Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-09 Thread Robert Whelan
2 PM Subject: Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg Your entire box or the servers go down? On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Robert Whelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While I didn't go with NO server.cfg I did go with a server.cfg and just > listed a hostname. Our box seems to

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-09 Thread J T
was (perhaps Valve > did something on the backend). > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Patrick Shelley" > To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list" > > Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 2:26 AM > Subject: Re: [hlds] More pl

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-09 Thread Robert Whelan
vember 09, 2008 2:26 AM Subject: Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg > Kevin - what about keeping unreserve in the cfg as well - or remove that > to? > Patrick :) > > > > On 11/9/08, AnAkIn .  wrote: >> >> Also, I can connect fine to my server from

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-09 Thread Kevin Ottalini
efore but it was (perhaps Valve did something on the backend). - Original Message - From: "Patrick Shelley" To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list" Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 2:26 AM Subject: Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg >

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-09 Thread Patrick Shelley
> > > > > > > 2008/11/9 Alec Sanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >> just confirmed this as well. removing the tags fills the servers > instantly > >> > >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-09 Thread AnAkIn .
/9 Alec Sanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> just confirmed this as well. removing the tags fills the servers instantly >> >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com >> > Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 14:54:10 -0800 >> > Subject

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-09 Thread AnAkIn .
PROTECTED] > > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com > > Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 14:54:10 -0800 > > Subject: Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg > > > > I can confirm this, I have a minimal server.cfg but as soon as I add > sv_tags > > or sv_allow_lobby_connect_on

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-08 Thread Alec Sanger
just confirmed this as well. removing the tags fills the servers instantly > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com > Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 14:54:10 -0800 > Subject: Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg > > I can confirm this, I have a minimal server.

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-08 Thread Kevin Ottalini
with those cvars but they certainly are not transparent to the matchmaking process. - Original Message - From: "Steven Barker" To: Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 1:47 PM Subject: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg WOW this is turning into some wiered shit, I have been h

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-08 Thread 1nsane
Hah it did before as I tried running a non lobby connect server with and whitout it. Maybe the update fixed it then :D. On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:24 PM, bl4nk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm pretty sure that reservations get dropped on map change. Just having > it in the server.cfg wouldn't help

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-08 Thread bl4nk
I'm pretty sure that reservations get dropped on map change. Just having it in the server.cfg wouldn't help you if a lobby host connected and then left. I believe they fixed that so that when that happens the reserved slots are timed out after a while. 1nsane wrote: > Oh? But then once it's res

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-08 Thread 1nsane
s up fixes an issue that people had > when trying to join servers (I forget the error message). > > > Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 17:02:44 -0500 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com > > Subject: Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg > > &

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-08 Thread 1nsane
Oh? But then once it's reserved the reservation lasts for negatives and it stays reserved even after people leave. That has been the case for me atleast. Unless there was some optional update that I missed? On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:08 PM, bl4nk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think you under

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-08 Thread Blood Letter
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com > Subject: Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg > > Well for starters you have "sv_tags "Server Browser Join Enabled"" but > that's a lie because you do not have "sv_unreserve" anywhere in your > server.cfg so

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-08 Thread bl4nk
I don't think you understand how it works. sv_unreserve only does something if the slot is reserved for lobby connections. The slots aren't (at least they shouldn't be) reserved until a lobby host attempts to join your server, so having it in your server.cfg isn't a requirement. 1nsane wrote: >

Re: [hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-08 Thread 1nsane
Well for starters you have "sv_tags "Server Browser Join Enabled"" but that's a lie because you do not have "sv_unreserve" anywhere in your server.cfg so your server is reserved only for the lobby and you're just annoying people who see those tags and can't join due to reservation. On Sat, Nov 8,

[hlds] More players with no server.cfg

2008-11-08 Thread Steven Barker
WOW this is turning into some wiered shit, I have been having some problems with my L4D server, by that I mean a lack of players joining, on my home server I start it and people join with in seconds (literally 4/4 within about 5 seconds) however on my externally hosted server it can go for hour