Ted,
I'm seeing examples of catalogs being in the top 1% of datasets for
read-only disconnect time. While catalog IO may represent a small percentage
of the IO for a file, the aggregate catalog IO may represent a single point
of contention and delay for the end to end application.
Also of note i
TKLM is IBM's new Tivoli Key Lifecycle Manager and is the replacement for
EKM. While EKM is (was) a no-cost download; I believe (could be wrong) TKLM
is an extra-cost software product that requires WebSphere (oh goody-goody).
And while EKM can still be downloaded, the statement on the IBM web-site
>If you have a sysplex, significant performance would be gained by implemention
>Enhanced Catalog Sharing.
As long as ECS is working!
I've had too many bad experiences.
The I/O to the catalogue is so small, vs the files, that it's not worthwhile!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
If you have a sysplex, significant performance would be gained by
implemention Enhanced Catalog Sharing.
Terry Traylor
charlesSCHWAB
TIS Mainframe Storage Management
Remedy Queue: tis-hs-mstg
(602) 977-5154
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.u
Michael
What my notes showed was the z/OS commands which need to be entered
once the OAT is available to the OSA. Ed's earlier post indicated you may
need to be aware of that sequence.
Ed provided a very simple "TSO in batch" job sample which indicated how you
can execute IOACMD commands in a
--
The system structures designed into S/360 that turned into bottlenecks sooner than most others
did were built around the cKd architecture, in which the K is uppercased because it means KEY
(where "KEY rhymes with "bad, bad, bad").
McKown, John wrote:
I know "it's the one not taken!". But of the B, J, or BR, can they be ordered?
I am 99.9% certain that having the branch address in a register is the fastest. But is it
significant enough that I should dedicate a register for it? I'm asking because I'm
reoptimizing some cod
There are a couple of options here. First, there are software based
encryption and then there are hardware based devices. With hardware based
devices; you need to make sure there are similar devices at your DR location
if used for backup (the main purpose of tape of course). And you have the
issue
---
By 'killer apps' you mean good ones to COMP for, right?
Would you COMP regardless of size, if short on CPU already, with lots of
DASD?
(even for less than 50 cyls)
If size matters, what should the MIN size be?
---
I have been given the task of designing a way to prevent batch jobs
fromfilling up our spool packs. The main culprits are traces with large
input files that result in 10's of millions of lines of trace data on
the spool vo
--
I may be advertising my age, but would a BXLE or BXH be the most efficient?
-
If you're guaranteed a hit, BRANCH RELATIVE ON COUNT would be the
fastes
Perhaps someone could summarise cogently what was wrong with water
cooling the first time around (which, yes, I was there to witness). :-)
I surmise it wasn't the water cooling so much as the space and the
energy consumpt
If you want to backup non z/OS stuff to the VTS it is probably doable if you
look at FDR Upstream for that function.
A little cable to your smaller boxes and this software may do the trick. I
had hoped to this at our shop with a TS3500. So far, the little guys are
very resistant.
Lizette
>
>
Mike Cowlishaw, developer of the REXX language, author of several books,
and IBM Fellow for quite some time, will take early retirement from IBM
March 5. It's hard to exaggerate -- or even grasp, really -- how much
REXX changed IBM computing and how those lucky enough to know REXX get
their wor
On 2/17/2010 5:19 PM, Tom Longfellow wrote:
Just started a good look at something like the IBM TS7700 and sure
enough the Chief comes by with a broad question. Are any people using
the TS7700 to backup data from our Brethren over on the Windows or
RedHat Linux side of things and then taking those
Ron,
> What is the objective of compressing the dataset?
Nobody remembers.
It was done in a time far, far away ...
My client is short on CPU, so I (new sysFROG) started wondering why ...
> regardless of size.
So, size is not everything after all ;-)
Rez
--
On 2/17/2010 5:04 PM, Tom Longfellow wrote:
We use IBM's 3592 Tape Encryption technology for all our tape
encryption needs. Any software based tape encryption is going to cost
CPU cycles whereas offloading the encryption/decryption to the
hardware we've found to be a cost effective solution.
H
>customers have, shall we say, certain "demands", like "Don't you put our
>"stuff" in the same LPAR as that customer!!".
That is a valid requirement!
Especially after SOX, in the states.
Before PR/SM (LPAR), we had to dedicate entire processors.
>So, the numbers of LPARs may also be driven by cu
Scott:
That agrees with my experience. Although my current client has ESCON and
no switches, each tape drive (and CU) had its own unique CHPid. Been
working fine here for the last several days.
Mike Myers
Mentor Services Corporation
(919) 341-5210
On 2/17/2010 6:02 PM, Scott Rowe wrote:
Yes
Greetings All,
We are unable to purchase due to serious budget issues.
I am looking for a WYSIWYG freeware or open source tool to build AFP resources
with. We have PSF, but not InfoPrint. Up until now we have just written OGL,
but now we need to look for a tool. It would be fine for i
Yes, each tape drive contains it's own CU.
You can't really have the "same CHP" going to all the drives. Either you have
a CHP going directly to a single drive, or you have a FICON switch in the
middle. In either case the CUADD has no practical use, there is only one CU at
the end of the fib
On z10 machines, you can do this. On older machines, I'm not sure.
Use
ACTIVATE IODF=nn,TEST
to find out whether your new IODF is valid for dynamic LPAR updates. On
z10, I was recently allowed to change an LPAR name from "LPAR1" to "*" - the
asterisk character represents a reserved LPAR, and to
>When I say all, I mean all.
I was being facetious.
What I meant was what I said in my fourth point - how many.
I would recommend is that you do some sort of degradation analysis before you
do (what might be) wasted work.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
Gsg,
Looking at Catalog and VLF statistics will tell you how well your catalog is
caching, but it will not tell you about the performance of your catalog IO.
Caching is IO avoidance, while the catalog uncached catalog activity is what
may be encountering problems.
I'd start by looking at your Ty
In a customer driven environment like ours, customers have, shall we say,
certain "demands", like "Don't you put our "stuff" in the same LPAR as that
customer!!". So, the numbers of LPARs may also be driven by customer
requirements.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:26 AM, George Henke wrote:
> Here is
That does seem like a good number, they are being conservative. I
would have thought they would have recommended 8250 as long as 2200 has been
working for you.
Carl Swanson
carl.swans...@verizon.net
Mobile: 215.688.1459
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ma
Lynn,
We had a 3090-200 that did something similar. Problem occurred on a weekend
and no-one was aware of it until the parts melting into the sub-floor
triggered the smoke alarms.
IBM took it away, and I believe it spent a few months in a Melbourne
warehouse being poked and prodded to find a root
We just purchased SUN/STK 9840D drives that can be GEN'ed as 3590; I was
told by the SUN/STK sales representative that T1 tape drives had to
be GEN'ed as 3592 which meant PTF's amd PRE-Reqsfor our OS.
Better check this.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailt
Check the IEANTASM macro in PRD1.MACLIB and the IEANTCR.OBJ, IEANTDL.OBJ
and IEANTRT.OBJ in IJSYSRS.SYSLIB. I don't think they are documented
anywhere in the VSE docs. Just use the z/OS docs.
Chuck Arney
illustro Systems International, LLC
http://www.illustro.com
Internet-enable your application
Hi:
I just recently set up the I/O configuration for a SL8500 ATL, although
we were using STK 9840C tape drives, operating in 3590 compatibility
mode. We are ESCON attached rather than FICON, but required HCD
definition had to see each tape drive as existing on its own control unit.
I can't
Would that be the F CATALOG,REPORT... commands?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/ar
W dniu 2010-02-17 10:49, Jorge Garcia pisze:
Hello:
We want to remove two partition from our iodf. We have executed any
dynamics activations y we have solved all the requirements.
1 .- We have unassigned all the candidate list definition chpid for the lpar in
the HMC i/o configuration
2 .- W
W dniu 2010-02-17 21:26, gsg pisze:
Can having all production application aliases defined in a single UCAT cause
performance problems? If so, does anyone have any stories to tell regarding
this.
It depends - did you expect any other answer for such general question?
1. It depends on number of
Windows or RedHat Linux side of things and then taking those dumps
(TS7700) offsite
Jim
We're using a 3584 with LTO and 3592 tape drives and the little people are
using Tivoli to backup/dump data to the LTOs. We haven't taken it offsite
yet, other than to Iron Mountain. I can put you contact
We're considering porting a z/OS application to z/VSE. Currently it uses data
space with a name/token to find it. I can find references to IEANTCRS with
VSE, but can't figure out where it's documented for use under VSE.
Can anyone point me in the direction of how to find documentation for this
I don't know how to go about measuring this to determine if it is a
problem
A good place to start is the 'f catalog,.' commands. they will tell
you lots of good things about how busy your catalogues are and their
performance.
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
---
When I say all, I mean all. There are probably 50 plus applications, but not
sure how many are running at the same time. We are CPU constraint as it is.
I don't know how to go about measuring this to determine if it is a problem or
not. Just trying to see if it is a possibility before raisin
Just started a good look at something like the IBM TS7700 and sure enough
the Chief comes by with a broad question. Are any people using the TS7700 to
backup data from our Brethren over on the Windows or RedHat Linux side of
things and then taking those dumps offsite.
Let me know if indeed thi
>Can having all production application aliases defined in a single UCAT cause
>performance problems?
>If so, does anyone have any stories to tell regarding this.
1. Define all.
2. It depends on the answer to 1.
3. With VLF, modern DASD, cache, & FICON, most likely not.
4. Very general question --
The system structures designed into S/360 that turned into bottlenecks sooner
than most others did were built around the cKd architecture, in which the K is
uppercased because it means KEY (where "KEY rhymes with "bad, bad, bad").
Real key areas were written onto DASD tracks for system catalog
According to my understanding, we need a CUADD for every controller on the
FICON
I'm not sure what a "SL8500 ATL with STK 1 drives" is but your
comments seem to indicate that each CU is a tape drive? Is each STK 1000
drive a contol unit and do you have the same CHP going to all of the
Can having all production application aliases defined in a single UCAT cause
performance problems? If so, does anyone have any stories to tell regarding
this.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
s
In , on
02/16/2010
at 12:09 PM, "McKown, John" said:
>I know "it's the one not taken!". But of the B, J, or BR, can they be
>ordered?
There are two separate issue, the speed of the branch itself and it's
impact on the speed of other instructions. Both of those are model
dependent.
In general
In , on
02/16/2010
at 10:31 PM, Chris Craddock said:
>If you can't change the source, then create yourself a little look-aside
>module that does something more sensible (name/token perhaps, although
>that could easily use more cpu) and then zap the load module to call your
>look-aside at the a
In , on
02/16/2010
at 12:34 PM, "McKown, John" said:
>I prefer email clients, like Pine, which simply know to insert a line
>break every 72 characters or so while you're editting.
How about GUI client that automatically insert a CRLF at a column width
specified by the user and not tied to th
In , on 02/16/2010
at 01:31 PM, J R said:
>One additional problem I seem to have is that, when breaking up long
>lines, the key seems to result in double spacing.
Does that only mean that you see a blank line, or does it mean that
CRLFCRLF is actually transmitted?
--
Shmuel (Seymour
On 16 February 2010 00:33, Ed Gould wrote:
>
>
>> ---
>> I fail to understand how 3705 Assembler routines/modules could
>> possibly be relevant to this discussion. The 3705/3745 PoPS are
>> radically different from any IBM "mainframe" hardware of the la
I found I could open the file as a TXT file with Windows Notepad and simply
save it back. Notepad apparently fixed the end-of-line issue.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
shar...@dtcc.com (Scott Harder) writes:
> I think it's Thermal Conduction Module, but not 100% sure.
IBM TCP Collection:
http://ibmcollectables.com/gallery/album122
>I think it's Thermal Conduction Module, but not 100% sure.
You get a virtual prize of your choice!
(8-{]}
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to list
John,
Comparex has been around for decades.
http://www.serena.com/products/mainframe-tools/products/product-comparex.htm
l
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
> Mike Shorkend
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:05 A
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:14 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: xml files to mainframe
>
> Most likely you are originating from a *nix platform that i
Most likely you are originating from a *nix platform that is not sending a
CR/LF to signify end of record. That is a FTP configuration option on the *nix
box and there is little you can do downstream to fix the issue.
There has been much discussion on this issue in the past.
HTH and good luck
On 16 February 2010 14:50, Ken Porowski wrote:
> IIRC this is not cooling of the CPU/chip itself but an add on cooling
> 'door' on the rack to help with the heat dissipation. This has been out
> for a couple of years at least.
That's about what the first IBM water cooled mainframes did. The
360/
Good point. Do you want to pay the per CPU charge for software on a 10-way
where the software really runs on about 1 cpu's worth? We split out our
WebSphere's to smaller LPARs for this reason.
Jon L. Veilleux
veilleu...@aetna.com
(860) 636-9179
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainfra
Why is it that you think you need a CUADD? Unless there are multiple control
unit images at the end of the fiber, then CUADD doesn't make sense to me.
>>> Anton Britz 2/17/2010 10:11 AM >>>
I received the following question this morning :
We are busy installing a SL8500 ATL with STK 1 driv
Tim Brown of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote
on 02/17/2010 12:31:12 PM:
> Is there any way to transfer an xml file to the
> mainframe and keep the look of it. By default it
> wraps the entire file into large records.
>
>
> I want this
>
> EDIT P08145.XML1
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Tim Brown
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:31 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: xml files to mainframe
>
> Is there any way to transfer an xml file to the
> mainframe and
I think it's Thermal Conduction Module, but not 100% sure.
Scott
Hal Merritt
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
02/17/2010 01:12 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: What was old is new again (water chilled)
IIRC, the chip t
Is there any way to transfer an xml file to the
mainframe and keep the look of it. By default it
wraps the entire file into large records.
I want this
EDIT P08145.XML1 Columns 1
00072
Command ===>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Clark Morris
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:09 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Fastest branch instruction
>
>
> If this code is in a routine called by a COBOL pr
In a message dated 2/17/2010 11:40:26 A.M. Central Standard Time,
john_matt...@ea.epson.com writes:
info in the TDQ, and writes it to the JES Queue. Once there we use
MacKinney's JQP product to send it on its way to IP Printers. This is the
cheapest way we found to write CICS to IP Print
IIRC, the chip technology of that era produced a lot of heat in very small
places and was very temperature sensitive. There were things called TCM's or
Thermal Controlled Modules. The later technology lent itself to air cooling.
I want to say the buzzwords were BIPOLAR and CMOS. BIPOLAR was ver
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:54:43 -0400, Clark Morris wrote:
>>>
>Since executables can exist in zFS, would the smarter long term
>strategy be to migrate PDSE to zFS and dead end PDSE? The PDSE
As soon as they allow Unix directories in my STEPLIB concatenation.
(And LINKLIST.)
But no aliases for prog
On 16 Feb 2010 10:10:22 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>I know "it's the one not taken!". But of the B, J, or BR, can they be ordered?
>I am 99.9% certain that having the branch address in a register is the
>fastest. But is it significant enough that I should dedicate a register for
Many times, it is much easier to plan Business Resumption (DR) to a single
LPAR. Mirroring DASD, Tapes (real or virtual), etc. can have many moving
parts that make more sense to manage from one vantage point. A separate QA
LPAR makes perfect sense if it exactly mirrors the Production LPAR (names
On 17 Feb 2010 05:39:17 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>Bruce Hewson of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>wrote on 02/17/2010 04:09:59 AM:
>
>> Hello John,
>>
>> there have been many responses.some positive some negative...this is
>> another negative I am sorry!
>>
>> 1. Our dev
John
I have been reminded in another thread - where the topic of the "program
properties table" (PPT) arose - that I missed a point when I suggested what
was minimally required in order to split off the TN3270E server.
There have been no replies so I guess you didn't try my suggestion.
There i
How about a CICS program which will read a CICS TDQ whenever
something is put into it, and write it to the JES output queue, in a
particular otuput class, with a destination?
We have an assembler program which is defined as a CICS program
and has an associated transaction. CICS
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:34:15 -0600, Al Sherkow wrote:
>But sites are being forced to follow the rules initially set long ago. That
>is not a productive use of valuable system programmer time. Some sites spend
>a lot of effort managing this. They could be installing a new release of DB2
>or IMS.
I just jumped to zos 1.08 to 1.11 and the only thing I ran into was making
sure the TN3270 STC had a UNIX UID/GID.
RDEFINE STARTED TN3270.** STDATA(USER(OMVSKERN))
And make sure the TCP stack associates the same STC name with Telnet for
ports 23 and 1023 (in most cases).
---
STK got back to us. The recommended Percentfull in our case is 8000. Just in
case anyone else had the same configuration.
Thank You,
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN
I have read through several responses to this, and I agree with all of
them. Performance wise, having less LPARs is probably better. Our shop
is small and we have only on CEC with three LPARs (production,
development, and sysprog sandbox). One purpose for the three is to be
able to test new rele
Thanks, Chris Mason and others... That was it exactly. Once I understood
TELNET had to be split out of the stack, it was easy to run down the
details. I was barking up all the wrong trees.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signof
All mine have no CUADD in the report I just ran.
Doug
Anton Britz wrote:
I received the following question this morning :
We are busy installing a SL8500 ATL with STK 1 drives
TST1 *Control Unit List * Row 9 of 161
Command ===>
Thanks very much for that empherical testing of which is better. That is the
best way, but I wasn't allowed.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
john.mc
Beyond Compare is a pretty good PC compare tool if you don't mind doing
the compare off the mainframe. It is not smart enough to understand your
example but has a number of rule sets supplied and you can add your own.
It's not free but there is a 30 day trial and the standard version is
$30.00.
With z/OS and sub-capacity pricing the charges for many important and key
products (and the more expensive) are tied to the "size" of the LPAR. A
small amount of IMS in a large LPAR is charged a larger price than a small
amount of IMS in a small LPAR.
Some of IBM's current policies cause sites to
George,
I will give you the application developer's point of view. I can and
have brought Dev/QA LPAR's to their knees with mistaken coding while
developing new projects or updated programs. It isn't intentional, mind
you, but mistakes happen. We are human.
Do you really want your production o
I know "it's the one not taken!". But of the B, J, or BR, can they be ordered?
I
am 99.9% certain that having the branch address in a register is the fastest.
But is it significant enough that I should dedicate a register for it? I'm
asking
because I'm reoptimizing some code which is very hea
>From a pure performance standpoint fewer is probably better (less
overhead).
WLM balancing should be possible if you want to mix DEV, UAT, PROD on
the same LPAR but there is always the possibility of a DEV or UAT task
impacting PROD in any number of ways that might not have as large an
impact on
HCD team answers me:
Hello Jorge,
before running the dynamic activate you have to do the following:
>From HCD point of view you have to prepare the IODF in the following way:
--Unassign all shared channel paths from the partitions you are going to
remove.
Dedicated channel p
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:26:56 -0500, George Henke
wrote:
>Here is what I thought was a dumb question until someone posed it to me
>yesterday.
>
>Why have a separate QA LPAR and not just leave QA in the DEV LPAR?
>
>The more I tried to come up with a good reason, the more I could not find
>one.
>
On 02/17/10 10:39, MONTERO ROMERO, ENRIQUE ELOI wrote:
Hi team,
I mean, we are evaluating the way to encrypt the data saved into cartridges or
tapes.
Is there some way to activate the tape encryption with RMM?
Is it a software or Hardware functionality?
Which is the easiest way to start encryp
Hi team,
I mean, we are evaluating the way to encrypt the data saved into cartridges or
tapes.
Is there some way to activate the tape encryption with RMM?
Is it a software or Hardware functionality?
Which is the easiest way to start encrypting our tapes?
Best regards,
Enrique Montero.
-
Here is what I thought was a dumb question until someone posed it to me
yesterday.
Why have a separate QA LPAR and not just leave QA in the DEV LPAR?
The more I tried to come up with a good reason, the more I could not find
one.
Then I started to take the logic to its extreme and ask myself, "Wh
This is a re-post due to absence of a subject. Sorry.
I'm hoping someone else has gone through this exercise. We have STK 9840s
emulating 3490s. We are about to install 9840Ds and migrate our HSM Backups and
ML2 data from 9840As to 9840Ds.
We currently have 2200 specified for our 9840As
TAPEU
I received the following question this morning :
We are busy installing a SL8500 ATL with STK 1 drives
TST1 *Control Unit List * Row 9 of 161
Command ===> ___ Scroll ===>
CSR
Select one or more control units, then press Enter.
I'm hoping someone else has gone through this exercise. We have STK 9840s
emulating 3490s. We are about to install 9840Ds and migrate our HSM Backups and
ML2 data from 9840As to 9840Ds.
We currently have 2200 specified for our 9840As
TAPEUTILIZATION(UNITTYPE(3490) PERCENTFULL(2200))
What is t
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 01:28 -0500, Ron Hawkins wrote:
> What is the objective of compressing the dataset?
In my environment (cycles to burn) reads for certain long sequential
datasets are faster for compressed data. So my ACS routines look for
specific larger datasets that are written once, read
"Hardee, Charles H"
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
02/16/2010 09:39 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: What was old is new again (water chilled)
Yeah this is the bigger "wow!" for me. I didn't realize they had been
out
now i understand .
thanks
2010/2/17 מתן כהן
> shane,
> sorry but I didn't completely understood what you meant ?
>
> 2010/2/17 Shane
>
> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:00 -0500, Mark Jacobs wrote:
>>
>> > You can always do it the old fashioned way by reading the existing
>> > catalog for all existing
shane,
sorry but I didn't completely understood what you meant ?
2010/2/17 Shane
> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:00 -0500, Mark Jacobs wrote:
>
> > You can always do it the old fashioned way by reading the existing
> > catalog for all existing alias entries and build define alias statements
> > for e
The normal codeplaces for $, # and @ is used for our (Sweden's)
additional 3 alphabetical letters Å, Ä and Ö.
Regards,
Thomas Berg
_
Thomas Berg Specialist A M SWEDBANK
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:00:15 -0500, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
>On 02/17/10 07:53, ××ª× ××× wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I need to copy all of my aliases from my currently in use Master Catalog to
>> a new Master Catalog.
>> I know the option of the command 'MERGECAT' of IBM® Tivoli® Advanced
Catalog
>> M
Bruce Hewson of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
wrote on 02/17/2010 04:09:59 AM:
> Hello John,
>
> there have been many responses.some positive some negative...this is
> another negative I am sorry!
>
> 1. Our developers still regularly break PDSEand we are still getting
new
> APARs as
I blame Lotus Notes !! :-)
"Steve Comstock"
Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List"
16/02/2010 05:03 PM
Please respond to
"IBM Mainframe Discussion List"
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: Netiquette Guidelines (Was: Preview: z/OS V1.12)
Long lines are problematic
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:00 -0500, Mark Jacobs wrote:
> You can always do it the old fashioned way by reading the existing
> catalog for all existing alias entries and build define alias statements
> for each one. Then just run IDCAMS using the statements generated in
> step 1.
RCNVCAT from th
On 02/17/10 07:53, מתן כהן wrote:
Hi,
I need to copy all of my aliases from my currently in use Master Catalog to
a new Master Catalog.
I know the option of the command 'MERGECAT' of IBM® Tivoli® Advanced Catalog
Management , but not familiar with other ways.
is there any a fast way to copy t
Hi,
I need to copy all of my aliases from my currently in use Master Catalog to
a new Master Catalog.
I know the option of the command 'MERGECAT' of IBM® Tivoli® Advanced Catalog
Management , but not familiar with other ways.
is there any a fast way to copy those aliases with no further objects f
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
