Make sure you have id=13657 at the end. The URL has been truncated.
Crispin Hugo
Systems Programmer, Macro 4
http://www.macro4.com/
Macro 4 plc, The Orangery, Turners Hill Road, Worth, Crawley, RH10 4SS
Direct Line: +44 (0)1293 872121 Switchboard: +44 (0) 1293 872000
Fax: +44 (0) 1293
Hunkeler Peter (KIUB 34) wrote:
http://technology.inq7.net/infotech/infotech/view_article.php?article_i
d=13657
That link only brings me to a sitemap page. No hint about
you wanted to show us. What should I be looking for?
You should fix the wrap.
Stupid me. After clicking the link I manually appended everything
after the first / (including the wrapped 57) at the end of the
address shown in IE's address line. Didn't recognize the start
of the URL was changed to *services*.inq7.net from *technology*...
Sorry to have bothered you
Peter
Is this an old article? The date suggests no but what is said
is what IBM said at least 2 years ago. I thought they have set
sails in the meantime...
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
victorzhang_mvscn wrote:
Hello list,
Does z900 support 3174 connectivity? I have a customer who currently
running z800 and has 3174 connection with a tape library. He will
upgrade to z900 soon, I wonder if 3174 is still supported by z900 or
I will notify customer to upgrade tape library
Giovanni Cerquone wrote:
Dear folks;
As a possibly a neverending debate, I wanto to know, besides storage and
CPU usage implications, what are the benefits of not having all the smf
records ON with the exception of 4,5 and 99.
I don't have neither the VSAM SMF records ON nor the CICS
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/07/2006
at 07:26 AM, Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Or something like 'CAPS ON LOCK' and 'CAPS OFF LOCK'
How about CAPS OFF WARN and CAPS ON WARN?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
And what's the best way to put a private library dynamically in one's
SYSEXEC concatenation? Would that be LIBDEF?
ALTLIB.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
At 06:18 PM 8/7/2006, Ed Finnell wrote:
In a message dated 8/7/2006 4:18:58 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
the nite and another guy is moving some things off to JSF. Just
thought I'd ask the question here before opening an issue with IBM.
We did a search at the IBM
with Java. We need to know how to call our old existing COBOL routines
from Java.
Done that. It is easy.
Warning, I have never done this and I don't speak COBOL, but... You need
to make a JNI call from the IBM Java environment into a compiled program
running in an LE-conforming environment.
Just a heads up for those running SoftwareAG products like ADABAS to have
your IT Financial folks contact the local rep. I am planning an upgrade to
z9BC's where I go from 688MIPS/119MSUs to 745MIPS/104MSUs and the May
inquiry said no upgrade fees (they charge for MSUs).
Got a panic call
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 06:41 -0500, Jim Marshall wrote:
There is Pre-z9 rates and then z9 RATES. The long and short is a $138K
upgrade charge to go from 119 MSUs to 104 MSUs.
Cute ...
Wonder if IBMs mickey-mouse marketing MIPS sleight of hand is starting
to bite, and the ISVs are starting to
Steve,
What is it you need to do once it ends? Do *you* just need to know that
it has run? Do you need to do something once it runs? Do you need to
know how it completed?
Well, currenty I only need to submit the job and need the information that
it ended.
But I guess in the near future I need
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
My favorite on spelling was a sign I once so that read Gone
Ghoti'ing. This signified that the person was not that since
he was currently Fishing (GHOTI being an alternate/odd way of
spelling
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 23:28:32 -0600, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Could this be automated? In, e.g., Mark's putative CHGIT macro,
to 'X' all lines containing '//*' before doing the CHANGE ALL X?
I know; I need to RTFM. But I'd be grateful for a pointer to
a command name.
x all //* 1
Shane wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 06:41 -0500, Jim Marshall wrote:
There is Pre-z9 rates and then z9 RATES. The long and short is a $138K
upgrade charge to go from 119 MSUs to 104 MSUs.
Cute ...
Wonder if IBMs mickey-mouse marketing MIPS sleight of hand is starting
to bite, and the ISVs
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:28:40 -0600, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It may take a little longer, but I don't mind going into each
member and doing an ISPF CHANGE ALL command for tape_unt and
vend_hlq to whatever I need. If I know I will do a lot of this
At least two contributors to
Michael Knigge wrote:
Steve,
What is it you need to do once it ends? Do *you* just need to know that
it has run? Do you need to do something once it runs? Do you need to
know how it completed?
Well, currenty I only need to submit the job and need the information that
it ended.
But I guess
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:37:26 -0500, Tom Marchant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Still, it would be nice if the vendors would use set symbols and include a
member in all the jobs so that the symbols could be set in one place.
What would you do for SYSIN? Typically install jobs contain (at a
minimum)
I found a Power Point Enterprise COBOL and Java Interoperation. Nick
Tindall and Stephen Miller It's advice is to use a OO COBOL Class as a
wrapper to call procedural COBOL. In CICS I have sucsessfully called
procedureal COBOL from Java, but using the JCICS classes.
What is the JCICS doing
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:09:27 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW: Cost
of offload jobs is rather irrelevant, beacuse usually they don't burn
CPU cycles during rush hours.
No, they burn cycles whenever a dump is triggered by a MAN dataset
filling up. Yes, in some small shops / environments
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Vendor JCL (was: WHY IS JCL ALLERGIC ... )
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:37:26 -0500, Tom Marchant
I was listening to an IBM podcast on the mainframe, discussing how new
developers can easily get into host development through tools like WebSphere
Developer For zSeries. Does anyone on this list use that product? If so, do you
like it? How did/does it fit into your existing development
Is there any utility that will display all of the name/token entries on
a system? I am concerned about my new JES2 user exit code that is using
the service and would like to see the entries.
I searched the archives and the CBT tape and of course the IBM Manuals
but did not see anything that
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 08:08, Michael Knigge wrote:
Well, currenty I only need to submit the job and need the
information that it ended. ...
You can use the TSO STATUS command or roll your own; the JOBRLSE member
in file 183 at http://gsf-soft.com/Freeware/ show you how to use the
Hi Lizette,
You didn't say COMPRESSED so if you are not you might try it. It takes
a little CPU but is well worth it give the size reduction for a typical
SVC dump. As an aside I think IBM plans some day to make some of the
enhancements to SVC dump that have already been incorporated in Stand
I think there must be a distiction between calling a module and another
transaction. E.g. with IMS you can do a program to program switch from
a IMS Java tran to an IMS COBOL tran, but these are separate
transactions (Units of work). I don't know enough about CICS but I
guess a COMMAREA call
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Knigge
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 7:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to Submit and monitor a Job?
snip
But I guess in the near future I need more: is it running, which
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Vendor JCL (was: WHY IS JCL ALLERGIC ... )
snip
Of course, I am not a developer, so I may well be
The freeware MXI does this (NTOK command) - download from www.rs.com and
also cbt files 409 and 410
ShowZOS (aka SHOWMVS) does it as well (cbt files 492?)
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi/
A CICS COMMAREA is just a parameter between two programs. It is in the same
unit of work and transaction.
The Technology office persion is using the OO COBOL wrapper to make a class
that Java can call. He is having trouble finding the procedural COBOL
module in the PDS. I am suggesting
In a recent note, Tom Marchant said:
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:11:09 -0500
x all //* 1 3
Thanks. And now a little mystery. The test macro:
/* Rexx */ signal on novalue; /*
*/
trace R
address 'ISREDIT'
'MACRO (EARGS)'
/* Make no changes in comments.
*/
'EXCLUDE //* ALL 1 3'
exit(
In a message dated 8/8/2006 6:18:50 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
show any symptoms. For a test on another system we removed MIM
temporarily and tired it again. This time the ASID pointed to
JES2MON. Hence our confusion. We'll open an issue with IBM and follow
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 23:46 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
You should fix the wrap.
I wish the OP had also added a word or two about the article. There are
a couple of people here who post URLs to ibm-main with the unhelpful
comment interesting article.
I'm grateful for the pointers, of course.
Mark;
Another debate is what's small and what's large. I'm a 303304 complex and
I do not condider myself large. I have one (1) man dataset per 3390-9
volume and each is dumped four times a day and I don't have VSAM nor CICS
activity logged.
I prefer to have all the possible records rather
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:29:32 -0500, Giovanni Cerquone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another debate is what's small and what's large. I'm a 303304 complex and
I do not condider myself large.
Too hard to debate that... it's always relative. Someone on a small
z800 might think you are a large shop.
Check to make sure you re-assembled all JES2 interface tables and/or
interface modules for the various products. We had a problem like this
once when we changed z/OS levels, JES2 control blocks and data areas had
changed; the vendors were able to handle it, but it took place when you
ran
We are running recycle processing which is using 3 drives. 1 for the
recycle tape .. and 1 each for the spill and alternate spill. for a tape
that is barely used say 1.3million 16K blocks it takes approx 2 hours ??
our Tape channel speed isnt even being used to 1/2 of its capacity ?? can
z/OS 1.5; need to FTP PUT a directory structure to a remote system.
How? PUT /a/b/c/* gives FILE /a/b/c/* NOT FOUND; MPUT /a/b/c/* sends
all the files without maintaining the directory structure.
TIA,
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN
How about using pax to create an archive file. You can then FTP this
archive file to a remote system. This way you preserve the entire directory
structure, including any sub-directories that may be present.
--
For IBM-MAIN
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Benjamin White
Try to use the mkdir and cd commands to create
directories on the target system before the put or file.
I was hoping to avoid having to do that, but it looks like I'll have to
wait until we get z/OS
Well, the people on this list certainly don't need
training on what we have scheduled, surely. But you
may know some people in your applications groups that
could use a little updating. Enrollment deadline is
fast approaching, so please spread the word to the
appropriate corners of your
We are planning to set up GRS in our 2 LPAR mainframe to get familiar with
its operations. Anyone out there done this?
Care to share your experiences? Any pointers to manuals/SHARE talks on this
topic.
Thanks
John Norgauer
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB
What is your overall CPU utilization?
What is HSM's dispatching priority relative to your other workloads?
Do you have the CDSs defined with the recommended half meg of buffer
space?
-Original Message-
From: Ginnie Nuckles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 11:33
Thanks so much to all responders and Mark, as always, very proficiency.
Giovanni
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ramiro Camposagrado
How about using pax to create an archive file. You can then
FTP this archive file to a remote system. This way you
preserve the entire directory structure, including any
sub-directories that
In a message dated 8/8/2006 11:18:47 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, we don't have any flavor of 'zip' on z/OS (except GIMUNZIP, which
probably isn't compatible with anything non-SMP/E).
_http://www.info-zip.org/_ (http://www.info-zip.org/)
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:03:24 -0400, Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then the idea that ISVs don't know SMP/E is a bit out there -- well
I'd hope that ISVs know SMP/E.
I'd hope so too, but some vendors consistently do it wrong.
Some examples:
Providing PTFs without proper
I'm hoping some of the IBM LE folk who lurk here can answer a question I had
over on the CICS-L list.
CICS TS 3.1 introduced the XOPTS(LEASM) parameter to permit LE-compliant
Assembler programs to be the frst program in a CICS transaction. The CICS
Assembler translator and macros produce an LE
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 11:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Vendor JCL (was: WHY IS JCL ALLERGIC ... )
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:03:24 -0400, Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:36:25 -0400, Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So there are lots of things that vendors have to take into
consideration, and the biggest one today are the Sr. Systems
Programmers
who don't know what a USERMOD is or a JES exit.
Now there's a statement that I
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 11:41:44 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:03:24 -0400, Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) wrote:
And then the idea that ISVs don't know SMP/E is a bit out there -- well
I'd hope that ISVs know SMP/E.
I'd hope so too, but some vendors consistently do it wrong.
Some
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:47:16 -0500, Tom Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Providing PTFs without proper PREs
Providing PTFs that don't SUP when they should
Routinely asking a customer to use BYPASS ID
PTF A has a PRE on FMID B, but FMID B has a SUP on PTF A
Failure to provide UCLIN to create
Peter,
you can use X.C. Getmain or the LE callable service
to obtain more storage. Don't know why such a limit during
initialization exist.
Roland
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:24:04 -0400, Farley, Peter x23353
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Benjamin White
Z/OS USS has TAR which can create a backup of a directory
tree. Microsoft does not give you TAR, but there are free
versions of TAR for MS Windows, With TAR you can also use
COMPRESS to make it
Thanks Roland, yes, that I know. The discussion on CICS-L covered that as
well. The real question is what happens during LE initialization of your
LEASM main program when your DSA/DFHEISTG size is 4K bytes. Does CICS LE
initialization crap out, or does some other nasty surprise await your
In my opinion, you can always compute the value R13 + 4K, put it
into another register and do a USING on this. I recall that I've done this
when I wrote CICS ASSEMBLER programs some ten years ago. The parameter
restrictions of macro DFHEIENT don't matter (much).
Kind regards
Bernd
Am
Cross posted to IBMTCP_L and IBM-MAIN
I'm lost ... Is there any way to force a specific Reply-To address
through the z/OS SMTP Server?
I have a job scheduler and automated ops package that can send to SMTP
(Control/M and /O). Their setup does not contain a 'Reply-To' address.
I would like to
Hello List: I have a problem to print o with DITTO a file ksds. This file
is in one lpar, and the problema occurs when we pass the file to another
lpar. The ength is 133 y the key legth is 41 bytes, we have O/390 2.10 on
Z890 2086, disk is shark. We done this test, pass the same file to
In a message dated 8/8/2006 2:33:46 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
try to go back to the mainframe. Ideally I could do this based upon a
specific sender (i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] becomes [EMAIL PROTECTED]). I
tried the header rewrite rules but it doesn't appear to
Thanks Sam, and everyone else.
We have no issue with the DASD part of the dump. I have that setup as
stripped. It is just the virtual dump I am having difficutly with. We have
limited storage and so our MAXSPACE can only go to about 4.5G. The 6G or 8G is
out of the question right now. I
Lizett Koehler wrote on 08/08/2006 04:02:23 PM:
Will look at Compressed to see if it could provide any releif.
We have a large inventory of compressed dumps in Poughkeepsie, and our
experience suggests that you'll save around 40% of the space that you'd use
without compression.
Bob Wright -
Ken,
You need to send the header string Reply-To: in your message header.
I.e.:
Reply-To: Technical Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I believe it is up to the mail client to use or offer to use this
address in place of the From:
address.
I have not found a reference to Reply-To in the SMTP RFC.
On
40s (dynamic DD) are also in the 30s, so they are
excluded as well
But, IIRC, the 40's have dataset names.
I know the 30's have only DDNames.
When in doubt.
PANIC!!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
http://www.info-zip.org/
Info zip hasn't been maintained for a long time.
IIRC, there is no 'true' z/OS version; the last being for OS/390 V2R10.
You get what you pay for.
It was one I investigated last November.
I started a project to convert from PKZIP for z/OS to ZIP/390.
Not due to the
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:58:44 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
40s (dynamic DD) are also in the 30s, so they are
excluded as well
But, IIRC, the 40's have dataset names.
I know the 30's have only DDNames.
When in doubt.
PANIC!!
How 'bout when in doubt, RTFM. :-)
I don't see any
How 'bout when in doubt, RTFM. :-)
Unlike others, I am willing to admit I was wrong.
The local Montanna's doesn't seem to have a Funny Manual available.
I was going by (obviously shaky) memory.
They say the mind is the second thing to go.
I'll be diddly dadburned if I can recall what the
our cpu is fine ,, hsm has high priority and the BCDS (this is on the
backup recycle ,,) is at 1/2M of buffer space. this is supposed to be
9Mper second channel but it looks like we are only getting 2 ?? its tape to
tape on A60 controller 3590's 2 paths the drives are B11's 128 track ???
In a recent note, Gary DiPillo said:
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:51:13 -0400
I have not found a reference to Reply-To in the SMTP RFC.
(replying without looking) Is it not in RFC 822?
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 09:03 -0700, John Norgauer wrote:
We are planning to set up GRS in our 2 LPAR mainframe to get familiar with
its operations. Anyone out there done this?
Care to share your experiences? Any pointers to manuals/SHARE talks on this
topic.
Define a CTC, then GRS planning -
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 21:18:21 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I was going by (obviously shaky) memory.
Ted,
Were you thinking of the SMF Type 42 records, maybe? One of its subtypes
(subtype 6) has dataset names and oodles of tuning/performance
information. (I've always been a fan of T42-6.)
--
Look here for RFC 2822
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 08/08/2006
05:29:39 PM:
In a recent note, Gary DiPillo said:
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:51:13 -0400
I have not found a reference to Reply-To in the SMTP RFC.
Another interesting JCL thing.
If you invoke a program such as REXX with JCL and pass a parm with
back slashes in it, the back slashes work fine. Ex :
//JS001 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,PARM='%SAYPRM \X\XX'
However, when I do essentially the same JCL with a program which
Were you thinking of the SMF Type 42 records, maybe?
One of its subtypes (subtype 6) has dataset names and oodles of
tuning/performance information.
(I've always been a fan of T42-6.)
Got it in one!
Now that our shop has MXG again, I am going to be paying with all the DSN
records.
When in
we use the ROOM parm to contain a deliverly location for print out. And we
have been using for years the ROOM program from the CBT tape, file 325
that updates the ROOM value for a TSO user.
Well it's time for us to upgrade to z/OS 1.7 and I'd rather not go through
the check out and
In a recent note, John Mattson said:
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:44:33 -0700
Another interesting JCL thing.
If you invoke a program such as REXX with JCL and pass a parm with
back slashes in it, the back slashes work fine. Ex :
//JS001 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,PARM='%SAYPRM
To be honest, I dislike all those autocust things.
I never found that it made the install any easier. Same
with the rest of them. Mostly front ends to SMP/E, to cover up for
the
fact that the vendor doesn't have a clue how to create proper SYSMODs.
Let alone HOLDDATA.
I can't speak for
On 8 Aug 2006 15:41:36 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
To be honest, I dislike all those autocust things.
I never found that it made the install any easier. Same
with the rest of them. Mostly front ends to SMP/E, to cover up for
the
fact that the vendor doesn't have a clue how
On 8/8/2006 5:19 PM, Steve Myers wrote:
Do z/OS and RACF support mixed case userids.
RACF command processors do not support the creation of mixed-case user
IDs. Technically you could create them using the lower level interface
ICHEINTY. However, it's unlikely that you'd get all the data
I'm trying to locate original distribution tapes for a number of OLD software
products that I used and/or installed in my salad days. If anyone has tapes
for the following products and is willing to part with them, I'll cheerfully pay
reasonable shipping costs. If you can help, please contact me
I would love to get my hands on CSMP, PL/C, GPSS, SNOBOL and SPITBOL to get
them working in a z/VM environment. If you can find them, please let me know.
/Tom Kern
--- Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to locate original distribution tapes for a number of OLD software
products
Chris Craddock writes:
. . .The autocurse installers exist because a significant number of
customers ask (demand!) them. The ibm-main audience is not necessarily
typical because there are a lot of customers who can't spell SMP/E let
alone configure high end software products.
CC
and he
What support issues did you have with PKZip?
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
http://www.info-zip.org/
Info zip hasn't been maintained for a long time.
IIRC, there is no 'true' z/OS version; the last being for OS/390 V2R10.
You get what you pay for.
It was one I investigated last November.
I started a
I know that it's possible becaue I have done it and do it occasionally
when I absolutely have to, but there are a lot of factors that have to be
addressed, you have to update the exit and load parms and then dynamically
invoke them and you have to be careful that you load the module into the
I have a assembler program that can be added as the last step of the JOB
which will send you an email (via SMTP) with the step return codes (and
abend codes if applicable) and the start, end and soem other additional
information.
I also have a facility that I wrote, that will do this same
I used to have such a program but I misplaced it over the years. Can you share
your 'last-step' program?
/Tom Kern
/301-903-2211
--- Brian Westerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a assembler program that can be added as the last step of the JOB
which will send you an email (via SMTP) with
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:23 PM, John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
What support issues did you have with PKZip?
Back about 6 years ago. We were installing a new processor. We got
the codes before hand and at least one of them would not work. When
we called them a 02 am there was no answer and their
Hello Victor
and if you use IBM ESCON converters, or the Optica replacements, you can
connect them via an ESCON Director so long as you dedicate the connection
inside the director.
We have been using converter attached 3174s for some years nowz900 and
z990 boxes.
Regards
Bruce Hewson
Hello Michael,
we are looking at this product.
I know it will work with IBM's SCLM.
I have been told it does not work with Serena's ChangeMan at this time.
I believe the same was true of CA-Endevor.
As I understand it, the WD4z product grew from Eclypse and the Rational
Developer IDEs.
What support issues did you have with PKZip?
1. No 7/24 support.
2. Surly support staff.
3. No flexibility on key extension.
When in doubt.
PANIC!!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
I was hoping to avoid having to do that, but it looks like I'll
have to wait until we get z/OS 1.7 up and running to MPUT a tree
structure. :-(
I didn't know mput would create directories as needed. Haven't found
it in the V1.7 IP manuals nor was I able to get it to work. What
parameter am I
91 matches
Mail list logo
