- Original Message
From: Greg Shirey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 14 November, 2008 17:55:47
Essentially, we have a baseline MSU level with CA and we are invoiced
annually based on that MSU for the year. If the SCRT reports show we
have exceed our MSU baseline, we are invoiced
Will you be dressed like a cave-man? :-)
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.8497
-Original Message-
From:
Hello.
We are using SYSVIEW , many a times connections gets lost due to network
problems and id gets locked. In SDSF we can purge the id from my my fellow's
machine, here we need to call the helpdesk and do the same? is there any
faclity here by which we can cancel the id?
Thanks,
Ron
Hi All,
does anyone have a JCL to upload PS file from Mainframe to Local drive...?
Regards,
Ram Balaji.S.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
Ram Balaji wrote:
Hi All,
does anyone have a JCL to upload PS file from Mainframe to Local drive...?
Yes.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
P.S. I couldn't resist...
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:34:20 +0100, R.S. wrote:
Ram Balaji wrote:
Hi All,
does anyone have a JCL to upload PS file from Mainframe to Local drive...?
Yes.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
P.S. I couldn't resist...
Indeed. I have one also. The OP might have told us
at least what OS controls the local
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WTF? Why couldn't they use a more modern drive with the 7-track feature?
I had that thought. My guess was that (as is always the case with stories about
which I have domain knowledge) the real story is that they couldn't find one
*in Australia*. Or
G'day.
If you are acessing the new file in the same JCL, the DD statement
should look like: DUMPIN DD DISP=SHR,DSN=PCYC.TMVHSTM.TMVS04.IRR(+1).
If it's in another jcl then:
DUMPIN DD DISP=SHR,DSN=PCYC.TMVHSTM.TMVS04.IRR(+0).
To access a one the previous generations then use (-1) or (-2)
Ram Balaji wrote:
does anyone have a JCL to upload PS file from Mainframe to Local drive...?
Perhaps...
Probably what I have could be useful...
'Upload'? From what perspective? From 'Mainframe' or from 'Local drive'?
What PS file? (There are no such thing like PS file, on z/OS there are PS
Hi Elardus Engelbrecht,
ps--? Flat file
Upload? From mainframe to Local drive
Mainframe---? OS/390
Local drive---? windows
Regards,
Ram Balaji.S.
(Dying Hard to explore MainFrames)
-Original Message-
From: Elardus Engelbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi Radoslaw Skorupka,
Thanks for the reply.Its working fine.
Regards,
Ram Balaji.S.
(Dying Hard to explore MainFrames)
-Original Message-
From: Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 7:28 pm
Subject: Re: JCL to upload PS file from Mainframe to
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:18:38 -0500, Ram Balaji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Elardus Engelbrecht,
ps--? Flat file
Upload? From mainframe to Local drive
Mainframe---? OS/390
Local drive---? windows
Regards,
Ram Balaji.S.
(Dying Hard to explore MainFrames)
There are many
Hi all,
Can anyone provide me pdsm(partiotion dataset manager) document or link.
Regards,
Ram Balaji.S.
(Dying Hard to explore MainFrames)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Thanks John..
Regards,
Ram Balaji.S.
(Dying Hard to explore MainFrames)
-Original Message-
From: John McKown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 7:57 pm
Subject: Re: JCL to upload PS file from Mainframe to Local drive
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:18:38
In addition to using JCL, you can also transfer files to or from the PC using
ISPF option 3.7.2.
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/SIM/simplist.htm
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:25:38 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JCL to upload
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:27:17 -0600, John McKown wrote:
This is generally not done for desktops. It, generally, requires that IIS be
installed because the Microsoft ftp server is a part of IIS.
What I'm really getting at is that every solution that I know of to do this
requires installation of
In addition to that, every 3270 terminal emulator I know has the
up/download to/from host option.
Kees.
Dave Salt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In addition to using JCL, you can also transfer files to or from the
PC using ISPF option 3.7.2.
Dave Salt
Simply coding the base entry name on a DD statement is a
means of processing ALL the generations of a GDG without
resorting to concatenated DD statements for each generation.
Instead, the system resorts to concatenated DD statements
on your behalf, albeit in reverse chronological
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you looked at ISPF's WSA. I'm not familiar with WSA, but others have
used it successfully. But I don't know if it can be used in batch.
Yes, the WSA can be used in batch.
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
Linda,
If you check the $TJOB command there is an operand called OFFS= which
is used to set/reset any of the offload indicator(s).
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Linda Mooney
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 4:45 PM
To:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:14:00 -0600, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
What PS file? (There are no such thing like PS file, on z/OS there are PS data
sets)
???
Where have you been for the past decade or more?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:132$ uname -a
OS/390 ECCY 19.00 03 2094
... I call that z/OS.
Ram Balaji wrote:
ps--? Flat file
Upload? From mainframe to Local drive
Mainframe---? OS/390
Local drive---? windows
I don't have any OS/390 JCL ... really ;-D
From z/OS to windoze (NT/XP) you could try this:
//FTP EXEC PGM=FTP,PARM='windoze ip (EXIT '
//SYSPRINT DD
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:42:31 -0500, Tony Harminc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, OK - you (and IBM) win! ...
Tony, to the best of my knowledge, no one in IBM System z marketing, or for
that matter, anyone with significant knowledge of the technical aspects of
System z, has made official, public
The legendary catalog Solutions is still available through EMC (used to be
Softworks). We have it and I highly recommend it over CR+. I haven't had the
opportunity to use T-Rex but based on CSL, it must be good.
Dick Bond
HFHS Mainframe Administration
-Original Message-
From: IBM
In SDSF your only option would have been to Cancel the TSO user.
Is it really a TSO user you are trying to cancel? In SYSVIEW the user
could be using the ISPF/CICS/Roscoe/VTAM interface. Any of these
interfaces could be used to cancel a TSO user if thats the interface
being used. I also think
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Where have you been for the past decade or more?
Hmmm, good question, now you're asking me, I'm sorta confused ;-D
Oh yes, playing on earth with my favourite z/OS. :)
What about you, you still here ... ;-D
accessible with JCL, using //SYSUT1 DD PATH='...'.
I already
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:35:16 -0600, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:27:17 -0600, John McKown wrote:
This is generally not done for desktops. It, generally, requires that IIS be
installed because the Microsoft ftp server is a part of IIS.
What I'm really getting at
When they changed to screen so that you had to do two searches because
they split the searchable databases we complained (by providing feedback
through the link on the site).
There was enough noise that it got put back.
We should do the same in this case. I only looked at one ETR after the
I did a IBMLINK Feedback on this issue. We'll see what happens.
Probably the more that take the 5 minutes to do so, will get this
fixed
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1830 East Paris,
I usually stress that adding zIIPs and zAAPs provides a performance
benefit for both of the reasons that Bill mentions below. The most
significant for everyone is the second benefit (reducing the strain on
the CPs). But you need to realize that the 'notable exception' is
getting to be
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Field, Alan C.
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Servicelink view format - was: Re: IBMLink planned outage
When they changed to screen so that you had
I also did a 'feedback'. Whomever IBM has in India updating ServLink
should have to use it before 'designing' changes.
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
Jousma, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
11/17/2008 10:39 AM
Please respond to
IBM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 3:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Test...Please Acknowledge.
Thanks
_
LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this
snip
you are trying to move your DASD alias addresses from SS0 to SS1, you
don't need to define another CSS
unsnip
John, thanks a million too. I did get hung up about 'assuming that I had
to defined the SS1 to use it'..
Thanks again
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
Hi all,
Can anyone provide me pdsm(partiotion dataset manager) document or link.
Regards,
Ram Balaji.S.
(Dying Hard to explore MainFrames)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Can you explain what you are trying to do?
Are you looking for Backup/Recovery? Allocation, Cleanup?
I have not heard of a product called a PDS Manager. There are many products
that can assist in the support of PDS datasets like DFHSM, PDSMAN by CA, and a
few others. Some are freeware,
Will any of the more modern drives handle the appropriate density? I'm
not sure: will a 7-track 3420 handle 200 BPI? or 556 BPI?
Rick
--
If you're not the lead dog, the view never changes
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL
What PDS manager are you refering to? We need much more information
before we can formulate a meaningful reply. I personally don't know of a
product named PDSM.
Ram Balaji wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone provide me pdsm(partiotion dataset manager) document or link.
Regards,
Ram Balaji.S.
On 16 Nov 2008 18:05:16 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Sounds like the govt..store data that cant be retrieved...and no backup...
Saw the same thing at a State Agency
While at a Year 2000 session, I raised the question of having the
programs able to read archived data. One
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:47:06 +0100, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had an example in my post where 3 libraries where defined
through one //OWNSYSLB DD. Isn't this what you're talking about?
You can concatenate many PDSs, PDSEs and even UNIX directories
with a single DD (The
Clark Morris wrote:
[...]
While at a Year 2000 session, I raised the question of having the
programs able to read archived data. One participant claimed that the
legal requirement was only to have the data and that there was no
requirement to be able to read it.
Interesting approach g. In
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 08:25:18 -, Terry Sambrooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank,
In answer to your query about the default UNIT and SPACE in the following:
[deleted]
If the output listing is checked it might help explain what has happened.
The SYSUT1 override should appear ahead of its
I usually point out to my customers that adding zIIPs and zAAPs
provides a performance benefit for both of the reasons that Bill
mentions below. The most significant for everyone is the second
benefit (reducing the strain on the CPs). But you need to realize
that the 'notable exception'
While at a Year 2000 session, I raised the question of having the programs
able to read archived data. One participant claimed that the legal
requirement was only to have the data and that there was no requirement to be
able to read it.
I think you got bad advice.
I used to work for a
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:29:29 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While at a Year 2000 session, I raised the question of having the programs
able to read archived data. One participant claimed that the legal
requirement was only to have the data and that there was no requirement to
be
Boy, I could make a snide reply here. But maybe the Canadian courts are
smarter than the ones down here.
Probably not.
Maybe I should have said:
Better than a dump of the dataset.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For
There is a product called PDS Manager described at
http://www.tcpip4vse.com/products/zos/PDS-Manager_zos/PDS-Manager_zos.htm
However, there is also something called PDSMAN from CA (PDS Library
Management):
http://www.ca.com/us/products/product.aspx?id=1434
as well as the PDS command (from the
There is also a product called SimpList,
www.mackinney.com/products/SIM/simplist.htm but it is more of a
general purpose productivity tool than a PDS manager per se. (If you
are new to mainframes, as your signature line implies, then SimpList
would be a big help to you.)
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:08:39 -0600, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Oh yes, playing on earth with my favourite z/OS. :)
Ah, but z/OS has many enhancements over MVS/XA (the
last MVS not to have files. TSO tries to fake it.)
What about you, you still here ... ;-D
You've been following the business
List,
We're in the process of implementing some TS1120 tape drives on our z/OS
system. These will sit next to our 3590s. I don't know if I'm missing
something obvious or if there's something I need to do to make this
work. Here's the situation - which I know many of you have already
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:55:39 -0600, Pommier, Rex R.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
List,
We're in the process of implementing some TS1120 tape drives on our z/OS
system. These will sit next to our 3590s. I don't know if I'm missing
something obvious or if there's something I need to do to make this
I had posted a query on the MXG list about reporting on zIIP usage via the
PROJECTCPU function in IEAOPT.
I got a wonderful response back from Al Sherkow. One of the points he made
surprised me a bit.
Apparently if there are no zIIP or zAAP engines, some ISVs will not make their
SRB's
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:44:07 -0400, Clark Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
While at a Year 2000 session, I raised the question of having the
programs able to read archived data. ...
How many of your organizations
keep old record layouts / data base descriptions to match archived
tapes? Can
John is almost right, but you will only need one manual library. Once a tape
is SMS managed, he can tell the difference between the different tape
technologies.
I have done exactly what you are doing. If you want to talk offline, I'll be
happy to help.
Scott Rowe
John McKown [EMAIL
Scott and John,
Thanks for the information. I'll definitely be asking for more help as
I head down this path. This is an area of z/OS where I'm not that well
versed.
Our current 3590 tapes are a combination of SMS-managed and non-managed
tapes. The 3590s are currently used for batch datasets
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Kelly
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 10:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Servicelink view format - was: Re: IBMLink planned outage
I also did a 'feedback'. Whomever IBM has in
:I don't recall being asked if I wanted to have a scrollable area the size
of a 3270 MOD 1 (40x12).
ditto, me neither. I also submitted a feedback on this issue. I'm wondering
who exactly requested that change? .
--
For
For existing datasets, the system first figures out which volume the dataset is
on, and if that volume is in an SMS library then SMS gets the allocation, if
the volume is not in an SMS library the allocation continues normally. So, no,
you will not have a problem with the scenario you
Anyone know how to contact them? :-)
I wonder if they ever actually asked NASA?
Folks, EVERY BIT OF EVERY MISSION is available for the archive. Some
of it is online, the rest you must ask for, and they will make a tape
or CD-ROM. The data - all the data - keeps moving from one format to
the
Just something to be aware of when ordering z/OS V1R10. IBM has just
withdrawn Enterprise COBOL for z/OS V3R4 (5655-G53) from marketing. What
was not expected is when we ordered a ServerPac which should include
COBOL, it is not included. What could be included is Enterprise COBOL for z/OS
V4R1
Fill in the details below (LPAR on which the user is logged on, userid
of user to be cancelled etc., removing the '' but keeping the quotes -
e.g. /*$VS,'CANCEL U=ABCDEFGH'), select either the /*ROUTE or the
/*JOBPARM card but not both, and then submit the job. That should do it.
//jobcard
Fill in the details below (LPAR on which the user is logged on, userid of user
to be cancelled etc., removing the '' but keeping the quotes -
e.g. /*$VS,'CANCEL U=ABCDEFGH'), select either the /*ROUTE or the
/*JOBPARM card but not both, and then submit the job. That should do it.
Except for
I'm trying to use Logrec Viewer, downloaded from IBM.
Is the tool suitable for configuration without logrec logstream?
As supplied, it is only with logstream. You can add a new option in the
panels where you can submit a batch job using your SYS1.LOGREC.
You might want to check out my ISPF
I GET PAGE CANNOT BE DISPLAYED message. How about a real UTL.
George Fogg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of David Alcock
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 7:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Logrec Viewer 1.1
I'm trying
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:15:38 +, CM Poncelet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fill in the details below (LPAR on which the user is logged on, userid
of user to be cancelled etc., removing the '' but keeping the quotes -
e.g. /*$VS,'CANCEL U=ABCDEFGH'), select either the /*ROUTE or the
/*JOBPARM card
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:59:24 -0600, Ron Thomas wrote:
We are using SYSVIEW , many a times connections gets lost due to network
problems and id gets locked. In SDSF we can purge the id from my my fellow's
machine, here we need to call the helpdesk and do the same? is there any
faclity here by
I had posted a query on the MXG list about reporting on zIIP usage via the
PROJECTCPU function in IEAOPT.
I got a wonderful response back from Al Sherkow. One of the points he made
surprised me a bit.
Apparently if there are no zIIP or zAAP engines, some ISVs will not make their
SRB's
___
Note: This e-mail is subject to the disclaimer contained at the bottom of this
message.
___
Hi Barbara,
I agree, but
The URL below works for me.
I GET PAGE CANNOT BE DISPLAYED message. How about a real UTL.
George Fogg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of David Alcock
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 7:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
CA Solutions will work without specilaty processors and show you
what would have run on a zIIP when you specify PROJECTCPU.
Please note, your milage may vary from what PROJECTCPU says
vs. what actually happens with the zIIP.
-Original Message-
From: Lizette Koehler [mailto:[EMAIL
In a message dated 11/17/2008 7:29:09 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seems in this new 21st Century I get to monitor all the
Announcement letters on my own and look out for Ole #1 (the new way).
Question: are others finding this to be true and if so, what tools
It's working now.
Thanks,
George Fogg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Roland Schiradin
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Logrec Viewer 1.1
The URL below works for me.
I GET PAGE
In a message dated 11/17/2008 11:38:35 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The URL below works for me.
Likewise. Maybe it's a firewall problem...any return codes?
--- First panel -?
DA$EREP is an ISPF application that makes it easy to browse EREP (LOGREC)
I had called in to the servicelink help desk yesterday. This is the response
from EMEA support:
Some customers have complained about the new look of the ETR pages, in
particular the scroll box that displays the PMR contents.
This feature was deployed because many customers had asked for this,
Bill and I have fun (and ultimately academic) debates on this point. :-)
My view: if it's easier to explain to the boss that a specialty engine is
an accelerator, go right ahead. It's a reasonable way to think about its
impact. If you Google zAAP (or zIIP) and accelerator you'll get
plenty of
If you absolutely cannot figure out how to get zIIP or zAAP eligibility
turned on for certain products, and you suspect you're consequently
undercalling the eligibility in your test measurements, you might want to
talk to your IBM rep.
As one option, under OOCoD (On Off Capacity On Demand) terms
A lot of people subscribe to IBM iNews and set a profile to receive any
announcements concerning their products. I think this works pretty well.
Here's the link:
http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/index.wss?buttonpressed=ADDINFO
Then click on the appropriate iNews link for your part of the world to
Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will any of the more modern drives handle the appropriate density?
I'm not sure: will a 7-track 3420 handle 200 BPI? or 556 BPI?
http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/storage/storage_3420.html
It seems that they do 556 and 800 normally, 200
Seems in this new 21st Century I get to monitor all the Announcement letters
on my own and look out for Ole #1 (the new way).
I, honestly, don't understand the question.
Aren't we responsible for understanding the requirements for each upgrade,
regardless of the product?
-
Too busy driving
79 matches
Mail list logo
