t; From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
>> Of retired mainframer
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 11:12 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: HSM question
>>
>> Look at the VERSIONS operand of the SETSYS command and the ALTERDS command
11:12 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM question
>
> Look at the VERSIONS operand of the SETSYS command and the ALTERDS command
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> > Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi
> > Sent: Wedne
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Gadi Ben-Avi
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 4:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question
Thanks
In the Management Class there are to more options I would like to set:
How many backup versions of a deleted dataset are kept.
How long
On Behalf Of
retired mainframer
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question
Look at the VERSIONS operand of the SETSYS command and the ALTERDS command
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behal
Look at the VERSIONS operand of the SETSYS command and the ALTERDS command
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 12:15 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM question
&g
OK,
So how do I tell HSM to keep more than one backup version?
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 10:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question
MGMTCLAS won't matter for Non-SMS
MGMTCLAS won't matter for Non-SMS datasets
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 11:39 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: HSM question
>
> Hi,
> I wanted to res
Hi,
I wanted to restore a PDS backed up by HSM.
When I looked, I only found one backup version of the PDS.
When I looked through the HSM logs, I found that it was backed up many times.
The PDS is on a NON-SMS volume.
The addvol statement for the volume is:
ADDVOL vv UNIT(3390)
] Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes that have no copy1
Rex,
There are 2 places HSM records the DUPLEX volser 1 in the MCV record while the
Primary volume is still a partial tape and then in the TTOC record. The DUPLEX
tape would be displayed in the LIST TTOC output if the Primary volume still
Rex,
There are 2 places HSM records the DUPLEX volser 1 in the MCV record while the
Primary volume is still a partial tape and then in the TTOC record. The DUPLEX
tape would be displayed in the LIST TTOC output if the Primary volume still
existed. If it doesn't show in the LIST TTOC output
, February 14, 2019 2:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes that have no copy1
I get "entry not defined". Unfortunately that doesn't help, because on my
playground I have duplex tapes with their primary ML2 tape still existent, and
I ge
Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes that have no copy1
Try HSEND DELVOL(XX) PURGE FORCE(?)
I haven't looked up the syntax.
Actually, if they are not in the TTOC you can probably just expire th
associated)
the volume would not go scratch until replaced.
Don't remember the exact details.
Al
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 11:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes
try the TAPEREPL process in a test
environment to see what happens.
Thanks.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 8:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes
"owning" primary volume. The "offending" duplex volumes will be
deleted as part of the recycle process.
HSEND RECYCLE EXECUTE VOLUME(owning volser)
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Wednesday, Februar
Hello list,
I have a few HSM ML2 duplex tapes that no longer have their corresponding
migrate tapes that I can't seem to get rid of. If I try to do DELVOL, I get
an error saying they're not defined migrate volumes. What we're doing is
migrating our HSM ML2 environment into a VTS
13, 2019 9:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question - ML2 tapes no longer avaialble
Two recommendations below
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Allan Staller
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 7:03 AM
&g
On Behalf Of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 9:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: HSM question - ML2 tapes no longer avaialble
Several years ago, the HSM tapes were migrated from 3490 to 3590.
At that time, two 3490 tapes were unreadable so the systems programmer just
skipped
Two recommendations below
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Allan Staller
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 7:03 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM question - ML2 tapes no longer avaialble
>
>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: HSM question - ML2 tapes no longer avaialble
Several years ago, the HSM tapes were migrated from 3490 to 3590.
At that time, two 3490 tapes were unreadable so the systems programmer just
skipped the recycle and went on to the next tape. So, now I have 2
3490
Several years ago, the HSM tapes were migrated from 3490 to 3590.
At that time, two 3490 tapes were unreadable so the systems programmer
just skipped the recycle and went on to the next tape. So, now I have 2
3490 tapes still in my CDS and I want to remove them. These tapes were
created back
You might also review this Technote that explains various reasons and things to
look at to see what might be going on.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg3T1023379
Max Smith
IBM DFSMS HSM Development
--
For
; >
> > From: Graham Harris <harris...@gmail.com>
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 6:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: SMS/HSM QUESTION
> >
> > Primary space management should normally process all volumes in a storage
>
met, HSM stops looking at the volume(s).
>
> From: Graham Harris <harris...@gmail.com>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 6:05 PM
> Subject: Re: SMS/HSM QUESTION
>
> Primary space management should normally process all volumes in a sto
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: SMS/HSM QUESTION
Primary space management should normally process all volumes in a storage
group. And PSM should normally look to reduce utilisation of a volume down
to the low threshold (caveat - various PATCHes can alter DFHSM standard
beh
Primary space management should normally process all volumes in a storage
group. And PSM should normally look to reduce utilisation of a volume down
to the low threshold (caveat - various PATCHes can alter DFHSM standard
behaviour).
Have you checked the messages for space management actions for
Thanks for the info., however it doesn't answer my question as to which
threshold I should modify.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
The Track-managed deals with the first 64K cylinders. The other one
deals with the EAV 21 Cylinder managed portion past the first 64K
cylinders.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 8:55 AM, willie bunter
<001409bd2345-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Good Day To All,
>
> I am trouble shooting a
Good Day To All,
I am trouble shooting a problem caused by space abends. I looked at all of the
54 SMS managed volumes
(via ISPF 3.4) and I found 2,930 dsns which are allocated on this specific
Storage Group which were created in Dec.2017 and have not been referenced since
their creation.
September 22, 2017 10:06 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: HSM question
>>
>> When a VSAM data set is migrated is the cluster, index, and data component
>> displayed under ISPF 3.4 as migrated? Or is only the cluster name shown?
>> FIRST TENNESSEE
>>
t; Behalf Of PINION, RICHARD W.
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:06 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: HSM question
>
> When a VSAM data set is migrated is the cluster, index, and data component
> displayed under ISPF 3.4 as migrated? Or is only the cluster na
Subject: HSM question
When a VSAM data set is migrated is the cluster, index, and data component
displayed under ISPF 3.4 as migrated? Or is only the cluster name shown?
FIRST TENNESSEE
Confidentiality notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged
When a VSAM data set is migrated is the cluster, index, and data component
displayed
under ISPF 3.4 as migrated? Or is only the cluster name shown?
FIRST TENNESSEE
Confidentiality notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential
r 24, 2016 2:39 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM question
>
> That's what I thought, but it does not seem to be working. So, I figured I was
> misreading or doing something wrong.
>
> Tony Thigpen
>
> retired mainframer wrote on 11/24/2016 04:42 PM
>> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 7:30 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: HSM question
>>
>> The elapsed time is 10 minutes.
>>
>> Before we get off-track too much, the end result we are looking for is:
>> We want the
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 7:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question
The elapsed time is 10 minutes.
Before we get off-track too much, the end result we are looking for is:
We want the HSM backup
Doesn't SETSYS PARTIALTAPE(BAKCUP(MARKFULL)) do what you want?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 7:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question
The elapsed
The elapsed time is 10 minutes.
Before we get off-track too much, the end result we are looking for is:
We want the HSM backup process to *always* use a scratch tape. We never
want it to ask for an existing tape to append to.
We will recycle the tapes to combine them at our convenience.
But,
and allow it to move on to the next
task.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 7:36 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM questi
UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 7:09 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM question
>
> Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
> >The remote operator is a human.
> >Tape management system is CA1
> >Still res
Tony Thigpen wrote:
>The remote operator is a human.
>Tape management system is CA1
>Still researching logs.
Thanks. I see that output and logs you gave to Lizette.
I see you have MOUNT WAIT TIME=010 MINUTE(S), but what are the [elapsed] times
for these messages and reply?
*IEC501A M
:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 6:33 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM question
>
> Answers:
> 1) OS/390 2.10
>
> 2) output from Q SETSYS:
>
> QUERY SETSYS COMMAND STARTING ON HOST=1
&g
Elardus,
The remote operator is a human.
Tape management system is CA1
Still researching logs.
Tony Thigpen
Elardus Engelbrecht wrote on 11/23/2016 02:04 AM:
Tony Thigpen wrote:
Once a week, HSM performs an AUTOBACKUP. Until about 3 months ago, if nobody was at the
shop, HSM would ask for
messages you are seeing during autobackup?
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 4:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: HSM question
HSM is not my ballgame, but I
Tony Thigpen wrote:
>Once a week, HSM performs an AUTOBACKUP. Until about 3 months ago, if nobody
>was at the shop, HSM would ask for an exiting tape, wait 10 minutes, and if no
>tape was mounted, it would ask "Can tape be mounted?". If our remote operator
>replied 'N', then HSM would us a
n List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 4:03 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: HSM question
>
> HSM is not my ballgame, but I am tasked with figuring out this puzzle, so bear
> with me. As for backgroun
HSM is not my ballgame, but I am tasked with figuring out this puzzle,
so bear with me. As for background, the shop attempts to run lights-out
24/7.
Once a week, HSM performs an AUTOBACKUP. Until about 3 months ago, if
nobody was at the shop, HSM would ask for an exiting tape, wait 10
You are correct. 'PREPARE' only creates an ABR record. No verification or
data movement occurs.
Glenn Wilcock
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
Good Morning Gentle Readers,
Just to ensure that I don't cause a problem if I issue the following command
the ABARS AGGREGATE is NOT recovered. All it does it adds the ABR record to
the BCDS.
ARECOVER DSNAME (HIL5.C.C01V0025) XMIT PREPARE.
An EXPIREBV was run in error.
Thank You.
49 matches
Mail list logo
