give me linux_java

1999-04-30 Thread proud
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Ken McNeil
First off you have taken my intentions to an extreme. I only wish to discuss these issues openly and in no way am I attempting to create anything. And also you have highlighted some things in my original post that are not truly significant to my message. I will point this out below. > > How i

Re: jdk1.2

1999-04-30 Thread Christopher Bodenstein
Hi, Ozer Irfan wrote: > Hello > Include jdk1.2 the swing libraries ? > If no where can I download it ? > > I have compilation error : > > for example : JFrame not found > > I do > > import com.sun.java.swing.*; I think you should do: import javax.swing.*; > > > Thanks > > Irfan > > --

Re: jdk1.2

1999-04-30 Thread Stuart McLean
Ozer Irfan wrote: > > Hello > Include jdk1.2 the swing libraries ? > If no where can I download it ? > > I have compilation error : > > for example : JFrame not found > > I do > > import com.sun.java.swing.*; > > Thanks > > Irfan > >

Parametric types proposal - where?

1999-04-30 Thread Wolfgang HOSCHEK
Maksim Lin wrote: > I'll second you on the bugs issue and the problem with Suns 1001 API's > approach. However to be fair you probably picked a bad eg. with > parametric types as Sun has just put up a proposal for them. Can anyone please point me to this parametric types proposal? Thanks. Wolfg

_dl_symbol_value (Glibc2.1)

1999-04-30 Thread Jeremiah Jahn
/usr/local/jdk/bin/i586/green_threads/java: error in loading shared libraries: /usr/local/jdk/lib/i586/green_threads/libjava.so: undefined symbol: _dl_symbol_value this is with jdk1.1.7. did this ever get fixed, and if so where. I can't seem to find a reference to it in any of the download site

jdk1.2

1999-04-30 Thread Ozer Irfan
Hello Include jdk1.2 the swing libraries ? If no where can I download it ? I have compilation error : for example : JFrame not found I do import com.sun.java.swing.*; Thanks Irfan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

problems with JNI: unsatisfied link error can't find fstat

1999-04-30 Thread Crispin Miller
Hello, I'm having problems with linking libraries in a JNI method in java 1.2... My machine is a RedHat 5.2 box with kernel 2.2.3. I have succesfully got jdk1.2 installed and run some of the Demos... The JNI code works fine under jdk117, but dies under 1.2 with: UnsatisfiedLinkError: /home/cris

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Ken McNeil
>Exactly competition is good. But I'm afraid a differ with you Ken on >what competition, I would prefer just competing implmentations, not >competing platforms (though even that in some ways is a good idea, eg. >one OS is not a good idea). You're right on both, within the Java(c) world competing

CORBA between * and Linux-Java-Server

1999-04-30 Thread Kutschera Peter
Hello! I asked this about 1 mounth ago but got no answer. In the meantime I did some additional tests. When I run a Corba Server implemeted with Java1.2 on my Linux box I cant get a connection from any other non-linux machine (I don't have a 2nd linux machine here for a test). Connecting the name

Re: Parametric types proposal - where?

1999-04-30 Thread Dimitris Vyzovitis
Ken McNeil wrote: > > > I'll second you on the bugs issue and the problem with Suns 1001 API's > > > approach. However to be fair you probably picked a bad eg. with > > > parametric types as Sun has just put up a proposal for them. > > > >Can anyone please point me to this parametric types propo

Re: Parametric types proposal - where?

1999-04-30 Thread Ken McNeil
> > I'll second you on the bugs issue and the problem with Suns 1001 API's > > approach. However to be fair you probably picked a bad eg. with > > parametric types as Sun has just put up a proposal for them. > >Can anyone please point me to this parametric types proposal? Thanks. It's on the JDC

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Michael Emmel
Matt Welsh wrote: > I usually can't stand flame bait like this but I wanted to point out one > thing. > > Sun has clearly recognized some of the advantages of the Open Source model, > which is the entire reason why they have adopted the 'Sun Community Source > License' for a large number of their

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Alex Pozgaj
Ken, first I'd like to appologize for some of the comments I made - I'm aware now that they could be understood as much more offensive than I intended them to be. Ken McNeil writes: > First off you have taken my intentions to an extreme. I only > wish to discuss these issues openly and in no

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Robb Shecter
Hi, Interesting conversation. I vaguely disagree with your overall sentiment, but the following prodded me out of lurker state. :) Ken McNeil wrote: > > >Do you REALLY want to make Java into the horrible mess C++ is today? > > Okay, I will substantiate this... > > 1. In the spirit of Darwinis

What could happen if Sun opened up Java ?

1999-04-30 Thread Michael Emmel
Well now that the Sun "Bashing" is back. Let me give you my dream of what would be possible if Sun opened up Java. First the spec for a server side Java implementation would be completed rapidly. second work begins on a distributed server side VM. WHat does this mean ?? Think about Java based

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Uncle George
For myself, as the lone alpha-linux porter, is that the new model is very different from the non-commercial lic agreement. With that agreement I can attempt to make the JAVA JDK work & distribute to any and all folks that are interested - FOR NO CHARGE of course. The New Open license appears to cu

Problem with native method parameter (jstring)

1999-04-30 Thread Denise Stringhini
Hello, I'm trying to port my Java 1.2 Solaris native method to Java-Linux 1.2 pre1. The program is running, but the string parameter that I pass to native method isn't correctly converted. Here is a piece of code: JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_CmdDist_startcons (JNIEnv *env, jobject obj, jstr

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Maksim Lin
Ken McNeil wrote: > > I have been programming in Java for over a year, using it mainly because of > its technical merits but also because it seemed to be the "anti-Microsoft". > >From the beginning I had the utmost respect for Sun and their mission to > build Java into the greatest thing since sl

Re: Anyone tried Teikade?

1999-04-30 Thread Robb Shecter
Hamdi Mohd Yusof wrote: > Hi, > > No, I have never heard of Teikade before. Can you give me the link? > Sure - http://www.pfu.co.jp/teikade/ I've played with it for about 1.5 hours altogether. It's apparently a 100% Java IDE, that's -very- closely modelled on the Smalltalk environment. It au

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Maksim Lin
Ken McNeil wrote: > > >I'll second you on the bugs issue and the problem with Suns 1001 API's > >approach. However to be fair you probably picked a bad eg. with > >parametric types as Sun has just put up a proposal for them. > > I thank you for pointing this out, but they should have responded

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Alex Pozgaj
Ken McNeil writes: > >I usually can't stand flame bait like this but I wanted to point out one > >thing. > > How is this "flaim bait"? I can only tell you how I understood it: basically just like an unjustified and unfair rant. Such posts are mostly seen as flame baits, because they almost n

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Maksim Lin
Matt Welsh wrote: > > I usually can't stand flame bait like this but I wanted to point out one > thing. It seemed likely to stirr up discussion but I don't think it was inflammatory either. > Sun has clearly recognized some of the advantages of the Open Source model, > which is the entire reas

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Maksim Lin
Ken McNeil wrote: > > >I usually can't stand flame bait like this but I wanted to point out one > >thing. > > How is this "flaim bait"? This is a topic that has been thrown around by > plenty, and unless you work for Sun I see no reason why this should seem > offensive to you. > > >This link is

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Ken McNeil
>I have mixed feelings (to say the least) about parametric/generic stuff >in java so I will not comment further on this. What are these mixed feelings you're referring to? At one point in the past I thought generic programming was only necessary if you didn't have a common base class, like in C

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Maksim Lin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I think it also worth mentioning that Java is barely 2 years old. Just because > we are used to working with developed languages like C, C++ or whatever else > tickles your fancy - that doesn't mean we can forcefully matriculate Java to > suit our time frame. I agree

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Gerald de Jong
On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Maksim Lin wrote: > As for a "java killer", I don't see one coming along, but then again I'm > sure most people didn't see Java coming. But really I don't see how our > lack of support for Sun will bring this about anymore then our support > will prevent it. As I said before

A Good Overview of Java-Linux

1999-04-30 Thread Gerald de Jong
for those of you looking for a good overview of the various efforts underway and the products currently available in the Java-Linux domain, this may be a nice article to read: http://www.gamelan.com/journal/techfocus/042199_jlinux.html -- Gerald de Jong, Beautiful Code B.V. Rotterdam, The Nethe

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Ken McNeil
>first I'd like to appologize for some of the comments I made >- I'm aware now that they could be understood as much more >offensive than I intended them to be. Good. I felt that you brought up some good points (in between the emotional sections) and I wish to keep this discussion going. > > >

Re: Problem with native method parameter (jstring)

1999-04-30 Thread Denise Stringhini
Hello again, Sorry, after I sent this message I saw that was a "copy/paste" problem. The "release" function is at wrong place... Thanks anyway, Denise. On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Denise Stringhini wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to port my Java 1.2 Solaris native > method to Java-Linux 1.2 pre1.

...

1999-04-30 Thread Riyad Kalla
Has anyone checked out the new STATUS page? oh wow... that kicks ass... well when its done atleast... --  (:  Riyad Kalla  :) (:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   :) (:    CS Major   :) (: University of Arizona :)  

Re: Sun Bashing 2

1999-04-30 Thread Matt Welsh
Maksim Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This I'm afraid makes no sense to me. How does one splinter java by > standardising it ? I'm not saying that I agree with this, either --- I'm only conveying what I believe to be Sun's motivations for maintaining control over Java. mdw -

Possible Java Bug ?

1999-04-30 Thread Michael Emmel
This generates the following output .. Parent2 Foobar null I understand why but it compiles and fails at runtime. Thus if you subclass a class with and inner class any method used is the parents consturctor cannont acces the Outer class. Of course I may be doing something stupid but I know th

Re: ...

1999-04-30 Thread Ken McNeil
>Has anyone checked out the new STATUS page? oh wow... that >kicks ass... well when its done atleast... Though I was content with the silence before it is nice to see that the blackdown developers have responded to this. Maybe now this list will not be as repetitive. _

Re: ...

1999-04-30 Thread Bruce R Miller
On Apr 30, 11:28am, Riyad Kalla wrote: > Subject: ... > > Has anyone checked out the new STATUS page? oh wow... that > kicks ass... well when its done atleast... BRAVO!!! (ie. Thanks guys!) -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://math.nist.gov/~BMiller/

...

1999-04-30 Thread Riyad Kalla
I realize this question has been asked, but I've been plowing through the archived emails and can't find a definitive answer. PROBLEM:     I want to upgrade to RedHat 6.0 tonight, but I realize the possibility of the error with glibc 2.1. QUESTION:     Is there a workaround for this now? Or do I

JIT and Java on Linux

1999-04-30 Thread Gordon Chamberlin
Hello, I'm asking a little advice of everyone to find out what a good JIT is for use with JDK 1.1 on Linux is? Is glibc or libc better or worse? We're trying to create some graphics images but it takes a long time to convert to run the code to convert to GIF. Thanks. -Gordon -- Gordon Cham

Re: javax.swing.preview not found

1999-04-30 Thread Bernardo Paz Betancourt
At 09:41 p.m. 29/04/99 -0600, you wrote: >Robert Williams wrote: >> import javax.swing.preview.*; >> returns a "not found in import" message. >> Is this something new that hasn't found it's way >> into the blackdown release? >> >The package com.sun.java.swing.preview no longer exists. The archive

JDK 1.2 and missing zapf dingbats fonts

1999-04-30 Thread Al
When I execute my program I get the following error. Font specified in font.properties not found [--zapf dingbats-medium-r-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-adobe-fontspecific] The program works fine. But it prints out a tone of error messages. How do I get zapf digbats fonts? I went to Gimp site they ha