-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter
Hi Group,
Apology for asking a dummy question. Is it possible to keep a seperate
Password for OMVS alone ?
Not out of the box, but so long as RACF supports password and password
phrase as separate
Seems that UI24300 did not ship an updated SRC member (just the MOD member) for
IGYCDOPT, so the resolution was to specify both PTFs in the PRE of the USERMOD.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chase, John
Hi, All,
On z/OS 1.13 I tried
Sounds a lot like Agile. :-)
But then Steve Jobs made a fortune building things people didn't know they
wanted. :-)
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
Too good not to pass to this group.
Preach it, Brother!
quote
...
Hi, All,
On z/OS 1.13 I tried to re-apply our Installation Options USERMOD (IGYWD51)
after APPLYing UI24300 to COBOL v5.1, but the re-apply failed because it did
not PRE the previous PTF level (!).
Among other fixes, UI24300 adds a new compiler option, so the options module
IGYCDOPT gets
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ken MacKenzie
In the old days, as far as I remember though I can't prove it, you used to be
able to look at a load
library member, check for a certain string (e.g.
C2 mm/dd/yy hh:mm:ss) and establish that the
CORRECTION: See below.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chase, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ken MacKenzie
In the old days, as far as I remember though I can't prove it, you
used
You originally wrote complimentary, which in some contexts does mean free
(of charge or cost).
Perhaps you meant complEmentary instead?
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Mitch
Sent: Friday, February 13,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:37:12 +, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
wrote:
We the willing,
Are doing the impossible,
I remember it as We the willing, led by the unknowing...
Also We the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:31:14 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
I should add that in general in the US and most countries copyright notices
are unnecessary. I
compare them to a Private Property sign on
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sam Siegel
The question of the day is, were
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sam Siegel
The question of the day is, were the balls fully inflated our not?
Precisely define fully inflated. Dig me up when everybody's satisfied with
your definition. :-)
-jc-
On Jan 23, 2015 6:28 AM,
-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 9:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: OT: Friday joke :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
On 2015-01-21 15:12, Greg Dyck wrote:
Normal (non-directed) LOAD processing serializes fetch processing for a
module and only performs
relocation of ACONs/VCONs once when the module is fetched.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 12:33 AM
I just want to understand ?how?.
Why?
I genrally say there is no stupid question, but this one is an exception.
There is no use in asking
why someone
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 10:41 AM
[ snip ]
How fast could a fully enabled machine mint bitcoins or other cryptocurrency?
How much power would
such a machine use while doing so?
Inquiring
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 1:49 PM
I'm reading the Redbook mentioned by Timothy Stipples on the z13. Some
interesting things, to me.
[ snip ]
10) Curious statement:
quote
If only Linux on z
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 1:32 PM
W dniu 2015-01-15 o 20:08, zMan pisze:
The other 5 LPARs are used by the NSA.
Do you mean No Such Agency or I missed yet another overloaded acronym used
here in
Context plus smiley suggest he meant there is no BitCoin machine.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 1:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z13
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tony's Basement Computer
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 10:26 AM
The entry for Congerville, IL is incorrect. A farmer called it in using the
C scale. I drove right
by that morning and laughed at the radio.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 8:04 AM
When I was in Boston in August and walked up to Fenway, it was bloody hot.
I mean seriously hot. And
the footy was just played in sub-zero.
I live outside of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 3:27 AM
Cross Posted to IBM main
Hello,
I am using QWS emulator to connect mainframes. One of our LPAR i am able to
logon using IBM DYNAMIC
with the screen size
connect to the session managers?
-jc-
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 3:27 AM
Cross Posted to IBM main
Hello,
I am
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Butler
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 8:19 AM
I'd like to state that even after 30 years of MVS, I still use the term
file when referring to
mainframe datasets. In fact, if you look at the IBM COBOL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 9:03 AM
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
[ snip ]
My question is, why should there be a limit of 32761? I understand the
signed halfword format imposes
a limit of 32767. I see no reason for any smaller limit.
In a VSAM Control Interval
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Alan Watthey
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:45 PM
David,
Yes, this function works perfectly for me. You need to use R or RC in front
of what you are finding
or changing (first parameter).
You have to
Hi, List,
I set a SLIP IF trap that included DATA=(0R,EQ,0,AND,12R,EQ,25BD8),ID=ID01.
The response to a D SLIP=ID01 command shows
DATA=0,0R,EQ,,AND,12R,EQ,00025BD8 .
Where did that leading zero immediately after the DATA= come from? I deleted
and reset the SLIP, and the leading zero
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:29 PM
Hi, List,
I set a SLIP IF trap that included DATA=(0R,EQ,0,AND,12R,EQ,25BD8),ID=ID01.
The response to a D SLIP=ID01
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Crayford
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:08 PM
On 12/12/2014 11:38 AM, David Speake wrote:
I did a double DUH! when I saw the missing R reply. It wasn't quite that
bad.I cannot cut/paste the
brackets
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of MURALI KANNAN
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:13 AM
I would sort the VSAM files using a key and then copy the data to flat file,
to avoid duplication or
merging of data.
Correct me if I am wrong.
The OP did
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shane Ginnane
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 6:54 PM
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 06:03:50 -0500, Mitch wrote:
... but why check when a job is submitted? Why not check before ...
Wheww - tuff requirements.
I've done
We have a full-volume zfs on a Mod-9 set aside for this kind of situation.
Gives us about 8 GiB. Just hang it on a convenient mount point and point
//SMPWKDIR at it, and away we go.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Ten Eyck
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 10:10 AM
Sorry for the confusion... these LPARs are in a Parallel Sysplex (using CF),
but not utilizing many of
the Parallel Sysplex features. Reading through the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Frank Chu
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 2:10 PM
Hi Doug,
Ok, so I need to make the z2.1 dasd volumes that contains the datasets to be
mounted available to the
zOS 1.13 system. How would I catalog the
z2.1
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 2:14 AM
[ snip ]
- smoke/vapor-based recording;
I use the word recording here quite consciously. These recording systems
could not be played back
when they were
Google 'bit.listserv'.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Dazzo, Matt
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 11:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Archive search problems
Dave, thanks that's awesome. Is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 8:01 AM
Just a shortage of LOW COST workers who can do the job.
quote
The real issue, say Salzman and others, is the industry’s desire for
lower-wage,more-exploitable
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 8:14 AM
Peter Ten Eyck wrote:
LE runtime is TERMTHDACT(UADUMP,,96)
Ok. I will bite. I see in LE book, this:
Under non-CICS, if the appropriate DD
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 8:42 AM
Lizette Koehler wrote:
Also these share presentations may be helpful
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/lang_environment/confer
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 9:46 AM
On 11/25/2014 8:19 AM, Chase, John wrote:
[ snip ]
Indeed. We're currently working a PMR in which, to get an SVCDUMP of a
S0C4 before LE's condition
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:25 PM
I was told that System Programming would be reduced to PARMLIB updates. Circa
1981.
And..
In a previous job as a CSR for an ISV, we got a new boss. In
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of ??? ?? ???
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 7:55 AM
Hi,
Is it possible to use RECEIVE ORDER for a specific FMID?
I am running SMP/E 36.11 on z/OS 1.13.
Yes, but only if the specific FMID is the only FMID in a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 10:01 AM
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07:41:14 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21225816
You can order maintenance in the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 8:08 AM
One solution I saw was using a Screen Scrapper process.
Have a PC setup that only has SYSLOG streaming to it. Then have the screen
scrapper monitor.
I'm
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of nitz-...@gmx.net
Is anybody out there running the RSE server on z/OS (1.13) with
USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO) successfully?
Anybody have any other idea why today the developers cannot authenticate to
the RSE server as
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hardee, Chuck
No, at least not intentionally.
When I run my usermod using no changes to the CSI and/or JCL, the output is
directed, via the MSGCLASS
parm on the JOB statement to class X, which is a hold queue.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hardee, Chuck
See, that's the rub.
As I understand SMP/E, if there is no DD in the JCL, then SMP/E will allocate
based on the DDDEFs.
If there is a DD in the JCL, then SMP/E will use it.
The first attempt at
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hardee, Chuck
No, I have an APPLY CHECK step executing separately, ahead of, my APPLY.
It's the APPLY step I'm trying to capture.
To the extent you can do so without divulging any proprietary information,
could you
Hi, All,
This past weekend we IPLed our DEV lpar with VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO) for the
first time. After a brief period (on Sunday), it was noticed that one
subsystem failed to start (an ancient Oracle API of some kind). A fresh
DIAGxx containing USEZOSV1R9R7LES(YES) was dynamically
Reaching 100% might make you SAD. :-\
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Vernooij, CP
(SPLXM) - KLM
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 7:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What address space is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Crayford
On 24/10/2014 6:50 AM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
Doesn't the example in the benchmark show performance problems in
EXECIO instead of REXX? EXECIO, IMO, is not part of the REXX
interpreter, but instead
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
I get the same 'null'. I am trying to get a Security Integrity APAR (SIA) PTF
for MQ. :-(
Have you not configured a RECEIVE ORDER job for obtaining PTFs?
Greatest thing since sliced bread. :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Beesley, Paul
Oh for a mainframe with an internet connection ... sadly, not... customers
say no.
A RECEIVE ORDER capability here would be welcomed...
Our sandbox system is allowed client only external access, and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Yuhas
I have been asked to install Enterprise COBOL 5.1 which went GA in October of
2013.
We are currently running z/OS 1.13 with a current RSU Level of 1404. We have
Enterprise COBOL 4.2 and
the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John Eells
What is the maximum number of cyclinders that can be used to define a dsn
that is not VSAM EXTENDED.
I think it is 4400 cylinders. I was trying to allocate a dsn at 4500 4500
but I kept on abending
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:36:38 -0400, Don Poitras wrote:
I guess it depends what you mean by I would like to use 64bit storage
for some functions from Cobol. If the Cobol part is never going to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Chase, John wrote:
But see APAR PI17184 for an instance when BSM did not return correctly.
Curious PER, hmmm. Is that only for COBOL 5.1 programs running under CICS?
That was the situation
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
z/OS V1.12 - Yes I know.
Okay, I am sure this is in a very easy to locate part of the HSM Admin
manual, but I just am not
seeing it.
This should be an easy question. I want to recall 5000
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Arellanes
You might want to read the COBOL Performance Tuning paper (for Enterprise
COBOL 4.2) at:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=203q=7018287uid=swg27018287
to see the performance implications
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ron Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 8:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Performance in S9(08) COMP
Hi .
In our cobol programs we have the variables declared as s9(09) COMP, now one
of the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bernd Oppolzer
I only had similar problems once in 2008 ca., but then subtasking was
involved and APL etc., and there
was some sort of race condition where one subtask ran too fast and the
POST/WAIT protocol dit
It appears that we captured relevant problem data via GTF tonight, so we shall
see what we shall see, when we see it.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: Chase, John
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 12:44 PM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Upgrade to Enterprise
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Mulder
[ snip ]
I reviewed your PMR and dumps, and made some suggestions in the PMR.
Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY
Thank you, Sir. We'll run it by Change Control, and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler
Jim, Peter
Thanks a lot. I understand it is not some precise measurement. I understand
this as a means to keep a
badly written SLIP from negatively impacting the system.
Out of curiosity: When
the storage
that holds the pointer that got corrupted in each previous dump, so we're
gambling on it being at the same virtual address in each job next time we try
to trap the corrupter. Note the generic job name in ASIDSA.
-jc-
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Chase, John jch
. Verify that the
Language Environment runtime message module
for facility IRZ is installed in DFHRPL or STEPLIB. The same source deck
compiled with COBOL v4.2 runs fine.
RDz Support is currently working a PMR for that.
-jc-
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Chase, John jch
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Ten Eyck
How do I tell if a given LPAR has RACF sysplex communication enabled?
Console command RVARY LIST:
. . .
MEMBER smfid IS SYSPLEX COMMUNICATIONS ENABLED IN DATA SHARING
-jc-
Hmmm.. Are you perhaps confusing this Chris Mason with the late SNA expert
of the same name?
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Shane Ginnane
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 8:40 AM
To:
Having installed HCTG900 (CICS Transaction Gateway v9.0) into our CICS TS 5.1
GLOBAL CSI according to the instructions in its Program Directory, I cannot
explain how HCTG900 was missing from the Global zone's FMID list, but it wasn't
there. Adding HCTG900 to the Global zone's list allowed the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Charles Mills
Well, I suppose it is possible that it is removing the *code* but not the
literal.
Does COBOL 5.1 have a show me the pseudo-assembler listing option? That
would provide a better test
IMHO.
MAP
OK, puzzle me this:
RECEIVE
ORDER(
ORDERSERVER(ORDSRVR)
CONTENT(ALL)
Hi, All,
Has anyone implemented COBOL 5.1 to the point that you have measured the
promised performance improvements in application code over the same code
compiled with earlier COBOL compilers? Any hiccups or other glitches or
gotchas you'd care to mention with COBOL v5.1?
TIA,
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
On 9/26/2014 2:25 PM, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Hey Steve,
Your recommendation for defining binary data items and using
TRUNC(OPT) does not make the following truncate with COBOL standard
rules:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
Well, I'll whine. Where the F,,, is Ibmlink SIS now?
On my ServiceLink page, it's between Product Cross Reference (PCR) and
Service Request and Delivery (SRD), where it has been since Day One of the
Try www.ibm.com/ibmlink
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 1:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SIS?
And, even now I know where to go, I can't
GIYF
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
Dear Group,
(Still waiting on the CICS-L Listserv)
Back when my hair was a younger color I used to write online CICS
programs. I found a sample CICS
program shown
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of nitz-...@gmx.net
[ snip ]
So every sysprog should have enough dump reading skills to at least ascertain
when someone is giving
them bullsh.. (Now I dream on.)
You are not alone. :-)
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Relson
I also recommend MODE=HOME for PVTMOD=
In general, you should try to use ASID and/or JOBNAME if you are going to use
MODE=HOME. This avoids
unnecessary space-switch interrupts (and their
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chase, John
[ snip ]
The SA trap we were given for the same problem specifies
RANGE(12R?+1C4,+1C7), but the example in the
SLIP doc restates the register in the ending address as well. Is it
necessary
Hi, All,
IBM Lvl 2 has given us a SLIP IF trap to set for a problem we currently have
open, but so far the trap has not triggered. The address range to monitor was
specified as . . .,PVTMOD=(modname,C4),. . . . The instruction immediately
preceding that offset is a STORE, so the instruction
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz
(Seymour J.)
In 7227021730034872.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
09/16/2014
at 06:20 PM, Paul Gilmartin
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said:
But empirically I discover:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shane Ginnane
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 07:25:10 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Can't we forget MVS (that's *so* 20th Century), and talk instead about
z/OS, which is the topic of the Redbook (see URL)?
Nope.
Up to,
Been using Bluezone FTP for more than a decade, and have never encountered that
sort of error.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Phil Smith
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 11:55 AM
To:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
Our shop was without a Software Xcel contract for a few months due to a
contract mix-up. As of this
morning, we have it back.
My question is what changed in the interim?
I used to be able
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Price
What hardware are you on?
I ask because a z196 has some high CPU costs for certain PSW Key-related
instructions.
For example, SPKA (Set PSW Key from Address) on a z196 shows up in CICS CPU
Sorry: ... key-related instructions simply to access key9 storage.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 7:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jantje.
[ snip ]
My company (and I guess many others) blocks access to all such file-sharing
services, unfortunately.
Maybe you could consider using attachments to the posts?
I believe the listserv is
Not a flame, but I've finally gotten used to the InfoCenter delivery. But soon
I'll be forced to accustom to the Knowledge Center delivery. The
presentation is somewhat like the InfoCenter, but finding stuff initially is a
bit more challenging. For example, to find the doc for the COBOL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing
On 08/16/2014 06:14 AM, Mike Stayton wrote:
and also
http://www.research.ibm.com/articles/brain-chip.shtml
Mike Stayton
An interesting development, but if technology ever progresses to
Hi, All,
Many of our TSO users have a 4MB default TSO Region size (Size === 4096
field on the logon panel), which nowadays is a relic of the 1970s, pretty
much unusable for many utilities like Fault Analyzer, etc. I'm looking for
suggestions on what should be a reasonable and realistic
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
[ snip ]
Sigh... I can't win or lose... ;-)
I could just toss up a coin (rare collectable or damaged pick-up): Head - you
win. Tail - I lose. ;-)
You can't win. You can't break even. You
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
At 20:01 -0700 on 08/11/2014, Duffy Nightingale, SS wrote about Re:
INITILAIZE COST:
Heavy emphasis on that last sentence. Just had a customer who
didn't keep track of the number of entries
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
Can anyone post a good link for IBM Announcements?
I have been through a couple of PCs in the last four months and have lost
admin privileges (and
FIREFOX) in the process. For now, I only
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:04:21 -0500, Norbert Friemel wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:45:36 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote:
//SYSUT2 DD DISP=(,KEEP),DSN=SYS1.SIEALNKE.N,DSNTYPE=LIBRARY,
//
It seems logical to me that a PTF which supersedes a HIPER PTF should itself be
ASSIGNed the HIPER SOURCEID flag, but in one current instance (UI19849, which
supersedes UI18382 whose APAR is flagged HIPER and DATALOSS) the superseding
PTF is not flagged HIPER.
Is that perhaps an oversight by
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Norbert Friemel
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:24:00 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:04:21 -0500, Norbert Friemel wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:45:36 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
At 09:30 -0400 on 08/03/2014, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about
Re: LE APAR PM99349:
In 2830304844335286.wa.ibmmaintpg.com...@listserv.ua.edu, on
08/03/2014
at 06:52 AM, Shane Ginnane
Hi, All,
One newly-available PTF for LE, UI18450, fixes APAR PM99349, but a search for
PM99349 on IBMLink fails with a not found error. Am I to ass.u.me that
it's a security / integrity APAR and just apply the PTF?
TIA,
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Dennis Trojak
Yes it is a security/integrity APAR. If you subscribe to the Security Portal
you can review it.
Description: This issue may pertain to users of Language Environment for z/OS
with FMID HLE7770,
Anybody else having long delay times on SMP/E RECEIVE ORDER? I have a job for
one PTF that's been waiting 30 minutes so far:
GIM693ISMP/E HAS BEEN WAITING 15 MINUTES FOR ORDER ORDn. SMP/E WILL
WAIT A MAXIMUM OF 120 MINUTES.
GIM693ISMP/E HAS BEEN WAITING 30 MINUTES FOR ORDER
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
