I'm not aware that we've announced a follow on to z12 BC so I would assume
so.
Jim Elliott follows this newsgroup so will probably want to wade in at
some point.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 22:47:07 -0600, Mark Post wrote:
That has never been the case. We have always supported installing on z/VM or
in an LPAR.
Hmmm - I was sure I had a migration doc that said z/VM was now required for the
install scripts (rather than just recommended).
My bad maybe.
Shane
It seems to me this is another abstraction layer that would enable an instance
of bare-metal Linux to spool up multiple instances in an LPAR without z/VM.
What would the effect be of running KVM in a Linux instance under z/VM? And
of course PR/SM is still dispatching logical IFLs onto real
On 8/18/2015 at 08:43 AM, Jon Butler butler@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me this is another abstraction layer that would enable an
instance of bare-metal Linux to spool up multiple instances in an LPAR
without z/VM.
That's the whole purpose of KVM, on any architecture.
What would
IMHO, not uploading the presentation tends to dilute the message. Being able to
share the keynote presentation slides with the management back at the shop
would be much more effective than just being able to share your own attendee
notes.
Linda
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 18, 2015, at 10:21
On 8/18/2015 at 12:46 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Your last point is substantially true but the villain if you will is not
SHARE. SHARE does not upload anyone's presentations. The speakers do or do
not upload handouts,
Being a speaker, I understand that. I also understand that
Agree with your last point 100%. I often want to go back and look up things
like I know he said something about a lot of customers running Linux --
what EXACTLY did he say?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Mark
In 6233245832691859.wa.butler.jongmail@listserv.ua.edu, on
08/18/2015
at 07:43 AM, Jon Butler butler@gmail.com said:
What would the effect be of running KVM in a Linux instance under
z/VM? And of course PR/SM is still dispatching logical IFLs onto
real IFLs...or are we eliminating
Minoru,
Thanks for your info. Comparing appears to be quite complicated.
I have a 'current' and 'new' SCDS, which I expected to be the same, but they
are not. I have a reasonable idea of where the differences will be, so
altogether I think comparing the SMS constructs will give me the
Kees: I, too, found that a simple SuperC of even the DCollect output wasn't
helpful because it requires comparison at the byte level. That loses which
record the delta is from since SuperC only reports the byte offset from the
beginning of the file. (or, at least, *I* don't know how to
JimP solosa...@gmail.com writes:
Interesting. The main contractor told us it was due to the teraflops
it could do, a YMP-2. I worked for a sub-contractor.
IBM Kingston supposedly had the responsibility for doing new
supercomputer ... also was providing to Chen's endevor (responsible for
both
As far as I know, there is no good way to compare with ACS routines
automatically.
I only compared with two SMS configuration based on SMS Configuration
Report produced by NaviQuest batch job.
I compared Base Configuration, SMS constructs, Tape Library definition,
DASD volumes (SG), and accounting
On 2015-08-18 15:37, Cali zMan wrote:
I can't get some EXTRN variables to resolve at link-edit time.
Prog1 has:
VAR1 DC A(Equate1)
VAR2 DC A(Equate2)
Need to declare them as ENTRY.
Prog2 (separate CSECT, source file, etc.) wanting to reference those
variables, has:
Yep, adding the ENTRY statement fixed it. Not sure how I missed its
necessity.
Thanks to Paul and Charles for chiming in.
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:55:19 -0600
From: 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Resolving EXTRN References
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Do you have ENTRY VAR1,VAR2 in Prog1?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Cali zMan
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 2:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Resolving EXTRN References
I can't get some EXTRN
I can't get some EXTRN variables to resolve at link-edit time.
Prog1 has:
VAR1DC A(Equate1)
VAR2DC A(Equate2)
Prog2 (separate CSECT, source file, etc.) wanting to reference those variables,
has:
EXTRN VAR1
EXTRN VAR2
...
VAR1E DC A(VAR1)
VAR2E DC
Soldier of Fortran site had links to all this. I don't think any of the
information is new.
Rob Schramm
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015, 7:15 PM Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
Really. In 2012 Logica, a mainframe service bureau in Sweden, suffered a
disastrous hack that involved government agency
Phil Young has been doing these talks for several years and some of the tools
are posted on his Soldier of Fortran site.
He is absolutely correct in that some sites are complacent in their the
mainframe is secure attitude and that, like every other platform, z/OS
requires a continuous
Different from C, where you use extern on both ends.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Cali zMan
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 3:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Resolving EXTRN References
In 4431566099938040.wa.calizman1outlook@listserv.ua.edu, on
08/18/2015
at 04:37 PM, Cali zMan calizm...@outlook.com said:
I can't get some EXTRN variables to resolve at link-edit time.
Where are your external references in program 1?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
From technologyreview.com:
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/540011/mainframe-computers-that-handle-our-most-sensitive-data-are-open-to-internet-attacks/
Really?
Robert Harrison
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On 8/18/2015 at 06:26 PM, Robert Harrison robert.harri...@omes.ok.gov
wrote:
From technologyreview.com:
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/540011/mainframe-computers-that-handle-
our-most-sensitive-data-are-open-to-internet-attacks/
Really?
Yes, really. Phil Young isn't the only
On 8/18/2015 at 06:26 PM, Robert Harrison robert.harri...@omes.ok.gov
wrote:
From technologyreview.com:
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/540011/mainframe-computers-that-handle-
our-most-sensitive-data-are-open-to-internet-attacks/
It's fun to read the comments on that article,
Really. In 2012 Logica, a mainframe service bureau in Sweden, suffered a
disastrous hack that involved government agency files, credit cards, and social
security numbers. The entry was via an online legal database that was
accessible via browser from the Internet, and which turned out to be
There is still supposed to be a definition in C that does NOT have extern
specified. It is quite common to just use extern declarations and most
compilers account for this.
Quoting IBM:
An extern declaration makes the described variable usable by the succeeding
part of the current source
I guess you're right. I actually write C++, where extern is necessary to do
more or less what ENTRY does in assembler, and no, I can't cite chapter and
verse but I just commented out an extern keyword on a definition and the
link failed unresolved.
Obviously in any language you need a definition
Hi Kees-san,
Before making DFSORT jobs for comparing with two SMS configuration reports,
I compared with two DCOLLECT SMS data extracted from SCDSs.
Comparing fields are different by each record type.
For example, in case of DC (data class), compared fields in DCOLLECT data
are following.
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 08:47:25 -0500, John McKown wrote:
I don't remember the information quoted below being said before.
From:
http://asmarterplanet.com/blog/2015/08/ibms-big-bet-open-source-economy.html
quote
More than a third of our mainframe clients today are running Linux.
/quote
I wonder
Gil asked an interesting question :
I wonder what fraction of their total workloads this represents?
In our case, it is about 17% of the load on our z114 and close to 70% of the
load on our zEC12.
The 12 (40IFL, 5CP, 5zIIP) is running SAP with the servers on Linux on zVM and
DB2 on zOS.
The
I don't remember the information quoted below being said before.
From:
http://asmarterplanet.com/blog/2015/08/ibms-big-bet-open-source-economy.html
quote
More than a third of our mainframe clients today are running Linux.
/quote
--
Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown
Your last point is substantially true but the villain if you will is not
SHARE. SHARE does not upload anyone's presentations. The speakers do or do
not upload handouts, and in my experience, SHARE and otherwise, the big
deal speakers never do. I think they think it helps keep the formula for
their
Hi Everyone,
Please take our 13 minute survey to provide our System z team with feedback
about your current user experience with IBM z/OS Product Documentation.
Here's the link to the survey:
https://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/2069493/IBM-z-OS-Product-Documentation
Survey extended until August 20,
Sorry to all a head of time this is Off Topic, but I am looking for someone who
might want to change jobs or looking for a new one.
We have an opening in our CARY NC office for a Senior Network Engineer
--Mainframe Network
Some respondesibilities
1) PAGENT - Admin and install/ TCP/IP,
2)
City of New York
Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications
Job Posting Notice Civil Service Title: Computer Specialist (Software)
Level: 04
Title Code No: 13632
Salary: $87,203/$100,284 - $120,754
Business Title: Senior Transaction Server (CICS) Specialist
Work Location:
On 8/18/2015 at 09:47 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't remember the information quoted below being said before.
From:
http://asmarterplanet.com/blog/2015/08/ibms-big-bet-open-source-economy.html
quote
More than a third of our mainframe clients today are
35 matches
Mail list logo
