W dniu 2011-12-19 23:52, Henke, George pisze:
Offloading VTAPE to zIIP would not be so bad, no?
No.
(my opinion)
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może
Shane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote in message
news:20111220123112.2a437a52@xpfs...
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:20:16 -0500 Tom Russell wrote:
PR/SM dispatches Logical CPs not Logical Partitions.
I wonder if it'd be considered churlish to point out this wasn't
always
the case.
Shane ...
Yes, I saw that.
It is happening on a CEEHHDLR call. There was previous COBOL but they all
ended.
Running LEDATA against the SVCDUMP I generated does not indicate any LE or
stack errors.
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:49:43 -0500 Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:
:Data at PSW is
:
Hi
RC4 encryption type supported on Kerberos z/OS ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
AMEN my brother!
Richard and Vickie Pinion
--- shai.h...@gmail.com wrote:
From: shai hess shai.h...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Tapeless Solutions
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:52:14 +0200
MFNetDisk also support tapeless solution for emulated tapes.
MFNetDisk tape
George,
Does it have to be IBM? Per Radoslaw's last post, we are using Bustech MDL
1000 with Data Domain back end storage. We are a fairly small shop, and up to
2 weeks ago we had about 5 TBs of data on tape. Most of that was Mobius View
Direct archives. We just went through the Arcmover
A churl is a very old word for a peasant or free man. But became to be
used for someone who has no manners or breeding. To be churlish is to have
bad manners. Like telling a new mom: That is one ugly baby!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churl
quote
This meaning held through the 15th century, but
Mike Schwab wrote:
begin snippet
Actually, the Islamic calendar is 12 lunar months of 29.5 days on
average. So it is shorter than a solar year by about 11 days and the
1st day of the year cycles through the solar year about every 34 or so
years.
/end snippet
and his point in fact makes mine.
In
ofa7a4bf57.9ffc0779-on8525796a.001e8ead-8525796a.00233...@us.ibm.com,
on 12/18/2011
at 01:24 AM, Jim Mulder d10j...@us.ibm.com said:
I could not find anything in the manuals which says this, but it has
worked this way for at least 30 years.
It's worked that way since the 1960's, although
In
ce3ffbb7e42033469ef752a1d8a19ba1eef...@kl1221tc.cs.ad.klmcorp.net,
on 12/19/2011
at 09:29 AM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com said:
You don't have to wait for it, you can also force it. Amdahl's MDF
did it. The main difference was that PR/SM is interrupt driven and
MDF was
In
f255efe0ecf08c4a9c1db6aff423541717de3...@ch2wpmail1.na.ds.ussco.com,
on 12/19/2011
at 01:47 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com said:
Why not specify the epoch origin as the Big Bang?
Because there are insurmountable theoretical difficulties in clock
synchronization and insurmountable
In 20111219091748.715752d5f...@urania.ugcs.caltech.edu, on
12/19/2011
at 01:17 AM, glen herrmannsfeldt g...@ugcs.caltech.edu said:
But if I understand it right, the date is computed from the value
in the interval timer, along with various offsets, only when it is
actually needed.
Do you
In
cajtoo5_sojvvt4dmwbn6pa6wb5gk92jq56vwuk4qez6viv0...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/19/2011
at 02:03 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:
Actually, I think they are going to have to downgrade the Big Bang
(creating all matter and the Universe) to a Large Bang (creating
known matter withing
Are you serious?
Kees.
Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote in
message news:20111220144901.d5dcaf58...@smtp.patriot.net...
In
ce3ffbb7e42033469ef752a1d8a19ba1eef...@kl1221tc.cs.ad.klmcorp.net,
on 12/19/2011
at 09:29 AM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com
Chaucer spelt it cherl.
Martin
Martin Packer,
Mainframe Performance Consultant, zChampion
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
In
ce3ffbb7e42033469ef752a1d8a19ba1eef...@kl1221tc.cs.ad.klmcorp.net,
on 12/20/2011
at 04:15 PM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com said:
Are you serious?
Certainly. If I recall correctly, MDF was implemented in what Amdahl
called macrocode, not by dedicated hardware. So what
Muslims.
--Original Message--
From: John Gilmore
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
ReplyTo: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Imagine having to deal with THIS in production
Sent: 20 Dec 2011 09:47
Mike Schwab wrote:
begin snippet
Actually,
Of course, but I suppose you know what I meant: PR/SM sits waiting for
an LPAR to produce an interrupt and decides then what to do next. MDF
determines that it wants to take action after a certain timeslice,
whether the domains like it or not.
The fact that the end of the timeslice might be
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
Certainly. If I recall correctly, MDF was implemented in what Amdahl
called macrocode, not by dedicated hardware. So what triggered the
redispatch at the end of a time slice if not an external interrupt?
the guys doing MDF use to
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:14:36 -0500, Shmuel Metz wrote:
How did MDF detect the end of a timeslice if not by an interrupt?
That is how it detected the end of a time slice. Early MDF code
would dispatch a different domain as soon as a processor entered
a wait state. That was determined to cause
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:33:14 -0500, Shmuel Metz wrote:
If I recall correctly, MDF was implemented in what Amdahl
called macrocode,
That's correct. Very similar to the millicode on current IBM
mainframes. A superset of 370 instructions that ran in
system state.
not by dedicated hardware.
Shane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote in message
news:20111220123112.2a437a52@xpfs...
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:20:16 -0500 Tom Russell wrote:
PR/SM dispatches Logical CPs not Logical Partitions.
SNIPPAGE
- I am quite sure that pr/sm always dispatched Logical CPs and Amdahls
MDF dispatched entire
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:19:35 +0100, Vernooij, CP wrote:
I am quite sure that pr/sm always dispatched Logical CPs and Amdahls
MDF dispatched entire domains (their word for lpar).
If by dispatched entire domains you mean that all of the
logical processors for a domain were always dispatched
In
ce3ffbb7e42033469ef752a1d8a19ba1eef...@kl1221tc.cs.ad.klmcorp.net,
on 12/20/2011
at 04:53 PM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com said:
Of course, but I suppose you know what I meant:
You're welcome to suppose what you wish. Just don't be surprised when
your suppositions are wrong
From Martin Packer:
| Chaucer spelt it cherl.
He did indeed, and he explicated his use of it very neatly in
| For vileyns sinful deeds make a cherl.
in which vileyn/villein/villain is not yet pejorative. Shane's use
was, I think, the more modern, now standard one that makes churlish is
a
Hi all! Does anyone know if or how it is possible to PUT temporary files
(filenm) using FTP in z/OS?
Thanks for the information!
*don*
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Donald Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: FTP PUT of temporary files possible?
Hi all! Does anyone know if or how it is possible to
You mean something like this?
//STEP9 EXEC PGM=FTP,PARM='(EXIT TIMEOUT 600'
//RPTVLTF DD DISP=(OLD),DSN=VLTF
//RPTDRDD DISP=(OLD),DSN=DR
//OUTPUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//INPUTDD *
Id
Password
PUT //DD:RPTVLTF VLTF.TXT
PUT
Rats! got the parms to the PUT reversed in the previous email.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Donald Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: FTP PUT of temporary files
Thanks Ulrich and John...I was so intent on thinking of the filename, I had
forgotten the //DD functionality...I will give this a go!
Thanks, danke, Merry Christmas und Frohe Weihnachten!
*don*
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Ulrich Krueger u...@pacbell.net wrote:
You mean something like
Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote in
message news:20111220170650.bceecf58...@smtp.patriot.net...
In
ce3ffbb7e42033469ef752a1d8a19ba1eef...@kl1221tc.cs.ad.klmcorp.net,
on 12/20/2011
at 04:53 PM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com said:
Of course, but I
That is where the Modified Julian Date comes in by subtracting 1/2 day
os 0.000 is midnight and 0.500 is noon.
Swatch time http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time and
watchs are almost the same thing, but they are using Central Europe
time of UTC+1.
0100Z = @000
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Muslims.
The Jewish calendear might be worse. They use leap months to keep the
calendar roughly aligned with the season. But after a leap month,
your year to year comparisons of the weather on a certain day of the
year
HI,
I have a customer question:
1. How could I configure MFNetDisk in ZOS in order to use ONLY the IP
192.168.254.200, instead of 192.168.254.254, because the last one is used
for production traffic?
MFNetDIsk uses TCP EZASMI API.
Can I run 2 TCPIP procedure running together?
TCPIP which
You can run several IP stacks in the same lpar.
ITschak
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:45 PM, shai hess shai.h...@gmail.com wrote:
HI,
I have a customer question:
1. How could I configure MFNetDisk in ZOS in order to use ONLY the IP
192.168.254.200, instead of 192.168.254.254, because the
Now, as I have asked a few times yet I don't quite get it, why do you need
multiple stacks?
Ok, I have my own personal mainframe, what can I accomplish with multiple
tcp/ip stacks, and to have the, what is it called, something affinity?, in any
case, there is a default and another choice.
Am 20.12.2011 19:45, schrieb shai hess:
HI,
I have a customer question:
1. How could I configure MFNetDisk in ZOS in order to use ONLY the IP
192.168.254.200, instead of 192.168.254.254, because the last one is used
for production traffic?
MFNetDIsk uses TCP EZASMI API.
Can I
You can use the SRCIP in the tcpprof
SRCIP
JOBNAME S250XXXD 172.26.1.1
JOBNAME XXXA 172.27.1.65
JOBNAME YYYR 172.27.1.65
ENDSRCIP
You can also bind at the port level if you want
PORT
21 TCP FTPD1 BIND 172.26.1.1;FTP Server
23 TCP TN3270 ; Telnet 3270 Server
Thank you. I think that this can be the best answer for my case.
Just to make it sure. If ZOS is the client (source) and PC is the
(destination).
If client ic MF want to connect and send data to PC, then if I will
specify in MF TCPIP address space
SRCIP
JOBNAME MFNetDisk 172.26.1.1
ENDSRCIP
Is it
first, as always, I do NOT speak for SAS. I am just another contributor to
this list, mostly I just learn. I contribute when I can, but alas it isn't as
often as I would like.
it is sometimes called the stack affinity. Google it a bit. you need to
know MUCH more about how to get the
don't stop here. please dig deeper. this isn't in my opinion the answer you
are looking for.
Most kind regards, Lindy
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
shai hess
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 10:42 PM
To:
In
cajtoo5-fmja5w5yauc_h-u_rd1aosqr3zrn9q_ncwnduq7p...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/20/2011
at 12:40 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said:
The Jewish calendear might be worse. They use leap months to keep
the calendar roughly aligned with the season.
There are also smaller adjustments such
Shai, I'm not sure I understand what you are asking..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of shai hess
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 2:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: TCPIP question
Thank you. I think that this can
Coping with the Jewish calendar in fact provides an excellent vehicle
for learning to do date arithmetic in general.
Among the not quite obvious pitfalls: There are Jewish holidays that,
at long intervals, do not occur at all in some Gregorian year, and
there are others that occur, again
Shai
As I have already reminded Lindy Mayfield, the best list for this sort of query
is the following:
For IBMTCP-L subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO IBMTCP-L
-
I detect that you are not very comfortable with the
At 20:38 -0600 on 12/16/2011, Chris Mason wrote about Re: Imagine
dealing with THIS in production:
Mike
Just think about all the people born on Feb 29th.
They would have their 15th birthdate when they are 60 years old.
Paradoxically a 29th February birthday can have happy consequences
At 23:02 -0600 on 12/19/2011, Joel C. Ewing wrote about Re: Imagine
having to deal with THIS in production:
There are of course other strong arguments against universal usage
of JD for dates any time in our lifetime. As long as we remain an
Earth-centric and not a space-centric culture, that
At 22:44 -0600 on 12/18/2011, David Mierowsky wrote about Re: Imagine
dealing with THIS in production:
At least they didn't have to deal with this! Thankfully this was
sorted out long before computers were around!
The Changes of 1752
In accordance with a 1750 act of Parliament, England and
Lindy
I recalled there had been a recent discussion regarding the desirability or
otherwise of using more that one instance of the IP component of z/OS
Communications Server supported by the same z/OS (in one LPAR obviously).
Then I checked - and, in terms of list-craft, it's a bit of a mess!
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg hal9...@panix.com wrote:
At 20:38 -0600 on 12/16/2011, Chris Mason wrote about Re: Imagine dealing
with THIS in production:
Paradoxically a 29th February birthday can have happy consequences - at
least in the fertile imagination of a writer
Robert A. Rosenberg writes:
begin snippet
. . . There is also the issue that in some calenders the date of New
Year's Day (ie: When the new year starts) is not a fixed number of
days from the start of the year but needs to be decided at the last
moment by an official who issues his ruling.
/end
Thank you Chris and others,
I will continue if I will need with the proper forum.
I thought that the answer to my customer can be simple by changing some
parameters in the TCPIP option file.
Anyway, I thought that changing parameter in TCP can better balance the OSA
HW between production load
Am I the only one who read the subject line too quickly, mentally
substituting an o for the a and dropping the first e?
I must be regressing.
Timothy Sipples
Resident Enterprise Architect
HI,
Another email from Spain.
I assume that more then 90% of the MF users never heard about MFNetDisk.
I only publish my product in this forum and sometime in the past in
Hercules forum.
So, the product is spread by old and happy users to new users and that
make me happy.
Some people offer
Yes, I also read it as TOPLESS, so I smile.
I hope I did not make to myself bad name, more then before.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Timothy Sipples timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
Am I the only one who read the subject line too quickly, mentally
substituting an o for the a and dropping
Thanks,
Shai
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Michael Klaeschen
michael.klaesc...@deutscherring.de wrote:
I think yes, the answer is simple by changing some parameters in the TCPIP
options file. To be precise: your objective of limiting access to IP
addresses or ports can be achieved with
56 matches
Mail list logo
