There is no current functionality for inferring type from structure or
values of JSON Objects.
Something like that has been requested, but it is difficult to both think
of how to generalize this (is there a declarative way of defining what and
how to match?) as well as how to make it work through
Since `XmlEnumValue` is a JAXB annotation, it is used if (and only if) JAXB
module is included.
`@JsonProperty` is applied through standard `jackson-databind`. Precedence
of annotations depends on how `AnnotationIntrospector`s are registered
(which has precedence). I assume that you have JAXB
Actually I don't think your problem is related to Jackson 1.x usage, since
you are trying to use 2.7.5 version of Scala module, which requires 2.x
base components. 1.x and 2.x components reside in different Java packages
and have different Maven group ids so they do not collide.
However it seems
Right, this isn't kind of use case for which there is (or likely will) be
special handling; for better functionality you may need to both use 2-pass
processing (first bind individual sub-trees to a JsonNode, or Map or
TokenBuffer) and custom error handling (for each generic subtree). In
general
Your suggestion sounds plausible, but to fix it, as well as to guard
against regression, it would be necessary to have a way to reproduce the
problem.
So if there is any way you could suggest a way to trigger the problem that
would be great.
Exception, however, would seem to indicate some other
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:03 AM, JonyD wrote:
> Hi,
> I will repost the question I did in stackoverflow (
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/38797189/how-to-
> access-typeresolutioncontext-in-jackson-2-8-1).
>
>
> I am upgrading jackson library in a java project from
This definitely sounds like a bug in Jackson; exception itself indicates
that the state Jackson databind thinks it is in (wrt what is to be written)
differs from what low-level JSON generator thinks.
If possible, could you file a bug at
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues
but
Thank you!
-+ Tatu +-
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Colin White <colinrtwh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I'll take a closer look into the allocations on
> the stack and report back.
>
> -Colin
>
>
> On Thursday, 30 June 2016 22:33:41 UTC-7, Tat
I can't think of anything obvious. Since registration occurs via REST
framework of some kind, it would seem like maybe registration is failing
for some reason? Sometimes framework uses different `ObjectMapper` than
user expects, leading to missing configuration.
-+ Tatu +-
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016
There is no way to do this; you can have case-insensitive properties, or
regular conversion (given POJO property, produce translated expected
external value), but no arbitrary conversions applied on-the-fly.
To support such mapping you would need to do 2-phase processing: first read
content and
As per title, I have pushed 2.8.0 release out (with JAX-RS provider being
synced to Maven Central now). As usual, Scala module should follow with
some delay, but otherwise core components are released.
Release notes can be found from:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.8
If content does indeed contain character 10 (Unicode), that is, linefeed,
it is prohibited by JSON specification (should be escaped as \n), so the
content should be fixed and parser is right to report it.
This is assuming content does have that; cut'n pasting JSON can not quite
tell that, so you'd
Unfortunately I don't think this approach will work due to overhead being
added: just looking at code it would make all existing usage measurably
slower. And for case where there are actually required properties there's
even more due to construction and management of the Map. There are other
I can not think of anything specific in this area that would cause such
problems.
The first thing I would strongly recommend, however, is to upgrade to the
latest patch of the minor version you have: there is absolutely no reason
to use 2.6.1 over latest one, 2.6.7.
If the problem still
Ok, code has a few problems.
First: method `constructFromCanonical()` really isn't meant to be
end-user functionality.
Maybe Javadocs should make this clear, but it is not something I was
planning to be used by anything but core Jackson functionality. I can
sort of see why it might seem useful,
So far pushed out core components (annotations, streaming, databind),
base modules.
Will proceed with dataformats, datatypes and then languages (kotlin, scala).
As usual, process may take a while.
This is likely to be the last 2.7.x release for a while; it may even
be the last patch.
But branch
Yes, you can serialize a Java object as CBOR using Jackson's
`jackson-dataformat-cbor` as extension of `jackson-databind`. As you
would know by reading the README at:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-binary/tree/master/cbor
it's something like:
ObjectMapper mapper = new
One problem I see is the use of `As.EXTERNAL_PROPERTY`: this is not
what you want based on expected json structure.
Instead you probably just want to use plain `As.PROPERTY` (unless you
want to also map it to a regular, existing property, in which case
`As.EXISTING_PROPERTY` may be more
Since this has been asked a few times (every now and then), it would
be great if existing settings could be shared -- I am pretty sure they
do exist. This would help developers on Android platform.
A section for `jackson-docs` or just README of `jackson` dedicated to
things to consider on Android
stance.class, name =
> "unknown")})
> public abstract class ObjectInstance implements Serializable {
> private static final long serialVersionUID = -8515880933242237477L;
> private List fields;
> }
>
>
> Br
>
> On Friday, January 20, 2017 at
Apologies for a slow response here: yes, once this:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-binary/issues/35
gets into release (2.7.9 and 2.8.7) this will work using
`SequenceWriter`, like so:
SequenceWriter w = mapper.writer(schema)
.writeValues(file);
w.write(item1);
As per title, 2.8.7 is being released. Change list at:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.8.7
and upgrade is, as usual, recommended; although nothing considered
generally critical fix was included this time (YMMV of course).
We are also getting very close to 2.9.0.pr1;
Almost but not quite. Use of
`@JsonTypeInfo(include=As.WRAPPER_OBJECT)` would indeed allow use of
JSON property name as type identitifier. This would work for property
values, and Lists/Arrays, but not quite the way you'd want for Maps.
So if I understand use case correctly, there is nothing out
tion it may not be possible to just
omit value (f.ex. in case property is to be serialized, name is
already written); except if property itself
is to be excluded (using `@JsonInclude` mechanism for example).
-+ Tatu +-
>
> Thanks
>
> David
>
>
> On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 1:49:4
if I understand use
case.
-+ Tatu +-
>
> Thanks
>
> David
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 4:40:19 PM UTC-6, Tatu Saloranta wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:43 PM, David Hayek <david...@sial.com> wrote:
>> > If I have to se
Usually my first guess is that configured `ObjectMapper` is not being
used at all.
So if you can re-configure mapper in some other way (like default to
indenting or something) maybe you can eliminated the possibility that
this mapper is not being used?
Another small thing is that
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:33 AM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have the following scenario:
>
> * Map
>
> * CustomClass contains a field Map, and has a
> CustomClassSerializer registered in module added to the ObjectMapper
>
> * the
didn't work.
>>
>> What do you meant by "re-configure mapper in some other way". Could you
>> please provide some more details?
>> My guess is that JacksonJsonProvider is not getting used at all. How do
>> you I know that?
>>
>> -Ni
Um, how are we supposed to help if you don't provide either:
1. Classes you use for reading/writing
2. JSON being read (or expected to be written)
?
Including list of symptoms may help but these two things are the most important.
-+ Tatu +-
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:54 PM, vivek sharma
ode.
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Friday, 10 February 2017 19:19:59 UTC, Tatu Saloranta wrote:
>>
>> I have not heard of such problem.
>>
>> But make sure NOT to disable `FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES`
>> DeserializationFeature -- (too) many developers auto
erModifier.modifySerializer() called for
> Collection?
Because `modifyCollectionSerializer()` is called for it; they are type-specific.
-+ Tatu +-
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 8:28:56 PM UTC+1, Tatu Saloranta wrote:
>>
>> There is no functionality to d
I don't know of any specific facility, and since Jackson specifically
stays of Transformation use cases (with some minor exceptions for
simple unwrapping), it may be out of scope for automated handling.
Having said that I would think a common pattern would be to read input
as tree (`JsonNode`),
That sounds like an odd result. From code it looks like simple valid
usage that sound not fail.
Are you using a recent Jackson version? (2.7.9 or 2.8.6)
-+ Tatu +-
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Solar Entropy wrote:
> Not entirely sure where to ask for help with this,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Mike Price wrote:
> I am currently attempting to implement some of the tricks described in this
> presentation to increase performance. I would like to be able to change a
> particular ObjectMapper instance to serialize all POJO's using a
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:43 PM, David Hayek wrote:
> If I have to serialize an object that I can not annotate and that contains
> parent-child relationship, such as a DefaultMutableTreeNode, I can avoid the
> infinite recursion/stack overflow problem by supplying an
Ignored in what way? What is happening? What does your
`JsonViewOverrideSerializer` look like?
One common problem is that all delegating serializers MUST implement
`ResolvableSerializer` and `ContextualSerializer`, and delegate them
to underlying serializer -- otherwise that instance can not be
Although Jackson has had Avro backend for quite a while -- in fact, it
was introduced in 2.1, over 4 years ago -- it hasn't been widely
adopted, and feature-wise there has been much development
aside from bug fixes (big thank you to all adopters who have reported them!).
Lately there have been a
No, currently there is no way to have what amounts to
multiple-argument setters. From annotation perspective it should be
possible to just use `@JsonSetter` for such methods, but internally
those are not yet supported.
They would be nice to support, but would likely require lots of work
due to
What is compact1 profile?
-+ Tatu +-
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Ferry Huberts wrote:
> I would really like to run the jackson bundles under compact1 profile for my
> JSON serialisation.
>
> Is it possible to adjust the databind bundle so that it only uses the
>
Looking at the exception output, interesting part is this:
at [Source:
start_date=28%2F02%2F2017+14%3A01_date=01%2F03%2F2017+14%3A03_date=01%2F03%
which gets printed because input comes as a String (otherwise wouldn't
print, although Jackson 2.9 does improve on this a bit). So input that
is
Behavior does sound like a concurrency problem, but I do not recall
anything specific that should cause it. I do know there have been fixes to
some concurrency issues related to type resolution so this could be the
root cause.
There are no currently open bug reports for this, as far as I know.
.7, 2.8.1 (no 2.8.0
> release due to incompatibilities), and 2.8.2. They should be available on
> maven central within a few hours.
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:31 AM Tatu Saloranta <t...@fasterxml.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Quick note: after releasing 2.7.7 patch release last we
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Clément Poulain wrote:
>
>
>> I think there are many ways to build filters, including cases where you
>> have a small number of filters, but each with complicated logic. One
>> possible problem is that of passing settings/configuration into
Adding custom Collection deserializers is possible, but it is quite a bit
more involved due to delegation needed. Best examples of how this is done
would probably be found from `jackson-datatype-guava` package, which has
support for Immutable lists and sets.
You may also want to have a look
Quick note: I just finished pushing patch version 2.8.3. Release notes can
be found here:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.8.3
Upgrade is recommended from earlier 2.8.x versions.
Scala version is not yet out, but our hope is that it can be release within
upcoming week
Nothing definitive, but in general:
1. Releases wiki page --
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Releases -- and explicit
sub-pages do get updated
2. We try to tweet via @fasterxml
3. There is also `jackson-announce` mailing list (alas, not reliable used)
I would be interested in
Patch release 2.7.8 is now out, as per:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.7.8
(minus some inertia wrt Scala module, to follow)
Although upgrades from earlier patch versions is always recommended -- we
try to keep risk for patch versions very low, and unlike issues with
This is tricky, and in general there isn't way to force "raw"
inclusion for pass-through data: content must be first decoded from
XML, and re-encoded. It would not be possible via Stax, even with
direct access.
However, question of escaping '>' (which Woodstox only does if it's
part of "]]>", as
The only thing is @JsonTypeInfo(defaultImpl=...) which would be used if
nothing is found or matches.
-+ Tatu +-
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Note the fallback if statement here. Is there a way to do an @Type
> that says what to do if nothing
You can think of `@JsonGetter` and `@JsonSetter` mostly as old aliases for
`@JsonProperty`. So you shouldn't have to them for anything.
And yes, annotated getter/field for serialization (to access property
value), setter/constructor-parameter/field for deserialization (to assign).
Beyond this,
I don't think schema generation / type introspection aspects have been
tested with virtual properties, so you are exploring uncharted territory
here.
Most likely some wiring is missing. As usual, a github issue with simple
repo would be good way to go.
-+ Tatu +-
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:12
Java String just becomes JSON String value, that is, surrounded in double
quotes and contents escaped if and as necessary.
So to pretty-print, you need to parse JSON into a Java object structure,
then write with pretty-printing. Something like:
JsonNode root = mapper.readTree(input);
String
Thank you for reporting this: I will update documentation as suggested!
-+ Tatu +-
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Alexander Mironenko
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just found the behaviour relate to JsonIgnore annotation. The cause is
> described here:
As some of you may have noticed, I started pushing Jackson 2.8.5 patch
release yesterday.
Core components are out, as well as datatypes, base modules, and half
of dataformats.
I still need to figure out one thing wrt binary dataformats but hope
to push them tonight (within 12 hours); after which
Oh. Actually, never mind that one. I should have checked the link
first -- this is for JSON output.
What Woodstox offers is, as per issue you filed (thanks!) property
`P_TEXT_ESCAPER`.
Wiring this via `CharacterEscapes` would be the clean way.
Until then, this thread:
No, for two reasons:
1. JsonNode is singly linked, only parent -> child linkage (not a
problem for root node itself, but in general)
2. JsonNode does not have JsonLocation, since this is not needed in general
to get location information, you need to use JsonParser directly, or
sub-class JsonNode
field has type Optional assign
> Optional.empty() instead of assign null
>
> On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 12:55:48 AM UTC+3, Tatu Saloranta wrote:
>>
>> What do you mean by optional fields? Optional values are usually defined
>> by assigning them in POJO.
>>
rmat' when mapping data across multiple
> threads ? Where exactly is this done ?
>
A new instance is created with a clone; no sharing is done. If you want to
see where, have a look at code.
-+ Tatu +-
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mohan
>
> On Wednesday, 12 October 201
No, you'll have to handle it on your own; possibly by using separate
`XmlMapper` for values.
-+ Tatu +-
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:28 PM, wrote:
> How do I parse a json containing xml as string in one of the field.
>
> Pojo:
>class A {
> B b;
> int
Unfortunately handling of TypeIdResolver is quite strongly coupled
with that of `TypeResolverBuilder`, and your best route would probably
be via annotation introspector. Although I actually like your approach
above: did not know it would actually work (I spent some time back in
the day trying to
Everything else done a long ago. Not sure what Scala status is.
-+ Tatu +-
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Steve A. <a.steven.ander...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> What's the lastest status on 2.8.5 esp. wrt scala?
>
> On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 2:36:10 PM UTC-5, Tatu
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Lev Kuznetsov
wrote:
> But why would the type erasure on the map be the deciding factor here? The
> type of the value is known at runtime, it is Bar, it has a property lol -
> that gets serialized no problem, clearly it knows the type
First: how would you know how many have seen your message? Just
because there are no answers does not mean much: mailing lists
messages are sent as emails and there is no way to track that. It is
possible that Web UI has separate counts.
Second: what's with the entitlement? Do you really expect
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Literate Aspects
wrote:
> How can take my remote data (generated by a Model class bean and a remote
> data connect bean displayed in xhtml VIEW [live xhtml VIEW][1]) and convert
> -- that POJO into a JSON string -- to use in jquery
That should work: you do need 2 separate ObjectMappers, and a way to
change polymorphic type inclusion.
If using default typing it's simple (just setting for mapper), but
otherwise need to apply changes to settings. Options I would have
suggested include:
1. Use of mix-in annotations (to add or
The reason for (4) is the good old Java Type Erasure.
What you writing out is essentially `Map`, as far as available
type information tells -- there is nothing that could tell otherwise.
So as general rule:
- Do not serialize generic values as root value, if possible.
o but if you do, you
For sake of completeness (full desc in issue filed): there is no way
to match the behavior with code, because usage can not be fully
supported. This was not known at the time API was left open.
The underlying issue is that generic `java.lang.reflect.Type` types
can only be fully and reliably
vement has been made yet.
>
> Of course not using @JsonUnwrapped is not an option here :)
>
> Thanks for your help in any case!
Likewise!
-+ Tatu +-
>
> Le mercredi 11 janvier 2017 21:53:14 UTC+1, Tatu Saloranta a écrit :
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:45 AM, <v
, Tatu Saloranta <tsalora...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Quick note: I am now on vacation, and while I may be checking (and
> occasionally responding) my emails, I won't be working on any issues. I will
> be checking the backlog in january so no reason not to file bugs, add
> updates
JavaType construction itself looks ok. So that should not be causing
the problem. Without seeing more of code it is hard to know what could
be causing the issue: so a code snippet that contains call to
`readValue()` (or even better unit test) would be needed to resolve
the issue.
-+ Tatu +-
On
There is no built-in support for specifically filtering out named
fields, although doing this using @JsonFilter should be possible. It's
briefly explained at:
http://www.cowtowncoder.com/blog/archives/2011/02/entry_443.html
and in bit more detail at:
Quick note: I am now on vacation, and while I may be checking (and
occasionally responding) my emails, I won't be working on any issues. I
will be checking the backlog in january so no reason not to file bugs, add
updates, but my follow-up will be slower than usual.
Happy holiday season to
You can enable/disable `SerializationFeature`s using `ObjectWriter`
instead of `ObjectMapper`, like so:
byte[] bytes = mapper.writer().with(SerializationFeature.WRAP_ROOT_VALUE)
.writeValueAsBytes(pojo);
I don't know what support Spring Boot offers for doing this.
-+ Tatu +-
On Mon, Mar
Actually it should already be possible to use `@JsonIgnoreProperties`
for properties as is, but I think it only affects property value
itself, and not contents of containers.
But it seems reasonable to assume that since Lists/arrays/Maps do not
have properties of their own (except in non-standard
terXML/jackson-docs/
but most documentation refers to public API developers are most likely to use.
-+ Tatu +-
>
> BR, Zsolt
>
> 2017. március 23., csütörtök 6:45:18 UTC+1 időpontban Tatu Saloranta a
> következőt írta:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:24
Could you please file an issue for `jackson-databind`. Looks like a bug.
-+ Tatu +-
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Anuj Kumar wrote:
>
> I am getting an exception with jackson databind version 2.8.0 and later,
> everything works fine with any version below 2.8.0.
>
> Issue
L module, as that should be slightly more robust.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help and hints! Hope I helped someone...
Thank you for sharing this!
-+ Tatu +-
>
> BR, Zsolt
>
> 2017. március 24., péntek 1:06:37 UTC+1 időpontb
e it has to something with the fact that I register it for an abstract
> class, and the concrete implementors still use their defaults?
BeanSerializerModifier is a callback, but yes, result would be bound
for whatever type it was called for.
-+ Tatu +-
>
> BR Zsolt
>
>
>
> 2017. má
JSON Schema reflects the fact that Jackson serializes URLs as JSON
Strings -- it wouldn't make much sense to report it as Object since
that is not its serialization. So this part works the way I would
expect it to be: JSON Schema defines the way JSON structures work, not
what is semantic view of
PM, Zsolt Balanyi <zsolt.bala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> OK, thanks, then I'll go that way!
>
> BR, Zsolt
>
> 2017. március 20., hétfő 20:13:25 UTC+1 időpontban Tatu Saloranta a
> következőt írta:
>>
>> This can not be done from annotation-based serializer
sed in annotation like this:
> @JsonSerialize(using = UIElementSerializer.class)
>
> BR, Zsolt
>
> 2017. március 20., hétfő 19:21:29 UTC+1 időpontban Tatu Saloranta a
> következőt írta:
>>
>> Not 100% sure I understand the question, but if you want to access
>> informati
y I have a Page, that contains a StackLayout that contains a
> Label and an Image.
> It would solve the problem, if the JsonTypeInfo could put the type name to
> the element name...
>
> BR, Zsolt
>
> 2017. március 20., hétfő 19:22:10 UTC+1 időpontban Tatu Saloranta a
>
com
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Tatu Saloranta <t...@fasterxml.com> wrote:
>>
>> That does sound like a possible path, as
>> InputDecorator/OutputDecorator allow wrapping of parser/generator
>> using delegation.
>> Implementation o
What is the POJO you are serializing?
-+ Tatu +-
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Zsolt Balanyi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a structure that outputs this:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I use @JsonTypeInfo(use=JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME, include=As.PROPERTY,
>
Ok so what do you mean by "edit"? Change the effect taken, or to
modify file from which data comes?
Or something else?
-+ Tatu +-
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Public Share
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm using jackson csv to write csv file.
> But the header is mapping
I hope someone who has had similar issue can share how they
implemented limitations.
-+ Tatu +-
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:40 PM, <ni...@codenation.co.in> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply. Are there workarounds to implement these?
>
> On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 1:45:06 AM
Not 100% sure I understand the question, but if you want to access
information about annotations on property, from your custom
serializer, you need to implement `ContextualSerializer`, and then its
`createContextual()` gets called with `BeanProperty`.
`BeanProperty` has accessors for annotation
There is no such functionality available for either aspects.
First one is unlikely to be supported at all as the delegation means
that none of serializers is concerned with more than one level (or,
possibly another small fixed number considering wrapping for type id
handling, or "unwrapped"
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:38 AM, <st...@heliossoftware.com> wrote:
>> > Thank you Tatu. If I were to try to override this behavior, where
>> > should I
>> > look in Jackson? For example, if I wanted to try to have Jackson skip
>&
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Adarsh Jalaja wrote:
> I am trying to send json to convert to java via rest using apache CXF
> (3.0.11)
>
> jackson being used is 2.8.6.
>
> when I send the plain JSON (without namespace) its giving namespace related
> error. This used to
I am not an expert with Weblogic, but I suspect there may be some
dependency that includes component that prevents use of Jackson. So...
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Claude Libois wrote:
> Hello,
> I have been fighting since yesterday to enforce the simple pojo to me
Already done:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformat-xml/issues/228
but will be part of 2.9.0(.pr3)
If anyone observes similarly missing functionality for other context
please file issues: unfortunately this change needs to be rolled out
incrementally.
-+ Tatu +-
On Wed, Apr 12,
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Joseph wrote:
>
> I'm looking to simply return null and add errors to a
> Map from all JsonDeserializer instances when a
> JsonMappingException is encountered (since the JSON parser can continue). In
> each of
s are called in expected place(s)
and are responsible for trying to keep token stream in compatible
state: this is why `skipChildren()` is called for some of the cases.
Throwing exceptions generally cuts through call hierarchy and tends to
make nested deserializers get off expected state.
So choices tend
Jackson XML backend does not really support mixed content -- content model
that has both non-whitespace text AND elements. This is difficult to
represent with databinding, and is mostly operated with XML-centric models
like DOM.
There has been some talk about exposing this in some form or
The problem with your code is that you are for some reason assuming
that `user` would be dropped for some reason: it is not. JSON
structure that would be equivalent is rather:
{ "user" : {
"name" : "Joe",
"age" : 28
}
}
So basically there is no 'age' property in main level object:
2:14:27 AM UTC+1, Tatu Saloranta wrote:
>>
>> What is compact1 profile?
>
>
> See
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/compactprofiles/compactprofiles.html
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> &qu
Jackson databind has no idea where calls comes from, so by default no.
JAX-RS provider could theoretically pass this information, but this
has not been wired.
I think you could build something using `ObjectReaderModifier` and
`ObjectReaderInjector` to pass information from endpoint, using
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Drpbxa wrote:
> When you annotate a property with @JsonUnwrapped you can set a prefix
> attribute:
>
> @JsonUnwrapped(prefix="camel")
> MyObject obj;
>
> If MyObject has a property named "casedProperty", the json key will be named
>
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Adrien Quentin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to use jackson deserialization to parse and map java object.
> Work fine except when the xml contains two same local names in differents
> namespaces, like this :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Borehole
1 - 100 of 729 matches
Mail list logo