Yes, I too though Tom was being a bit harsh.
I have a customer that has just replaced all their disk with the latest kit.
But no PAV ...:(
Ours is not to reason why.
Shane ...
- Original Message -
From: Craddock, Chris
Tom Conley said;
HTF do you buy an RVA without IXFP? snip
Hi all and thank you for your replies.
Reading my post I realized I did a mistake, we have to activate new
Checkpoint mode from R4 to z2 for new z/OS 1.7 (and NOT for z/OS 1.6) we'll
install next year.
Sam, I said I need a COLD restart because it's stated in IBM papers.
Thanks
Max Scarpa
DB2
Hello Mike,
Before HCD and IODFs the esoteric token was generated in the IOGEN
implicitly. So the first esoteric was 1 sequentially.
So if you changed the order of esoteric entries, the tokens changed and so
maybe caused catalogued dataset access problems.
When I turned on the tokens in my
Lieven,
I takes 4 - 5 hours to merge partially filled 3490's to 1 9840. The 9840 has
a nominal (uncompressed) capacity of 20GB, I don't know the capacity of the
3590's. Merging from 3480 will require more (4x?) tapemounts, unless they
are full, so processing time might be even more.
You must
I got a problem :
IKJEFTSR interface error
Authorized program 'VRASPFLK'. Return code = 20.
Reason code = 56.
I have listed the library to APF and listed also in
IKJTSOxx.
Someone have any sugestion ...?
Thanks for the attention.
Dave,
Your reply is wrong on so many levels that I don't know where to start. It is
obvious to me that the topic of this thread *is not clear to you.*
In the case of an ABEND or CICS close immediate situation, what information
would you like Mark to write to the file? And where is this
Lieven,
When I converted the 3480s to 3490Es using the CA-DISK MERGE utility, I
would do 50 input tapes at a time. These tapes then went to one of five
output tapes. The output tapes were grouped by how long the backup dataset
was retained. Doing the conversion this way would took about 6-8 hours
In a message dated 7/6/2005 5:22:42 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the case of an ABEND or CICS close immediate situation, what
information would you like Mark to write to the file? And where is this
information
supposed to come from?
I think you are
A dataset is pre-allocated using the TSO allocate command using a
Cylinders with primary allocation of cylinders and 333 secondary
space with a list of volumes. When writing into the dataset in a
separate step, I would expect that on the second volume, A primary
allocation space will be
DFSMS: Using Data Sets has the details. Using SMS, you can allocate data
sets with the guaranteed space attribute, which sounds like what you want
to do.
Regards,
John Kalinich
Computer Sciences Corp
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bo Xie
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 10:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Does z/OS 24 bit,31 bit or 64 bit addressing mode
affect 1 byte is 8 bits?
Hi,
UNIX98 standard ed
Copy the data sets elsewhere and INITialize the volume using DSF.
NO! That will make the problem no better and probably worse.
If you do a minimal INIT (just VTOC), then the tracks for all the
datasets that used to be on the volume will STILL be assigned in the
back-store. If you do a
In a message dated 7/5/2005 11:52:51 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
funds are somewhere south of the salesman's best
price and management decides to buy less than half
a solution... but what would we know?
Missing something in the loop? Keep it running, keep
What he could do is move all the datasets off a volume, then DELETE
the volume from the RVA control panel (which releases the backstore),
then redefine the volume and move datasets back. This could be very
tedious.
Just reread what I typed. Assuming that he moved the datasets to
another
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 08:51:36 +0800, Ron and Jenny Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CABLE.COM wrote:
Seeing as the dataset is opened, wouldn't there be a type 42-6 record for
it
that is not just using the relative concat id?
Good thought, but no go. I just ran a test and not even the STEPLIB
that my
When I have a lot of VSAM files to rename, I use DFDSS to do the rename
with filtering, here is an example
//S02 EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=6000K,TIME=95
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=A
//SYSIN DD *
John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
Webshpere is IBM term for their family of middleware.
If you mean Websphere Application Server, it is IBM's J2EE application
server.
Out of the box you can't use Websphere as a DNS server or a DHCP server,
but you can use it as a Web server. Technically I think
The following ROT are still reasonable-
- Individual local page datasets should not exceed 30% (or 25% if you
choose) utilization because the contigious slot allocation algorithm becomes
inefficient/unsuccessful for that dataset. The utilization% at a total
paging subsystem level is irrelevent
I never even envisioned automated tools looking at VSAM stats. My
ASSumption when reading Mark's posts was that he was referring to individual
programmers looking at individual VSAM file stats for guidance. My
experience is obviously severely limited in this regard, as in my varied
positions
See my earlier reply to Mr. Richards for the ASSumptions behind that
statement.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Ted MacNEIL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 6:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM VSAM Statistics are often Bogus
...
Just because they are
snip
Is anyone out there using or did use OS/EM from Trident Data Systems?
Did it save your company money? Easy to use? etc..
/snip
Great product, but IMHO, not worht the expense. IBM provides native
code to perform 95% plus of the OS/EM functionality, at no extra
expense.
At one time, this was
Where is the library containing VRASPFLK located? LPA? Linklist?
STEPLIB? ISPLLIB? LIBDEFed? TSOLIBed?
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Albertus Dwisulami
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 6:00 AM
To:
Dave Juraschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
... CICS close immediate situation
This really is a red herring.
The CICS CEMT PERFORM SHUT IMMEDIATE is completely IBM code. This is an
example of where this is absolutely not a user/application/customer
problem.
From: caleb ong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 9:35 PM
Subject: RVA: How to free up space from deleted datasets wtihout IXFP
We have a RVA with NCL nearing 85%. We don't have IXFP. We are trying to
free up space to bring down the NCL.
Without
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
[ snip ]
Can someone tell me why I never saw the post below? I get the
feeling I have some setting such that I'm missing some of the
posts on ibm-main.
If you get your IBM-MAIN via email, you
Arghhh, following up on my own post. Bad form as usual.
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 11:16 -0400, David Andrews wrote:
From: caleb ong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RVA: How to free up space from deleted datasets wtihout IXFP
Caleb, you should post to the list rather than the newsgroup.
Whoops. I see
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 06:57:38 EDT, Bill Fairchild wrote:
In a message dated 7/6/2005 5:22:42 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
Bob Richards writes:
In the case of an ABEND or CICS close immediate situation, what
information would you like Mark to write to the file? And where is this
information
You could try to bring the partition down (deactivate it).
We used to run linux/390 on a partition, and it doesn't have any IXFP,
so our STK CE told us to bring the partition down once a week for the
SVA to free up deleted stuff.
SteveBui
-Original Message-
From: IBM
In a message dated 7/6/2005 10:26:57 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
invalid data? If your checking statement said you had $3,127.47 but next
to it in parentheses it said (but this amount is invalid), would you go
out and try to spend the money? No, I think you'd be
I think you really need to get SVAA ASAP.
http://www.stortek.com/products/category_page2011.html
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(office) 301.986.3574
If
The Honeywell Series 6000 boxes - taken from GE design, IIRC - had 36-bit
addressable words, that could be interpreted as 6 6-bit BCD characters or 4
9-bit ASCII characters.
Decades ago, I wrote some GMAP (was that the assembler, or am I thinking of
Prime Computer's PRIMOS assembler?) routines
Bruce Black wrote:
Copy the data sets elsewhere and INITialize the volume using DSF.
NO! That will make the problem no better and probably worse.
If you do a minimal INIT (just VTOC), then the tracks for all the
datasets that used to be on the volume will STILL be assigned in the
We've still got one and it is definitely the IXFP software that frees up the
backend storage when doing a pack init.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: Edward E. Jaffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RVA: How to free up
I am trying to figure out precisely what is destructive overlap. Does
destructive overlap
imply nonconcurrent copy (and vice versa)? For example:
ds 0d
a ds 12x
b ds 16x
mvc a(16),b
Here is an overlap but it is non-destructive. I would assume the copy
is concurrent?
But if I code
Bruce,
Duh, must have been seriously sleep deprived when I agreed with this
madness. You are correct, of course. I was probably still in shock that
anyone would have an RVA without IXFP. That's like running a car on rims.
Nice catch.
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Black
On 6-Jul-2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Thomen) wrote:
VSAM is a particularly complex access method, much more so than the others.
Is VSAM these days pretty much synonymous with KSDS?
At one time, I worked in a shop where I converted all of our Univac 9030 data to
IBM, and made everything
- Original Message -
From: David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: How to free up space from deleted datasets wtihout IXFP
One way to free up space on your RVA without IXFP is to fill up your
volumes with
You want good stats to base things such as REORGs on? Go to DB2. And
pay for it.
Only in FOSS will you get something for free (either Libre or Gratis).
And, in FOSS, if you don't like it, you can fix it yourself. If you
don't have the talent to fix it yourself, then either: (1) nicely ask
the
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 6:00 AM
Subject: problem IKJEFTSR
I got a problem :
IKJEFTSR interface error
Authorized program 'VRASPFLK'. Return code = 20.
Reason
In a message dated 7/6/2005 11:35:21 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, in some shops, VSAM is obsolete altogether (except for databases
that
use VSAM that programmers don't see).
VSAM's being obsolete is like saying TSO is obsolete. VSAM has been the
Well, not everywhere. RRDS/ESDS in my experience are still actively used,
especially where database complexity would be a performance drawback instead
of an advantage. Not *every* business transaction requires a database.
KISS is still a good design principle.
Peter
-Original Message-
In a recent note, Greg Smith said:
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:26:01 -0400
ds 0d
a ds 12x
b ds 16x
But if I code
mvc b(16),a
the overlap is destructive (ie b won't necessarily be an exact copy of
a). Would a
concurrent copy occur? (in this case, a concurrent copy could
DB2 is also loaded into VSAM datasets. Also, don't forget the linear
datasets used by the OS.
Bill Fairchild wrote:
In a message dated 7/6/2005 11:35:21 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, in some shops, VSAM is obsolete altogether (except for databases
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
[ snip ]
No. I believe the destructive character of the overlap has
long been part of the specification of MVC. In particular,
programmers of old were accustomed to blanking out a buffer with:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Thomen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: IBM VSAM Statistics are often Bogus
Had I worked in VSAM for 30+ years I'd have made this change a long time
ago and this issue would never
Don't forget the all time favorite method for clearing a print buffer:
MVI PBUF,C' '
MVC PBUF+1(132),PBUF
PBUF DS CL133
I have never heard of it being called a destructive overlap before. I
have always herad it called a destructive move.
Fought a bug in a CICS COBOL program for
...
Decades ago, I wrote some GMAP
...
General Macro Assembly Program(me).
I learned on a Level 66, running GCOS-8.
It had just had its name changed from GECOS, after Honeywell bought
General Electric's computer division
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
--Deming
In a recent note, Chase, John said:
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:51:50 -0500
MVI C' ',A
Hmmm Is it really true that Lysdexics have more nuf? :-)
Have you heard about the man who was insomniac, agnostic and dyslexic?
MVC A+1(L'A'-1),A
I once astonished Ed Jaffe (or
Hello listserv members,
Mark Thomen really hit my hot button on his last response:
Ask Ron Ferguson who preaches don't reorg based on split counts, or
check out the VSAM Demystified Redbook. Or do your own studies.
Which is better - downtime for a major application, or reorging a
file
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:34:54 GMT Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:On 6-Jul-2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Thomen) wrote:
: VSAM is a particularly complex access method, much more so than the others.
:Is VSAM these days pretty much synonymous with KSDS?
:At one time, I worked in a shop
Thanks for the info. I will keep that in mind for future reference.
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I once astonished Ed Jaffe (or was it Bruce Black) by stating that
I don't write assembler code (or was it that I don't read dumps).
Every now and again I feel the need to provide proof.
And for Steve's
In a message dated 7/6/2005 12:56:40 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It doesn't take a weatherman to know
which the wind is blowing.
...which WAY the wind is blowing. (Unless you were trying to imply
no 'way' in your original sentence?)
If we are going to
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, Greg Smith said:
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:26:01 -0400
ds 0d
a ds 12x
b ds 16x
But if I code
mvc b(16),a
the overlap is destructive (ie b won't necessarily be an exact copy of
a). Would a
concurrent copy occur? (in this case, a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:OFD38D43EF.26E4669D-ON85257036.005F128B-85257036.005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Ok, I'll be the whipping boy.
Why can't the Operating System be Enhanced to intercept the Abend and
close the files.
That's what module IFG0TC0A (IFG-gotcha) does.It is an
In a message dated 7/6/2005 2:51:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Most of the VSAM control blocks are in user key. If these have been
overlaid or incorrectly modified, writing this data to the catalog may
BREAK THE DATA SET. The effects of breaking the data set
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 13:02:22 -0500, Steve Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
And for Steve's doubts about destructive overlap:
Ranked Search Results for Book: dz9zr003
z/Architecture Principles of Operation
10 topics have matches for: destructive overlap
1. MOVE LONG, 7.5.90
2.
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:16:52 -0400, David Andrews wrote:
One way to free up space on your RVA without IXFP is to fill up your
volumes with large datasets containing binary zeros, then delete those
datasets. The backend will still remember those tracks as they do
without IXFP today, but they'll
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 20:56:49 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
Neither RRDS or ESDS have any particular advantage over BDAM (despite IBM
calling it obsolete) or BSAM/QSAM.
Hmm, you get VSAM statistics for RRDS and ESDS. Isn't that an advantage...
g, d r
Norbert Friemel
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:20:39 -0700, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Interesting. We no longer have an RVA, so I can't try anything. But I
seem to remember the NCL going down when we reinitialized a volume.
OTOH, we did run IXFP. That probably explains why we observed that
phenomenon.
...
1) One can always do one's own interval accounting by opening and closing
the file periodically.
...
I hope you are joking!
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
--Deming
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 7:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM VSAM Statistics are often Bogus
...
1) One can always do one's own interval accounting by
...
have seen people referring to VSAM as IBM's ISAM
...
That's like saying it's IBM's PDSE, z/OS, etc.
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
--Deming
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Bill Fairchild writes:
A Devil's Advocate might be tempted to say just because you don't ABEND
does not mean that
a user did not overlay or incorrectly modify VSAM control blocks that are
in user key. How can
you ever trust the stats?
and there is of course a sense in which his argument
A Devil's Advocate might be tempted to say just because you don't ABEND does
not mean that a user did not overlay or incorrectly modify VSAM control
blocks that are in user key. How can you ever trust the stats?
Bill Fairchild
Note:
CICS, recovering an application abend (via DTB) does not have
...
Who said IBM doesn't have a sense of humor? Thanks,Mark, that gave me
the giggles.
...
I verified this one years ago.
I don't know if it's still true.
The programme prefix for dfpSMS is IGD.
Years ago, either the main module or an alias was IGDZILLA.
“I, God-Zilla”.
(8-{]}
-teD
In
...
Why? I've been known to do CLOSE TYPE=T on sequential datasets after
processing n records. Of course, IIRC, it was a specialized
application. Lost is the mists of pre-history, now.
...
Open/Close processing is not cheap.
Also, if you have (partial-)release on close, you can easily create a
I'm working on my Cobol-Analyzer called COBANAL (www.cbttape.org file321). to
support the newest Cobol-Compiler.
Anybody running this version and is able to send me a load-module compiled with
Enterprise Cobol V3.4 including a
compile listing? Please contact me and I'll give you more details.
Will this thread never end? Mark Thomen explained now several times the why and
the current state of this issue. Please raise requirements if you relay on
those statistics and explain the business case
and also how did you handle this the last nn years in the past. I believe a lot
of customers
...
As for Alte-Leipziger I can say it's not issue for us.
...
I couldn't find the meaning of that compound word.
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
--Deming
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
In a message dated 7/6/2005 4:24:41 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A Devil's Advocate might be tempted to say just because you don't ABEND
does not mean that
a user did not overlay or incorrectly modify VSAM control blocks that are
in user key. How can
you ever
Peter,
Well, as long as we are bearing our sins, I must humbly admit that I have coded
REXX to process the entire catalog structure based on LISTCAT output (then
changed to CSI output) and then taken actions. The shame of it all. I have Ron
F. to thank for showing me the error of my ways of
Hey,
I thought I'd throw this one up just in case (well, just in case):
I am trying to collect Sysplex-wide WLM performance data, compare actual
vs. desired. Unfortunately, or so it seems, WLM's IWMRCOLL macro only
provides information for the system on which it is invoked on. The
(Sorry for the duplicate post - it showed up in the wrong thread).
Hey,
I thought I'd throw this one up just in case (well, just in case):
I am trying to collect Sysplex-wide WLM performance data, compare actual
vs. desired. Unfortunately, or so it seems, WLM's IWMRCOLL macro only
provides
On Jul 6, 2005, at 3:30 PM, Norbert Friemel wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 20:56:49 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
Neither RRDS or ESDS have any particular advantage over BDAM (despite
IBM
calling it obsolete) or BSAM/QSAM.
Hmm, you get VSAM statistics for RRDS and ESDS. Isn't that an
On Jul 5, 2005, at 7:00 PM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
...
1) One can always do one's own interval accounting by opening and
closing
the file periodically.
...
I hope you are joking!
Ted,
Along similar lines we had a programmer close and open a vsam dataset
after each search. I agree with you.
STEPLIB ...
Albertus SD
--- Imbriale, Donald (Exchange) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Where is the library containing VRASPFLK located?
LPA? Linklist?
STEPLIB? ISPLLIB? LIBDEFed? TSOLIBed?
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL
Tom, et al,
I was just thinking... CICS aside, when a job ABENDS while updating a KSDS
file, what is the most common thing that happens to allow the job to be
rerun? Delete and restore the KSDS, right? So what good are the accumulated
statistics at this point - valid or invalid? Well there worth
In a message dated 7/6/2005 6:52:42 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The penance for both of us is to write Invalid data is invalid data ten
thousand times. Under ISPF EDIT, it should take us roughly ten seconds. vbg
R10 Invalid data is invalid data
rr
rr
In a message dated 7/6/2005 7:00:53 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anybody have any notable knowledge in this area?
Thanks in advance.
Cheryl even had the presence to market it as GoalTender.
_www.watsonwalker.com_ (http://www.watsonwalker.com)
Ed,
You must be a typist. It took me 7 of the 10 to type the words!
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ed Finnell
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 10:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:Re: IBM VSAM
On Jul 6, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
I never even envisioned automated tools looking at VSAM stats. My
ASSumption when reading Mark's posts was that he was referring to
individual
programmers looking at individual VSAM file stats for guidance. My
experience is obviously
In a message dated 7/6/2005 9:43:31 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You must be a typist. It took me 7 of the 10 to type the words!
I'm decent, but was able to just cut and paste! Then I went and
did a review of the Oracle Grid. Hmmm, wonder how in the world they
John,
I'll take your word on the automation coding time. For now, I off to search the
Internet for the meaning of boustrophedon. grin
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
john gilmore
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005
In a message dated 7/6/2005 9:54:54 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
boustrophedon
'Hot air balloon'
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not quite!
It is a writing style compare to an ox plowing a field where
.noitcerid etisoppo eht ni seog dna snrut ylerem eh
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ed Finnell
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005
On Jul 6, 2005, at 9:48 PM, Ed Finnell wrote:
--SNIP-
I'm decent, but was able to just cut and paste! Then I went and
did a review of the Oracle Grid. Hmmm, wonder how in the world they
stay up forever with no abends and no catalogs??? Hmmm.
Well, I am not a ORACLE
I have done some research and it would appear that this data is
available by calling the RMF sysplex data server, quizzing SMF 72 subtype
3.
Does anybody have any experience doing that? Any caveats?
I had a play with extracting data from the Sysplex server a while back.
Basically pretty
At 07:36 -0500 on 07/06/2005, Chase, John wrote about Re: IBM VSAM
Statistics are often Bogus:
The fact remains that CEMT P SHUT I causes an ABNORMAL termination of CICS,
as would the MVS CANCEL or FORCE command. The fact also remains that on a
commanded ABNORMAL termination of (anything),
88 matches
Mail list logo
