SMF record for IQD channel activity

Hello, Is there a specific SMF record that reports the IQD channel activity(I mean the Hipersocket network analysis). I do not see any indication about the hipersocket under SMF 118 and SMF 119. Is there anyother record in specific that can report the Hipersocket network traffic analyzing

Re: SMF record for IQD channel activity

IBM Knowledge Center (http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/) returning an empty in IE11, works OK in Firefox. Why??? This should be working reliably. Kees. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jake Anderson Sent: 25

IBMLINK SR Application Unusble

Has any on else (beside me) found the recent changes to the formatting of IBMLINK SR making the service unusable ? This addition of this data had made the application virtually impossible to use. IBM® Marketplace Print this page E-mail this page Digg Facebook Twitter

Re: [EXTERNAL] IBMLINK SR Application Unusble

It has become more difficult I'll grant you that - the font is larger - the layout less intuitive. AND when opening an incident it still asks for operating system and that after selecting the product/component which is operating system specific :-)

Re: IBMLINK SR Application Unusble

IBM still doesn't understand the internet very well. Their websites and processes there are not intuitive and easy to use. From: Doug Henry <012e22efeed4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 8:22 AM Subject: IBMLINK SR

Re: SMF record for IQD channel activity

Hi Jake, Look at the RMF type 73 (Monitor I Channel Path Activity) which shows activity by channel path ID and also shows the channel type, such as IQD. There is also information in the Monitor II and Monitor II Channel Path Activity. The only thing I can't tell you is the interpretation

Re: IBMLINK SR Application Unusble

Agreed! _ Dave Jousma Manager Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB2H p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe

Re: SMF record for IQD channel activity

IBM has always been optimized for FireFox with IE as an after thought -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 5:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMF

Re: SMF record for IQD channel activity

On 25/08/2016 10:24 PM, Steve Beaver wrote: IBM has always been optimized for FireFox with IE as an after thought Not sure about that. IBM uses the Dojo toolkit which should support most browsers, especially modern ones. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: IBMLINK SR Application Unusble

On 25 August 2016 at 08:22, Doug Henry <012e22efeed4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Print this page > E-mail this page > Digg > Facebook > Twitter > Delicious > Linked In > Stumbleupon > Google+ A good ad blocker makes short work of those "social

Re: IBMLINK SR Application Unusble

Yes. And scrolling is now mangled as well. Perhaps we need a SHARE requirement to get this thing corrected? Or, perhaps all of us should select the first O/S in the drop down list. It will cause IBM much grief internally and just might get them to take this seriously. Yes, I am suggesting

Re: Dump in 64 bit mode "Storage around GPR2 is invalid."

Here's an example Parameters, Registers, and Variables for Active Routines: main (DSA address 0048082FEA20): DOWNSTACK DSA Saved Registers:

Re: IBMLINK SR Application Unusble

Thanks Tony, That certainly helps with part of the problem. Now the issue is the font changes that went with this change. The fonts for the top section of the SR are very large but the the "Service request update history" part (ie the text that is the main part of the SR) is in very tiny font.

Re: Dump in 64 bit mode "Storage around GPR2 is invalid."

I don't have an example in front of me (not enough S0C4's lately ) so I can't talk specifics but I am generally very happy with the CEEDUMP and find it quite satisfactory. My C++ is exclusively AMODE 31 (with some assembler subroutines using SAM64) so I suspect your problems are due to the

Re: Dump in 64 bit mode "Storage around GPR2 is invalid."

On 25 August 2016 at 12:11, Janet Graff <004dc9e91b6d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > I have XGR'd GPR2 and GPR3 before the abend and GPR5 definitely does not > contain a bunch Beees. I'm not sure quite what you mean by this. Your own code (that you know has run not long before the

Re: IBMLINK SR Application Unusble

Tony Harminc wrote: A good ad blocker makes short work of those "social media" buttons Yeah, suddenly when I visit my favorite chess website it's plastered with ads for IBM systems. -- Jack J. Woehr # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of www.well.com/~jax # thinking, a

Re: IBMLINK SR Application Unusble

FWIW, I have found that the changes are much more disruptive when using IE. Using Chrome and Firefox, they are less of an impact. We are running an older version of IE (IE9) due to compatibility issues with an internal application. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe

Don Deese

DONALD RAE DEESE, 74, passed away on Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at his home in Hartfield, VA. One of thirteen children, he is survived by Marilyn and Frank, as well as his sweetheart Nancy Roth, daughters Felicia Marie Deese & Carissa Ann Murray, and six grandchildren. He enjoyed sailing,

Re: Don Deese

https://www.meaningfulfunerals.net/fh/obituaries/obituary.cfm?CFID=232898aa- 98d6-4feb-b93c-8be63a15ecb6=0_id=3869997_id=14468 Link to Obituary page. Can sign the guest book or send condolences. http://tinyurl.com/h8vtw5h In a message dated 8/25/2016 11:46:18 A.M. Central Daylight

Re: Don Deese

A very sad day indeed for the performance and capacity community! My condolences to his family. Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Barry Merrill Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 12:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Re: Dump in 64 bit mode "Storage around GPR2 is invalid."

On 25 August 2016 at 12:47, Charles Mills wrote: > I am generally very happy with the CEEDUMP and find it quite satisfactory. My experience with CEEDUMP is that it's all just fine until it isn't. It seems not to cope at all well with anything other than a simple failure within

Re: IBMLINK SR Application Unusble

They just can't leave a functional interface alone. They always seem to try to "improve" it. Omegamon is another one they keep trying to "improve". -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tony Harminc Sent: Thursday, August

Re: Dump in 64 bit mode "Storage around GPR2 is invalid."

At the risk of topic drift, BTW I believe LGHI Rx,0 is now preferred to XGR Rx,Rx. Why? - On older processors, XGR makes the poor CPU get a stable copy of the register and tie up the fixed point arithmetic unit, a long hard way of solving the simple problem of "slam a zero into Rx." - Newer

anyone using SRD application on IBMLINK

F.Y.I. This is the first time that I have used SRD to order/download PTFs since the change to make FTP-SLL mandatory. When the order is complete, there will be a RFNJOBS JCL sample provided in the DOC subdirectory. It appears that the intention of this JCL sample was to be customized for the

Re: Dump in 64 bit mode "Storage around GPR2 is invalid."

I don't know if I'm XPLINK or standard linkage. I'm using the following command to link xlc -o MY64.exe -q64 VSHVOLTG.o VSHVOLT.o VSHMSG.o MY64.o where would I look to see if XPLINK is turned on? How would I turn it off? I can't find XPLINK mentioned in the Compiler Reference V10.1 IBM XL C

Re: Dump in 64 bit mode "Storage around GPR2 is invalid."

Yeah, no disagreement there. Like any of these tools that "do the work for you" they are great until they guess wrong. Many years ago I learned to really dislike Abend-Aid. I'm sure it is a wonderful help to the average application programmer but it seemed to always obfuscate the kind of more

Re: Don Deese

Sadly, we are losing the giants My condolences Steve -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B. Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 11:46 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Don Deese A very sad day

Re: IBMLINK SR Application Unusble

I am really finding it annoying and lots of my screen is chewed up by info and links I don't need. The font for Service Requests is now much smaller as well at least on my screen. I really don't like it. Dan On Thursday, 25 August 2016, Doug Henry <

Re: Dump in 64 bit mode "Storage around GPR2 is invalid."

Thanks Charles! >Why are you using the AIX compiler reference? There is a z/OS compiler >reference manual, you know. Covers USS as well as legacy MVS. >http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27036892 >Charles -- For

Re: IBMLINK SR Application Unusble

I left feedback on the subject here: https://www-304.ibm.com/ibmlink/feedback/display.wss?lc=en=US The response I received: Hello Steve As per our information, there is no change in SR page. However you can go ahead and delete cache cookies and then try to access the page. This should solve the

Re: Dump in 64 bit mode "Storage around GPR2 is invalid."

http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ceea300/xplnk5.htm Ah! You know what? I am 95% sure that AMODE 64 implies XPLINK. Why are you using the AIX compiler reference? There is a z/OS compiler reference manual, you know. Covers USS as well as legacy MVS.

VSCOB2 (5668-958)

Guys, My P370 is running a VMSP rel5. I have many licensed compilers but unfortunately my VS COBOL II mdisk is failing. I've tried to restore this mdisk from original CDs but this media is failing too, same problem.. :(Anyone has this compiler and could share with me? I have more than 4000

Re: IBMLINK SR Application Unusble

Love it or hate it, 'no change' is a nonsensical answer. I updated an SR on 18 August--just over a week ago. The page certainly did not look this way then. The change is striking. In the responder's defense, it's not uncommon for support personnel to be given 'new software' well in advance of

Re: Job Search

On 7/19/16 7:57 AM, Ken Smith wrote: My organization has just posted a CICS sysprog job (below). There's good support for Telecommunting here and if you've got solid skills working remote should not be a deal breaker. Problem is the pay is well below market rates. We have several unfilled

Re: Dump in 64 bit mode "Storage around GPR2 is invalid."

On 25 August 2016 at 17:52, Janet Graff <004dc9e91b6d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > I don't know if I'm XPLINK or standard linkage. The fact that your dump says DOWNSTACK DSA almost certainly implies XPLINK. In the LE Debugging guide where I went to verify this, there is this