Hi
Thank you, that was.
I found the IGVDGNPP STC after two hours of search.(my own low core
memory ...)
We are seraching for a C++ null pointer reference
George Kozakos wrote:
Miklos was actually answering his own question.
IGVDGNPP (aka PRIMEPSA) is an undocumented tool.
It primes PSA
Hi all ...
I have a question about SMF record type 119 ... is there the same
information as after I issued /D TCPIP,,T,CONN,CONN=
MONGRP1
0090PERIOD: 300 MULT: 60
0090 /W AVG LOC AVG SUM R/T SSQ R/T ST
I have been looking through the manauls and it does not seem to be there.
Does anyone know of a way to display IEAOPTxx so I can see if my changes to the
parameters occurred?
Lizette
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Does anyone know of a way to display IEAOPTxx so I can see if my changes to
the parameters occurred?
Unfortunately, unless you have a monitor like OMEGAMON, the answer is NO.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For
That seems a bit short sighted of IBM.
Okay, I have TMON MVS. I will see if it can provide the information.
Otherwise, I will see if I can do a control block hunt for the IEAOPT
information.
Lizette
Does anyone know of a way to display IEAOPTxx so I can see if my changes to
the
The IBM Solution is OMEGAMON. :-)
Joe Winterton
IBM Manager OMEGAMON - RD
Phone 914-766-1822 T/L 826-1822
cellphone - 914-954-0483 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
07/02/2008 10:52 AM
Please respond to
IBM
That seems a bit short sighted of IBM.
It's sorta: Trust me! You set it, so it should be what is in your PARMLIB!
Of course, that's assuming you edited the correct PARMLIB.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN
And if you have seen the OMEGAMON of today; you might not think it is much
of a solution.
Jim Chappell
503 745-7841
503 349-5603(cell)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daimler Trucks North America LLC
If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately that you
have received this e-mail in
The IBM Solution is OMEGAMON. :-)
I'm willing to guess that Lizette is looking to see if the ERV value is changed
(as was asked over on MXG-L).
But, IIRC, OMEGAMON doesn't display that.
(Of course, I could be wrong).
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
You might try this freebie from IBM:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/wlm/tools/wlmque.html
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 10:41:46 -0400, Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have been looking through the manauls and it does not seem to be there.
Does anyone know of a way to display IEAOPTxx so I can see if my changes to
the parameters occurred?
Here's some REXX code I put together to display CPENABLE. It can be
modified/enhanced to display other 'stuff'.
/* rexx */
/*
Display CPENABLE values;
CVT points
It can be seen in TMONMVS via option 1.5.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 10:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Display IEAOPT
I have been looking through the
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I need to make a few changes to a CLIST ISPF EDIT macro. (I haven't
jurisdiction to convert it to Rexx.) So I do:
ISREDIT CAPS OFF
ISREDIT CHANGE ALL NX Foo /dev/null
EXIT
And my string Foo
gets changed to /DEV?NULL
CONTROL ASIS
or
ISREDIT CHANGE ALL
Yes I did find that. It showed the before and after picture.
Since IEAOPT00 has been around a long time, I was certain by now IBM would have
supplied an Operator command for it. I do not see Omegamon as a good response.
Not every shop has an Omegamon or Tmon, etc.
I guess I can use this
Rafal
If you have a look in the CS IP Configuration Reference manual, you will see
there are some appendices. If you look in Appendix C, you will see that it has
the title SMF type 119 records. I can tell from the command you used that
you appear to be interested in the TN3270E Telnet server
IMHO - and y'all know I DON'T work for Development... :-)
All the OPT parms and WLM policy details and any dynamic overrides of
those ought to be in an SMF record. Self documenting would be a GOOD
thing.
Martin
Martin Packer
Performance Consultant
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
+44-20-8832-5167
[ This is a resend atttempt, apparently my first post never went to IBM-MAIN ]
Martin Packer wrote:
All the OPT parms and WLM policy details and any dynamic overrides of those
ought to be in an SMF record. Self documenting would be a GOOD thing.
Indeed. Look for SMF type 90, subtype 11. Look
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:41:08 -0400, Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes I did find that. It showed the before and after picture.
Since IEAOPT00 has been around a long time, I was certain by now IBM would
have supplied an Operator command for it. I do not see Omegamon as a good
I haven't looked at any IDCAMS documentation in a really long time.
Going through the docs in the DFSMS bookshelf it appears that the book I
need is DFSMS AMS for Catalogs.
It appears this is the right one, but why does it say ...for Catalogs?
Thanks!
Lindy
Hi Lizette,
How will system Rexx help you in this case? Just curious.
Lindy
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: 2. heinäkuuta 2008 18:41
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Display IEAOPT
. . .
I
Case sensibility, if it means anything, characterizes different emotional
responses to minuscules, 'a', 'b', ... , 'z', and majuscules, 'A', 'B', ... ,
'Z', as in the poetry of e. e. cummings. (This now learned usage was not
always so. It is embedded in the title of Jane Austen's novel, Sense
Lindy Mayfield wrote:
I haven't looked at any IDCAMS documentation in a really long time.
Going through the docs in the DFSMS bookshelf it appears that the book I
need is DFSMS AMS for Catalogs.
It appears this is the right one, but why does it say ...for Catalogs?
Thanks!
Lindy
Just thinking of creating something that could be access from the console
easily by operations or me. I am just dreaming in different directions right
now. I like to see what I can do that will be easy to support. Convience,
reliabilty and maintanabilty. I am one of the few here at my shop
This might be of some interest to the folks here
http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/24560.wss
DJ
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
If you can't beat 'em, eat 'em?
Dave Jones wrote:
This might be of some interest to the folks here
http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/24560.wss
DJ
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:41:14 -0500, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This might be of some interest to the folks here
http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/24560.wss
quote
As part of this acquisition, both IBM and PSI dropped their respective
claims against each other.
Ah ! I
All the OPT parms and WLM policy details and any dynamic overrides of those
ought to be in an SMF record. Self documenting would be a GOOD
thing.
Unfortunately, they aren't.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For
All the OPT parms and WLM policy details and any dynamic overrides of those
ought to be in an SMF record. Self documenting would be a GOOD
thing.
Unfortunately, they aren't.
I saw Elardas' response after I sent this.
The last time I looked at the doc, this wasn't possible.
Since I don't have
Case sensitivity, responsiveness to differences in case, is what is wanted in
the current thread. Moreover, if, as in that thread, the negative form is
needed, it is insensitive/insensitivity not nonsensitive/nonsensitivity or
nonsensible/nonsensibility.
What are you talking about?
What
IMHO that puts paid to any hope for a solution to the PWD/FLEX-ES issues
coming out of the PSI litigation. No more litigation == No reason for
IBM to provide any solution at all.
Thanks for the heads-up Dave, sad news though it is.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:49:39 +, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...it is insensitive/insensitivity not nonsensitive/nonsensitivity or
nonsensible/nonsensibility.
What are you talking about?
What current thread?
You didn't include even a piece of another post!
...
He was refering to
Wasn't this the whole point of Platform Solutions' business plan from
the start?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Jones
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM buys PSI
This
On 30 Jun 2008 11:01:24 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Green
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 12:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Another difference between platforms...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 2:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM buys PSI
Wasn't this the whole point of Platform Solutions' business
plan from the
On 2 Jul 2008 12:39:29 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clark Morris)
wrote:
Apple has changed processors for its OS.
Twice.But maybe the bigger change is to change their core OS to
Unix.
But by starting clean, they were able to get rid of vulnerabilities by
design instead of by patching.
That's such an anticlimax, I was hoping for some real good fireworks. Oh well,
July 4th fireworks will have to do.
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:41:14 -0500, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SOFTWARE.COM wrote:
This might be of some interest to the folks here
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 2:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another difference between platforms...
snip
... Blind pursuit of backward compatibility has left us
Hi,
Ok, so for all the IBM'ers that do not have their Out of office message on,
what does this press release actually say, because all I can conclude is that
they dropped their respective claims against each other.
What we want to know as customers :
a) Can we still buy these boxes
b) Will
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 15:38:37 -0500, Anton Britz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Ok, so for all the IBM'ers that do not have their Out of office message on,
what does this press release actually say, because all I can conclude is that
they dropped their respective claims against each other.
What we
Hi Mark,
The bigger question is actually :
a) Did PSI just surrender because they do not have the spare cash to take
IBM on or
b) Did IBM detect a shift in the market place and tey are trying to counter by
trying to expand their product offering in the down sizing market place
instead of just
- Original Message -
From: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 12:41 PM
Subject: IBM buys PSI
This might be of some interest to the folks here
http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/24560.wss
DJ
Bastids. This
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:29:50 -0400, Thompson, Steve wrote:
Is it CKD vs. FBA? Or is this caused by it being cheaper to emulate CKD
on RAID? And then, to continue with 3390 based geometry because it is
cheaper to do that than to put out a new DASD device?
What does you mean, Steve? All of the
Hi Everyone,
We have a catalog issue. Two SMP/E CSI's were created on one of our test
LPARS before the HLQ Alias was added. These are now cataloged in the master
catalog. Is there any simple way to create the alias and get them cataloged
into the user catalog they belong in? I'm not strong on
For the first, use REPRO MERGECAT from the master catalog to the user catalog.
Follow this with the define of the alias.
David Mueller | Systems Programmer | DMS / SSRC
Phone: 850-414-9134 (Rm 107 SSRC) | Fax: 850-921-8343
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We serve those who serve Florida
Please
Use IDCAMS job with REPRO MERGCAT and specify LEVEL or ENTRIES parameters.
Sorry, I do not have a sample, but the IDCAMS books has some.
Pedro Vera
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Hi Everyone,
We have a catalog issue. Two SMP/E CSI's were created on one of our
test
LPARS before the HLQ Alias was added. These are now cataloged in the
master
catalog. Is there any simple way to create the alias and get them
cataloged
into the user catalog they belong in? I'm not strong on
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 4:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another difference between platforms...
snip
How much existing code would break? Example: PDS uses TTR
Hi Mary,
Make sure the files are not in use (they cannot be recataloged while in
use) and use JCL like this
If you need to define a new high level qualifier typical job
//DEFALIAS EXEC PGM=IDCAMS,REGION=4M
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN
I bet Shai Hess knows...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Thompson, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 5:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another difference between platforms...
-Original
For the first, use REPRO MERGECAT from the master catalog to the user catalog.
Follow this with the define of the alias.
Not only are we swatting a fly with a Buick, but we're putting a pretty heavy
load on a non-VSAM person.
Another poster's solution was simpler:
1. Rename the TWO datasets.
Not only are we swatting a fly with a Buick
But I think the SMP/E CSI datasets are vsam datasets. I do not think the
novice can rename or uncatalog vsam files easily.
The simpler approach is
1. repro mergecat
2. define alias
And Sam had a nice JCL sample, so perhaps Mary will be able to
But I think the SMP/E CSI datasets are vsam datasets. I do not think the
novice can rename or uncatalog vsam files easily.
Sorry, I forgot about that.
But, I thought you could uncatalogue ICF VSAM?
Also, why not:
1. Backup -- all SMP/E procedures have a backup step.
2. Delete.
3. Define
--snip---
How difficult would it be to write (or under the covers, convert) CKD
CCWs to FBA CCWs?
--unsnip
Isn't that exactly what happens in the current crop of RAID controllers now?
IGVDGNPP is not a supported program, but has been disclosed to vendors for
diagnostic (not production) purposes.
It does not cause' references to low storage to fail.
It helps if someone picks up an undefined PSA field and uses that as a
pointer. Then the value primed by this program is likely
I still maintain that while FBA architecture has some advantages, there's
still a place for CKD architecture as well. I guess that makes me obsolete,
too. :-)
Me three! (8-{]}
I know how to manage and tune ECKD DASD.
I was at an IBM seminar about 20 years ago, and somebody asked about FBA.
The
Thanks Everyone! I couldn't get the repro mergecat to work but I think there
is a problem with the user catalog I created since I can't even define an
alias on it. (I'll have to practice on this one a little more) But I got the
rename to work.
Thanks again,
Mary :-)
-Original Message-
One way I like to do this is use DFDSS or FDR to backup and delete the file,
add the alias, restore from my backup.
I do not need to know vsam and it works well.
Lizette
Not only are we swatting a fly with a Buick
But I think the SMP/E CSI datasets are vsam datasets. I do not think the
Lindy Mayfield wrote:
I haven't looked at any IDCAMS documentation in a really long time.
Going through the docs in the DFSMS bookshelf it appears that the book I
need is DFSMS AMS for Catalogs.
It appears this is the right one, but why does it say ...for Catalogs?
Thanks!
Lindy
...
I'm using a system based on the rather old adcd z/os 1.4 release. This comes
complete with Enterprise PL/I 3.1.0 but the necessary HFS to use it under USS
doesn't appear to be mounted at /usr/lpp/pli/bin.
I've found a dataset IEL310.AIBMZHFS which contains a single member IBMZPLI3,
tagged with
I'm not sure which poster said..
Blind pursuit of backward compatibility has left us stuck with CKD
even while most of the major logical methods of storage are FBA (VSAM,
DB2, and PDSE).
..but blind is completely out of court here and cannot go
unchallenged in this forum. If CKD
I will be out of the office starting 07/02/2008 and will return on
07/17/2008.
I am on Vacation but will be checking my email. I will respond to your
message as soon as possible.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
_Redmond Channel Partner Online | News: Citibank Hack Shines Light on PCI
Compliance_ (http://rcpmag.com/news/article.aspx?editorialsid=10023)
Very entertaining...
**Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for
fuel-efficient used cars.
63 matches
Mail list logo
