What are Hiper PAVs and are they better than Dynamic PAVs?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Is there a way to restrict jobs from running it a particular job class? Is
there
more than one way and if so, what is the easiest? TIA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
Dear Lister,
I try to delete noscratch a dataset and found this error:
Environment z/OS 1.7.
VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 90 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLFO-54
Looking at the message manual reason code up to 52. What is reason code 54?
Thanks an advance who response.
Mohd Shahrifuddin wrote:
Dear Lister,
I try to delete noscratch a dataset and found this error:
Environment z/OS 1.7.
VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 90 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLFO-54
Looking at the message manual reason code up to 52. What is reason code 54?
Mohd,
My hint: provide whole
gsg wrote:
Is there a way to restrict jobs from running it a particular job class? Is there
more than one way and if so, what is the easiest? TIA
Yes. I don't know the ranking of the methods, but I would suggest to use
exit IEFUJI with calls to RACF. You can even find free samples.
--
I will be out of the office starting 12/03/2008 and will not return until
13/03/2008.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Stephen Flavell is my team leader should you need to contact someone in the
JTC before my return.
Mohd Shahrifuddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Dear Lister,
I try to delete noscratch a dataset and found this error:
Environment z/OS 1.7.
VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 90 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLFO-54
Looking at the message manual reason code up to 52.
Hi,
I've just joined a new company recently and discovered that they are still
running z/OS 1.4 on a 9672-Z87 CPU with both central (2G) and expanded (4G)
storage defined.
My question is - I thought that starting z/OS 1.2 and above, expanded
storage is all gone and running in pure 64-bit??
My question is - I thought that starting z/OS 1.2 and above, expanded storage
is all gone and running in pure 64-bit??
Up to 1.5 (iirc), there is/was bi-modal support for z/OS.
So, 31-bit still works with 1.4.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Hi Ted,
Thanks for the prompt reply. I have another question, if we have central
storage constraint, can we increase the central storage to more than 2GB? Or
should I need to do something else to be able to do this? I am not sure whether
the 9672-Z87 allow 64-bit.
TIA,
Jason
-Original
Hi,
If you are in the Metro Washington DC area Thursday you might want to
consider to attend the National Capital Area CMG. NCACMG
http://www.ncacmg.org is a regional chapter of the national Computer
Measurement Group http://www.cmg.org
Registration is open for the next NCACMG Seminar which
We do it with ACF2 resource calls just in case your an ACF2 user.
At 04:04 AM 3/12/2008, you wrote:
gsg wrote:
Is there a way to restrict jobs from running it a particular job
class? Is there more than one way and if so, what is the easiest? TIA
Yes. I don't know the ranking of the
That is excellent news, glad to hear it.
- Original Message -
From: Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 10:14 PM
Subject: Bob Richards Update
Barring any sudden changes, Bob will be discharged from
can we increase the central storage to more than 2GB? Or should I need to do
something else to be able to do this? I am not sure whether the 9672-Z87 allow
64-bit.
You need to be on a z/900, or later, machine and on OS/390 2.10 (or z/OS) to
run 64-bit.
Otherwise, you can only support 2GB of
From the 1.9 manuals:
54
Explanation: DELETE failed because the data set is being renamed but it
has not completed.
Programmer Response: Rename the data set with the IDCAMS ALTER command
and then delete it.
There were vertical bars beside this entry, so it was added via PTF
after the manual
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
03/11/2008
at 01:30 PM, Eric Bielefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
My first thought when I read Seymour's original post was that he was
being humourous. I'm sure we'll find out when he logs on again.
No, Spring forward, Fall back is a common mnemonic in the USA.
--
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 03/11/2008
at 12:18 PM, Schwarz, Barry A [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
While all true, it doesn't address the question.
Yes it does, because -(A-B) = (B-A); in particularar, (CDT-CST) =
-(CST-CDT).
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position;
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 6:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Legal Issues with WEB
Anyone see this or run into such issues?
What is your point?
What does
Aw, the HECK with this.
I hereby declare that from now on, daylight savings is banned and all
clocks shall be set to GMT only, worldwide.
Signed,
Doc Farmer
Benevolent Dictator and Confirmed Horophile
(stop snickering, I'm *not* a NY Governor)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:10:59 -0500, gsg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to restrict jobs from running it a particular job class? Is
there
more than one way and if so, what is the easiest? TIA
...didn't we just answer this (not really..similar question) :-)
Yes, there is more than
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:55:44 -0400, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We do it with ACF2 resource calls just in case your an ACF2 user.
You need an optional exit for this correct? But ACF2 supplies it ... or
at least used to. I believe they called this (and other optional exits)
MVS
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 02:09 -0500, gsg wrote:
What are Hiper PAVs and are they better than Dynamic PAVs?
See:
http://www.ibmsystemsmag.com/mainframe/mayjune07/focusonstorage/14208p1.aspx
Sam Knutson (not speaking for him, just reporting what I heard) said at
SHARE that his installation is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 6:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Legal Issues with WEB
I'm not familiar with the specific patents in question, but it should be
obvious by now
Sam,
You can try creating the GDG Base and try to catalog. I guess it will
work. Good Luck !
Regards, Mani
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pushparaj, Samuel S
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
On 12 Mar 2008 06:09:21 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doc Farmer)
wrote:
I hereby declare that from now on, daylight savings is banned and all
clocks shall be set to GMT only, worldwide.
Signed,
Doc Farmer
Benevolent Dictator and Confirmed Horophile
(stop snickering, I'm *not* a NY Governor)
On executing an IMS conversation I'm getting this abend:
SE2DCompiler noted E-level error in program.
Any idea what it means?
Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
---snip---
I hereby declare that from now on, daylight savings is banned and all
clocks shall be set to GMT only, worldwide.
Signed,
Doc Farmer
Benevolent Dictator and Confirmed Horophile
(stop snickering, I'm *not* a NY Governor)
In our MVS/QuickRef I found:
E2D
Explanation: A program requested an overlay. In answer to the request,
the overlay supervisor was using program
Hi,
we are a group using z/OS Unix and have been given an HFS (USS?)
we can install gmake ourselves as per our z/OS sysprog
have downloaded and unwound gmake.pax.Z.bin from IBM and it looks to be EBCDIC
already. The unwind created folders bin, share, info, and man and put all the
data
Doc Farmer wrote:
Aw, the HECK with this.
I hereby declare that from now on, daylight savings is banned and all
clocks shall be set to GMT only, worldwide.
I have no issue with time zones. But, I really don't like the
semi-annual confusion caused by switching between Daylight Saving and
Ed,
Actually, latest studies show it causes an additional one to four per
cent increase in energy use:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=87991839
Tom Harper
IMS Utilities Development Team
Neon Enterprise Software, Inc.
Sugar Land, TX
-Original Message-
From: IBM
snip
I have no issue with time zones. But, I really don't like the
semi-annual confusion caused by switching between Daylight Saving and
Standard Time. Yes, it's been proved to save energy. However, it's also
been proved to cost more in the end.
--
Edward E Jaffe
/snip
Ed,
Here in
On 12 Mar 2008 08:13:22 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rick Fochtman)
wrote:
I disagree. Let all HARDWARE clocks be set to GMT and use PARMLIB OFFSET
values to adjust to local time.
Better than nothing. But in the U.S. lots of people are learning
ESPN time. Maybe it will result in a country like
Uh, what part of Benevolent Dictator did you not understand? ;D
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:14
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: clock, daylight savings time
Rick Fochtman wrote:
---snip---
I hereby declare that from now on, daylight savings is banned and all
clocks shall be set to GMT only, worldwide.
Signed,
Doc Farmer
Benevolent Dictator and Confirmed Horophile
(stop snickering, I'm *not* a NY Governor)
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pushparaj, Samuel S
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Recatalog a GDG - accidentally deleted the base
Hello
Required help!
Unfortunately I deleted the GDG Base and I have 2
The QCB chain that was pointed of the RIBE has been removed in Z/OS R9 -
RIBQCB. Any ideas how I can search the QCB's?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
Programmers have been deleting for years using BR14 (MOD,DELETE), and
IDCAMS DELETE. I am finding that we are spending ever more time on HSM
Migrated ds being recalled just to delete them. Is there an EASY way to
convert these deletes into HSEND DELETE?
Hi, All,
In preparation for z/OS 1.9 we're re-evaluating our paging subsystem
configurations. Currently we're using the same size and configuration
carried forward from time immemorial, mainly because it still works:
Three (3) page datasets of 2,000 cylinders each, with one in reserve
(available
With a poor, starving z/OS sysprog? [grin]
I'm still working on our MONOPLEX to basic sysplex. We have another test
this Sunday, but it is only 4 hours. And they expect it to be perfect.
One problem that I am encountering is that I am having problems finding
all the product documentation to
IIRC DB2 SPAS may not be the best practise anymore with the latest versions
of DB2.
On 1/14/08, Gary Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is probably the wrong forum to post this but I know I'll be told
where to go if it is.
I am about to setup WLM for DB2 SPAS; I know, I know, it should
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Mattson
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Easy way to covert IEFBR14 and IDCAMS deletes to HDELETE
Programmers have been deleting for
Ed Holt wrote:
The QCB chain that was pointed of the RIBE has been removed in Z/OS R9 -
RIBQCB. Any ideas how I can search the QCB's?
I believe the intent of this change is to discourage customers and ISVs
from looking at QCBs directly. (This allows them to be eventually moved
into 64-bit
John Mattson wrote:
Programmers have been deleting for years using BR14 (MOD,DELETE), and
IDCAMS DELETE. I am finding that we are spending ever more time on HSM
Migrated ds being recalled just to delete them. Is there an EASY way to
convert these deletes into HSEND DELETE?
I thought
The problem is that if you perfrom an IDCAMS DELETE and specify nonvsam,
HSM does a recall. Without the nonvsam, he does an HDELETE if the dataset
is migrated.
I am trying to figure a way to convert my deletes without having to go
thru a massive change process to remove the nonvsam entries.
John Mattson wrote:
Programmers have been deleting for years using BR14 (MOD,DELETE), and
IDCAMS DELETE. I am finding that we are spending ever more time on HSM
Migrated ds being recalled just to delete them. Is there an EASY way to
convert these deletes into HSEND DELETE?
CBT File 673: A
Are you saying that CA-Sysview can replace MQ on z/OS?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
DTS has a product, ACC, that can handle these for you. We use it and it
works great. It cut out our recalls for BR14 deletes completely.
ThanksRick
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Mattson
Sent: Wednesday, March 12,
William Bishop wrote:
The problem is that if you perfrom an IDCAMS DELETE and specify nonvsam,
HSM does a recall. Without the nonvsam, he does an HDELETE if the dataset
is migrated.
This sounds APARable to me.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd,
IIRC DB2 SPAS may not be the best practise anymore with the latest versions of
DB2.
For at least 5 years.
I would also recommend that you try the DB2 List, where the DB2 experts hang
out.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
What was the E-level message (at compile-time)?
Given the other reply to the note, if it was a COBOL program with an error
related to SEGMENTATION - that would certainly seem relevant. If so,
which compiler are you using?
Francois Guillez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:30:32 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
With a poor, starving z/OS sysprog? [grin]
I'm still working on our MONOPLEX to basic sysplex. We have another test
this Sunday, but it is only 4 hours. And they expect it to be perfect.
One problem that I am encountering is that I am
As a Rule of Thumb (and thumbs come in various shapes and sizes ... yours
may vary):
1 PLPA dataset
1 COMMON dataset
4 (or more) LOCAL datasets
LOCAL datasets should peak at no more that 30 (or so) percent utilization,
else the block paging algorithm starts to have problems (the probability of
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:57:55 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, All,
In preparation for z/OS 1.9 we're re-evaluating our paging subsystem
configurations. Currently we're using the same size and configuration
carried forward from time immemorial, mainly because it still works:
Three
For a person who demands absolute precision and accuracy from others
(USS is not unix, directory blocks are not 256, etc), your insistence
that CST can be 7 hours off of GMT appears very much out of character.
Your attempts to justify this with algebraic gibberish are unbelievable.
Has someone
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 11:30 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
I'd appreciate any GRSRNLnn member you'd like to share.
At the Orlando SHARE, Sam Knutson and Brian Peterson talked about their
RNLs in detail. Here's a pointer to this great session:
Hallo To All,
Is there a way of telling if a USER CAT is near full or full?
Thanks.
-
Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address.
--
For IBM-MAIN
You may try to run KSDSPACE from CBT file 394 against the catalogue and
see what it shows.
Current z/OS catalogue support issues a warning message when a catalogue
approaches its extents limit. I do not remember the message/ details
though.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:38:14 -0400, David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 11:30 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
I'd appreciate any GRSRNLnn member you'd like to share.
At the Orlando SHARE, Sam Knutson and Brian Peterson talked about their
RNLs in detail. Here's a pointer to
John,
IMHO You should try to stick with no paging even with memory object
sorting. Buy more memory if you need it at $8K/G on z9 it's cheap and
getting cheaper on z10 at $6K/G I think. If you are adding to your
above the bar exploitation and paging already that does not make sense
to me.
It
When using custompac to view an existing installed order I find that some of
the options like 'Installation' have an asterisk next to them and are not able
to be selected for viewing. Any body know why this might be? Thanks Matt
Command F CATALOG,ALLOCATED will show message IEC348I. The last column:
The percentage of allocated extents for each catalog in the list. This
percentage indicates the extent usage by either the data or index
component, whichever is higher, for that particular catalog. For
catalogs
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:14:22 -0400, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:20 AM 3/12/2008, you wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:55:44 -0400, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We do it with ACF2 resource calls just in case your an ACF2 user.
You need an optional exit for this correct?
At 09:20 AM 3/12/2008, you wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:55:44 -0400, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We do it with ACF2 resource calls just in case your an ACF2 user.
You need an optional exit for this correct? But ACF2 supplies it ... or
at least used to. I believe they called this
That's great news about Bob. I worked with Bob and have known him from
CMG, but I've never met Becca. She sounds like someone who'll lay down
the law to him now about healthy eating and not smoking. I know he'll
be feeling better than ever once this is all over.
Tom Kelman
Commerce Bank of
First, the good news. A catalog can have up to 123 (if I recall correctly)
extents. If you haven't reached this limit, you should be OK.
If you are at (or near) this limit, it gets a bit fuzzy. If, by creating a new
entry in the catalog, you cause a CI split, which in turn causes a CA split,
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:20:23 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:14:22 -0400, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:20 AM 3/12/2008, you wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:55:44 -0400, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We do it with ACF2 resource calls just
At 03:20 PM 3/12/2008, you wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:14:22 -0400, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:20 AM 3/12/2008, you wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:55:44 -0400, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We do it with ACF2 resource calls just in case your an ACF2 user.
You need
snip
What would be a comfortable paging subsystem configuration, especially
for the Production LPAR, as to individual size and (especially) number
of page datasets?
/snip
IMO, the largest needed paging subsys can be determined as follows:
1) Determine actual working set in use. This is easy if
Other posters have responded with good, practical solutions. We had a
solution years ago that was neither. We kept several hundred dummy
aliases in a user catalog in order to keep it full, artificially. If we
needed to define a few new ones, we deleted some dummies.
Excusing my failing memory,
I am curious. Do I care if it is full or if it has a lot of splits (CA/CI)? I
had one catalog in my past we called a database because it was over 700,000
entries. We reorged it every weekend because it performed poorly due to the
splits, not the size.
Lizette
Other posters have responded
If it's anything like Service Pac, you have to complete, at least do, the
preceding item before it'll let you start the next one. If that's what
you're talking about.
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
Matt Dazzo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 16:05 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:
I am curious. Do I care if it is full or if it has a lot of splits
(CA/CI)? I had one catalog in my past we called a database because it
was over 700,000 entries. We reorged it every weekend because it
performed poorly due to the
Glen wrote
IIRC DB2 SPAS may not be the best practise anymore with the latest
versions
of DB2.
That's right... DB2 9 no longer supports SPAS.
Martin Packer, IBM
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
sounds good here too, changing the clock twice a year is absurd
- Original Message -
From: Doc Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: clock, daylight savings time
Aw, the HECK with
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:22 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Warren Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
we are a group using z/OS Unix and have been given an HFS (USS?)
we can install gmake ourselves as per our z/OS sysprog
have downloaded and unwound gmake.pax.Z.bin from IBM and
Those are the instructions for an install from source. It sounds as if you
have the precompiled binaries. For that situation, I think that what the
Redbook attempts to say is that the unloaded files should be copied into
the corresponding directories under /usr/local: so the file from bin is
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:27 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-snip-
If you're a Linux-on-z shop, then you should know that HyperPAV support
has been submitted to upstream for inclusion in the kernel. So soon
Linux will have PAV support too.
To be a
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 15:15 -0600, Mark Post wrote:
Linux for System z has had support for PAV since late 2006
Thanks; I wasn't aware of that.
I haven't seen any indication that HyperPAV support has been submitted
just yet. It would have gone through the git390 server if it had
been.
My
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/11/2008
at 08:28 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
No, Spring forward, Fall back is a common mnemonic in the USA.
They say that the memory is the second thing to go; I don't remember the
first thing.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 03/12/2008
at 09:44 AM, John Mattson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Programmers have been deleting for years using BR14 (MOD,DELETE), and
IDCAMS DELETE.
IEFBR14 doesn't delete the data set. By the time IEFBR14 gets control the
data set has already been recalled. But I
At 2008.03.12 15:23, Serenity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to IBM-Main
about UDB JDBC procedure call causes S04E in DB2:
I'm trying to call a z/OS stored procedure from Win UDB and am getting
a SQLCODE: -444, SQLSTATE: 42724.
On the the z/OS system log, I see -
DSNL027I [snip]
I always heard it was the knees.
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:43:50 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They say that the memory is the second thing to go; I don't remember the
first thing.
--
--
For IBM-MAIN
The buzz on the radios in Idaho explain that while you are saving money in the
spring, you get home earlier in the summer and run those air conditioners
longer. Thus you spend more overall. And those old urban legends it was for
the farmers, well the animals and crops can figure out when the
Reminds me of a problem I thought I had once, how about EXPONENTIAL form
affecting e0 versus e8?
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:43:18 +0200, Binyamin Dissen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:29:16 -0500 Patrick O'Keefe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:09:45 +0100,
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:03:41 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Bishop wrote:
The problem is that if you perfrom an IDCAMS DELETE and specify nonvsam,
HSM does a recall. Without the nonvsam, he does an HDELETE if the dataset
is migrated.
This sounds APARable to me.
I
I thought it was your hair.
Scott
IDF
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kenneth E Tomiak
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 7:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: clock, daylight savings time
I always heard it was the
This isn't a bug in rexx.try this little clist
/* rexx */
X = 00E0 + 00E8
Say datatype(x) -- this returns NUM
Y = 00F0
say datatype(y) --- this returns CHAR
Can't add two character together...
Regards,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
Here is the output trace of the clist I showed earlier...
O 0
4 *-* say datatype(x)
V 0
F NUM
NUM
5 *-* y = 00F0
L 00F0
6 *-* z = c2x(y)
V 00F0
F F0F0C6F0
7 *-* say z
V F0F0C6F0
F0F0C6F0
8 *-* say
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:03:41 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
William Bishop wrote:
The problem is that if you perfrom an IDCAMS DELETE and specify nonvsam,
HSM does a recall. Without the nonvsam, he does an HDELETE if the dataset
is migrated.
This sounds APARable to me.
... or a Requirement?
Amen brother gil..thats because most of the sys admins don't really know how
to program
Scott
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 8:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re:
I've got basically the same thing with a HBDELETE first. I call it
HBEGONE.
Ages ago, before TSO/IDCAMS was so nearly smart, I coded in
Rexx (IIRC):
address 'TSO'
'HDELETE ''DATA.SET.NAME'' WAIT'
if RC0 then
'DELETE
I just need some confirmation/clarification on implementing PAV on an
existing DASD subsystem with data or DASD volumes already allocated. Will
implementing PAV affect the existing data on the DASD subsystem? If no, is
it applicable to both IBM and EMC DASD subsystem? How big is the risk
involved
Does DB2 V7.1 run on z/OS V1.9 and if so any PTFs required?
Anybody in this situation?
Bu
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Does anybody realise that you cannot issue prior restraint?
You cannot legally enforce the fact that you cannot disseminate an e-mail that
was sent to you, stating you can't send it from here!
If an email was sent to you, unsolicited, you can do whatever you want with it.
Sending to a list
On 12 Mar 2008 17:52:58 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Gilmartin) wrote:
Ages ago, before TSO/IDCAMS was so nearly smart, I coded
in
Rexx (IIRC):
address 'TSO'
'HDELETE ''DATA.SET.NAME'' WAIT'
if RC0 then
'DELETE
Ah, a John M. Ford fan. The Final Reflection - one of the best non-canon ST
novels out there.
I don't think it's an issue of prior restraint. It's an issue of no restraint
whatsoever. However, taglines and disclaimers do at least provide a modicum of
protection to the sender, if worded
Lol, outstanding DocFarmer
Scott
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Doc Farmer
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 10:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Disclaimers
Ah, a John M. Ford fan. The Final Reflection - one of
Ah, a John M. Ford fan. The Final Reflection - one of the best non-canon ST
novels out there
I don't know how you figure that out, but yes I am.
I've read them all.
I was 9 when startrek went on the air (TOS) and have watched them all!
But, my point is still the same.
-
Too busy driving to
if worded correctly, so that a message cannot be used as a legally binding
agreement (and believe me, it's been tried) which can come back to bite the
sender in the bee-hind.
My issue was never that.
It's the implied liability of the recipient.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
