On 4/11/2012 3:09 PM, McKown, John wrote:
I'd likely use a system key (probably 0, but maybe even 7
because I don't think anybody else uses it
I think IMS and DB2 use key 7. The last time I looked the
least used keys were 2 and 3, but it has been a long time
since I checked.
--
Richard
On 4/2/2012 4:26 AM, Jake anderson wrote:
Changed the subject header
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Jake andersonjustmainfra...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear All,
Reason for opting another option to initialize was due to the below
abend :
SYSTEM SUPPORT UTILITIES IEHINITT
TAPE
On 3/14/2012 11:22 AM, Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
Hi list,
I have a couple questions about commands that can be run from the console.
First of all, is there a console command that can be used to display the MAC
address of an OSA port?
Second, is there a console command to ping an IP address out
On 3/14/2012 12:38 PM, Richard L Peurifoy wrote:
On 3/14/2012 11:22 AM, Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
Hi list,
I have a couple questions about commands that can be run from the
console.
First of all, is there a console command that can be used to display
the MAC address of an OSA port?
Second
On 3/7/2012 2:11 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
I've got several DD statements in a proc that have only a single parameter,
PATH='long/path/name'
Because the path is long the statement will not fit on a single card image
(but the PATH parameter by itself will). So I coded
//MYDDNAME DD
//
On 3/3/2012 12:13 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 10:39:32 +0100, R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2012-03-03 07:34, Edward Jaffe pisze:
IMHO, STP should be included in the price of the machine.
Or at least STP light which would allow to use ETS (NTP).
However it's NOT incluted. :-(
I
On 2/29/2012 6:43 AM, Martin, Larry D wrote:
You can also use IDCAMS MERGECAT to move the catalog entries and then define
the ALIAS(s).
Here is a sample to do it.
//MOVCAT JOB
//*
//PRINT EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//*
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=A
//SYSIN DD *
REPRO -
LEVEL(@ ) -
On 2/20/2012 12:32 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
There may well be a facility for suppressing unwanted DFSORT messages,
particularly informational ones. If there is, FY will provide you and
the rest of us with information about it here (unless perchance he is
in Timbuktu today).
I don't think this
On 12/16/2011 1:47 PM, David Booher wrote:
Yes, my CSF will run:
13.46.16 STC01522 $HASP373 CSF STARTED
13.46.17 STC01522 CSFM607I A CKDS KEY STORE POLICY IS NOT DEFINED.
13.46.17 STC01522 CSFM607I A PKDS KEY STORE POLICY IS NOT DEFINED.
13.46.17 STC01522 CSFM610I GRANULAR KEYLABEL
On 12/14/2011 2:32 AM, Ron Hawkins wrote:
Richard,
If the format 9 DSCB includes the date, time and jobname of the creating job
it should not be too hard to tie this to an SMF Type30 subtype 2 or 3 record
to get additional auditing information.
This is true, but unless you keep SMF data
On 12/13/2011 1:15 PM, Bill Fairchild wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 12:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Is there an IBM program that will tell me
On 10/29/2011 3:55 AM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Directory is 62 (or so) blocks (to take up the entire first track).
44
IIRC it is 45 for a 3390, and 46 for a 3380.
--
Richard
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On 10/29/2011 5:44 PM, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
In5296461027529388.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu, on
10/27/2011
at 06:53 PM, Paul Gilmartinpaulgboul...@aim.com said:
I recall a computer, perhaps pre-360; perhaps non-IBM whose
operator's console had a deeply recessed button
On 10/11/2011 1:46 PM, Rob Schramm wrote:
My question is concerning SCHDxx.
If IBM supplies default values for about 80 PPT entries, is there any
reason to have a SCHDxx that has any IBM PPT entries that have default
values?
I think the only reason to code one is if you want to change one of
On 10/9/2011 10:34 PM, Mingee, David wrote:
Hello All,
Anyone had success with performance gains in run time and fewer
tapes being created when using z/OS Large Block Interface(LBI)? We are on
R1.11 and have created tapes with blksize of 256k(262144) and the block count
is reduced
On 9/14/2011 11:41 AM, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
In4e6fc2e1.9080...@neo.tamu.edu, on 09/13/2011
at 03:53 PM, Richard L Peurifoyr-peuri...@neo.tamu.edu said:
This was supposed to go to the ISPF-L list.
Why? The issue is far from limited to ISPF. In fact, your reply listed
some of
On 9/12/2011 10:59 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
o Those rules should be enforced at a low level in the OS (e.g.
SVC), not by APIs such as JCL, TSO, ISPF, language runtime
systems, etc. In fact, those APIs should not enforce constraints
external to the primary OS.
I would argue instead
On 9/13/2011 2:05 PM, Richard L Peurifoy wrote:
On 9/12/2011 10:59 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
o Those rules should be enforced at a low level in the OS (e.g.
SVC), not by APIs such as JCL, TSO, ISPF, language runtime
systems, etc. In fact, those APIs should not enforce constraints
external
On 9/6/2011 9:37 AM, McKown, John wrote:
I should have said that I know how to convert the SMFSTAMP8 to RCF3339 format. The problem is
determining the timezone offset for a specific date time rendered in LOCAL time. Now, for my
own shop, there is only one problem: the 1 hour overlap when
On 8/25/2011 1:21 PM, Staller, Allan wrote:
The manual previously cited does not state either case (pro or con)
clearly under the discussion of the INITSQA parameter.
My understanding was that this parameter was used to increase the
initial allocation until the SQA parameters of IEASYSxx were
On 8/25/2011 11:54 AM, Carlos Bodra - Pessoal wrote:
Hello
We have an z/os 1.8 running under a lpar in a z890. Now we have a chance
to move it to a z10 BC machine, but
during IPL we are getting iea304w wait 80009064.
We already tried a lot of combinations of CSA, ECSA, SQA and ESQA values
and
On 8/25/2011 12:22 PM, Staller, Allan wrote:
The wait state code indicates a program check.
Was z/OS 1.8 *ever* supported on z/10? That is one possibility required HW/SW
not available. Has all applicable maintenance been applied?
Search IBM link for 2098DEVICE and research/install the
On 8/11/2011 8:42 AM, Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
In
cabefxsoet9vpbx6a6h6suiesmppts9o8+gp7otlk_c6dweq...@mail.gmail.com,
on 08/10/2011
at 12:11 PM, Scott Rowescott.r...@joann.com said:
During dataset creation, the only DCB information available is from
the allocation parameters (i.e.
On 8/11/2011 4:06 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote:
snip--
It's also possible to create a dataset with SVC 32, although I don't
know what happens if you try it on an SMS volume.
On 8/11/2011 2:08 PM, DanD wrote:
Scott,
To handle SMS you need to SCRATCH first then UNCAT (can't have
uncataloged SMS data sets).
Or you can invoke IDCAMS to do the DELETE and do it all at once.
Actually if you issue a scratch SVC specifying an SMS volume, it
will look up the data set in
On 7/27/2011 7:12 AM, esmie moo wrote:
The use of AMASPZAP is restricted. No can do. Thanks for the suggestion.
You can get a dump of a member with IDCAMS:
//IDCAMS JOB
//PRINT EXEC PGM=IDCAMS,REGION=64M
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=A
//DSN1 DD DSN=your dsn(some member),
//
On 7/19/2011 3:39 PM, Gary DiPillo wrote:
My presumptuous assumption was that RENT was always honored when
specified. Not the first time I've been WRONG!!
I only need to persuade myself to turn on REFRPROT, and I will do just
that once I'm sure I can get out of that choice safely and easily
On 7/7/2011 12:48 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 08:39:51 -0400, Gary DiPillogdipi...@axiosproducts.com
wrote:
The challenge is that the code David refers to uses unpublished details of the
SERVICE CALL instruction and the SERVICE SIGNAL external interrupt, so it seems
On 6/15/2011 12:07 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
I have a quick process / CAMLST macro question after readi
Hi All:
I have a quick process / CAMLST macro question after reading thru the DFHsmsdfp
manual.
My situation is that I want to find a catalog QSAM file and then delete it..do I
assume I do the
On 6/9/2011 12:17 PM, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
My operator inadvertently issued a Z EOD on the wrong system.
While I am reading the fine manual, I thought I'd ask how to recover from this
easily.
It has been a while since I looked at this, but I think the only things
EOD does is to switch
On 6/1/2011 9:27 AM, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
On 6/1/2011 9:19 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
It seems to me like the ideal way to do this would be to have not two
stages
(MVC for 256 and EX'ed MVC) but rather three cases: A loop with a
hard-coded or unrolled string of 16 MVC's that moved 4K blocks
On 5/11/2011 11:22 AM, Sumi, Joseph J. , CMS/CTR, CTR wrote:
If any of you use CA TPX, can you tell me what your SMRT Inquire Checking
Interval
time is and why you went with that number.
Ours is set to 3 min. which I think is the default.
I haven't had any compelling reason to change it.
--
On 5/11/2011 2:06 PM, Sumi, Joseph J. , CMS/CTR, CTR wrote:
Thanks.
Do you guys ever see your sysA going N/A on TPX screen during heavy or
very heavy processing on sysA ?
Our value is 10.. 3 is sounding better.
I have not seen this, but if the app is so busy it doesn't respond I
guess
On 5/4/2011 8:52 AM, Rob Schramm wrote:
If you specify the ,L at the end most of the parms have a list option. At
least it will give you a record in syslog of what you chose.
You might not want to do this on the MSTRJCL parm, IIRC it will cause
the JCL and messages for all started tasks to be
On 4/25/2011 1:44 PM, John Eells wrote:
Is anyone still using OLTEP...and if so...what for?
Note 1: If you haven't been a sysprog for 20 years or more, my guess is
that you probably don't know what it is--and will probably never need
to, so don't worry.
Note 2: Don't panic just yet. We're just
On 3/28/2011 11:03 PM, W. Kevin Kelley wrote:
I'm being asked one more time by TPTB to determine how the HMC System
Console is actually being used by z/OS customers:
1) How many of you have used to it in an emergency as the console of last
resort?
2) How many of you have used it to recover OSA
On 3/1/2011 11:32 AM, Lucy Arnold wrote:
Hello,
I have a programmer who insists the following JCL has always calculated a
valid blksize:
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=DAPJPQ.TEST.NEW,
// DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE),SPACE=(TRK,(22430,0)),
// DCB=(C.SYUNIV.MODEL,RECFM=U,LRECL=6184),
//
On 2/24/2011 11:31 AM, Lucy Arnold wrote:
We had a tape drive fail (not 982). The failing drive was replaced, and is
working fine. The 982 drive in the same ATL will not go offline, we get
the:
IEE329I 0982 IN USE BY A SYSTEM COMPONENT
The display below shows it in use by jobname
On 2/12/2011 4:16 PM, Skip Robinson wrote:
We have VPS but not DRS. Let me describe the problem I'd like to solve.
Can't you write the SMPDATA1 output to disk and then add a step to read
the disk file and write it to sysout?
--
Richard
On 12/27/2010 3:48 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 15:25 -0500 on 12/27/2010, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote about How to
delete orphaned Data and Index components?:
I have somehow created a data and index component of a VSAM KSDS that
are orphaned from the cluster name. The cluster was deleted
On 12/21/2010 4:02 PM, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:42:13 -0600 Tom Trainor
thomas.j.trai...@exxonmobil.com wrote:
:Why would it create the //IEFPROC.IEFRDER DD DEST=HP9050
:statement for DEST=HP9050 and NOT for any OTHER parms passed to
:the PROC? Is there something special
On 12/18/2010 2:15 AM, adarsh khanna wrote:
I have a situation where I need to report updated records from an
Hi,
I have a situation where I need to report updated records from an IMS database
everyday.
On the first day, I run an IMS scan utility to report everything on the IMS DB
(around 30
On 12/15/2010 1:22 PM, Lorne Dudley wrote:
I'm having problems getting the following batch program to run
correctly. It's running from an authorized library and abends with 0C4,
reason code 4.
Are you trying to update a field pointed to by CVTUSER, or
are you trying to update the CVTUSER field
On 12/15/2010 1:48 PM, Sam Siegel wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Richard L Peurifoy
r-peuri...@neo.tamu.edu wrote:
On 12/15/2010 1:22 PM, Lorne Dudley wrote:
I'm having problems getting the following batch program to run
correctly. It's running from an authorized library
On 12/15/2010 3:23 PM, Chris Craddock wrote:
Ok. Don't do it. It is basically a bad idea. While that field was
originally intended for user (i.e. customer) use, in practice it is
unusable. If you want to be able to anchor something globally then you
should probably use some common storage and
On 11/19/2010 12:50 PM, Kelman, Tom wrote:
Yes, it sounds interesting. Did CA7 install its own version of IEFBR14?
As Gerhard said in another post, IEFBR14 as supplied doesn't have any
instructions requiring addressability, so it can't get an S0C4.
My guess would be that the abend wasn't
On 11/2/2010 5:33 PM, Richard L Peurifoy wrote:
It appears I had my results backwards in my test.
PMO didn't like LCCA/PCCA above the line.
SCHDMUF didn't like VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO).
There is a fix for PMO. As soon as it is on I will try again.
CA fix RO20128 has been applied for the PMO
It appears I had my results backwards in my test.
PMO didn't like LCCA/PCCA above the line.
SCHDMUF didn't like VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO).
There is a fix for PMO. As soon as it is on I will try again.
--
Richard
--
For IBM-MAIN
On 11/1/2010 1:45 AM, Barbara Nitz wrote:
Yes, CA are certainly BIG offenders in this game. Actually, we just ran into a
key8 CSA thing with datacom - you cannot change the XCF MUF group name
without it. Even after IPL they do not come up.
We've had pretty good luck getting CA to correct these
On 10/26/2010 4:28 PM, Knutson, Sam wrote:
Even though it is not the default with appropriate testing no one should be
afraid of setting USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO).
This is going to have a positive impact on performance in select tasks.
We went to production this way VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO) and have
On 10/25/2010 4:23 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I am hoping someone can shed some light and also, I might be able to
warn anyone about to take this path.
We did a POR to activate MCL maintenance on our z9BC-L03.
After the POR and IPL, we had problems with EntireX from Software AG.
This system
On 10/19/2010 12:33 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
I am running z/OS V1.11
TPX R5.2
I have been asked to determine the maximum number of users and what sessions
(cics, ims,etc) that they are using.
What is my best option to creating a report for this.
Is there an SMF record? We have MXG and
On 10/19/2010 1:06 PM, Ricc Harding wrote:
I have always taken comfort in the fact that every message was going to be
on the syslog. This always gave an immutable paper trail (remember when we
tried to print the hardcopy log on paper.
Maybe I am an anachronism but I think the syslog should
On 10/15/2010 9:54 PM, W. Kevin Kelley wrote:
To make a long story short: we are proposing to change MPF processing so
that it no longer forces matching messages to hardcopy. If a message is
issued requesting that the message be hardcopied (the default), MPF will
honor it; if the message is
On 10/15/2010 10:49 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:24:13 -0500, Ron Wells wrote:
Anyone run across where a IEBGENER fails with a S013-64
//SYSUT1 DD DUMMY,
// DISP=SHR,LRECL=4096,RECFM=FB
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=XX15.TEST.DATA.SET,
//
On 10/6/2010 10:07 AM, zMan wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:09 AM, William Richterrichter...@cox.net wrote:
http://www.ca.com/us/content/campaign.aspx?cid=240377
This looked interesting.
Then I tried to view the video; on a 25Mbit connection it paused after
five seconds. Nice network, CA
On 9/7/2010 8:27 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
On 7 Sep 2010 15:19:03 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
---snip-
Why is JES2 better than JES3?
-unsnip--
On 9/7/2010 10:00 AM, Rick Humburg wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to find an explanation for a volume note appearing in a list of
volumes for a storage group. This volume has just been added. The search
for volumes is being done with IEFSSREQ.
I have a dim (unreliable?) memory about a volume not
On 9/3/2010 7:41 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
On 3 Sep 2010 15:52:25 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On 9/3/2010 5:36 PM, Gerhard Adam wrote:
The way I read the articles, there was mirroring and the failure of
primary was made disastrous by the failure of the mirroring device. If
this
On 9/3/2010 5:36 PM, Gerhard Adam wrote:
The way I read the articles, there was mirroring and the failure of
primary was made disastrous by the failure of the mirroring device. If
this is the case, what are the probabilities of the same thing on IBM
devices regardless of the operating system?
60 matches
Mail list logo
