Hi all,
We are using Imail 7.07 and need to change top directory for a host on the
server.
I have read after changing the top level directory (doing this first time) I
will need to manually copy the users folder to the new directory. needed to
confirm that I will need to copy the Group type
Hi,
I use this script for removing a message in a submailbox spam.mbx
immsgexp -tE:\Mailhosts\antispam\users\pasquale -d1 -mspam.mbx
This script works only for a single users.
What can I do for do this for every use of a mailhosts or for all the users
of all mailhosts.
I don't want to this
Trying changing your command to
immsgexp -tE:\Mailhosts -d1 -mspam.mbx
That should look at all the spam.mbx files.
Tripp
- Original Message -
From: Pasquale Viscione - Dial S.p.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 7:36 AM
Subject: [IMail
Thanks; It work!
Now, I have to create a file called spam.mbx in every mailbox for each
user.
What can I do??
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Tripp Allen
Inviato: martedì 10 febbraio 2004 14.01
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: Re: [IMail
FWIW - copying a file or whatever to all users' folders
Here's what i schedule to run once a day (to pick up any new users)
where the file spambox.fwd in d:\imail contains the single line :
spambox
~~~
rem spamboxcopy.bat
rem batch to copy spambox.fwd to ALL users
Why do you need to create this file?
Tripp
- Original Message -
From: Pasquale Viscione - Dial S.p.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:07 AM
Subject: R: [IMail Forum]Delete msg in a spam.mbx
Thanks; It work!
Now, I have to create a file
Title: Rules equal not working
I am trying to block mail with subject of only hi so I added this rule:
S=hi:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is blocking hi how are you ect...
So tried:
S=\shi\s:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This doesn't block anything but hi
Thought this should be a no brainer. Can
Title: Rules equal not working
Basically, I'll
notice that I haven't gotten any new mail for a long time, and hit the sync
button on my mail client (the Apple Mail app on my Mac), and it gets nothing. But then I stop and restart it, and I get a whole batch
of new mail. Looks like the
I am trying to block mail with subject of only hi so I added this rule:
S=hi:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That will block any E-mail with hi in this subject, including This is a
subject.
So tried:
S=\shi\s:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This doesn't block anything but hi
Correct.
Thought this should be a no
Title: RE: [IMail Forum] Rules equal not working
Thanks Scott, not what I wanted to hear. Wonder if mxGuard will do it? I will contact them.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: RE: [IMail Forum] Rules equal not working
mxGuard filters email based on blacklists and other criteria, and adding
informatoin to the message header. The latest version also has virus
protection capabilities. I doubt it has, or will have, the functionality
to do what you want --
The IMail rules cheatsheet can be found at
http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/guide/imailug801/Chapter%204%20processing3.html
As for mxGuard, the results of our spam checks are added to the messages
headers. The user/admin must configure IMail rules to benefit. As Marc
said, we will be
You should be able to setup inbound rule on the domain for this. You
have to build the rule to identify the spam depending on how you are
sorting. The final action of the rule should be to move the message to
the mail box spambox and each time a new messages comes in Imail will
examine it, if it
Title: RE: [IMail Forum] Rules equal not working
Thanks
to David and Marc for your help. I think I am on a roll. Found an
old email from Jim Comerford that has aninbound rule that looks
promising. Between the mxGuard and new rule we will give it another
try. I do not delete any messages so
Title: RE: [IMail Forum] Rules equal not working
Hi all,
The word info is not in my phrase list on its own,
it is in several domain names, etc. but it is still getting caught.
Any suggestions, I am stopping alot of legits
because people can't type out information.
Thanks
Jay
Hello everyone-
We recently upgraded our iMail system from v6.04 to v8.03. Now we're getting
complaints from users not being able to send mail. When we look at the server
via the iMail Administrator application, the SMTP service is listed as stopped.
Simply starting it up clears the
Did
you make sure that no other SMTP services are running, such as Microsoft's in
IIS?
Dennis T. Kemp II (Tom)Program Manager
MCSE/CNA/A+Control Concepts, Inc.[EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ#:
157741210For additional contact information, click
Sorry for the post - I know this topic has probably been addressed before,
but I couldn't find anything in the archives that would help me.
I want to know if there is a way to be able to collect mail from external
POP3 accounts and send it to the Imail server. I know Imail can't do this,
which
We recently upgraded our iMail system from v6.04 to v8.03.
My first suggestion would be to upgrade to v8.05. There have been a number
of issues corrected between 8.03 and 8.05; this could well be one of them.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The
On 2/10/2004, 1:28 PM, R. wrote:
We recently upgraded our iMail system from v6.04 to v8.03.
RSP My first suggestion would be to upgrade to v8.05. There have been a number
RSP of issues corrected between 8.03 and 8.05; this could well be one of them.
FWIW - I actually had no problems with
Reply from: Pat Thompson
Yep - verified that iMail is the only application running SMTP.
Did you make sure that no other SMTP services are running, such as Microsoft's in
IIS?
Dennis T. Kemp II (Tom)
Program Manager MCSE/CNA/A+
Control Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ#: 157741210
For
Reply from: Pat Thompson
Thanks Scott:
I just double-checked and confirmed that we are in fact running v8.05 - 2003.12.17.4.
The box is labeled 8.03, so I assumed that is what we had installed.
-PT
We recently upgraded our iMail system from v6.04 to v8.03.
My first suggestion would be to
Pat,
I had the same problem with 8.03 and 8.04 running in Win2k Server. Upgrading to 8.05
fixed it.
Art Plato
-Original Message-
From: Pat Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re[2]: [IMail Forum] We upgraded from
Is it 8.05 or 8.05HF1. I went from 8.04 to 8.05HF1
-Original Message-
From: Pat Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 2:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re[2]: [IMail Forum] We upgraded from v6.04 to v8.03 - Now the
SMTP service stops working
This would not be causing your problem, but you may want to check your
anti-spam configuration. You are sending out email with several
X-IMail-Spam headers in them.
These headers were in the mail and the list server does not perform these
checks:
X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALHELO: (17629356)
...and our spam filter rule is catching them and putting them in the spam
box.
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Tripp Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: re[2]: [IMail Forum] We upgraded from v6.04 to v8.03 - Now the
SMTP
Scott Smith wrote:
I want to know if there is a way to be able to collect mail from external
POP3 accounts and send it to the Imail server. I know Imail can't do this,
which is why I'm hoping somebody out there figured out a way around it. I
saw a post in the archives about fetchmail, but
Does this:
02:10 13:40 SMTPD(004801B2) [192.168.1.6] connect 192.168.0.150 port 1328
02:10 13:40 SMTPD(004801B2) [192.168.0.150] EHLO engman-taylor.com
02:10 13:40 SMTPD(004801B2) [192.168.0.150] MAIL
FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
02:10 13:40 SMTPD(004801B2) [192.168.0.150] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply from: Pat Thompson
Tom:
Interesting. We've set the server up for antispam according to the KB article:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20030513-DM01.htm
Also, we've enabled the DNS Blacklists (insert X-Headers), along with turning on the
options for Verify MAIL FROM Address, Perform
Reply from: Pat Thompson
8.05. We just went ahead and bumped it to 8.05HF1. We'll monitor it and see what
happens now.
-PT
Is it 8.05 or 8.05HF1. I went from 8.04 to 8.05HF1
-Original Message-
From: Pat Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 2:10 PM
To:
Reply from: Pat Thompson
We've configured antispam according the the Ipswitch article:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20030513-DM01.htm
Is this setup causing the headers to be generated?
-PT
This would not be causing your problem, but you may want to check your
anti-spam configuration.
Does this:
02:10 13:40 SMTP-(014F0C92) Connect urmgroup.com [69.24.68.215:25] (2)
02:10 13:40 SMTP-(014F0C92)
02:10 13:40 SMTP-(014F0C92) SMTP_DELIV_FAILED
indicate the problem is on the receiver SMTP end?
Yes. You can't tell from the log files what the problem is, but
Title: Recovering deleted mail from Webmail
Hi,
I have a user who accidently deleted all his email from Webmail.
His deleted folder shows as being empty.
Is there any way to recover this?
Thanks,
Sharyn
The problem with the headers is probably due to your clients are not AUTHing
into the SMTP when the sending emails. If they don't auth, they need to be
in the trusted IP list so the connection filtering won't be applied to them.
Tripp
- Original Message -
From: Pat Thompson [EMAIL
Title: Message
nope,
gone. Unless you have it on backup
Jason
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn
SchmidtSent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 2:42 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [IMail Forum] Recovering
Title: Recovering deleted mail from Webmail
Back-ups??? Otherwise they are gone...
Sincerely,Grant Griffith, Vice PresidentEI8HT LEGS Web
Management Co., Inc.http://www.getafreewebsite.com877-483-3393
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
Title: Message
nope, gone. Unless you have it on
backup
That's what I thought.
Gee, just because I ALWAYS caution people that deleting mail from Webmail means
it's gone for good, doesn't mean they should listen,
right?
sigh
Thanks,
Sharyn
Title: Message
There
is a setting in Web Messaging that they can set so that anything they delete
goes to a trash or deleted folder. Then if they do it by accident they can
get it back. We encourage this to most users and then I use a utility that
someone on this list passed out that
Title: Message
Back-ups??? Otherwise they are gone...
Thanks. The tape backups are from last
night. This wouldn't help with the email that he received today that hasn't been
backed up yet.
Appreciate
it!
Sharyn
Title: Message
Which utility would that be that deletes old
messages? Could I take a look at it?
Scott Smith - IT ManagerWestside Detroit
Reprographics248.489.1999 (Office)248.467.0452 (Cell)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
Grant Griffith - IMail
To:
I'm just curious as to why the RFC rules do not like not allowing a null
sender as any email that is rejected usualy comes from a valid mail server
and I have never seen one come in without an email address attached to it.
When I turn on deny null sender about 20% of my spam go's away and my mail
Title: Message
Oh, nevermind, I found the utility.
Scott Smith - IT ManagerWestside
Detroit Reprographics248.489.1999 (Office)248.467.0452
(Cell)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
Scott
Smith
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 4:06
Well the RFC's are Request for Comments (Guidelines) not laws nor rules.
Most servers try to adhere to these guidelines to ensure the successful
delivery/return of email. If you refuse NUL senders you'll get listed in an
ignorant database called something like ignorant.org (which FWIW any email
Hey, that looks really nice. I'd like to test that on my system if
possible. Thanks.
Dan Horne, CCNA
Web Services Administrator
TAIS Web
Wilcox World Travel Tours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This email message, including any
I'm just curious as to why the RFC rules do not like not allowing a null
sender as any email that is rejected usualy comes from a valid mail server
and I have never seen one come in without an email address attached to it.
Actually, you have that backwards. The RFCs require that you accept
On 11/02/2004 at 07:39:26, imail wrote:
I'm just curious as to why the RFC rules do not like not allowing a null
sender as any email that is rejected usualy comes from a valid mail server
and I have never seen one come in without an email address attached to it.
The null sender must be used
I keep getting a bunch of these
Received: from 65.182.136.130 [65.182.136.130] by mymail.host.com
(SMTPD32-8.05) id AB06103A0120; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:18:14 -0800
Received: from 216.166.232.118
X-UIDL: 375166071
Any idea what they are, and how do I set up rules against them because they
I've been having some *serious* email trouble over the last few days.
I think I've got *new* mail flowing now, but there's a ton of old mail out
there that may not be going anywhere.
In the spool directory, I did a dir of the D*.*, Q*.*, and T*.* files to see
what the relative totals were:
Your 5000+ T files are left over from message deliveries to your mail server
that were lost, abandoned, etc... If you stop SMTP and Queue services, you
can delete them and their corresponding D files since they are
incomplete/dead
Your 1300= Q files along with their corresponding D files will be
I had written a script to re-create the Q files from the D files.
Unfortunately I can't find it. After I used the script I found out that the
D files were left over from mail that was already delivered. You might want
to check a few D's and the person's box it was meant for to see if it made
it
Do not attempt to regenerate the Q files. The information in the Q file does
not have to nor might well not correlate with the information in the header
of the D file.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
51 matches
Mail list logo
