Wondering why no one has suggested the all new USS file/directory dumping
capability in DFDSS.
I would also run ls -alf in a batch job against all the 'old' mount points to
get a listing of owners & permissions.
Batch because the output will probably be huge.
See if Co:Z SFTP can help in any
Well, I'll look at he manuals tomorrow. Fortunately, this is still the sandbox.
It worked fine with the Syncsort
ICE067I 0 INVALID PARAMETER IN JCL EXEC PARM OR INVOKED PARM LIST
JOIN UNPAIRED
JOINKEYS
On 29/10/2020 8:40 am, Kirk Wolf wrote:
/bin/sh (when it uses spawn() and _BPX_SHAREAS=YES/MUST) will try to start
the child process in the **same** address space as the parent.
I just reran the same script with _BPX_SHAREAS=YES to see what it looked
like.
It cut the number of SMF records
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 19:59:45 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>They call them smart hyphens because someone is guarantied to smart when they
>are covertly used.
>
I tried to suggest as much with my Subject:
>A gentleman name Dante wrote a comedy about people who deploy such code.
>
Is that Dante
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 5:37 PM Andrew Rowley
wrote:
> /bin/sh is executing the commands in a separate address space but
> without the sub-step created by fork-exec (I guess this is the spawn
> method that Kirk Wolf described).
>
>
/bin/sh (when it uses spawn() and _BPX_SHAREAS=YES/MUST) will
After you get your unix files to the target system,
If you need to change ownership of all the directories the following will come
in handy:
//JS10 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN
> What's your criterion for separating fields into lines? Your example is
insufficiently informative.
Gil,
This is my interpretation of the requirement. Treat the entire data that OP
showed as a single line of data and OP wants to split the records beginning
with open curly bracket { and end
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:40:54 +, Ituriel do Neto wrote:
>Hi,
>I have an omvs file and would like to separate the fields into multiple
>lines.The input file has the following format:
>
What's your criterion for separating fields into lines? Your example
is insufficiently informative.
>
Ituriel,
Here is DFSORT/ICETOOL job that would give you the desired results. I
assumed that you can have a maximum of 100 records in a single record. I
assumed that the maximum length of each individual record has a length of
60 bytes.
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=ICETOOL
//TOOLMSG DD SYSOUT=*
Hi,
I have an omvs file and would like to separate the fields into multiple
lines.The input file has the following format:
They call them smart hyphens because someone is guarantied to smart when they
are covertly used. A gentleman name Dante wrote a comedy about people who
deploy such code. It's as bad as the auto-defect code that automatically and
silently changes correct words to incorrect, and ludicrous, words.
Classification: Internal
Last time I looked, WPS was noticeably less expensive than SAS and fully
embraced by Barry.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 2:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
In
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.bpxa500/r4paxsh.htm
each option is shown as being introduced by an en-dash, x'e2 80 93'
rather than the corrct hyphen, x'2d'. This is a disservice to
programmers who choose to copy-and-paste code from the
Barry pointed this out to me. And I did know this. My reply to him is below.
Maybe I should look at a trial version of that SAS equivalent out of the UK.
Thanks Barry,
Except I do have a fair sized investment in my current batch MXG jobs. And,
as I've mentioned before, we will be shutdown
SAS and MXG have PC versions.
So, I lose MXG and reasonable ability to process SMF anyway.
-Original Message-
From: Gibney, Dave
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Oct 28, 2020 11:47 am
Subject: Re: Syncsort to DFSORT - my time has come.
If we had longer to exist, I might. But,
> The rules are so convoluted that it ought to be simpler to remove the
> exceptions.
Exactly. I have learned that the key is to write the documentation FIRST. It is
often easier to write code that corresponds to something that was written
clearly than to try to clearly document something that
Once concern would be the GID/UIDs - if they are different on the target
system from the source there will be problems.
Lionel B. Dyck <
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
"Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what
you are, reputation merely what others think
After the pax, unmount your new ZFS/HFS file. DFDSS dump it, terse the dump
then FTP the tersed file. At the receiving site, unterse and restore.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin
A PDSE or a Eunix file systems, either of which might also include text files.
At least with PDS, it's rare (don't ask, don't tell) for a library to have both
load modules and other member types.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:40:04 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>That's the problem. Not PGM=UNIX_thing specifically but that there are so many
>special cases. One could not simply write an introductory paragraph "When we
>say executable we mean any of ..." because then EXEC PGM=executable would be
In Eunixland, isn't an executable anything with execute permission, including
text files beginning with a shebang? And what if you want to refer only to load
modules and program objects, not to Eunix files?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:43:22 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>And then copy the pax with FTP or whatever and then un-pax it?
>
ssh is your friend. No need to store the archive. But when I shot from
the hip, suggesting:
( cd $HOME & pax -w . ) | ssh -f user@other-lpar 'cd & pax -vr'
# Must
W dniu 28.10.2020 o 18:25, Jesse 1 Robinson pisze:
Radoslaw, I would be happy to have you as my teacher.
You are very kind, thank you.
In fact I really love teaching.
IMHO this is crucial - when you do what you like, usually you do it well.
I was teaching maths, physics, chemistry, and
And then copy the pax with FTP or whatever and then un-pax it?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Michael Brennan
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How best to
That's the problem. Not PGM=UNIX_thing specifically but that there are so many
special cases. One could not simply write an introductory paragraph "When we
say executable we mean any of ..." because then EXEC PGM=executable would be
incorrect; we would have to say PGM=executable* and *except a
W dniu 28.10.2020 o 17:52, Charles Mills pisze:
I have two z/OS systems joined by a real fast TCP connection. (They're
actually two guests on the same VM, but seeing as how I have relatively
little knowledge or authority on the VM side of things it may be simpler to
just think of them as two
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:19:49 +0100, R.S. wrote:
>Executable - that could mean REXX or CLIST.
>In fact people usually say:
>load module - nevermind what is proper name of member/program in PDSE
>binary - could be ambiguous
>binary program - better a little
>EXE files/members - just analogy to
Mount yourself a brand new empty ZFS or HFS file and mount it at /To_Directory/
then go into OMVS (TSO OMVS) and issue following commands:
cd /from_directory/
pax -rvwkC -pe * /To_Directory/
Michael
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Radoslaw, I would be happy to have you as my teacher.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
W dniu 28.10.2020 o 18:00, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:09:27 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Load module or program object should be easy: executable, or binary executable.
Does this include "executable" residing in a UNIX directory? Must this be
further clarified, perhaps to
Executable - that could mean REXX or CLIST.
In fact people usually say:
load module - nevermind what is proper name of member/program in PDSE
binary - could be ambiguous
binary program - better a little
EXE files/members - just analogy to PC-DOS or Windows world
compiled program - one could
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:52:23 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>I have two z/OS systems joined by a real fast TCP connection. (They're
>actually two guests on the same VM, but seeing as how I have relatively
>little knowledge or authority on the VM side of things it may be simpler to
>just think of
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:09:27 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>Load module or program object should be easy: executable, or binary executable.
>
Does this include "executable" residing in a UNIX directory? Must this be
further clarified, perhaps to prohibit:
//STEP EXEC PGM='/bin/true'
--
I have two z/OS systems joined by a real fast TCP connection. (They're
actually two guests on the same VM, but seeing as how I have relatively
little knowledge or authority on the VM side of things it may be simpler to
just think of them as two adjacent machines.) This is the IBM Dallas
If we had longer to exist, I might. But, we haven't been collecting Syncsort
SMF, so until I see the need...
And my SAS license expires soon also. So, I lose MXG and reasonable ability to
process SMF anyway.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of
Load module or program object should be easy: executable, or binary executable.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 8:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Generic name for PDS/PDSE
I use
Not my dog... I'm just a developer.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Martin Packer
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 2:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Syncsort to DFSORT - my time has come.
FWIW I would go with SMF=FULL -
And load modules live in a load library. What the heck do program objects
live in -- and what would be the generic or "inclusive" name for that and/or
a load library?
When one is writing code testing for condition X or condition Y is not a
whole lot more complex than testing just for condition X.
What I have may not be the best. This is my first attempt at this.
And, I'm no expert in this area. If you see things that I shouldn't
be using, please let me know. This is what I cobbled together
from the zOSMF Network thing, and Googling. So, please be
kind in your criticism.
TTLSRule
Reply with your PAGENT rules for FTPS - you need a client and a server rule
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
PINION, RICHARD W.
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 10:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] z/OS 2.4 and FTP server with FTP
What would it even mean to release the space for a member?
Note: RLSE is a positional sub-parameter of SPACE on a DD statement; the
leading commas are mandatory.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
I use "PDS(E)", but what's the generic for "load module or program object"?
I spell auto-correct as "auto-defect"; we hates it, precious. Of course, some
of the "corrections" are hilarious.
I would interpret "MVS library" as DSNTYPE=LIBRARY, but I wouldn't bet on that
being correct.
--
I've been working with z/OS 2.4's FTP server using AT-TLS with certificates
for the last few days. PAGENT is setup, and it seems to be functioning
correctly. I've finally gotten to the point of the client sending in a
certificate
and logging on without having to specify a password, which is
Dear IBM Z user,
Please take our survey to help us understand your experience with
upgrading z/OS releases and adopting new function and enhancements through
continuous delivery.
Here's the link to the survey:
https://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/5953855/z-OS-Adoption-Research-October-2020
We'd
On 10/28/2020 7:57 AM, Roger Lowe wrote:
As PMA is no longer supported under zOS 2.4, I am using the View -> Products,
Features, and FMIDs action for a software instance defined to z/OSMF Software
Management and would like to be able to print the resulting information. However,
there doesn't
As PMA is no longer supported under zOS 2.4, I am using the View -> Products,
Features, and FMIDs action for a software instance defined to z/OSMF Software
Management and would like to be able to print the resulting information.
However, there doesn't appear to be a print or export function
W dniu 27.10.2020 o 22:17, Frank Swarbrick pisze:
Is there a standard "generic" name for PDS/PDSE? Is it "PDS(E)"? Or maybe something like
"MVS library" or "MVS dataset library"?
Just wondering.
Unfortunately no.
There are some names, but no "the only standard".
Some names in use:
PDS -
Thank you all for your replies.
It appears that z/OSMF NCA is, as we say, the best thing since sliced
bread, but many do not like sliced bread.
Our configuration is not typical because the system is used to test a
SSL/TLS application and developers need to test z/OS servers and clients
with
FWIW I would go with SMF=FULL - unless you have an exceptionally large
number of sorts - or tight SMF space restrictions.
There’s gold in them there records. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 27 Oct 2020, at 21:13, Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
>
> Here is our ICEPRM00, if you are
49 matches
Mail list logo
