick
I would rather say, patch haproxy so that it not only sends
x-forwarded-for but also x-forwarded-for-sourceport.
Patrick
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:48 AM, John Lauro john.la...@covenanteyes.com wrote:
Hello,
Running mode tcp in case that makes a difference for any comments, as I know
Use mod_rpaf and apache will to REMOTE_HOST = X-Forwarded-for in all
its processings.
stderr.net/rpaf or something like that for the URL.
Patrick
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Will Buckner w...@chegg.com wrote:
Hey guys,
All of my Apaches are logging the load balancer's IP in the error
--
Powered by PHPlist, www.phplist.com --
inline: powerphplist.png
---
doc/configuration.txt |7 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt b/doc/configuration.txt
index e1d5b71..a3d4ac4 100644
--- a/doc/configuration.txt
+++ b/doc/configuration.txt
@@ -2859,7 +2859,7 @@ no option httpclose
a 250ms http-keep-alive timeout
too, which seems to be a good tradeof).
Thank you for any comment on these points.
--
Patrick Mézard
Le 12/06/10 07:09, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:40:18PM +0200, Patrick Mézard wrote:
Hello,
[... snip, thanks for the answers ...]
3- option forceclose says:
When this happens, it is possible to use option forceclose. It will
actively close the outgoing
# HG changeset patch
# User Patrick Mezard pmez...@gmail.com
# Date 1276351177 -7200
# Node ID e62ef7ba49a979f308fc9ff653e4dfb51652e1f0
# Parent 502d8a7ee3377e176347f3c5b6c2718d0ee855a3
doc: summarize and highlight persistent connections behaviour
diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt b/doc
# HG changeset patch
# User Patrick Mezard pmez...@gmail.com
# Date 1276351667 -7200
# Node ID 665a0f2365f59ddf58e862ff8ccf830568c89fb9
# Parent e62ef7ba49a979f308fc9ff653e4dfb51652e1f0
doc: mention 'option http-server-close' effect in Tq section
diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt b/doc
# HG changeset patch
# User Patrick Mezard pmez...@gmail.com
# Date 1276354342 -7200
# Node ID 771c93c657b8fca58f6ae8eee7f8bbfa8e02c03c
# Parent 665a0f2365f59ddf58e862ff8ccf830568c89fb9
doc: add configuration samples
configuration.txt is thorough and accurate but lacked sample configurations
from the CLI or web interface and even generate
documentation dynamically for features brought by third-parties plugins.
--
Patrick Mézard
---
doc/configuration.txt | 20 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt b/doc/configuration.txt
index 3e777fa..7fd570c 100644
--- a/doc/configuration.txt
+++ b/doc/configuration.txt
@@ -6610,16 +6610,16 @@ backup
check
it be a feature request?
Thanks
-Patrick
, and then let the custom log
format add the date, host, program, and pid.
-Patrick
). Does the http_request_counter only increment under
certain conditions, or is this a bug?
This is with haproxy 1.5-dev19
-Patrick
On 2013/08/11 15:45, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
I'm using the %rt field in the unique-id-format config parameter
(the full value is %{+X}o%pid-%rt), and am getting lots of
duplicates. In one specific case, haproxy added the same
http_request_counter value to 70 different http requests within
the acl and the
use_backend in the frontend, and then put the acl again with the reqrep
in the backend. Is there any cleaner way (if it works since I haven't
tried it yet)?
-Patrick
in
the content-length header)? And with a 4XX status code as well.
We have monitoring in place which looks for server errors, and I'd love
for it not to pick up client problems.
-Patrick
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2013-09-18 01:46:50 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: Client timeout on http put shows as a server timeout with
error 504
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 06:29:13PM -0400
an important consideration.
Best regards,
Jinn
Personally there are still several things that have been talked about
for 1.5 that I am still hoping to see. So I for one hope that 1.5 is not
released until it is finished.
-Patrick
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
*From: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*Sent: * 2013-09-18 10:26:36 E
*To: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: Client timeout on http put shows as a server timeout with
error
504
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2013-09-18 01:46:50 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9
),
and then using `capture request header` to add that to the log. But it
does not appear haproxy can capture headers added by itself.
-Patrick
*From: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*Sent: * 2013-10-22 19:13:08 E
*To: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *handling hundreds of reqrep statements
I'm currently using haproxy (1.5-dev19) as a content based router
*From: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*Sent: * 2013-10-22 23:32:31 E
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: handling hundreds of reqrep statements
*From: *hushmeh...@hushmail.com
*Sent: * 2013-10-23 01:06:24 E
*To: *hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: handling hundreds of reqrep statements
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 05:33:38 +0200 Patrick
Simple question: Is there any way to disable a backend through the socket?
I see you can disable both frontends, and servers through the socket,
but I don't see a way to do a backend.
-Patrick
No. As I said, I want to disable the backend.
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#4.2-disabled
-Patrick
*From: *Jonathan Matthews cont...@jpluscplusm.com
*Sent: * 2013-12-22 16:23:18 E
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 05:05:16PM -0500, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
No. As I said, I want to disable the backend.
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#4.2-disabled
That doesn't really work for backends since they don't decide to get
traffic. At least if a config accepts
*From: *Gabriel Sosa sosagabr...@gmail.com
*Sent: * 2013-12-26 09:41:21 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: disable backend through socket
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Patrick Hemmer
hapr...@stormcloud9.net mailto:hapr...@stormcloud9
. It would probably be harder to code as well,
but I really don't know on that.
-Patrick
ideas?
Thanks
-Patrick
` will
be one less than the value used for `unique-id-format` (this applies to
both using %ID in the log format and using `unique-id-header`).
Without this patch, all values are the same.
-Patrick
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
.
-Patrick
*From: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*Sent: * 2014-01-25 03:40:38 E
*To: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: haproxy duplicate http_request_counter
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-01-25 04:43:28 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: haproxy duplicate http_request_counter values
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 03:40:38AM -0500, Patrick Hemmer wrote
Confirmed. Testing various scenarios, and they all work.
Thanks for the quick patch :-)
-Patrick
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-01-25 05:09:09 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *haproxy
/proxy-protocol.txt
-Patrick
*From: *Semenov, Evgeny ev.seme...@brokerkf.ru
*Sent: * 2014-01-27 09:06:59 E
*To: *haproxy@formilux.org haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Real client IP address question
Hi
fragile when someone updates their config to
capture an additional header, but forgets to update all indexes (plus
having to keep track of indexes in the first place).
-Patrick
:8080
mode http
balance
timeout client 5000
timeout connect 4000
timeout server 3
stats uri /haproxy_stats
stats realm HAProxy\ Statistics
stats auth user:password
--
patrick
Patrick Landry
University of Louisiana at Lafayette
Director, University Computer Support Services
- Original Message -
Hi Patrick,
I think your listen adminstats would be glad to have a 'stats enable'
statement!
Baptiste
Thanks but that does not fix it. I had that included at one point. I have been
through so many configurations
listen adminstats 0.0.0.0:8080
mode
- Original Message -
From: Cyril Bonté cyril.bo...@free.fr
To: Patrick Landry p...@louisiana.edu, Baptiste
bed...@gmail.com
Cc: HAProxy haproxy@formilux.org
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 5:32:25 PM
Subject: Re: 503 errors from HTTP statistics proxy
Hi Patrick,
Le 21/02/2014 00
*From: *Sok Ann Yap sok...@gmail.com
*Sent: * 2014-02-21 05:11:48 E
*To: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: Just a simple thought on health checks after a soft
reload of HAProxy
Patrick Hemmer haproxy@... writes
http checks from the frontend haproxy are
failing. But since the backend haproxy is still accepting connections,
the retry option does not work.
-Patrick
*From: *Baptiste bed...@gmail.com
*Sent: * 2014-02-24 07:18:00 E
probably be a minor detail to not only dump the
up/down state, but all stats.
-Patrick
*From: *PiBa-NL piba.nl@gmail.com
*Sent: * 2014-02-28 11:15:19 E
*To: *Andreas Mock andreas.m...@drumedar.de, haproxy@formilux.org
The haproxy log contains the original request, not the rewritten one. If
you want to see the rewritten URL you need to look at the backend server
which is receiving the request.
-Patrick
*From: *Steve Phillips stw
, or am I misunderstanding something?
-Patrick
content reject if -rewrite _req_rate
tcp-request content reject if -rewrite _conn_cur
server s1 127.0.0.1:2700
server s2 127.0.0.1:2701
server s3 127.0.0.1:2702
-Patrick
*From: *Baptiste
never
would have expected that to be something haproxy would support. But I
think it would make sense as a plugin.
-Patrick
through.
-Patrick
*From: *Baptiste bed...@gmail.com
*Sent: * 2014-03-18 11:03:56 E
*To: *Roel Cuppen r...@cuppie.com
*CC: *HAProxy haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: Radius authentication
Well, I'm currently writing
connect and cli timeouts, but that didn't change anything.
Thanks,
Patrick
logging on, but I am not seeing any 5xx responses (almost all
200s, with a low number of 4xx, which seems about right).
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Patrick Schless
patrick.schl...@gmail.comwrote:
I am running on 1.5 dev22, and doing SSL termination. Traffic seems to be
handled fine, but my ereq
and don't seem related to
SSL (since some of the errors are on the http frontend). The counts for the
various types of 400s are here:
[patrick@haproxy-k49 ~]$ sudo grep haproxy /var/log/messages | grep -E
[0-9] 400 [0-9] | awk '{print $6 $9 $11 $15}' | sed
s/:[0-9]*// | sed s/tapp-.../tapp-abc
1.4 does not support SSL. SSL was added in 1.5-dev12
-Patrick
*From: *Juan Jimenez jjime...@electric-cloud.com
*Sent: * 2014-03-30 02:44:42 E
*To: *haproxy@formilux.org haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *No ssl or crt in bind
,
Patrick
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Just issue a 'show errors' on HAProxy stats socket and you'll know why
these request have been denied.
You can also give a try to the 'option accept-invalid-request' to tell
haproxy be less sensitive
We have an issue with haproxy (1.5-dev22-1a34d57) where it is
intermittently not connecting to the backend server. However the
behavior it is exhibiting seems strange.
The reason I say strange is that in one example, it logged that the
client disconnected after ~49 seconds with a connection flags
-Patrick
*From: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*Sent: * 2014-04-01 15:20:15 E
*To: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *haproxy intermittently not connecting to backend
We have an issue with haproxy (1.5-dev22-1a34d57
You want the errorfile config param.
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#errorfile
-Patrick
*From: *Piavlo lolitus...@gmail.com
*Sent: * 2014-04-02 15:16:22 E
*To: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject
That makes perfect sense. Thank you very much.
-Patrick
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-04-02 15:38:04 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: haproxy
!! For now I'm thinking about something that sends a TERM after
an hour or so, but there might be something that's a bit cleaner.
Didn't find anything in the docs. Or am I looking badly?
Hints? Experience? Ideas?
Thanks!
Patrick
my related rules grouped together, and so this message
pops up every time haproxy is (re)started. Currently it logs out 264
lines each start (I have a lot of rules), and is thus fairly annoying. I
am well aware of what the message means and my configuration is not
affected by it.
-Patrick
a check completion time of 30001ms.
Attached is a simple configuration that can be used to demonstrate this
issue. Launch haproxy, and then go to http://localhost/haproxy/stats
-Patrick
global
log 127.0.0.1 local0
defaults
log global
modehttp
option
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-04-11 08:29:15 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: haproxy mis-reporting layer 4 checks
Hi Patrick,
On Thu, Apr 10
the configured timeout should it be a 5XX.
Nginx uses 499 for client closed connection. Perhaps haproxy could use
that status code as well when `option abortonclose` is used.
-Patrick
*From: *Patrick Hemmer hapr
*From: *Cyril Bonté cyril.bo...@free.fr
*Sent: * 2014-04-13 11:15:26 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: suppress reqrep / use_backend warning
Hi Patrick,
Le 08/04
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-04-14 11:27:59 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: haproxy intermittently not connecting to backend
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 01:38:54AM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
This just keeps
capture between
haproxy and the backend server.
The packet capture shows that the backend server listening on port 4001
sent a TCP FIN packet to haproxy first. Therefore haproxy shouldn't have
logged it with C---
-Patrick
global
log 127.0.0.1 local0
maxconn 20480
user haproxy
*From: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*Sent: * 2014-04-16 17:38:54 E
*To: *haproxy@formilux.org haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *haproxy incorrectly reporting connection flags
With 1.5-dev22, we have a scenario where haproxy is saying the client
closed the connection, but really
*From: *Cyril Bonté cyril.bo...@free.fr
*Sent: * 2014-04-23 02:37:07 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: haproxy incorrectly reporting connection
*From: *Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com
*Sent: * 2014-04-23 12:16:01 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *RE: haproxy incorrectly reporting connection flags
Sorry about that. I see it on the mailing list archive
Friend.
I decided to share this lucrative opportunity with you, I am the foreign
operations manager of our bank here in my country, Burkina Faso West Africa. i
am married with four children. I want you to assist me in other to transfer the
sum of into your reliable account as the business
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-05-02 02:02:11 E
*To: *Rachel Chavez rachel.chave...@gmail.com
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: please check
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 03:44:46PM -0400, Rachel Chavez wrote:
The problem is:
when client sends a request with incomplete body
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-05-02 11:15:07 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *Rachel Chavez rachel.chave...@gmail.com, haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: please check
Hi Patrick,
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 10:57:38AM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
*From
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-05-02 12:56:16 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *Rachel Chavez rachel.chave...@gmail.com, haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: please check
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:18:43PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
At any moment the server
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-05-02 14:00:24 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *Rachel Chavez rachel.chave...@gmail.com, haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: please check
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 01:32:30PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
I've set up a test
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-05-02 15:06:13 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *Rachel Chavez rachel.chave...@gmail.com, haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: please check
On Fri, May
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-05-06 17:41:18 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net, Rachel Chavez
rachel.chave...@gmail.com
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: please check
Hi Patrick, hi Rachel,
I might have fixed half of the issue, I'd like you to test
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-05-07 09:45:47 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net, Rachel Chavez
rachel.chave...@gmail.com
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: please check
Hi Patrick, hi
still a single field separated by comma (assuming
some client doesn't pass an invalid value in. but that's also why this
is at the end of the log line)
The other advantage of doing it that the default http log format is
missing %U, which we find useful to have.
-Patrick
researching the subject, it seems that the only reliable way to
mitigate the issue is in the server software. Apache has implemented
code to disable renegotiation. Would it be possible to add an option in
haproxy to disable it?
-Patrick
*From: *Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com
*Sent: * 2014-05-16 13:23:43 E
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net, haproxy@formilux.org
haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *RE: Disable TLS renegotiation
Hi Patrick,
While going through the Qualys SSL test
(https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest
for this behavior (did a brief
search and didn't see one)? I'd be interested in following it as this
behavior will likely have an impact on an upcoming project I've got.
-Patrick
Haproxy 1.6 is very close to release.
See http://marc.info/?l=haproxym=140129354705695 and
http://marc.info/?l=haproxym=140085816115800
-Patrick
*From: *Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
*Sent: * 2014-06-18 08:40:55
Err, pardon the typo, 1.5 :-)
-Patrick
*From: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*Sent: * 2014-06-18 08:49:27 EDT
*To: *Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net, haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject: *Re: HAProxy 1.5 release
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-06-23 10:23:44 EDT
*To: *haproxy@formilux.org
*CC: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net, Rachel Chavez
rachel.chave...@gmail.com
*Subject: *3rd regression : enough is enough
*From: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
*Sent: * 2014-06-24 01:33:41 EDT
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org, Rachel Chavez rachel.chave...@gmail.com
*Subject: *Re: 3rd regression : enough is enough!
Hi Patrick,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:30:11PM -0400, Patrick
*From: *Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com
*Sent: * 2014-06-24 06:44:44 EDT
*To: *Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu, Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net
*CC: *haproxy@formilux.org haproxy@formilux.org, Rachel Chavez
rachel.chave
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#8.2.3
-Patrick
unsubscribing from the list. How many people unsubscribe because
they are tired of the spam?
I know I barely pay as much attention to the mailing list as I used to
because of the amount of spam. Oh look, a message. SPAM. Oh look, a
message. SPAM again...
-Patrick
*From: *Cyril Bonté cyril.bo...@free.fr
*Sent: * 2014-09-05 15:50:21 EDT
*To: *Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net, Willy Tarreau
w...@1wt.eu, Ghislain gad...@aqueos.com
*CC: *Mark Janssen maniac...@gmail.com, david rene comba lareu
shadow.of.sou...@gmail.com, Colin Ingarfield co
to determine how to handle the incoming
request? Are there any resources I should check out to help with this?
Thanks!
--
Patrick Kaeding
pkaed...@launchdarkly.com
txn.res:send(response)
txn:close()
end
I'm just curious if this is the right way to do this in HAProxy?
On May 07, 2015, at 10:56 AM, Patrick Slattery patrickmslatt...@mac.com wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to figure out how rewrite an incoming query string such as:
http://www.example.com/?domain
Hi, I'm trying to figure out how rewrite an incoming query string such as:
http://www.example.com/?domain=companyx.comsdn=sid=123456789sid_guid=d8bfbc1a-c790-4cf8-beec-ffbbf72d9476k=mystringstrid=1e9611e961t=%20?
becomes:
Wow, very nice, regular expressions sure are powerful :-)
Here is what I ended up with:
defaults
mode http
timeout connect 1s
timeout client 1s
timeout server 1s
listen HTTP-in
bind 127.0.0.1:80
reqrep .*(sid=[a-z0-9A-Z]*)(sid_guid=[^]*).*(strid=[0-9a-zA-Z]*)
\1\2\3shopurl=search.aspx
It looks like the mailing list archives stopped working mid-December.
https://marc.info/?l=haproxy
-Patrick
to your anwser but to the original
> question ;-)
>
Something that might satisfy both requests, why not just append to the
existing request-id?
unique-id-format %[req.hdr(X-Request-ID)],%{+X}o\
%ci:%cp_%fi:%fp_%Ts_%rt:%pid
This does result in a leading comma if X-Request-ID is unset. If that's
unpleasant, you could do something like write tiny LUA sample converter
to append a comma if the value is not empty.
-Patrick
On 2017/1/27 15:31, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Patrick Hemmer
> <hapr...@stormcloud9.net> wrote:
>> Something that might satisfy both requests, why not just append to the
>> existing request-id?
>>
>> unique-id-fo
nocancel () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x7f4d1a570ebc in _do_poll (p=, exp=-1440976915)
at src/ev_epoll.c:125
#2 0x7f4d1a4d3098 in run_poll_loop () at src/haproxy.c:1737
#3 0x7f4d1a4cf2c0 in main (argc=, argv=) at src/haproxy.c:2097
This is haproxy 1.7.0 on CentOS/7
Unfortunately I'm not sure what triggered it.
-Patrick
arguments (`...`). This led me to expect it was
comma delimited, which ended up not working.
-Patrick
),crc32()
I don't currently see a way to do this, but I could be missing something.
If it's not possible, any chance of getting it added?
-Patrick
e, I might be willing to attempt it. But
I've never worked in the haproxy source before, so not sure how involved
it would be.
Thanks
-Patrick
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
