As an additional side note to my earlier post I am receiving in the log a "reconnect" or "retrying service" as a result of using an IP for my BL.
BLACKLIST: connecting to service (service name)
BLACKLIST:retrying service (service name)BLACKLIST: failed to connect to service (service name)
AJM
Main reason for migration is the lack of knowledge and the cost of running.
They only have a license for 2000 and they have no spam or virus protection
currently on the exchange system. The have multiple domains that they want
to move from the current ISP's mail server and host on their own.
The
Thanks Scott, could you elaborate a little more on your last comment
except the return value, such as
127.0.0.2) into the IMail v8 anti-spam settings...
You can ignore that part -- IMail v8's anti-spam doesn't support return
values (except through rules).
Is it just me or does there seem to be a problems with anything that
resolves to an akadns.net address? (www.microsoft.com, sbc.yahoo.com ...)
Gary
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone else was having this issue. We are currently
running 8.11. It looks like it is running perfectly and does for periods of
time, but then, with no warning, SMTP32 process stops worrking. SMTPD
continues to wok and collect mail, but the que just grows and grows
When logging into the mail server via webmail, I recently started getting
the message A runtime error has occurred. Do you wish to Debug? Line: 892
Error: Syntax error.
I'm using XP Pro IE 6 have all latest updates, fixes, patches, etc.
Any suggestions?
To Unsubscribe:
If you are receiving mail, then wouldn't it be the Queue Manager Service
that's crapping out on you?
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Imail_Forum
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 7:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] SMTP32
this would be
greatly appreciated!!!
20040615 100952 127.0.0.1 SMTP (033004dc8f54) processing
C:\IMail\spool\Q033035dc8f54.GSC
20040615 100952 127.0.0.1 SMTP (033004dc8f54) Inbound
20040615 100952 127.0.0.1 SMTP (033004dc8f54) ldeliver machineshopbidding.com rgoff-Sent
(1
Disable script debugging in IE 6.
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Post
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 7:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Webmail-runtime error?
When logging into the mail server via webmail, I
I can't reach microsoft or symantec.
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Faulkingham, Shawn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:02 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: DNS problems
| You are correct...I am wondering if yahoo is getting blasted with its news
|
Hi,
It's a bit off topic, but: I need a command line based POP3 client. This tool should
receive an mail and should store an attachment to the disk.
any idea?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Merlin Consulting
Martin Schaible
Bahnhofstrasse 27
CH-8702
I know of no such animal for Windows or DOS. Maybe in Unix...anything I know
in Unix usually runs IMAP.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:35 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Command Line based pop3
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of Jeff Reinhardt
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 7:45
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail
Processing and Hardware Limitations?
I have the following configuration:
Dual PIII-733 MHz
Hardware
is surely not your problem, unless you have some highly fragmented Disks.
fragmented could be an issue as I know we have not
defragged the drives in a while, how often should this be done
and
what is the best way to do it since we only have the
one server?
There are issues with
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of Jeff Reinhardt
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:17
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail
Processing and Hardware Limitations?
Hardware is surely not your problem, unless
you
Chris,
Take a look at
NetMailBot:
http://www.exclamationsoft.com/exclamationsoft/netmailbot/default.asp
It is a bit pricey but is very configurable and does POP3 and SMTP from the
command line.
Gary
At 07:35 AM 6/15/2004, you wrote:
Hi,
It's a bit off topic, but: I need a command line
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of Jeff Reinhardt
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:34
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail
Processing and Hardware Limitations?
If you have Diskkeeper you can Set It and
Yep - that did it. I also had to do the ipconfig /flushdns on the client as
well.
turn off Winddows resolver caching on Imail servers, actually, turn it off
on ANY windows server. it's a registry hack
Len
_
Then I realized none of my clients were caching DNS entries on the local
side. I can only assume every DNS request passes through my DNS server,
which obviously has been working, but has to be a bear on the network.
DNS is a very lightweight, low-volume protocol. UDP only, not disk access,
Can you elaborate on how to do that??
Thank You,
Joshua Moser
Webmaster
ISATonline, LLC
1.800.229.2029
Http://isatonline.com
MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:11
I believe this is what he is referring to:
The Windows 2000 client DNS resolver accepts responses from DNS servers that
it did not query. This behavior speeds up performance but can be a security
risk if the responding DNS servers have been compromised. If you want to
disable this default
you wrote:
turn off Windows resolver caching on Imail servers,
actually, turn it off on ANY windows server. it's a registry hack
Can you explain this please?
Chris
Chris,
I think they mean to stop and disable the windows DNS Client Service:
===
Resolves and
I think they mean to stop and disable the windows DNS Client Service:
NO!! the DNS client aka resolver (resolves DNS queries into answers),
must be kept on, but it's caching must be turned off. stop the resolver,
and your machine is useless for ip networking.
this service is stopped, this
FYI, only running the barracuda spam firewall (which includes clam a/v
and whatever else 'proprietary' they use), 19, 24, 25 got through.
*
Dave Heritage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
918-406-1975
A flock of sheep led by a lion can win a
battle but a pack of lions led by a sheep is
likely to
Hello All,
Does anyone know what happened to the refuse null
senders option in the SMTP security tab in Imail
V 8.11? I have it available in 8.05, but not 8.11. We have been getting a large
amount of this type of address hitting the server and would like to refuse them
before they are
The information below only applies to the DNS Client that runs by default
on all W2K and WinXP machines. We disable this service on all machines
(servers and client computers) as it only causes problems. For those
running MS DNS Server, the registry change you want to make is under:
Hive:
The information below only applies to the DNS Client that runs by default
on all W2K and WinXP machines. We disable this service on all machines
(servers and client computers) as it only causes problems. For those
running MS DNS Server, the registry change you want to make is under:
Hive:
- Original Message -
From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The information below only applies to the DNS Client that runs by
default
on all W2K and WinXP machines. We disable this service on all machines
(servers and client computers) as it only causes problems. For those
running MS
If you are talking IMail 8.xx, then yes, I would agree. We do disable DNS
Cache in the IMail administrator under Services\Queue Manager.
is that caching inside of Imail or in the Windows resolver?
Len
_
Thank you everyone for your time.
I-Mail version 8.05
Current Configuration. I-Mail accepts e-mail from the world. The I-Mail
server has a static IP address. I-Mail accepts e-mail from a mail relay.
This mail relay has a static IP address. We have several users from
several domains who use their
-FEATURES: (H
here are som examples:
Inbound X-IMail-Rule: H~X-IMAIL-SPAM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Data-
X-IMAIL-SPAM-HTML-FEATURES: (N
20040615 092610 127.0.0.1 SMTP (04B9) ldeliver mail.domain.com root-bulk (1)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5886
Inbound X-IMail-Rule: H~X-IMAIL-SPAM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Data
I am trying to reduce the number of spam email that is reaching our firm
and decided to use at least one verification method.
I am not sure what methods out of the following three is safe to use:
A - Verify MAIL FROM address
B - Perform reverse DNS lookup for connecting server
C - Verify
We have configured our MX records so that the mail relay has a
higher priority than the I-Mail server, this should route our
incomming mail through the relay. Yet, as evidenced by the routing
stamps in the headers of the received e-mail, some e-mail is being
transmitted
I think perhaps we should all look at this:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;318803
It shows how to keep you cache, yet turn down the ttl on the cache, positive
and negative...
Shawn Faulkingham
Indoff Inc.
314-997-1122
-Original Message-
From: Len Conrad
Let's see if I understand correctly and can give you my thoughts
accordingly.
Your Scenario
Server A = IMAIL Server
Server B = Spool and Forward server
Your MX records are configured like this
MX10 points to Server B
MX20 points to server A
Your users send email and receive email to and from
A - Verify MAIL FROM address
the simple verify is no longer usable, as more and more servers disable it.
all MXs should disable it.
but for verification:
RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... works just as well as VRFY command.
there is a new smtp message 252 try sending valid email adresse foprmat
or
Is this a domain local to the server or are you are gatewaying for? I seen
this error before when I was gatewaying for a domain and I forgot to put in
the remote mail servers ip address in the relay for addresses tab.
Darrell
So you are saying this text is incorrect?
Yes, and if you test it on a Windows machine you'll quickly see I'm
right.
so there are 2 DNS resolvers in Windows, one in the services panel
and one somewhere else.
The DNS Client service is not responsible for the wire-protocol DNS
lookup,
Does anyone know what happened to the refuse null senders option in the
SMTP security tab in Imail V 8.11? I have it available in 8.05, but not
8.11. We have been getting a large amount of this type of address hitting
the server and would like to refuse them before they are processes. Any
1. erase MX20 or point it to Server B to.. That way all incoming
email will always go to your relay and then it will be redirected to
your server A (where Imail is hosted). That way no incoming email
using MX will by pass the relay server.
I'm afraid that's wishful thinking, Luis.
Hi,
Anybody know how I can limit some users to send and receive
e-mails to and from the same host. Example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] just receive
and send e-mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please help me!!!
Thanks
Palmeiro
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by
Hi and thanks for your answer, I try to explain my problem better:
- (A) server with win2000s/smtp integrated in IIS
- (B) server with win2000s/imail 7
.. host A send mail to B and B send external net ( that is towards Internet) but B it
gives back error to me that I have described, therefore I
Anybody know how I can limit some users to send and receive e-mails
to and from the same host. Example:
Inbound and outbound rules scanning header information.
Note that rules depend largely on forgeable data, so if a user spoofs
the address of an allowed to send user, they will still be
Hey Darrell,
I dig the products. Any deal on the bundle?
Thanks,
Chris Patterson, CCNA
Network Engineer
-Original Message-
From: darrell_list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail Processing and
Thanks Sandy...
So... I need create a rules to identify a different email of my host
(@mail.com), is it???
The rules is based in FROM and TO fields, correct???
Thanks my friend...
Rodrigo Palmeiro
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Sanford
Now the users you are emailing from A are they local users on B or are
they out on the internet? If they are not local on B your imail server do
you have A's IP address listed in relay for addresses in Imail B?
So based on your example below is pluto.com a local domain or is this a
remote
Are you looking to purchase both QueueMon and DLAnalyzer? if so what
version of DLAnalyzer? Let me know - email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Darrell
Chris Patterson writes:
Hey Darrell,
I dig the products. Any deal on the bundle?
Thanks,
Chris Patterson, CCNA
Network Engineer
Hi,
Posting again since I never really got an answer, hoping somebody knows.
I'm trying to figure out if there's a way to tell Imail to never check
outgoing messages (from authenticated users...we have SMTP security set up
to relay for local users only) for spam content. This has been a big
We're still having problems sending to RoadRunner
addresses. Tons of MX connect fail errors just to RoadRunner MX's.
Mail is getting through, though delayed as much as a couple of hours, since I
told IMail not to cache DNS or skip failed domains, but I still need to talk to
a RR mail admin
Beware, there's no free lunch.
The connector shim that Ipswitch has licensed or purchased and is modifying to work
with Imail IMAP server has per-client licensing fees.
I would expect the Imail connector to also have per-user fees.
If you only need anti-virus and spam blocking, it is very
Running IMail 8.05 with HF03
I originally posted this problem to the list on May 23rd but it was quickly subverted
by a flame war and, consequently, never answered. Since that time, I have gathered
more information which may be beneficial to others.
We host a number of lists on our mail server
Wow - I must say you have gone the extra mile to find the source of the
problem. We could all learn a lesson here.
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of FastWave
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 4:28 PM
To: IMail Forum
Subject: [IMail Forum]
Posting again since I never really got an answer, hoping somebody knows.
I'm trying to figure out if there's a way to tell Imail to never check
outgoing messages (from authenticated users...we have SMTP security set up
to relay for local users only) for spam content. This has been a big problem
We're still having problems sending to RoadRunner addresses. Tons of MX
connect fail errors just to RoadRunner MX's. Mail is getting through,
though delayed as much as a couple of hours, since I told IMail not to
cache DNS or skip failed domains, but I still need to talk to a RR mail
admin
When I first came across this problem, I thought the IMail product was in
error and reported it to Ipswitch (I initially thought the IMail server
was sending the wrong 'Reply-To:' address). Now, I am convinced that
Roadrunner is the problem and would like to report this to them. I seem to
Hi Scott,
According to their http://security.rr.com website we should see a message in
our server logs if we're blacklisted. We don't...just the MX connect
fail...and we're at the detailed log level.
Their website may be incorrect and they may be blocking, but that's all we
have to go on at the
We were having the same problem. DO you have a reverse lookup record for
your official host in Imail? That fixed the problem for us. We were
getting MX failures from Hotmail and AOL because of this.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Yep, we have reverse in placebeen working fine for a couple of
yearsjust having all of the MC connect fails to RR all of the sudden.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Joshua Moser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:25 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail
yup
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 7:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Still need a RoadRunner postmaster contact
Some yes, some no...and sometimes one will work, other times
Good...so it's not me then... it definitely got better after telling IMail
not to skip failed domains or cache DNS, but it would be nice to talk to RR
and see what they're doing to fix it.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matrosity Tech Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
In meantime i found a small command line based pop3 client. This small peace of
software
works pretty well.
Link:
http://www.interlog.com/~tcharron/getmail.html
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Merlin Consulting
Martin Schaible
Bahnhofstrasse 27
As time goes on, spammers are learning how to get around spam
filters. Currently of the email I receive, about 90% is spam.
If Imail removed all HTML tags , prior to performing the phrase
checking, then this would remove at least 70% more spam than it does now.
Below is an example of a spam
62 matches
Mail list logo
