Hi
Try to install z/OS 1.12 via WEB download and got allocation
errors in GIMUNZIP for
SYSUT1 as:
GIM54701S ** ALLOCATION FAILED FOR SYSUT1 - IKJ56893I FILE SYSUT1 NOT
ALLOCATED+.
GIM54701S ** ALLOCATION FAILED FOR SYSUT1 - IGD17040I ERROR IN DADSM
PROCESSING ON VOLUME UNKNWN FOR
Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
GIMUNZIP SYSUT1 alloc problem (urgent)
Hi
Try to install z/OS 1.12 via WEB download and got allocation
errors in GIMUNZIP for
SYSUT1 as:
GIM54701S ** ALLOCATION FAILED FOR SYSUT1 - IKJ56893I FILE SYSUT1
Szigetvarimiklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion ListIBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
02/23/2011 02:12 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion ListIBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
GIMUNZIP SYSUT1 alloc problem (urgent)
Hi
Try to install
I wonder if I could get a button that says that to wear.
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
That's a good point I suppose, but I think he's just worried about being
able to move his production system to a hardware platform so that he can
convert to something a bit more recent without bending over backwards and
doing back flips.
The session at SHARE that I will be presenting this year
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Brian Westerman
[ snip ]
Maybe we should rename my session to z/OS conversion FUD-Buster, what
do you
think?
FUDSI -- includes Superstition and Ignorance, both of which
frequently accompany FUD... :-)
-jc-
Carlos,
As Timothy replied, please consult with your IBM rep. What may technically
run, and what you may be able to license may be different.
The zNALC pricing metric is the replacement for z/OS.e (and NALC). For more
information about it, look here:
It's not IBM supported but it will work. Contact me offline if you have
any questions.
Brian Westerman
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
It appears from the code that z/OS 1.6 can be run on a business class z10
(model 2098) assuming that you have the appropriate APARs that were
provided in support of z10, such oas OA25040.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
Hello,
Can I run, zOSe 1.6 under a z10 machine? This is for a temporary
migration, since customer has a z890 today
and z10 announcement didn´t show zOSe as a supported system.
Any real experiences?
Thanks
--
Carlos Bodra
IBM zSeries Certified Specialist
Sao Paulo - Brazil
Carlos, please inquire with your friendly IBM representative to ask for
assistance. They may have a temporary workaround available to facilitate
the migration.
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Resident Enterprise Architect
STG Value Creation Complex Deals Team
IBM Growth Markets (Based in Singapore)
G'Day,
I need to interrupt the LEVEL 1 to LEVEL 2 Migration. I issued the HOLD
MIGRATION command but nothing is happening. Could anybody advise me how I stop
the LEVEL 1 / LEVEL 2 Migration for the moment?
Thank You
--
Try the HOLD MIGRATION(AUTO) command and see what happens.
From the manual:
To interrupt or prevent only automatic volume space management and
automatic secondary space management, issue the following command.
Automatic volume space management and automatic secondary space
management stops at
:
07/20/2010 10:43 AM
Subject:
DFHSM QUESTION - STOPPING LEVEL 1 TO LEVEL 2 MIGRATION - URGENT
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
G'Day,
I need to interrupt the LEVEL 1 to LEVEL 2 Migration. I issued the HOLD
MIGRATION command but nothing is happening. Could anybody
snip
Try the HOLD MIGRATION(AUTO) command and see what happens.
/snip
Shouldn't Hold Migration trump (AUTO), in that it should stop ALL
migrations?
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:57:02 -0400, John Kelly
john_j_ke...@ao.uscourts.gov wrote:
snip
Try the HOLD MIGRATION(AUTO) command and see what happens.
/snip
Shouldn't Hold Migration trump (AUTO), in that it should stop ALL
migrations?
One would think so, but it appears that it did not, or at least
, 2010 9:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: DFHSM QUESTION - STOPPING LEVEL 1 TO LEVEL 2 MIGRATION - URGENT
G'Day,
I need to interrupt the LEVEL 1 to LEVEL 2 Migration. I issued the HOLD
MIGRATION command but nothing is happening. Could anybody advise me how I stop
the LEVEL 1 / LEVEL 2
again to all who offered their help.
--- On Wed, 21/7/10, John Kelly john_j_ke...@ao.uscourts.gov wrote:
From: John Kelly john_j_ke...@ao.uscourts.gov
Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - STOPPING LEVEL 1 TO LEVEL 2 MIGRATION - URGENT
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Wednesday, 21 July, 2010, 12:54 AM
I have an MP3000 coming my way, unfortunately due to an error in RAID
configuration, the SE - the OS/2 side - was flatlined. Wiped. And the
restore CD has been mislaid.
So I urgently need a copy OS/2 restore CD for a MP3000. Urgently as
in, by the weekend, as we have to get it running to wipe
We just ran into this issue. If a job tries to create a new GDG entry that
matches a GooVoo that is in deferred roll in status then you will experience
data loss. The old GooVoo does not get overwritten but is cataloged as the new
entry.
APAR OA32968 has been created to resolve this issue.
We just ran into this issue. If a job tries to create a new GDG entry
that matches a GooVoo that is in deferred roll in status then you will
experience data loss. The old GooVoo does not get overwritten but is
cataloged as the new entry.
APAR OA32968 has been created to resolve this issue.
On 05/07/10 12:07, Darth Keller wrote:
We just ran into this issue. If a job tries to create a new GDG entry
that matches a GooVoo that is in deferred roll in status then you will
experience data loss. The old GooVoo does not get overwritten but is
cataloged as the new
On Fri, 7 May 2010 12:18:57 -0400, Mark Jacobs
mark.jac...@custserv.com wrote:
The apar doesn't say that there's an fix available but I just opened up
an ETR with IBM to see if something is available.
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
Local fix is to Set the GDS_RECLAIM SMS
On 05/07/10 12:21, Patrick Lyon wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2010 12:18:57 -0400, Mark Jacobs
mark.jac...@custserv.com wrote:
The apar doesn't say that there's an fix available but I just opened up
an ETR with IBM to see if something is available.
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Patrick Lyon
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 12:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: URGENT z/OS 1.11 GDG Deferred Rollin Data Loss
On Fri, 7 May 2010 12:18:57 -0400, Mark Jacobs mark.jac...@custserv.com wrote:
The apar doesn't say
Hi,
I got $HASP050 on BUFX - Extended logical buffers .
so i added bufx with the $t defbuf.
the message disappeared but jobs and started task were stuck .
i started performing IPL with cancel all jobs/stc/db2, the i try one more
time to execute my STC for shutdown the computer and it actually
when the system start jes2 it failed and i get the following message :
*16.15.02 *IEF431E ZERO QMPA POINTER FOUND. SWA MANAGER
REASON CODE=3C
Make sure all of the datasets referenced in the JES2 JCL are cataloged in the
master catalog.
Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Matan Cohen
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: URGENT - PROBLEM WHILE STARTING JES2
Hi,
I got $HASP050 on BUFX - Extended logical buffers .
so i added bufx with the $t defbuf.
the message
All possible descriptions for that can be found in 'MVS-system codes'
for code 0B0 , reason 3C.
On 25.02.2010 15:29, Martin Kline wrote:
when the system start jes2 it failed and i get the following message :
*16.15.02 *IEF431E ZERO QMPA POINTER FOUND. SWA MANAGER
REASON CODE=3C
i marked the line below and jes2 start successfully :
//* DD DSN=CSQ700.SCSQPROC,DISP=SHR
this line is under proc00 on the jes2 proc, until now it work perferctly i
don't know what change.
i have some more DD under proc00 which are not in the master catalog .
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:37:18 +0200, Matan Cohen matancohen...@gmail.com wrote:
i marked the line below and jes2 start successfully :
//* DD DSN=CSQ700.SCSQPROC,DISP=SHR
this line is under proc00 on the jes2 proc, until now it work perferctly i
don't know what change.
i have some more DD
snip
i marked the line below and jes2 start successfully :
//* DD DSN=CSQ700.SCSQPROC,DISP=SHR
this line is under proc00 on the jes2 proc, until now it work perferctly
i don't know what change.
/snip
You can save yourself a lot of issues by taking the PROCs out of JCL and
letting JES2
Depending on your level of z/OS you might want to look at the PROCLIB statement
in JES2. It might help in these types of situations.
Lizette
i marked the line below and jes2 start successfully :
//* DD DSN=CSQ700.SCSQPROC,DISP=SHR
this line is under proc00 on the jes2 proc, until
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 9:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: URGENT - PROBLEM WHILE STARTING JES2
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:37:18 +0200, Matan Cohen
I must me-too here. Minimizing what is in your PROCLIB(JES2) and
putting the procs in PARMLIB(JES2PARM) is WONDERFUL. One of JES2's
sweetest improvements ever. You can dynamically change them, use user
cats etc etc. Thanks, IBM !!! If your shop has not done this yet, I
highly recommend
solved... someone defined the disk of which the user catalog was on to be
offline.
thanks all for your help.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:37 PM, John Mattson john_matt...@ea.epson.comwrote:
I must me-too here. Minimizing what is in your PROCLIB(JES2) and
putting the procs in PARMLIB(JES2PARM)
List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Chris Mason
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 5:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: FW: Mainframe console issue - urgent
Chokalingam Thangavelu
I would have thought that if this was *urgent*, you would have responded
to
my last post
configuration if it fails on the principle one. This would, of course,
correspond
to a different hardware address and hence a different console definition but it
may get you what you need. Just an idea!
Incidentally, for an urgent matter such as this, I expect you have contacted
your IBM support. You may
definition but it
may get you what you need. Just an idea!
Incidentally, for an urgent matter such as this, I expect you have contacted
your IBM support. You may like to mention what advice you have received
from this source.
Be aware that this list is *not* any sort of formal support. It is a best
Chokalingam Thangavelu
I would have thought that if this was *urgent*, you would have responded to
my last post explaining how you had resolved the problem or posting your
ICC session parameters.
Some time ago I assisted with an ICC problem in the VSE-L list. It was also a
case of not being
One console is working fine with LU-ID - ACN06C1 but other consoles not.
Do we need to do anything in HMC configurations?
Also we are getting the below error while connecting the console thru
IBM
PCOM.
PCSTLNET013 - an unknown error occurs during device type negotiation
Regards,
Chokalingam
Dave
I disapprove of private e-mails prompted by a query in a public thread. If this
post had been even a little bit helpful - which it might have been if the
message explanation had actually contributed anything to the sum of human
knowledge - it might save time of other list subscribers
mikey.m...@virgin.net
Subject: Re: URGENT : DFHSM QUESTION : IEC030I B37-04
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Wednesday, November 18, 2009, 9:33 AM
I guess you should review the various HSM messages to determine why the
PDO (Problem Determination) files are filling so quickly, if that is the case
I checked the 2 dsns in question they had reached the 16 extents. The
volume they reside on is practically empty. I will (double) increase the
size of the dsns.
You do realize that you will still see these dataset's swapping, right?
This is normal behavior for HSM and is working as designed
Hallo All,
Because of critical space problems I migrated (issued command HSEND FREEVOL
MVOL(SL1101) AGE(0) TARGETLEVEL(Ml2)) a Ml1 vol to ML2. The process terminated
after an hour. Next I issued command HSEND FREEVOL MVOL(SL1101)
TARGETLEVEL(ML1). Presently it is executing. However, I
I guess you should review the various HSM messages to determine why the
PDO (Problem Determination) files are filling so quickly, if that is the case,
but
you can live without PDO output in your critical situation. It could also be
that the DASD volumes containing the PDO files are full, so
snip
IEC030I B37-04,IFG0554A,DFHSMY,DFHSMY,ARCPDOX,9BEB,SMP103,HSM.HSMPDOXY
/snip
Willie it certainly doesn't look like you've done too much HSM work.
Message seems WAD for what you've said that you're doing. What you may
have to look at for is the journal and automation that you have with that.
This is a non-issue. The HSMPDO* dataset are used for problem determination and
will fill up and toggle as needed.
*IF* you ever have an ongoing issue w/DFHSM, L2 may ask for the contents of the
PDO datasets to find out what was going on.
Essentially these are trace datasets designed to toggle
Hi All.
We are a 2 sysplex Members(SYSA SYSB), Zos 1.9 running on Z10 CPC's.
Last night we tried to IPL one of the members(SYSA) as a Monoplex with
a set of parameters we used many times.
The monoplex system abended with a wait state 40 rsn 52 (which
indicate no lpa dsn's were found), after
Several questions:
1. describe how you shut down SYSA before the first monoplex IPL attempt.
2. Name plexcfg from IEASYS for the first IPL attempt and the re-IPL attempt
into the sysplex
3. Which couple data sets did you use
a) during sysplex shutdown
b) during attempted monoplex IPL
c) during
, November 12, 2009 2:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Console Partition Cleanup - a bit urgent
Hi All.
We are a 2 sysplex Members(SYSA SYSB), Zos 1.9 running on Z10 CPC's.
Last night we tried to IPL one of the members(SYSA) as a Monoplex with
a set of parameters we used many times
Did you point to the same or different couple datasets?
Last night we tried to IPL one of the members(SYSA) as a Monoplex with
a set of parameters we used many times.
The monoplex system abended with a wait state 40 rsn 52 (which
indicate no lpa dsn's were found), after the abend we tried to
גדי בן אבי pisze:
I think that doing V XCF,SYSA.OFFLINE on the running system would have solved
the problem.
This should be done as part of the normal shutdown process.
It would be hard to issue the command on system after unsuccesful IPL
(wait state).
Wild idea: turn off the console and
The Monoplex uses a diffrent couplexx member and diffrent CDS's.
Thanks in Advanced
Magen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
1. describe how you shut down SYSA before the first monoplex IPL attempt.
-- SYSA was shutdown in a regular order.
-- First IPL operator issued to msg:
IEA101A SPECIFY SYSTEM PARAMETERS sys=0S insted of sysP=0S (
after he realized the mistake he did system reset and re-IPLED.
2. Name plexcfg
done as part of trying to remove SYSA from the plex
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Most likely when the system was IPL'd the first time, it reconnnected into
your sysplex. The NIP selected IEASYS00 by default since there were no
valid SYSP parameters specified. What does your IEASYS00 have in it?
When the system was re-IPL'd the second system went into lost system
recovery
+ = PATH AVAILABLE
--- On Tue, 7/21/09, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: ALLOCATION OF USERCAT MYSTERY - URGENT
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 9:55 AM
AVAILABLE
--- On Tue, 7/21/09, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: ALLOCATION OF USERCAT MYSTERY - URGENT
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 9:55 AM
Esmie,
See if the D M=DEV(
bunter williebun...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: willie bunter williebun...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: ALLOCATION OF USERCAT MYSTERY - URGENT
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Thursday, July 23, 2009, 4:52 AM
Here is the display of 1 of the addresses. It shows a 3380 device.
DS P,9C00,1
Esmie,
This looks like a 3390-3 type device.
--- On Wed, 7/22/09, esmie moo esmie_...@yahoo.ca wrote:
From: esmie moo esmie_...@yahoo.ca
Subject: Re: ALLOCATION OF USERCAT MYSTERY - URGENT
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 10:06 AM
Thanks Willie for the example
Esmie,
From your display the RTYPE shows 3380. Therefore you are running real 3380
DISK volumes.
If you look at Willie's display - it shows 2107 where you have 3380. That
means you have real 3380 DASD and Willie has Emulated 3380 Dasd.
Lizette
Thanks Willie for the example.
Here is
Eric,
I was told that the volumes are real 3380. However, since I don't have access
to the DATACENTER I cannot be 100% sure.
--- On Tue, 7/21/09, Eric Bielefeld eric-ibmm...@wi.rr.com wrote:
From: Eric Bielefeld eric-ibmm...@wi.rr.com
Subject: Re: ALLOCATION OF USERCAT MYSTERY - URGENT
@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: ALLOCATION OF USERCAT MYSTERY - URGENT
Eric,
I was told that the volumes are real 3380. However, since I don't have
access to the DATACENTER I cannot be 100% sure
Esmie,
See if the D M=DEV() helps. When I display mine I get the following
information. The SCP CU ND line may help. If these are real 3380s I think it
will say that there, unless they are emulated 3380s. My 2107 is an EMC DMX4500
Box emulating 3390s. If you could do the some displays
--snip--
I was told that the volumes are real 3380. However, since I don't have
access to the DATACENTER I cannot be 100% sure.
---unsnip-
I'm absolutely flabbergasted that you can
Check the definition of the SMS management class assigned and see if 'PARTIAL
RELEASE' is specified.
snip
I am trying to understand why the space allocation was changed when I allocated
the USERCAT. The USERCAT is SMS managed and resided on vol PLN902 before I
reallocated on PLN906. In the
: Re: ALLOCATION OF USERCAT MYSTERY - URGENT
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 2:16 AM
Check the definition of the SMS management class assigned and see if 'PARTIAL
RELEASE' is specified.
snip
I am trying to understand why the space allocation was changed when I allocated
Why would the system override my allocation of 25 cylinders primary? Is there
a reason to be concerned? How would I prevent this from happening again?
This looks strangely like the difference between a 3380 (47476 bytes/track) and
a 3390 (56664).
47476 / 56664 = 0.84
21 / 25 = 0.84
AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ALLOCATION OF USERCAT MYSTERY - URGENT
Good Morning Gentle Readers,
I am trying to understand why the space allocation was changed when I allocated
the USERCAT. The USERCAT is SMS managed and resided on vol PLN902 before I
reallocated on PLN906
to the INDEX?
Richard J Habres
AVP - Bank of America/Merrill Lynch
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
esmie moo
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 10:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ALLOCATION OF USERCAT MYSTERY - URGENT
Allan
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of esmie moo
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 9:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ALLOCATION OF USERCAT MYSTERY - URGENT
Good Morning Gentle Readers,
I am trying to understand why the space allocation was changed when I
that the allocations is done on 3380 calculations.
--- On Tue, 7/21/09, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] obrie...@mail.nih.gov
wrote:
From: O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] obrie...@mail.nih.gov
Subject: Re: ALLOCATION OF USERCAT MYSTERY - URGENT
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Tuesday, July
Arun,
It shows as SPACE-PRI--2 SPACE-SEC--1
I am following up on a hunch on the following:
Default Device Geometry :
Bytes/track . . . . . : 47476
Tracks/cylinder . . . : 15
This is displayed in the CDS BASE DISPLAY (ISMF 8.1)
This would indicate that the
I am following up on a hunch on the following:
Default Device Geometry :
Bytes/track . . . . . : 47476
Tracks/cylinder . . . : 15
This is displayed in the CDS BASE DISPLAY (ISMF 8.1)
This would indicate that the allocations is done on 3380 calculations.
Yes. This is an
.
--- On Tue, 7/21/09, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Subject: Re: ALLOCATION OF USERCAT MYSTERY - URGENT
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 4:31 AM
I am following up on a hunch on the following:
Default Device Geometry
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of esmie moo
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 11:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ALLOCATION OF USERCAT MYSTERY - URGENT
Our software guru confirmed my hunch. Seems
Esmie,
Do you have real 3380s on the floor, or just dasd that emulates 3380s? I
know when I was at PH and we got rid of all of the 3380s, we had 2 or 3
volumes defined on real 3390s that were emulated 3380s. We needed them for
an old Cadam application that didn't work with the 3390 track
If you do not specify space for DATA and INDEX, the system takes the 25 cyls
and allocates an INDEX as part of the 25 cyls you specified after the DEFINE.
If you want the DATA to contain 25 cyls, then you should specify SPACE for DATA
and INDEX. How much space was allocated to the INDEX?
My DBA has forgot to recall the SYSADM ISPF profile dataset from the VTS.
Now at DR site entry is there in ML2 which we can not access.
Looking for a way how to access this dataset. Any ideas.
JAcky
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Jacky Bright wrote:
My DBA has forgot to recall the SYSADM ISPF profile dataset from the VTS.
Now at DR site entry is there in ML2 which we can not access.
Looking for a way how to access this dataset. Any ideas.
JAcky
Do a DELETE ... NOSCRATCH
However, for this
Urgent is non-descriptive.
John's answer is how to continue, not how to access the dataset. You
can't access the existing dataset, you don't have it available at you DR
test. (I hope it's a test :)
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original
for migration (to ML1 or ML2).
For DR testing, that restriction extends even to datasets needed after
DFHSM is functional, unless the required media for recall will be taken
for the test.
JC Ewing
Gibney, Dave wrote:
Urgent is non-descriptive.
John's answer is how to continue, not how to access
they
are ineligible for migration (to ML1 or ML2). For DR testing, that
restriction extends even to datasets needed after DFHSM is functional,
unless the required media for recall will be taken for the test.
JC Ewing
Gibney, Dave wrote:
Urgent is non-descriptive.
John's answer is how
hi all
I got the following message on last lpar
IOS500I ACTIVATE RESULTS 394
ACTIVATE FAILED - ERROR MESSAGE(S) ISSUED
DEVICE IS NOT DEFINED AS DYNAMIC
how can I activiate the last one LPAR with activiate = IODFXX ?
many thanks
even activiate=IODFXX,FORCE issued, activiate still failure
REASON=0161,CAN NOT DELETE DEVICE 05CF
DESCTEXT=DEVICE IS NOT DEFINED AS DYNAMIC
COMPID=SC1C3
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Tommy Tsuitommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all
I got the following message on last lpar
IOS500I ACTIVATE
Is it possible to use RECOVER with TARGET option?
to activate the IODF even dynamic =NO is given on HSA
4.9.2.2 Continuing LPAR mode I/O configuration changes without system
reset
If your processor was running in LPAR mode, the failure does not
require a
system reset, and you want to
Look at HMC Customize/Delete Profile.
2009/6/6 Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com
hi all
I got the following message on last lpar
IOS500I ACTIVATE RESULTS 394
ACTIVATE FAILED - ERROR MESSAGE(S) ISSUED
DEVICE IS NOT DEFINED AS DYNAMIC
how can I activiate the last one LPAR with activiate =
any book recommend PR/SM?
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:13 AM, carlos roberto
viscondecvisco...@ig.com.br wrote:
Look at HMC Customize/Delete Profile.
2009/6/6 Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com
hi all
I got the following message on last lpar
IOS500I ACTIVATE RESULTS 394
ACTIVATE FAILED - ERROR
refer to support element guide, I need to create a new reset profile
and point to a new IOCDS, deactivate and activate it again
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Tommy Tsuitommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
any book recommend PR/SM?
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:13 AM, carlos roberto
I'm a little late to this conversation, but I just wanted to chime in and
say that I agree with the other commenters. Having RMF or CMF is a prereq
to ordinary efficiency. And if you're not reasonably efficient, you're
wasting (other) money. That's not a platform-specific statement, by the
way.
:51:34 +1000
From:Paul Gillis pgil...@pc-link.com.au
Subject: Re: Implications of not having CMF or RMF - Urgent
G'day Jacky,
I do not believe so. There may be some performance monitors on the CBT site,
but you will get what your client is prepared to pay for.
Nine tenths of Zero.
Cheers
of not having CMF or RMF - Urgent
___
Note: This e-mail is subject to the disclaimer contained at the bottom of this
message
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Implications of not having CMF or RMF - Urgent
May I recommend that you take look at MXI.
https://www.mainstar.com/products/cm/mxi/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Stephen Hall
Sent: Friday, May
Correct, it's crazy.
The only thing you have is the CPU (and channel I believe) busy monitor
of the HMC. It's for free which immediatley indicates its value.
It is like driving a car with the windows painted black, but with a
working speedometer. You won't see where and when you will crash, but
Subject: Re: Implications of not having CMF or RMF - Urgent
Correct, it's crazy.
The only thing you have is the CPU (and channel I believe) busy monitor of the
HMC. It's for free which immediatley indicates its value.
It is like driving a car with the windows painted black, but with a working
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 04:08 -0400, Rob Scott wrote:
I think that running without either RMF or CMF is not to be advised.
Almost word-for-word what I said :0)
Glad to see we agree.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Subject: Re: Implications of not having CMF or RMF - Urgent
__
_
Note: This e-mail is subject to the disclaimer contained at the bottom
of
this message
Certainly their must be other software that is optional or other ways to reduce
IBM and ISV software license charges, such as WLC or other measured usage
charges. Are they taking advantage of specialty engines, zIIPs, zAAPs, IFLs?
RMF is a basic part of running a system, your customer has
Due to licensing cost cutting my client is considering removing CMF. Also he
is not ready to go for RMF software.
Would like to know is there any third party tool which generates Type 70-79
records as being generated by these tools.
We are running SYSPLEX. Without these tools is there any other
1 - 100 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
