Hi
Without SYSPRINT or alternate you can easily get rc 12
On 28.02.2013 04:49, saurabh khandelwal wrote:
Thanks All,
I have used the code provided my IBM in SDSF with REXX
manual. Looks like the code is not properly setup and require many
modification to make it work.
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:19:33 +0530, saurabh khandelwal wrote:
Thanks All,
I have used the code provided my IBM in SDSF with REXX
manual. Looks like the code is not properly setup and require many
modification to make it work.
If anybody has used that code
Hallo To All Members
As a follow up to Esmie's post would anyone know if there is an IBM manual
around which would detail or contain the information to implement DUPLEXING? I
would like to read up on this topic.
Thanks.
From: esmie moo esmie_...@yahoo.ca
Hi
Searching for some simple tool to give some DISK allocation
values/statistics via qualifiers or user names.
I would like to see:
X user allocated x Mbyte
or
HQ1.HQ2.HQ3 allocated z Mbyte
--
Kind regards, / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Miklos Szigetvari
Research Development
ISIS Papyrus
Chapter 9 (Making Disaster Backup Copies of HSM-Owned Tape Volumes) of the
DFSMShsm Storage Administration manual and Chapter 10 (Implementing HSM Tape
Environments) of the DFSMShsm Implementation and Customization Guide. I don't
think there are any Redbooks on the subject other than those in a
Miklos,
There are a variety of licensed products that perform this function (including
the Storage Manager plug-in for MXI) - however if a simple batch report is
all you require, then I would suggest looking at DCOLLECT post-processing
programs or REXX execs on the CBT tape site :
the ONLY alignment values actually supported by contents supervision
were doubleword and page, regardless of what the binder doc claimed.
Of course the artist formerly known as CC is correct
The binder doc really does not claim otherwise. The binder (and assembler)
primarily support alignment
Somewhat tangential to the prior discussion(s).
Recently having had some experience with serious impacts of (non-IRD) LPAR
capping, I can only surmise the practicalities over-whelm the design. Quite
possibly exacerbated by being in a ring environment.
In both defined capacity capping and
You may want to take a look at Mark's SDSF@DR program. It sounds like what the
OP wanted to do.
Mark's page:
http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html
Regards,
Herman Stocker
It is impossible to make anything foolproof, because fools are so ingenious.
-- Robert Heinlein
The sender
As I understand the example, it was dependent on SYSPARM having 7
characters. For what it's worth, that happens to be the typical SYSPARM
that IBM products are built with (the FMID is 7 characters long, as is
an APAR number) when SYSPARM is used at all. Nevertheless, if a sample is
truly
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Searching for some simple tool to give some DISK allocation
values/statistics via qualifiers or user names.
I would like to see:
X user allocated x Mbyte
It depends on what you want. Is it (only?) datasets starting with X as HLQ1?
HQ1.HQ2.HQ3 allocated z Mbyte
ISMF
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:55:50 -0500, John Eells wrote:
IIRC (always a dangerous assumption), the page size changed from 2K to
4K in MVS 3.8 SE2.
I don't think so. IIRC, MVS never supported 2K pages. OS/VS1 did
I know this is OT, but I hope it is of some interest to the majority of
readers.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/02/pissed-off-politicians-want-loser-pays-rule-for-patent-trolls/
--
This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an
actual emergency, do you really
Customer:
The example on page 666 is wrong!
IBM:
So what? It's only an example!
Customer:
How do I ... ?
IBM:
See the example on page 666.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
crosspost from CICS-l...
I am looking for information about tolls, methods, how to, experience on
IMS/TM to CICS conversion. Thanks for your advise.
Itschak
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
On 02/28/2013 06:52 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
As I understand the example, it was dependent on SYSPARM having 7
characters. For what it's worth, that happens to be the typical SYSPARM
that IBM products are built with (the FMID is 7 characters long, as is
an APAR number) when SYSPARM is used at
Joel C. Ewing wrote:
snip
I would contend that the length of time a behavior has been in place
doesn't really count if the bad consequences of that behavior have only
recently been revealed.
snip
The problem with changing really old behaviors like this one is that
people are often relying on
It is probably true, that during the uncapped parts of the pattern, IRD could
have a chance to adjust weights, if this is what you mean by a 'better
chance'.
Yes, exactly. (BTW, I don't want to promote pattern capping in general.)
AFAIK, I must use the HMC to set the values again to their
Hello friends,
We're experiencing some weird DFSORT behavior after replacing our DS8100 with a
DS8800. Immediately after we configured and then moved our page datasets to a
DS8800, a number of DFSORT jobs started consuming all available (and sometimes
not so available) memory. We noticed in
W dniu 2013-02-27 17:54, Roberts, John J pisze:
I doubt the special capability of CDROM drive.
A bit of searching uncovered this statement from the Sun FAQ:
To ensure 100% compatibility on machines running Solaris 2.5.1 and
older, it is necessary to use a CD-ROM drive capable of supporting
John,
In my short 40 yrs, I can tell you also it has to do with experience much like
what you saying.
The assumption certain coding techniques were te only way. If you work in only
a couple places you not see other methods and or techniques.
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Tell me and
The only thing I can think of that DFSORT and a DASD device have 'in
common' is Cache Fast Write. Maybe you had it on on the DS8100 and not
on the DS8800. Although I cannot figure out immediately what effect this
has on memory, except that the CFW I/O is probably faster.
Kees.
-Original
Adams, Anne wrote:
We're experiencing some weird DFSORT behavior after replacing our DS8100 with
a DS8800. Immediately after we configured and then moved our page datasets to
a DS8800, a number of DFSORT jobs started consuming all available (and
sometimes not so available) memory. We noticed
Hi
Thank you , CBT tape 206 (Linnea Nichols) as good as 20 years ago (from
1994) .
Hmmm 20 years has passed, nothing has changed ?
On 28.02.2013 13:24, Rob Scott wrote:
Miklos,
There are a variety of licensed products that perform this function (including the
Storage Manager plug-in
Changes in paging activity? Okay, THAT did change when this occurred. We page
like hell bent for leather. Our page data sets fill up like crazy and NEVER
empty. When these jobs run, they page everything they can out of memory.
All DFSORT options are defaults - we're using DFSORT through DB2.
The arguments John Eells makes for retaining long-established
interfaces as they are and have been for decades are eminently
respectable generic ones.
As a defense cherished infelicities they are, I think, unanswerable.
In application to this case they nevertheless come close to something
very
On 2/28/2013 4:28 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
the ONLY alignment values actually supported by contents supervision
were doubleword and page, regardless of what the binder doc claimed.
Of course the artist formerly known as CC is correct
The binder doc really does not claim otherwise. The binder
One can make a case for brevity.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
No, they don't page everything out of memory.DFsort and DB2 coorporate nicely
with RSM to see how much memory is available for DFSORT. If you have usually
more than sufficient memory, DFSORT can easily take quite a lot of it. This
does mean that RSM has to page out pages that do not cause
Kees Vernooij wrote:
Again: the fact that DFsort acts differently on the new device could be caused
by CFW. With CFW dfsort could decide to use SORTWKs, without CFW DFSORT could
decide that this is too slow and use memory.
Very true! Will the DFSORT gurus answer on your statement this or next
On 2/28/2013 7:15 AM, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Hi
Searching for some simple tool to give some DISK allocation
values/statistics via qualifiers or user names.
I would like to see:
X user allocated x Mbyte
or
HQ1.HQ2.HQ3 allocated z Mbyte
ISPF 3.4. Select Total.
Regards,
Tom Conley
Thanks, I felt so alone. Like we were the only ones having this problem.
Checking into the Cache Fast Write on both the old and new DASD.
Anne R. Adams
DTI, Systems Engineering
State of Delaware
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
I have seen DB2 utilities with large sorts (reorgs of partitioned table spaces,
which does a lot in parallel), that consumed 6 - 8 GB memory of the 16GB in the
LPAR. Nobody was really harmed by it, only you could see RMS paging out heavily
old stuff to make room for the utilty. On these
Anne,
I've been discussing this with the DFSORT L2 rep that's working on
your problem. I don't believe CFW is related to this. I think I have an
idea of what's going on, but I'd rather work the problem through our
support process and then once we are sure of the cause, I can post an
In 5875672601797580.wa.breton.imhauseracxiom@listserv.ua.edu, on
02/22/2013
at 03:01 PM, Breton Imhauser breton.imhau...@acxiom.com said:
I also am wondering if there is a macro/copy member with EQUates for
the device types returned.
IEFUCBOB?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg
In 5457404732659672.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
02/26/2013
at 08:39 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
What I was more thinking of was that on the 3350 an optimum block
size was 6KiB, 3 times the 2KiB page size supported on the S/360
(370?)
The S/370 supported both 2
In 512e1e76@us.ibm.com, on 02/27/2013
at 09:55 AM, John Eells ee...@us.ibm.com said:
IIRC (always a dangerous assumption), the page size changed from 2K
to 4K in MVS 3.8 SE2.
No, MVS always used 4 KiB page frames. Perhaps you are thinking of
storage keys; I don't recall which processor
shmuel+...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
The S/370 supported both 2 KiB and 4 KiB pages; the 360/67 only
supported 4 KiB. As I recall, DOS/VS and OS/VS1 used 2 KiB, while
OS/VS2 used 4 KiB. I don't recall what page sizes Virtual Machine
Facility/370 supported.
360/67
Has anyone experienced slow down of FTP after upgrading to z/OS 1.13
(from 1.11)?
We have noticed that transfers of large files to one particular Linux
server from the mainframe have dropped from around 700kps to 200kps.
I found and applied UK82536 for PM73355 but it made no difference.
Of
From: Joel C. Ewing jcew...@acm.org
Date: 02/28/2013 08:05 AM
SNIPPAGE
SYSPARM is a documented system variable that is set based on parameter
options specified when the Assembler is invoked. Installations may use
this parameter for their own purposes, which makes any assumptions of
there
From: Walt Farrell walt.farr...@gmail.com
Date: 02/28/2013 08:05 AM
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:07:47 -0600, Steve Thompson sthomp...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
Glad it worked for you. I tried it with IEBCOPY and couldn't make it work
at all (yes, I compared the example in the REXX book to the info in
Ok - this is EXACTLY what we're seeing now. The one issue is that when the page
data sets fill up, they never get emptied and we end up having to add new ones.
What do people do? We can't IPL every week or go on adding page datasets
indefinitely.
Anne R. Adams
DTI, Systems Engineering
(302)
We had a similar situation and ended coding the sort parms:
EXPOLD=0
EXPMAX=50%
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Adams, Anne (DTI)
anne.ad...@state.de.uswrote:
Thanks Dave,
I did double check the CFW issue. It was turned off on the DS8100 but is
on with the DS8800. Will update Sam in the
Yeah, we've been told to do the same thing, but I need to know why this
suddenly happened. All we did was move our page data sets to the DS8800.
Anne R. Adams
DTI, Systems Engineering
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
I am planning on implementing the AUDITID parameter under zFS this weekend and
was wondering if there are any gotchas to look out for.
To the best of my knowledge, all I have to do is specify convert_auditfid=on
in my IOEPRM00 member of SYS1.PARMLIB
All suggestions greatly appreciated.
Bob
On 02/28/13 12:49, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
I am planning on implementing the AUDITID parameter under zFS this weekend and
was wondering if there are any gotchas to look out for.
To the best of my knowledge, all I have to do is specify convert_auditfid=on
in my IOEPRM00 member of
Yes, seems the $DEST kind of destroyed my registers and it was actually the
RETURN failing.. Old code did not do a SAVE at beginning.. Once I added that,
it started working thank goodness! I think we have probably been lucky that it
hasn't had a problem before I touched it.
Thanks you for
Thanks for all the pointers! I did get around to chasing down UCB constants,
and indeed found there, that byte 3 is the Device class constant I was
looking for, as recorded by ICF. Thanks all!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
In
897c82fc69765d45a301af8f5d1210cb0df5939...@otb6mail01.executive.stateofwv.gov,
on 02/27/2013
at 11:20 AM, Crabtree, Anne D anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov said:
CLC=CL4'VPRT',0(R6)
Gets a S0C4.
With what interrupt code? What's in R6? Is R12 correct? What are the
PSW and storage keys?
In
b870629719727b4ba82a6c06a31c291239b4928...@hqmailsvr01.voltage.com,
on 02/27/2013
at 06:42 AM, Phil Smith p...@voltage.com said:
In one of the IBM sample exits for DB2 (DSNA10.SDSNSAMP(DSN8FPRC))
we find:
SAVE (14,12),,'''SYSPARM SYSDATE SYSTIME'''
...which won't assemble,
Shmuel Metz wrote:
Did you create an ETR?
No, I don't have any way to do so (we're a vendor, don't have a real customer
number).
Where did you look? It's been there since OS/360 and it was still in
z/OS MVS Programming: Assembler Services Reference, Volume 2
(IAR-XCT), SA22-7607-15. I'd be
Don,
That's a good idea ..I used SAVE but with a minor modification ...I found and
borrowed *grin*
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll
understand. - Chinese Proverb
On Feb 28, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Don Williams
l...@garlic.com (Anne Lynn Wheeler) writes:
360/67 support 4kbyte pages and 1mbyte segments ... but it also
supported 24bit and 32bit virtual addressing modes (aka 16mbyte and
4gbyte virtual address spaces).
370 support 2kbyte and 4kbyte pages and 64kbyte and 1mbyte segments
... but only
Yeah, we've been told to do the same thing, but I need to know why
this suddenly happened. All we did was move our page data sets to the
DS8800.
Did the move preserve the number of page data sets, and the size of
the page data sets? Was the total amount of page data set space the
same
Anne -
Jim brings up a good point. Are all of your Page Datasets the same size on
the new box ?
If you have page Datasets allocated of different sizes then you end up not
using the full capacity of each page dataset from what I remember. I
recollect that the slot count used is the same across
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:14:29 -0600, Steve Thompson wrote:
And I am aware of the APF issue (and why it must be so), so that was what
I was waiting for -- if I hit the S047 ABEND, I knew I had a show stopper.
The method of invocation that I used works fine:
It needn't be so. As evidenced by
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013c.html#13 I do not understand S0C6 on CDSG
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013c.html#15 I do not understand S0C6 on CDSG
with regard to offline email regarding page replacement algorithms
When I was starting work on paging stuff as undergraduate circa 1968,
there
SAVE THE DATE! 2012 Workshop June 20-22 2013 at Indiana University-Purdue
University Indianapolis (Indianapolis, IN)
WHO:
z/VM, and Linux on System z Friends
WHAT:
Location, travel, lodging from (really inexpensive!) dorm rooms up to nearby
hotels, registration, travel hints, and
Well, you know. When you ask someone did they change anything and they say, No
I didn't change anything. They mean, No I didn't change anything that should
have affected you.
They did indeed change the size of at least one of the page datasets. That's
interesting to note that the slot count of
No, at least one of the page data sets was larger during the initial migration.
Also, as the page datasets fill up they'll add additional ones of varying sizes.
Anne R. Adams
DTI, Systems Engineering
State of Delaware
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Non-uniform page datasets is just bad. The smallest will generally drive the
allocation of all.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Adams, Anne
I don't remember if PAGEDEL on smallest will allow reallocation. Might take
IPL.
In a message dated 2/28/2013 5:05:28 P.M. Central Standard Time,
gib...@wsu.edu writes:
The smallest will generally drive the allocation of all
Cross-posted to Linux-390, IBMVM, and IBM-MAIN discussion lists.
To: VM Workshop attendees and those who would *like* to attend,
Background: The VM Workshop is a very inexpensive (registration only $100 each
of the last 2 years), all-volunteer, 2.5 day technical conference held in
All page D/S should be the same size (along with any to add later).
The ASM uses the smallest times the number attempting to (in general) fill to a
max of 65% (iirc).
I forget the exact numbers, but there used to be a warning at 60-65 and a
'crisis' at 80-85%.
There was an old zap in INITTUNE to
You may want to hold the PMR.
IIRC, to prevent scrollable areas from repositioning to the top you have
to use the ISPF DISPLAY service without a panel name after the initial
display. You will need to
use the REINIT section for any panel logic.
DISPLAY PANEL(MYPABNEL)
do while rc /= 0
Hello Walt,
I am running this program under z/OS 1.13 system only.
Regards
Saurabh
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Walt Farrell walt.farr...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:07:47 -0600, Steve Thompson sthomp...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
Glad it worked for you. I tried it
Hello Herman,
I have check this Mark's utility earlier, but this
doesn't suit to my requirement because my target is to put Job's output in
a single PDS with different members( name can be Job id or Job name). This
will be useful for us, while we are installing any product or
I had a bug in my previous snippet!
DISPLAY PANEL(MYPANEL)
do while rc = 0
DISPLAY
end
Panel processing including scrolling is documented in the ISPF manual
under defining the reinitialization section
All page D/S should be the same size (along with any to add later).
The ASM uses the smallest times the number attempting to (in
general) fill to a max of 65% (iirc).
That's just crazy talk. While there might be some load balancing
related motivations for using similar sized page data
Dave,
The PMR is already opened.
The actions that were described were with the IBM ISR@PRIM panel, not my own.
Yes, the UP/DOWN/LEFT/RIGHT are SETVERB actions but are recognized on the
ISR@PRIM panel by input in the ZCMD field. After the DOWN FRED I would
expect ZVERB to contain DOWN but why
I can only echo Shane's reply. I don't know why you are messing around with
external utilities when SDSF Rexx provides you with the function you are after.
Why re-invent the wheel?
Below is a snippet of Rexx invoking SDSF functions to write held sysout to a
PDS:
Anne,
Just for the picture: how much memory do you have in your LPAR and what is the
total size of the page datasets.?
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Adams, Anne (DTI)
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 18:29
Even 700 KBps seems very low - unless it's only a 10 Mbps ethernet link. What
is the topology? Any routers etc in the path? What I'd do is get a packet trace
(use Wireshark on the Linux box, or a SYSTCPDA CTRACE on z/OS) and check for
packet retransmissions or other anomalies. Wireshark is very
73 matches
Mail list logo
