hi,everyone
Is there a simply way to get address space's LSQA Bottom Address. I
checked the LDA control block,there is LDACRGTP which represent the User
Region Top Address.But I can't find LSQA Bottom Address. maybe I should scan
subpool DQE.
I do not think there is a simple field in a control block for this - I would
use VSMLIST to work it out.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Brian,
That would be the SUN STK 9990V, which is the same as the HDS USP-V :-)
Ron
My shop is now the proud owner of a HDS 9990V. We are however novices
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Ted,
Because it is a 9990V, meaning it is sold and supported by SUN STK. If he
said it was a XP24K then it would be sold and supported by HP. HDS are not
directly in the picture.
It's like back in the day when you could buy an Iceberg from STK or an RVA
from IBM. Same box, different vendor.
I'm
Try the PROF (profile) tso command with Nointerecom (TSO PROF NOINTERCOM
NoWTPMSG
Itschak
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Field, Alan C.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Have you looked at the IKJTSOxx member in PARMLIB.
Maybe there is an option in the SEND section that might help.
Subject: Re:
Hello,
I'm not sure, if this topic was diskussed before, but I think I'll get
some help here.
How can I identify a zFS File in a REXX procedure and separate it from
other VSAM LDS ?
Thanks in advance for any help.
--
___
You can find out a lot of that sort of information using the Rexx and USS
services.
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/BPXZB670/CCONTENTS
I think what you may be looking for is getmntent. Here is a quickly thrown
together example. The mnte_fsname gives you the VSAM
Sridher,
Be careful when you give specific advice like that. Sometimes it gives
the wrong idea. That being said, I have moved 16 volumes across 11 lpars
and they finished as fast as a DFSMSdss dump would have. YMMV depending
on how much I/O is going to the volumes you are moving.
Bob
Hi Wolfgang,
thanks for your answer. That's a solution, so I'll outtrap the LISTC
output in order to find the keyword ZFS.
BTW: nice to hear from you that way after a very long time.
Wolfgang Schäfer schrieb:
If I do a LISTC ENT(xx) ALL i find the word 'ZFS' in the line with
UNORDERED,
If I do a LISTC ENT(xx) ALL i find the word 'ZFS' in the line with
UNORDERED, NOREUSE and other attributes in the output. It's in the LISTCAT
output for the DATA component.
The method of looking at the mount table might be incomplete because some
ZFS filesystems might be managed by automount
Ron,
You're right, I muddied the waters with that one. Sorry.
Who's Brian?
Regards,
Dave O'Brien
From: Ron Hawkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 9/12/2008 3:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TDMF Questions
Brian,
That would be the SUN
Jürgen Kehr wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
thanks for your answer. That's a solution, so I'll outtrap the LISTC
output in order to find the keyword ZFS.
BTW: nice to hear from you that way after a very long time.
Wolfgang Schäfer schrieb:
If I do a LISTC ENT(xx) ALL i find the word 'ZFS' in the
Hi,
thanks for your fast answer. Unfortunately that's not exactly, what I'm
looking for. The getmntent service gives information only about the
mounted file system or HFS/ZFS files. I would need this information
about a perhaps unmounted VSAM LDS. Is this a zFS file or something else ?
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:43:13 -0700, Gibney, Dave wrote:
So far, that makes, IBM, IDP and Phoenix the ones I know still
provide Book Manager format. Wish I could name a few more vendors in
that list :)
Compuware.
--
Tom Marchant
Abend-AID Development
Compuware
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
On 11 Sep 2008 11:15:21 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John) wrote:
Why?
The easiest is to remove the NOTIFY keyword from the JCL.
That might be simplest, but not necessarily easiest (how
I obviously stirred up a hornet's nest. Good.
Every post basically said I don't care what are programming interfaces, I
am going to use whatever I feel like using. A customer will have very
little sympathy with that approach if his system stops working because of
it.
Not one addressed my point
I don't know the file, is it EDIFACT format?
The acronym or abbreviation EDIFACT does not appear in any of the
documentation for the TP029 file. It also carries a copyright on the bottom of
each page for Global Payments. So I am pretty sure this is their standard
format for sending data to
Peter Relson of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 09/12/2008 07:14:39 AM:
I obviously stirred up a hornet's nest. Good.
What about the scenario of you quitting IBM and going to work for Dave
Cole?
Regards,
John K
Oops! That should be David. My bad.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 3:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] TDMF Questions
Ron,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:00:29 +0200, Lindy Mayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can find out a lot of that sort of information using the Rexx and USS
services.
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/BPXZB670/CCONTENTS
I think what you may be looking for is getmntent. Here
So I am pretty sure this is their standard format for sending
data to clients that process payments through them.
Have you asked Global Payments for a record layout?
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:23:38 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Global Payments Systems TP029 file
To:
Mystery solvedour problem was BMC Batch Optimizer...it was running on
one test lpar but not the other, so our results were different.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Barry
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 8:41
Unfortunately then, this basically comes down to a naming convention, do
you agree?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: 12. syyskuuta 2008 16:08
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Identify ZFS files in REXX
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:18:47 -0500, Anton Britz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I change the default INTRDR assignments for ISPF to
//? DD sysout=(A,INTRDR),DEST=DUMMY
Summary: I want to change the default print location of all jobs to DUMMY
without inserting a route print card into
Hi all,
thanks to all who answered to my question. I finally decide to use
LISTCAT to determine the dataset type. Here 's my result;
/* REXX */
arg dsn
err_ret = ERROR
dsn =
Peter,
My answers are obviously slanted as I work as a developer for an ISV, however
...
In practice, is it the case that a debugger typically needs to know what is
the status of this name/token pair (does it exist, what is the token) more
than what are all the name/token pairs that I might
*sigh* Gotta love DB/2. Does anyone know why my code works fine in DB/2 v7
and fails (with a -303) in DB/2 v8?
GEODATA in this table is a BLOB(140).
---
-303 A VALUE CANNOT BE ASSIGNED TO OUTPUT HOST VARIABLE NUMBER
Larre
Since we also have Opsmvs we are going to try that idea...
thanks for everyones help--ideas..
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally
No, I don't agree. Unfortunately it comes down to parsing report output which
is a poor programming interface.
But I would hazard to guess that parsing IDCAMS output is the most
used poor programming interface on this platform. I see it all the time
in old code and new code (even though the
In a message dated 9/12/2008 2:06:37 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do not think there is a simple field in a control block for this - I would
use VSMLIST to work it out.
I can't find it, but there used to be VSMREGN(?) as part of IPO/IVP that
would map it all
In a message dated 9/12/2008 8:11:22 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have you asked Global Payments for a record layout?
Probably on the 'war drivers' blog if you don't mind getting your hands
dirty.(I'd for sure use
a nom de plume)
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:11:00 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No, I don't agree. Unfortunately it comes down to parsing report output which
is a poor programming interface.
But I would hazard to guess that parsing IDCAMS output is the most
used poor programming interface on this
Hi all,
When using RDW option, it adds 4 bytes at the beginning of each record
indicating the 'length' of current record. For example, if the current record
has
a LRECL=12, then the 4 bytes RDW contains 12+4 = 16 (i.e. x'0F') so the
length field in RDW actually includes the length of RDW
During an SMP receive operator I got the following error:
IEB1013I COPYING FROM PDSU INDD=SMPPTFIN VOL=MP3021 DSN=IBM.HCI6500.F3
IEB1014I TO PDS OUTDD=SMPTLIB VOL=OPSPR2 DSN=CICSTS32.HCI6500.F3
IEB1160I OUTPUT DATASET RECFM/LRECL/BLKSIZE COPIED FROM INPUT DATASET
David,
You will get more responses on DB2-L, but I believe this is due to the
ability in DB2 V8 to have multiple CCSID's in a statement, so DB2 has gotten
stricter on casting data types. I think
SELECT CHAR(SUBSTR(GEODATA,85,4)) INTO :releaseDate
Will get you what you are looking for.
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:50:22 -0500, Paul Ip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
When using RDW option, it adds 4 bytes at the beginning of each record
indicating the 'length' of current record. For example, if the current
record has
a LRECL=12, then the 4 bytes RDW contains 12+4 = 16 (i.e. x'0F')
Hello,
I think you need to enlarge the directory block value in the DSSPACE
entry in the used OPTIONS. AFAIK no other actions have to be taken.
Howard Rifkind schrieb:
During an SMP receive operator I got the following error:
IEB1013I COPYING FROM PDSU INDD=SMPPTFIN VOL=MP3021
Yes. Re-adjust the space parameters for your SMPTLIB datasets and re-run
the RECEIVE.
Howard Rifkind wrote:
During an SMP receive operator I got the following error:
IEB1013I COPYING FROM PDSU INDD=SMPPTFIN VOL=MP3021 DSN=IBM.HCI6500.F3
IEB1014I TO PDS OUTDD=SMPTLIB
Paul, you're asking for a non-standard VB format that probably won't be
properly handled by z/OS access methods. What's the reasoning behind this?
Paul Ip wrote:
Hi all,
When using RDW option, it adds 4 bytes at the beginning of each record
indicating the 'length' of current record. For
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Ip
Hi all,
When using RDW option, it adds 4 bytes at the beginning of
each record indicating the 'length' of current record. For
example, if the current record has a LRECL=12, then the 4
bytes RDW
- Original Message -
From: O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 2:43 PM
Subject: TDMF Questions
My shop is now the proud owner of a HDS 9990V. We are however novices in
the use of TDMF which the vendor
Hi,
Thanks for the responses and yes, I did not explain enough :
The Environment :
zOs 1.7 and Jes2
Yes, they use a destination DUMMY as their HOLD class in JES2 ( Historical
reasons )
Yes, if you do not code a /*Route Print Dummy , you have production control
shipping you tons of paper
Yes, if you do not code a /*Route Print Dummy , you have production control
shipping you tons of paper because Jes2 ships it to a Printer by default.
In 1981, we handled this a different way.
We made SYSOUT=A a held class.
In 2001, we re-genned LOCAL to have no printers, and made RMT13 the
Thanks!
This is definitely the right path. I modified the code to your suggestion,
and now bind is returning a -171 failure (copied below for your reading
pleasure.)
So, not resolved yet, but at least I have a path to follow.
Thanks!
Wow...Thanks for the reply.
Oh, it is correct that a windows program will process the VB files from z/OS.
It expects the Prefix contain only the length of Data part and the format is
indeed BBLL (the length is at the 3rd and 4th byte). In addition, it returns
the
same file format (BBLL as
Oh, it is correct that a windows program will process the VB files from z/OS.
It expects the Prefix contain only the length of Data part and the format is
indeed BBLL (the length is at the 3rd and 4th byte). In addition, it returns
the
same file format (BBLL as prefix 'RDW') from PC to z/OS...
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Paul Ip wrote:
Wow...Thanks for the reply.
Oh, it is correct that a windows program will process the VB files from
z/OS.
It expects the Prefix contain only the length of Data part and the
format is indeed BBLL (the length is at the 3rd and 4th byte). In
addition, it
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:18:08 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
In V(B) records the RDW (Record Descriptor Word) is a part of the
record, so its length is a part of the record length. You can actually
put any value in there from 5 (one data byte) through 32756 (32752 data
bytes), ...
3.1.3.1.2
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:18:52 -0500, John McKown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Paul Ip wrote:
Wow...Thanks for the reply.
Oh, it is correct that a windows program will process the VB files from
z/OS.
It expects the Prefix contain only the length of Data part and the
format
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:11:00 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I did check the CSI documentation and didn't find it. It's possible there is
a bit set that could be checked (in VSAMTYPE?) and just isn't documented.
If I have time I'll put a qd together later and compare some LDSes
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:04:12 -0500, Paul Ip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I think it is different from what FTP does with RDW: (where = length
of Data + 4)
x''+Data
It's not merely different from what FTP does with RDW but from what z/OS
does with RDW. I doubt that FTP is putting any
In a message dated 9/12/2008 11:34:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
wish we still had a regular contributor to IBM-MAIN from DFSMS support
like Mark Thomen.
Likewise, did we ever get a report on his health???
**Pt...Have you heard the news?
Paul,
I'm sorry, but I don't have an answer to your FTP question / problem. But
...
Have you considered using CSV - file format (comma-delimited fields in a
text format file) for your data transfer? This might save you from having to
go through the home-grown conversion programs and the issue with
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:50:22 -0500, Paul Ip wrote:
When using RDW option, it adds 4 bytes at the beginning of each record
indicating the 'length' of current record. ...
5.35 z/OS V1R10.0 Comm Svr: IP User's Guide and Commands
5.35 LOCSIte subcommand--Specify site information to the local host
How can I undo it? What can I say in LOCSITE so that:
LOCSITE ???
GET remote.file COPY.OF.VARIABLE.FORMAT.DATA.SET
reconstructs the record structure of the original data set?
You can try this way from z/OS to PC:
STRU R
BIN
PUT host.vbs.file remote.file
then from PC back to z/OS:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:00:00 -0500, Paul Ip wrote:
How can I undo it? What can I say [ ... ]so that:
GET remote.file COPY.OF.VARIABLE.FORMAT.DATA.SET
reconstructs the record structure of the original data set?
You can try this way from z/OS to PC:
STRU R
BIN
PUT host.vbs.file
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:33:45 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:11:00 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I did check the CSI documentation and didn't find it. It's possible there is
a bit set that could be checked (in VSAMTYPE?) and just isn't
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:48:16 -0400, Rob Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Is there a need outside of debugging - maybe not - but does that
invalidate the requirement? Funnily enough I considered raising a
requirement for this very thing a few years back as I hate having to
use
What happens if x'FF01' exists in the original RECFM=V[B] data?
will my single record containing that pattern be split at that point?
.I suppose the answer is yes.
maybe this method assume the Data onlt contain displayable byte characters.
For SAS/Windows processing, frequently I send z/OS SMF data
(RECFM=VBS/VB)
to Windows using a binary-format PUT and overriding the input DD with
RECFM=U; the PUT command is used with the //DD:your_jcl_ddname which
handles
the external local file specification. Then, with SAS, a specific
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
What happens if x'FF01' exists in the original RECFM=V[B] data?
will my single record containing that pattern be split at that point?
-- gil
If a x'FF' exists in the source dataset, it is encoded as x'' in the
output stream. In your case,
As you can see, one cannot expect to rebuild an RDW from a non-MVS undefined
record-length.
Scott Barry
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:29:43 -0500, Paul Ip wrote:
What happens if x'FF01' exists in the original RECFM=V[B] data?
will my single record containing that pattern be split at that point?
.I suppose the answer is yes.
maybe this method assume the Data onlt contain displayable byte characters.
We are preparing to place our 1.9 order and as most of you already know
Enhanced ACIF is billable. Two questions for a Friday afternoon, what is it?
And how do I tell if it is used here?
Thanks Matt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
All,
I just logged on ShopZ, and guess what? 1.10 shows up as orderable. I
just checked the announcements, and it isn't supposed to be available
until 9/26. I didn't think it showed up on ShopZ until GA date. It is
Friday, I could be wrong.
Can anyone tell me what kind of improvements can be realized changing PAVs
from Dynamic to Hyper? What is the real difference between the two?
TIA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
I just logged on ShopZ, and guess what? 1.10 shows up as orderable.
This is normal. Your order will be queued until the GA date.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Hi folks,
as of today SHOWzOS 7.17 with support for z/OS R10 is available at
www.cbttape.org. Select thte update link on the left. Don't care about the
text of this archive it's version 7.17.
Please note the archive contains macro ATRQUERY for z/OS R9 if you don't
have the ptf for OA22594
In a message dated 9/12/2008 2:03:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone tell me what kind of improvements can be realized changing PAVs
from Dynamic to Hyper?
I'll leave the quantification to others and to your own mileage calculations.
What is the real
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:18:08 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
In V(B) records the RDW (Record Descriptor Word) is a part of the
record, so its length is a part of the record length. You
can actually
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:24:15 EDT, IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Next came HyperPAV. IOS decides on an I/O by I/O basis if a PAV is needed
for the next I/O, finds one from a pool of available PAV UCBs, directs the new
I/O to a PAVed UCB which the controller knows how
ACIF is the AFP Conversion and Indexing Facility, a separately chargeable
feature of PSF, which allows you to merge AFP resources with print data to
create optionally index composed AFP data stream. It used to be a no
charge feature included with Print Services Facility (PSF). I think that you
Paul,
The free Co:Z toolkit allows you to support either '00xx' or 'xx00' RDWs for
transfers in either direction.
It uses SSH rather than FTP as its underlying connection protocol, however.
See: http://dovetail.com/docs/coz/dsp-ref_fromdsn.html
In addition, you can also specify -l mfrdw, which
One of the nice things about HyperPAV is that if you share DASD between
sysplexes, you don't have to worry about PAV thrashing like you would if you
had WLM controlled PAVs active to both sysplexes for the same DASD.
IBM has always admitted, unashamedly, that as of SYSPLEX, DASD sharing is
In a message dated 9/12/2008 2:57:34 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, for the exaggerator in the crowd, the maximum WLM interval is 10s,
not 10m.
I wasn't exaggerating. I had no idea of its magnitude, and was guessing
some number of minutes because of RMF's
Is there significant improvement from Dynamic to Hyper?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:57:01 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the nice things about HyperPAV is that if you share DASD between
sysplexes, you don't have to worry about PAV thrashing like you would if
you had WLM controlled PAVs active to both sysplexes for the same DASD.
IBM
I'm checking the output of the SMP Apply/Check run and found the following:
ERROR AK48164HCI6500 HCI6500 ++HOLD(HCI6500) .
I know what the UKxx and PKxx entries are but I don't have a cluse what
these AK items are.
Checked out Google and only saw an association with
AKx is an APAR. IBMLink will have the answer.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 4:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SMP CAUSER Question
I'm checking the
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:31:07 -0400, Howard Rifkind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm checking the output of the SMP Apply/Check run and found the following:
ERROR AK48164HCI6500 HCI6500 ++HOLD(HCI6500) .
I know what the UKxx and PKxx entries are but I don't have a cluse
what
AK.. items were just ptfs before cics started using UK.. ids for ptfs.
either that, or they were just like temporary fixes for the real UK
ptfs.
The AK items seem to have been sup'd by the UK items.
just check out an individual AK item on IBMLINK.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:22:07 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
put any value in there from 5 (one data byte) through 32756
(32752 data
bytes), ...
3.1.3.1.2 z/OS V1R7.0 DFSMS Using Data Sets
3.1.3.1.2 Record Descriptor Word (RDW)
A variable-length logical record consists of a
Hi,
AFAIK the prefix AK... was never used for PTFs instead is was used for
(physical) APARs, which means a possibly installed temporary fix. This
AK.. correspond to the (descriptive) APAR PK..., to which you'll find
some information in IBMLINK. There it's better you use PK... instead of
Hi, in connection to this topic another question comes to my mind:
for IMS there was a connection between the names of the descriptive and
the physical APARs, which depends on the used FMID. For IMS V8 it was
like this:
PK... leads to DK... for FMID HMK8800
PK... leads to VK... for FMID
Hi, sorry I was to fast with my question. Meanwhile I found the
information (in the PSP bucket for IMS V9:
4. 04/11/01 All IMS APARs begin with the PQ prefix. The first character
of the SMP/E the sysmod(s) will vary depending on the
fmid(s) affected. The following is a
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
ISTR getting some nasty ABENDs in JES access methods when I
used DD SYSOUT,DCB=RECFM=VBA and writing a record to it with
RDW=4.
That's correct. If you tell it you're supplying an ASA control
character then it needs to be present, making the minimum RDW
length 5. But
*JURUTAIP DIRUMAH DIPERLUKAN: RM3,800 SEBULAN (PENDAFTARAN PERCUMA)*
Sahabat Sekalian,
Sedang mencari kerja atau perlukan duit yang lebih
Kami bayar sehingga USD 1000 = RM 3,800 atau lebih secara bulanan.
Kami menawarkan kepada anda peluang pekerjaan di rumah seperti
join klik rupiah (PTC INDONESIA) asli indonesia 1 klik Rp 100, 10x= Rp
1000, 20 ref = Rp 1 dibayar per Rp 5 lewat BCA atau Mandiri.
Daftarnya Gratis... semua bisa tanya-jawab di forumnya, bisa beli
refferal pake rupiah juga, asyik banget deh. buruan daftar kita
ramaikan PTC INDONESIA.
Friends!!
Greetings from iFlowsoft
Let me present you the Hotlist of Consultants who is available for projects
immediately on various technologies. * *Please let me know if you have any
openings for our consultants listed below.
Please mail your requirements to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
89 matches
Mail list logo
