On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 22:18:51 +, Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
>
>There was a post to ibm-main by Allan Kielstra of IBM compiler development (I
>think) on May 10, 2017 (How are Program Object sections with Defer attribute
>loaded?) that discusses how the writable static area (WSA) is used in COBOL
I agree, but it's important to note that there are far more similarities than
differences. Most of the differences you see between country sites are the
same thing you would see different between two sites within the USA.
You can have a site in Arizona (which doesn't do daylight savings) and
If you have specific problems with z/OS 2.2 that you know about and they are
not addressed in the existing docs on 2.3, then it's likely not addressed in
the first GA of 2.3. I am aware of several problems, but only because I opened
them recently on 2.2, and I know they have not been addressed
>Is that feature going to be (or has been?) back-ported to V2.1?
No.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the m
when I said "nowhere known to IEWBLODI for the deferred classes to be
loaded from", I was thinking that IEWBLODI takes input from
, and builds an executable in storage.
Tony,
I think of it that the binder has everything, just as it would when saving
the executable to a data set.
The deferred s
I didn't have an answer in mind for the question. If the only differences are
obvious ones between countries, I'll profile the different uses of mainframes
you mention, since sometimes non-US installations don't get much US visibility.
But if there ARE country- or region-based variations (staff
Hello list!
I was reviewing our XCF groups and I noticed a few members that have been
quiesced or failed a long time ago (up to 10 years ago).
Question: We are not really getting close the NAME(GROUP) limit of our sysplex
CDS dataset, but how do you get rid of those garbage groups? I couldn't f
Just to let you all know I finally was able to delete the records. I was
barking up the wrong tree. I was concentrating on the 'B" instead of the "C"
records.
I dd a FIXCDS C HSMBACK.BACK.T592617.DB2.ARCHLOG2.I8257 DELETE
That did the trick.
Thanks to all who responded and helped out with the
Does anyone have code for overriding the RC=8 from ADR321E and setting it to
RC=4? I think this involves UIM23.
FIRST TENNESSEE
Confidentiality notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended re
It could help to see the whole message
But according to the message
The requested data set is not on the volume. The system might also issue this
message for a data set that is being migrated when DFSMSdss tries to process the
data set.
So you want this case you want to set an RC4 rather than an
Yes, we have FDR and have some multi-volume data sets that get migrated. Due
to the way FDR works, not all pieces of a data set may get migrated.
Therefore, when ADRDSSU (we have plans to convert from ADRDSSU to FDRABR DUMP
TYPE=APPL, but not right now) selects one of these data sets we get th
One of my clients is retiring an old TS7720 and wants to guarantee the
residual data is completely erased before it leaves the premises.
Can someone out there tell me if the "Secure Data Erase" feature works
with internal hard drives as the physical media, as well as with take
cartridges?
Th
Check with your vendor or CE. Most vendors have the ability for the CE to do a
secure erase that meets most requirements.
I had to excess a virtual tape system that did not support the erase. We wound
up pulling the drives and send them to be shredded.
Dennis Roach, CISSP
AIG
Identity & Access
Well, the copy you are attempting will certainly be broken and useless.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of PINION, RICHARD W.
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 10:49 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: ADR
As it stands now, the error message is issued and the data set is bypassed. I
would like to bypass the data set also, but give a RC=4. I want to treat it
like the entire thing has been migrated.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
A year or two ago I attended a webinar that was discussing (selling) a product
that would scrub sensitive information (generally PII) from dumps (SVC dumps,
SYSMDUMPs and the like) prior to sending these to a software vendor.
I told my management about it, and there was no interest, so I didn't
I have been trying to figure out where this intervention is coming from
It does not seem to impact the job running
Any ideas ?
Thanks,
Augie
VM
q 1a40
A tape 1A40 intervention required.
TAPE 1A40 ATTACHED TO MXVSEAUD 0A71 R/W
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 14:46:55
q 1940
A tape 1940 intervention required.
There was a patent filed by IBM on Locating and altering sensitive information
in core dumps.
http://www.google.com.pg/patents/US20080126301
Bill Skeldum
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Holst, Jeffrey A
Sent: Friday,
That Brazilian mainframe shop was the poster child for the zBX and the Cell
blade. I don’t think it’s very active at this point – at least IBM hasn’t
talked about it for years.
FWIW, the one comment I’d contribute is the decline of NLS language messages
and documentation. In most cases, English
I found the patent filing to be an amusing read, at least with respect
to
the z/OS specific stuff. There is no SS type of dump record. And if you
wanted
to process a dump, you certainly wouldn't do it by reading the raw dump
records
(as that wouldn't work very well for data which crosses a
Here is a link to the description of a product for log and dump
anonymization called SF-SafeDump:
http://www.fedtke.com/exchange/SF_SafeDump_for_zos.pdf
Thomas Loges
ITERGO Germany
Am 11.08.2017 um 22:08 schrieb Holst, Jeffrey A:
> A year or two ago I attended a webinar that was discussing (sell
To correct myself, there is a type SS record. I almost never see
them.
There are also type A, SC, SD, and SC records which could contain
sensitive data.
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.
Poughkeepsie NY
> I found the patent filing to be an amusing read, at
On 11 August 2017 at 16:23, Skeldum, William
wrote:
> There was a patent filed by IBM on Locating and altering sensitive
> information in core dumps.
> http://www.google.com.pg/patents/US20080126301
Whatever its technical merits, that IBM patent is remarkable in that
at least six of the seven in
>On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 22:18:51 +, Frank Swarbrick .COM> wrote:
>
>>There was a post to ibm-main by Allan Kielstra of IBM compiler development=
> (I think) on May 10, 2017 (How are Program Object sections with Defer attr=
>ibute loaded?) that discusses how the writable static area (WSA) is used in
Well that explains why its not documented! Sorry for discussing your secret
features. :)
I am curious about the 'C' way being using the WSA. Does this mean a C DLL has
all static variables allocated at the time the DLL is loaded? And is this a
"non-issue", in contrast to COBOL, because C pr
Yes a C DLL does have all static variables allocated and initialized when a DLL
is loaded. This is usually fine. However suppose you had a few thousand
independent programs that you linked into a DLL simply for packaging purposes.
And suppose that each program had a lot of static storage asso
Sounds like someone ought to fix that! ;)
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Allan Kielstra
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 5:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MSGIEW2678S Module contains one or more deferred classes
Yes a C DLL does
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Now imagine that the DLL gets loaded repeatedly and in each case only one of
the programs it contains is actually executed. That case could have
performance problems in the C world because the static data for all of the few
thousand independent programs is created and i
Did you open a case with EMC on this? The DLM Support group is pretty good.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of August Carideo/RYE/US
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 1:15 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
Something like Xbridge data sniff?
Rob Schramm
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017, 6:48 PM Tony Harminc wrote:
> On 11 August 2017 at 16:23, Skeldum, William
> wrote:
> > There was a patent filed by IBM on Locating and altering sensitive
> information in core dumps.
> > http://www.google.com.pg/patents/US20
Is the internal encryption already on it?
Rob Schramm
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017, 2:52 PM Roach, Dennis wrote:
> Check with your vendor or CE. Most vendors have the ability for the CE to
> do a secure erase that meets most requirements.
> I had to excess a virtual tape system that did not support the
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:09:10 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote:
>
> We did have a meeting in z/OS development quite a few years ago to discuss
>someone's wish for this type of function for z/OS dumps. We concluded that
>in general, identifying the sensitive data to be modified would be so
>problematic
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
