RESTORE from it with PARM=NORUN
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Jake Anderson
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 9:37 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: DLM Tape reading
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> Mike
>
> We ran a monthly volume level
Mike
We ran a monthly volume level of backup to a tape dataset
So I just wanted the list of dataset that was copied or backed up to the
tape dataset.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023, 7:54 AM Michael Watkins <
032966e74d0f-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> 'Inspect' in what way? What
'Inspect' in what way? What information about the tape dataset do you need? To
determine with certainty that the dataset on the tape can be read?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jake Anderson
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 10:34 PM
To:
Hi Mike
I would like to inspect the tape dataset
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023, 7:42 PM Michael Watkins <
032966e74d0f-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Are you looking for the names of the datasets on the 3990 volumes that are
> being backed up? If you're taking 'volume level' backups with
IMHO it's clearer to just use
READ PDSDECB,SF,PDSDCB,address _of_READ_buffer,MF=E
CHECK PDSDECB
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Joseph Reichman
I'd rather stick to the native OS/2 version for the time being, until I have
the native Linux version set up. Thanks.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Both JES2 and JES3 have alternative PROC sources. Worst case is a started job
with a JCLLIB DD.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Michael Brennan
A job card for a started task is normally found in one of the data sets
pointed to by the IEFPDSI DD or the IEFJOBS DD of your Master JCL. Master
JCL is normally found in SYS1.PARMLIB or one of the data sets in your
PARMLIB concatenation in a member named MSTJCL00 or some other number other
than
I did that, it didn't change from what I could see. I might open a question to
IBM support. See what they say.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
--- Original Message
Thanks
MVC 0(IODSECTLEN,R6),SYSADATA
LAR7,SYSDCBE
STR7,DCBDCBE
LAR7,EX24LST
STCM R7,B'0111',DCBEXLSA
Thank you all.
// SCHEDULE HOLDUNTL='+01:00' works like a champ! Thanks all.
I have a slightly different member (other tweaks in addition to the HOLDUNTL)
that I use for the re-run, which works out well.
Charles
--
For
V V2/s/ Anthony L. Zak
Original message ,From: Bernd Oppolzer
Date: 3/20/23 12:40 (GMT-05:00) To:
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] BookManager I would like to
thank all who responded and tellz you about the solution we found.Kz[> g
zd;&-÷3@^' First of all,
You are correct sir
Will make Binyamin changes and try it tonite
> On Mar 20, 2023, at 11:07 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> That doesn't explain why you had LA R7 in places where you didn't need a
> pointer,
>
> LAR7,SYSADATA
> MVC 0(IODSECTLEN,R6),0(R7)
>
>
,l/s/ Anthony L. Zak6iwjj
Original message From: Bernd Oppolzer
Date: 3/20/23 12:40 (GMT-05:00) To:
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] BookManager I would like to
thank all who responded and tell you about the solution we found.First of all,
with some support
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:42:41 +, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
>Thanks, no I didn't think of the chmount command. I ran a test on my sandbox.
>the /u directory is showing that automove will exclude the system I specified,
>but the file systems mounted under it don't show that attribute, just
I would like to thank all who responded and tell you about the solution
we found.
First of all, with some support from somewhere, we managed to re-install
the BookManager software
on the z/OS 2.5 system - unsupported / as-is. This, at least, allows us
to read the books temporarily
and to
I use WINE on top - works fine here
Am 20.03.23 um 16:10 schrieb Seymour J Metz:
If someone responds off-list, please send me the link.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Thank you for that link Peter.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Peter Stockdill
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 2:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PL/I Opt. Compiler V2 manuals?
I found the four books in:
Are you looking for the names of the datasets on the 3990 volumes that are
being backed up? If you're taking 'volume level' backups with (for instance)
ADRDSSU, the contents of the entire volume will be put into one output DUMP
dataset and only the name of that full volume DUMP dataset will be
If someone responds off-list, please send me the link.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Dave Jones [d...@vsoft-software.com]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023
That doesn't explain why you had LA R7 in places where you didn't need a
pointer,
LAR7,SYSADATA
MVC 0(IODSECTLEN,R6),0(R7)
Instead of the clearer
MVC 0(IODSECTLEN,R6),SYSADATA
Side issue are why you had separate moves for initialization instead of one
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:10:20 +0400, Jake Anderson
wrote:
>Hello
>
>I would like to understand how DLM users are able to read the contents of
>the virtual tape and the print the dataset with in each label of it ?
>
>We are taking volume level backup to the virtual tape and is it possible to
Thanks, no I didn't think of the chmount command. I ran a test on my sandbox.
the /u directory is showing that automove will exclude the system I specified,
but the file systems mounted under it don't show that attribute, just
Automove=Y. Do I need to change the mount attribute for all
Does anyone know where I can download the Softcopy Reader for Linux? The IBM
site seems to have only the Windows version.
Thanks.
DJ
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Ok
Thanks
The reason I had the LA R7
I first had to get 24 bit storage for 1) dcb 2) decb though I realize it can
live in 31 bit
3) decb it has to live in 31 bit 4) initial exit code has to be 24 bit
Once moved I had to get the proper pointers
24 bit pointers for exlst , decb
Let me
Hi,
(Posting on behalf of a colleague)
The initial question about include files, that depends on what was used for the
#include in the source. If it was something like #include “abc.h” then it
should take the current directory first (see the LSEARCH option defaults). Only
if they used the
First of all, the buffer address specified on READ MF=E is an RX address, not
an indirect address.
So the read will overlay from IOBBUFF. That could cause strange results,
You would need
L Rx,IOBUFF
READ ADATADECB,SF,(R6),(Rx),'S',MF=E
Also, I do not
You can use DITTO to do this... same as you do for real tape cartridge or tape
drive.
Carlos Bodra
IBM zEnterprise Certified
São Paulo – SP – Brazil
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Em nome de Jake
Anderson
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 20 de março de 2023 10:10
Hi
I know Charles Mills answered my question nearly 4 weeks ago but I would
just like to corroborate the I/O areas for the read can be 31 bit addressing
only the dcb and decb need to be below the line
I am running AMODE 31 RMODE 31
The DCB is below the line as well as the
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:04:44 +, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
>Thanks, but that's not helpful in my situation. The problematic file system is
>under /u which is under the sysplex root, That has to be automove.
>
>Mark Jacobs
>
Correct. Then the only way to "avoid" a lpar is to avoid it with the
Hello
I would like to understand how DLM users are able to read the contents of
the virtual tape and the print the dataset with in each label of it ?
We are taking volume level backup to the virtual tape and is it possible to
list a particular tape dataset to see it's content?
Regards
Jake
Thanks, but that's not helpful in my situation. The problematic file system is
under /u which is under the sysplex root, That has to be automove.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:03:28 +, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
>I've been looking at that and testing somethings in our sandbox environment.
>The problematic file system that's already impacted us twice is being managed
>by automount and I can't see anyway to instruct OMVS not to automove
I've been looking at that and testing somethings in our sandbox environment.
The problematic file system that's already impacted us twice is being managed
by automount and I can't see anyway to instruct OMVS not to automove
filesystems that are managed by the automount policy.
Mark Jacobs
It’s the same for z/OS. There is a chapter dedicated to ILC in the books
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=environment-zos-language-writing-interlanguage-communication-applications
> On 20 Mar 2023, at 12:53 pm, Farley, Peter
> <031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 20:01:30 +, Farley, Peter
wrote:
>Or is there a simpler (non-DLL) way to set up single-procedure dynamically
>called subroutines in C?
>
Did you look at the pragma linkage options ?
Cheers,
Jantje.
(Coming in a bit late on this thread)
As others have said, 'kicks' and Hursley are closely related (or rather,
_were_. It is my understanding that Hursley Grange is now some sort of IBM
museum.)
The local no. 66 bus goes between Romsey and Winchester via Hursley, so -
at least at some point in the
Thanks, Mark, that's very helpful.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Zelden
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 10:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: USS zlib issues
I meant to add that the sourceid is PUT2208, RSU2209. I'm
Thanks, Ann, that's very useful to know. I will pass on the info to our
sysprogs.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ann
Kelley
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 7:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: USS zlib issues
I checked my
Re: greater than 256 channels. I vaguely remember it was the top end of Amdahl
5995Ms which could have 512 channels. In order to use these the system had to
be partitioned in 2 (not using MDF?) with a max of 256 channels in each.
Re CF links, Hitachi were known to licence the IP for some System
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>Q: was it possible to connect Amdahl or Hitachi machines with
>IBM CPC using sysplex links?
>Did they use the same hardware and protocol?
It seems so. Bitsavers.org preserved these Amdahl brochures:
I found the four books in:
https://publib.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/df/s390app4.des
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Farley, Peter
Sent: Monday, 20 March 2023 12:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PL/I Opt. Compiler V2 manuals?
Thanks Mike, I
I am building a static version of ncurses (don’t ask) and there are a couple of
problems I note:
1. The xlc include search order defaults to -I/usr/include as the 1st place
to search (despite what the man page for c89 says) whereas other *IX systems
search the user specification first then
43 matches
Mail list logo
