Aha, that answers the question. You were restoring in batch and I was
using HSM. Probably my mistake.
-Original Message-
From: Richards.Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: manual incremental backups
I am not
of the question...Murphy rules again!
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 10:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: manual incremental ba
TED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 9:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: manual incremental backups
That may explain our different experience. I had mine set to the maximum
available at that time, probably 16, but not positive. AND I had no
requirement for applyincremental.
Bo
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 9:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: manual incremental backups
Bob,
I'm pretty sure I was using DFDSS as the data mover. The problem was
only 1 volume restored at a time when I expected 15 subtasks to be
active.
Da
: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: manual incremental backups
Dave,
What were you using as your data mover back then? I believe I restored
AUTODUMP'ed volumes as fast as DFSMSdss dumps when using DSS as the data
mover.
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
n, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: manual incremental backups
Bob,
I last ran applyincremental 4-5 years ago at DR so it's possible that
changes in the intervening years caused us to have differing
experiences. With newer tape, d
b Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ginnie Nuckles
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: manual incremental backups
Hi Bob .. thanks for all your help .. actually .. we would use the fu
Hi Bob .. thanks for all your help .. actually .. we would use the full
volume dumps from sunday night to recover all volumes then
recover * tovolume(volser) unit(3390) to apply the incrementals. We figured
out that the Auto Backup parameter in the Storage group left in inactive
and the Backup
the volume recovers to my dismay were single threaded. It
took 5 hours to restore 15 ML1 volumes. We quickly changed to daily DSS
Backups for ML1.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Richards.Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 11:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: m
Re: manual incremental backups
Ginnie,
If the backups are only for DR, why not use full volume backups? I
believe you indicated that the data was already in a separate Storage
Group.
Bob,
Hrecover volume commands take waaayyy too long. I have used Hrecover
applyincremental fromdate(dd/mm/) an
ubject: Re: manual incremental backups
Ginnie,
HSM Incremental backups for DR purposes? I certainly hope you do not
plan on doing HRECOVER APPLYINCREMENTAL commands during a DR. Takes
waaa too long.
Do you really have a requirement for incremental backups at DR? Most
shops still using tape
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ginnie Nuckles
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: manual incremental backups
Snipped per bandwidth police
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
The information transmitted is intended solely for
Hi Bob .. It doesnt seem to matter weather or not we do this by management
class or by individual volume. Its just easier to code the backvol command
pointing to the management class then all 26+ volumes in that class. We
want to break apart our incremental backup processing to allow for a
rea
une 16, 2006 6:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: manual incremental backups
Actually .. we run incremental backups at 1am every morning for all
management classes with the AUTO BACKUP set to Y. We would like to run
incremental backups just for a specific Management class at 5am
Actually .. we run incremental backups at 1am every morning for all
management classes with the AUTO BACKUP set to Y. We would like to run
incremental backups just for a specific Management class at 5am. and not
have this management class included again at 1am regardless of the last
changed b
ething I'm missing? (quite possible...it really has been
awhile)
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ginnie Nuckles
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: manual incremental
value to Y which will cause the volumes in this management class to be
included in the automatic backups at night (which is what we are trying to
avoid).. does anyone know how to
1. Run manual incremental backups of sms owned volumes in a specific
management class without having them be aut
17 matches
Mail list logo
