Thanks for all the fish!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
. But they eventually reviewed the program and issued a fix.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Co.
-Original Message-
From: Jantje.
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 4:19 AM
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 20:18:18 +, Pommier, Rex
wrote:
>Hi list,
>
>Should I be concerned about t
the same message as you received, so I'm not
sure that's your issue.
More information here:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.idai200/da6i2056.htm
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
to FDR, which I know nothing
about... )
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of
Watkins, Philip S.
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 2:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
Actually, DFSMSdss appears as a line item on my monthly IBM invoice.
I believe it is DFSMSdfp that is the base part - the "free product" as it were.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTS
storage group or volume then the
quiesced volumes are preferred over quiesced overflow volumes.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Schroeder, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 9:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LIST
With apologies to Firesign Theater, but that's an insane question to ask, man,
how can we know what you read?
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Monday, February 13
or SC values.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of retired mainframer
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2017 1:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM followup question
.
Sounds like CICS is doing a DETACH for a task that hasn't had time to shut down
cleanly.
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Reference:
https://listserv.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0608=IBM-MAIN=R45915
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM
IKJ56703A REENTER THIS OPERAND -
user(*)
Hello DPC088
***
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
Yes, it was a serious question. Sorry for bothering you with my unimaginative
inquiry. We can't all be as smart as you...
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul
I hesitate to ask, but how are you using IEBGENER without JCL?
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 9:53 AM
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016
that mostly relies on
public transportation, then modify the analogy to the subway system or the
busses, or point to the Alaska Airlines wiki article to show the dangers of
delaying maintenance.
My 2 cents,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN
ass Selection (ACS) routines are not to be
invoked to determine the target data set's storage class or management class
names. To specify BYPASSACS, RACF(r) authorization might be required.
I posted an example earlier in this thread.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Mess
Kees,
Yes, running the same job, but removing the BYPASSACS parm results in the
SMS-managed data set being created, but there is still no IGD101I message.
That's interesting.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
') -
RENAMEU((DPC088.DISK.PTF,SYT.DPC088.DISK.PTF)) -
STORCLAS(TSOSC) -
DELETE PURGE CATALOG PROCESS(SYS1) ALLDATA(*)
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message
I would suggest asking CA about the DMS step not generating the IGD101I
message. (DMS has a "hook" in SMS, doesn't it?)
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Ko
Kees,
How are you verifying the data set was created?
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 6:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN
(sgname),LISTVOL
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Chuck Kreiter
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 8:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMS Volume Status
I'm looking
-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Greg Shirey
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 3:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: RACF LISTDSD oddity
Skip,
I'm
Skip,
I'm suggesting that he's entering the wrong command - LISTDS instead of
LISTDSD.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016
That's the message you get if you issue [tso] LISTDS PREFIX(ABC). At least
that's what I got. LISTDSD works as intended
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1
. I spent a lot of time trying to
determine a method of proving any benefit or detriment but never could.
Sorry to be late joining the thread, been out for a few days...
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: Jesse 1 Robinson [mailto:jesse1.robin
John,
Wouldn't you have to reverse step 2 and step 1 of your job? I don't think you
could rename SOME.PDS.LOADLIB if the STC were still running. (Data set in use)
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN
Jorge,
I believe the V4R2 version of the message was IGYOP3091W, which is also a
warning message and would have also generated an RC=04.
The compiler may be incorrectly indicating code has been discarded - see APAR
PI63119, for instance.
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
s EDGTVEXT. A
benefit of this interaction is that DFSMSrmm can prevent DFSMShsm from
overwriting its own control data set backup, automatic dump, ABARS, and copies
of backup or migration tapes. Although DFSMShsm checks its own migration and
its own backup tapes, DFSMSrmm checks them as well.
HTH,
G
Willie has already posted that there is no backup. The data set along with the
catalog entry has been deleted - as long as the ML2 tape has not been recycled,
it can be retrieved from there. There is a documented procedure for doing this
in the HSM administration manual.
Regards,
Greg
=20120808094757
Back when I worked at a shop that had HSM, I had to use this procedure several
times. I would assume it is still valid.
Note, however, that the last step reads:
" If you follow all steps correctly and you are still unable to recall the data
set, contact IBM Support."
Reg
,999 will cause the JOBID format to change from
CCCN to C0NN where CCC is either JOB, STC, or TSU, and C is J, S, or T.
N or NN is a number.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.hasa400/has2u600110.htm
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Orig
discussion.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of retired mainframer
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 5:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Determine the PDS a job was submitted from?
We set ours to 4, but we haven't gotten around to experimenting with PDSE
generations yet, so that was a SWAG for us, too.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Richards, Robert
No, not me... My main contributions to the CBT are found in your stuff --
FILE452. But thanks for the thought.
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dan D
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016
I'm confused - you found a start command for EZAZSSI in COMMND00 or you didn't?
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Yuhas
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 3:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN
load management will attempt to provide the
defined minimum amount of CPU resource to that resource group.
Minimum and maximum capacity has a system scope, that is, WLM ensures that the
limits are met on each system within the sysplex.
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
INCARD1 DD *
##TABLES 01 VERSION
This will produce report RIN6002. Depending on how many archives you have, it
can be a very large report...
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: willie bunter [mailto:williebun...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, April 15,
allocated across two volumes - utilization 0%.
SMS may be getting in your way, but it would appear to be your local
implementation. Looks like you'll need to talk to those guys
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
You can only bypass SMS if the ACS routines allow you to bypass SMS.
You might be able to add two candidate volumes after allocation:
ALTER data.set.name ADDVOLUMES(* *)
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN
ast
ten years, someone other than you on this fine list would be able to confirm
it.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 9:27 P
Klein reported back in 2005 that he had started an "annotated" list of COBOL
error messages. It was incomplete, and I guess will remain so.
It's probably not real important, but there doesn't seem to be any evidence to
support your claim that IBM "finally" published a COBO
is in error. (dsname allocation, ddname allocation, unallocation,
concatenation, deconcatenation)
Application Programmer Action: Use a different ddname, or consult your system
programmer for
the proper ddname to use.
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith
to another volume -- until yesterday.
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 1:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM
Hmm, thanks for that. It looks like the EA value was NO instead of YES.
I'll have to figure out how that happened.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 11:21 AM
anything like this. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Call Compuware - they will be happy to guide you in fixing the issue.Unlike
IBM, Compuware provides how-to assistance as part of their product support.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Hmm, the page displays a "Supper-scale Mainframe System" and a "Large-scale
Mainframe System."
If someone asked me if I'd rather have supper or large, I guess my answer would
depend on how hungry I was....
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Me
Interesting.It worked fine for me...
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Robert AH Prins
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 11:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
There may not be an "X" displayed on the menu, but it is a valid selection on
the GIM@PRIM panel:
VER(,LIST,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,D,T,W,X MSG=GIMIS007)
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTS
You asked this same question yesterday and received several replies. If they
weren't satisfactory, perhaps you need to rephrase the question.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
It happens so rarely - normally the answer is "It depends." :-)
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 3:40 AM
To
Sorry, I don't think I'm understanding you. What product is it that you are
saying is free and easiest to use?
Thanks,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of David Mingee
Sent: Tuesday
Could you be more specific?
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Harold Gray
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 3:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
Why does the process need to delete the oldest GDG after it reads it? Won't
the oldest one be deleted when the next +1 GDG is created?
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
(A)'
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//MESSAGE DD DSN=SYS2.DFRMM.MESSAGE.FILE,DISP=SHR
//XREPTEXT DD DSN=SYS2.DFRMM.REPORT.EXTRACT.FILE,DISP=SHR
Hope this helps,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From
See SYS1.SEDGEXE1, member EDGRRPTE:
REPORT05 Inventory of Data Set Names include used kilobytes
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elaine Beal
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015
MGWU <> RCTCECWU THEN ,
say ' ** LPAR may currently be "soft capped". **'
IF RCTLACS > RCTIMGWU & RCTIMGWU <> RCTCECWU THEN ,
say ' ** LPAR is currently "soft capped". **'
END
Re
) and the results I reported
were mixed. I'd love to hear from others... (I'm optimistic too - but
cautiously)
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Wednesday
could have added more qualifications to my statement, but that
still would not have turned it into a complaint. It is what it is, as they
say.
And, by the way, it's "Shirey". As the great Leslie Nielsen used to say "Don't
call me Shirley." :-)
Regards,
Gr
but needed to be tested -
we just ran out of time. We'll try again with 5.2 sometime next year.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Sipples [mailto:sipp...@sg.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 3:03 AM
Subject: Re: COBOL V5.x and CSP descendants
According to Merriam-Webster online dictionary, one definition of "culprit" is
"the source or cause of a problem."
I suppose now there needs to be a discussion about whether the OP's situation
could be defined as a problem...
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
DELETED
IDC0896I MIGRATED ENTRY VTT.FSA.VT557.REPORT DELETED
IDC0896I MIGRATED ENTRY VTT.FSA.VT557.TEXTT DELETED
IDC0001I FUNCTION COMPLETED, HIGHEST CONDITION CODE WAS 0
CA-Disk r12.5; z/OS 1.13.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
COBOL.
Any ideas how COBOL facilitated a hack on sensitive data?
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Meir Zohar
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 11:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN
When I run your JCL, I get:
IEFC620I UNIDENTIFIABLE CHARACTER ; ON THE DD STATEMENT
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Roland Kinsman
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 4:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN
USER is the User ID associated with the batch job. If you have a FILTLIST of
the User IDs called, say, NOPDSES, then you can code:
WHEN (USER EQ NOPDSES AND
DSNTYPE EQ 'LIB') THEN DO
WRITE 'NOT ALLOWED FOR PDSE'
EXIT CODE(12)
END
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E
If you issue the command TSO HELP HRECALL, example 3 is the example Tom
provided.
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Andy Gilman
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 9:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN
Just a note - perhaps you haven't at your shop, but you can add to the SYSSTC
service class. We put the systems programmers' TSO sessions there, for
instance.
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Slow storage creep in SYSTEM.SYSSTC
Greg Shirey wrote:
We put the systems programmers' TSO sessions there, for instance.
TSO sessions not at TSOHOT, TSOHI, TSOMD, TSOLOW, etc.? Hmmm?
Just curious, if you don't mind please
are combined into one extent beginning
on cylinder 6, track 0, and ending on cylinder 12, track 14. Instead of two
extents, there is only one extent. Because VSAM combines the two extents, it
does not increment the extent count, which reduces the amount of extents.
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith
Not even remotely? Okay, I'll bite. What point were you trying to make by
your comment PUSH is one letter shorter.
Thanks,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J
Yeah, and shame on us for not discussing ways to achieve peace in the Middle
East, too.
What's the point of a technical forum anyway if we can't solve the big problems
in the world??
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
The O/S may never use the data set after the step runs, but perhaps using
the data set wasn't the point of running the step. I'd prefer the O/S not
make that assumption for me.
My 2 cents,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
- which if I remember
correctly, you hate...
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 11:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
once - so why
the fuss? Just get it done...
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 12:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IDCAMS
programming
techniques
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 6:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: migrating compiler versions
behavior
End-If
Read file2
If fs2 = 4 then
Display Corrected COBOL V5 behavior
Else
Display Incompatible wrong length read behavior
End-If
Close file2.
Goback.
HTH,
Greg
process the data in the buffer. This use might affect the processing of
both input files and output files.
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-
m...@listserv.ua.edu]
On Behalf Of David Speake
Sent: Monday, March 23
I don't think there's anything wrong with the logic, but you know that most
attributes of a DATACLAS can be overridden.
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday
Really? All your co-workers are spending the day watching videos on You Tube
and the only thing the boss complains about (to you directly) is what he
perceives the cost of the video to be? That sounds odd.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Run an IDCAMS EXAMINE on the data set and see if you get message IDC01718I
Found empty control areas that have not been reclaimed.
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark
Yes. See APAR PI22094.
Also, see APAR PI30156.
HTH,
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 12:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: XMLPARSE(COMPAT)
Test for DSNTYPE=LIB.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Dawes
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 7:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: TESTING SMS ACS ROUTINE OPTIONS VIA ISMF
G'Day,
I have to test my
It is not mentioned in SYS1.HELP(ALTER) on my z/OS 1.13 system
Is it in z/OS 2.1??
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 9:33 AM
Thanks for the update I was
.
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 6:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Changing Job Output class in ST screen in SDSF
It is still an option in COBOL 5.1.1. The default is NOSSRANGE.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 4:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN
I'm surprised, but it looks like on an average day the SYSLOG generates 1.3
million lines.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 11:34
need
to define the volume to the storage group and then activate the updated
configuration.
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Meenakshi, Vinoth - CW
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 2:35
MOVE YES TO END-OF-BUILD
000106 1GO TO 300-EXIT
000107END-IF.
IBM support was not helpful in letting us know which of the PTFs from September
fixed the issue.
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith
88K .3M 14.1M
SS604 0:05.00 000:00:46105,714 101K .3M 13.3M
So, this is not application code, but it is what we have measured so far.
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
--
For IBM-MAIN
it.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Gilmore
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 5:05 AM
snip
So far, we do not appear to be dealing with defective optimizations
with OPT(2), I browsed the program object and was able to
find BUBBA which leads me to believe that the optimizer is no longer removing
code that cannot be executed. (At least in this case.)
Is that a bug? I'll ask IBM and report back.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original
Hmm, remove the code but not the literal? That seems more trouble than it's
worth and to what end?
I could probably look at the pseudo assembler listing, but that's not my strong
suit.
What does it hurt? Well, if I wrote a COBOL program and the compiler reported
that a huge chunk of it
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 10:53 AM
Greg Shirey wrote:
Inside the paragraph that never gets executed, I added the following
statement:
MOVE BUBBA to WS-DESC.
What are the conditions you set that the part will never be executed
Compiler has Arrived!)
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 1:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: object/load module sizes - was RE
To be clear, though, about the examples I posted - they were all program
objects (whether compiled COBOL 4 or 5) and stored in the same PDSE.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Gilmore
Sent: Thursday,
be executed is not being discarded as it was in
COBOL 4.2. So, there's no message about it because the compiler is no longer
doing what it used to do. We intend to open a PMR in the morning and see what
response that yields.
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From
messages?
Has anyone already opened a PMR for this issue? (I searched but didn't find
one)
Thanks,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
serverpac order did not have C/370 that the
DDDEF for SEDCBASE would be directed to CEE.SCEELKED. I've never run CALLLIBS
or CALLLINK, so I don’t know what they do, so proceed with caution.
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM
years. Increasingly, I see this transition happening, Vecchio says. Waiting
isn't going to make this any cheaper, and it isn't going to reduce the risk.
They've been predicting that for close to 20 years now, I think.
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Possibly because there is no BOUNDS operand to the TSO EDIT command?
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 9:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
DEFAULTS - NONE
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of willie bunter
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 8:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN
I'm confused by your references to the manual paper feed and tray 2. You said
there are three paper sources, so if tray 3 and tray 4 are two of them, the
third one is either the manual feed or tray 2 - or are they one and the same?
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
From: Rick
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
